- Joined
- Jul 8, 2019
It's not murder if it's justified, that's just killing.Murder them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not murder if it's justified, that's just killing.Murder them
Not only that but don't forget the casting. How many girls have twerked (and done other suggestive moves) in front of a camera for the role? What happened to the tapes/files?
FTFYIt's not murder if it's justified, that's justkillingexecution.
On one hand I completely agree it’s softcore child porn.
On the other, obscenity cases are complete bullshit. Either charge them with an actual crime or don’t, but obscenity cases are bullshit stuff like this comic made fun of Jesus or this porno involved poop. In this case it’s warranted but it should be federal investigation not some podunk Texas shithole using obscenity.
I'm pretty sure that's actually the Texas CP "possession and promotion" statute.(a) In this section:
(1) “Promote” and “sexual conduct” have the meanings assigned by Section 43.25 .(2) “Visual material” has the meaning assigned by Section 43.26 .(b) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly possesses, accesses with intent to view, or promotes visual material that:
(1) depicts the lewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of an unclothed, partially clothed, or clothed child who is younger than 18 years of age at the time the visual material was created;(2) appeals to the prurient interest in sex; and(3) has no serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.(c) An offense under this section is a state jail felony, except that the offense is:
(1) a felony of the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the person has been previously convicted one time of an offense under this section or Section 43.26 ; ?and(2) a felony of the second degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the person has been previously convicted two or more times of an offense under this section or Section 43.26 .(d) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the depicted child consented to the creation of the visual material.
Will this actually do anything to Netflix?
This is the timeline I want to live on.So anyone who watched the movie is in for the count too? That would be...interesting to say the least
The grand jury are the ones who return the true bill of indictment.I mean doesn't the prosecutor have to sign an indictment or whatever? They don't like to lose so
Nick Rekieta stream when?How does prosecuting a corporation for a crime work? If convicted do they face dissolution? Financial Penalties? Do executives get locked up?
It’s really dumb but that’s what they’re arguing. I’ve also seen people argue “it’s ok because a WOC filmed it...” even if everyone who helped make it was a minority it’s still wrong.Also, love the idea that this film tries to combat sexuality of young girls by promoting awareness... through making young actresses perform sexual acts for the film.![]()