Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Politicians generally look like a warty ass on two legs, Belgians doubly so, so this dude more or less passes as a fugly fucking female Belgian politician.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
To clarify, are you referring to this man as “she,” or are you saying this visually impaired child has a job? If the latter, at least it suggests someone saw ID at some point.
Also lol at Belgian Deputy PM‘s wig. That is some wacky drunk next door neighbor in her worn robe and slippers hair, so good work, very very on brand.
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2020
Surely getting pregnant makes you a womanLol
Transgender man sues Amazon for pregnancy & gender identity discrimination
He says they assigned him to lift heavy bags of dog food after he told them he was pregnant and they refused to believe him...www.lgbtqnation.com
Shaun Simmons, a transgender man, has filed a federal lawsuit against Amazon alleging the company discriminated against him after he became pregnant. Simmons was a warehouse worker for the online behemoth before he was fired.
The lawsuit also names two of his former supervisors. Simmons alleges that the two outed him to other employees, spurring more harassment and discrimination from his co-workers.
Simmons claims that after he informed his supervisors that he was pregnant, they began to criticize his work performance in an attempt to demote him. His co-workers, he said, verbally abused and harassed him and once confronted him in the bathroom.
After he complained to human resources, he was placed on paid leave. But when he returned he was assigned to lift heavy objects like large bags of dog food. When he asked for a different position due to his pregnancy, he was placed on leave again and required to submit verification from his doctor that he was actually pregnant before he was allowed to return to work.
He says he was also denied a promotion to another facility where he could have escaped harassment.
Simmons is suing for harassment based on gender, pregnancy discrimination, failure to accommodate a medical condition, and retaliation. He is suing his former supervisors for “aiding and abetting discrimination.”
He seeks reinstatement to his job, back pay, restoration of lost benefits, legal fees and costs, and expungement of his employment record with Amazon.
I mean if you are planning on and are comfortable being preggers which is the most obviously female thing a person can do then I would question your motives / sanity
Also Mermaids are in full damage limitation mode with one hell of a slippery slope
Denying trans kids puberty blockers could steal away the rights of all young people. Contraception and abortion could well be next
Daminee Budhi is the legal policy officer at Mermaids. Writing ahead of this week’s landmark court battle over trans children’s access to puberty blockers, she argues that a positive ruling for the claimants could affect access to healthcare for all children.
A judicial review has been brought against The Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, which houses the Gender Identity Development Services(GIDS) clinic, and which supports young people, and their families, who are experiencing difficulties around their gender identity.
The claimants are a 23-year-old former Tavistock patient, Keira Bell, and a ‘Mrs A’, the mother of an autistic 15-year-old who is on the GIDS waiting list. Their argument goes that that those under the age of 18 are unable to give informed consent for affirmative medical treatment, specifically puberty blockers.
If successful, the case threatens to set a far-reaching and regressive legal precedent, undermining the landmark case of Gillick v West Norfolk (1986), which has given young people the right to make important decisions about their own bodies without the need for parental consent. Gillick competence recognises “the evolving maturity and individuality of children”. All children. Not certain children with certain needs. Ending Gillick competence for trans teenagers seeking puberty blockers would fly directly in the face of international best practice and effectively class them as being incapable of making decisions like anyone else their age.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2020
Daminee Budhi is a brain damaged moron with a stupid name and I would not have sex with them. Hope the claimants win.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
Also, a subset of Americans take for granted that other countries work like theirs from a cultural, social and administrative POV: from believing that European/Asian countries have the same percentage of POCs as USA (and consequently being enraged because their media are 'too white' of 'not diverse enough'), to being shocked when they learn that judiciary works differently. Last year a couple of American students killed one cop in Rome, they were dismayed when they told them they had to stay in prison, apparently they believed that in Italy you can go out on bail.
Meanwhile, Keira Bell just entered the High Court in London for her case against Tavistock. Good luck, brave lady.
Belstaffie twitter
Edit: typo and a wrong information
Last edited:
Inventor of the Telephone
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2020
I cut it myself... with garden shears. H-how does it look?
That arguments logic can and will be applied to pedophilia. I see your slope, you bastards.
I know what's best for your kids.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
This article uses feminine pronouns for Barbie Kardashian due to the fact that the law considers ‘self-identification’ to be enough to change gender and the court documents this article references refer to Barbie using feminine pronouns.
Barbie Kardashian, a biological male who’s had no hormone treatment or surgery, and has sworn to kill and rape women, has been placed in a women’s prison by the Irish authorities.
Barbie was arrested in Limerick on the 24th of September for threatening to kill two people, one of them her mother. The story of her arrest became a matter of national media attention after it was revealed that Barbie is a transgender woman, and that her solicitor had told a court that, following her arrest, Barbie was “very anxious she be detained in a prison facility for females.” Her solicitor did not mention that Barbie also has a well-known, and often stated, desire to rape, torture, abuse, and kill women.
A High Court order directing media not to mention her status as a transgender woman only ensured that, once Gript broke the story, Barbie’s gender, and the access that might give her to vulnerable women, was going to become the focal point of the story.
Legally, Barbie is a woman, although it is not clear when she formally changed her gender through a gender recognition certificate. It’s not a procedure that takes much time; under Irish law all you need is to make a declaration that you want to live your life as a particular gender, a birth certificate, and proof of address – it requires about the same amount of effort as opening a bank account. The process used to be more involved and require the involvement of doctors and experts, but that was changed in 2015 with the introduction of the Gender Recognition Act which allowed individuals to merely “self-identify” as a particular gender.
Barbie is understood to have undergone no hormonal or surgical intervention to change her body, but merely “self identifies” as a woman. Clinicians have expressed doubt that Barbie suffers from gender dysphoria at all.
In 2019 the Law Society Gazette quoted criminal defence lawyer Robert Purcell as saying that the 2015 Act was “challenging” for the courts and the Irish Prison Service because there were “potentially” safety issues housing female inmates alongside “male-bodied prisoners.” Apparently the 2015 law “did not envisage this situation.”
And yet, we know that Barbie, who is biologically male and who has a lengthy track record of targeting women for violence, has now been placed in the women’s section of Limerick prison. It’s not the first time this has happened since the 2015 Act, the women’s prison in Limerick already has a transgender inmate. That inmate was convicted of 10 counts of sexual assault and one count of cruelty against a child. It is understood that, as with Barbie, they have not undergone any surgical or hormonal transition but they are in possession of a gender recognition certificate saying they are female.
The majority of what we know about Barbie is drawn from newspaper reports of her court appearances, her social media accounts, and a 2019 judgement by Justice Máire Whelan in the Court of Appeal. That judgement details Barbie’s history and quotes from various assessments, psychological and otherwise, that have been undertaken by Barbie.
She was born in Ireland to foreign parents on the 25th of December, 2001. She is an only child. Her original name was Gabriel Alejandro Gentile, but she changed her name to Barbie Kardashian by deed poll on the 24th of August, 2020.
According to court documents relatively little is known about her early childhood other than the fact that Barbie was “born into a household of extreme depravity and domestic violence” with parents engaging in a “sadomasochistic relationship.”
Justice Whelan said that that “the degree of cruelty and dysfunctionality experienced by the girl during childhood was extraordinarily severe… the evidence of the impact on her welfare and development of this is overwhelming.”
According to a risk assessment report from March 2017 the care Barbie received from her parents was “absent, unreliable, perhaps intrusive at times, cruel and probably difficult to predict or understand. The people with the means to care for her – her parents –were the same people who at times harmed her by withholding care or being sadistic in their interactions with her.”
Barbie’s mother was prevented from breastfeeding or tending to her when she was a baby. When Barbie cried Barbie’s father would stop her mother from holding Barbie or attempting to sooth her.
Barbie’s father physically, sexually, and emotionally abused her mother, and is understood to have physically and emotionally abused Barbie. Before Barbie was 8 years old, she had become her father’s “apprentice” and was actively involved in the continued abuse of her mother. The father would later, in an interview with a care worker, “casually” acknowledge carrying out repeated acts of domestic violence, “appearing to lack all insight into the impropriety or deleterious impact of such conduct on herself or others.”
In November 2010, when Barbie was 8 years old, her mother left the family home, taking Barbie with her. They moved to a women’s refuge but staff there had “significant concerns about the level of violence that had been perpetrated by [Barbie] upon her mother.”
In 2012, when Barbie was 10 years old, she violently attacked her mother and became the subject of a care order. Initially she was placed into foster care but had to be removed after 13 weeks “due to an escalation in aggressive behaviour.” Her next placement in foster care lasted nearly a year before being terminated, again due to a continual escalation in Barbie’s aggressive behaviour.
Before she was 13 years old Barbie had been moved from foster care into residential care homes. The first care home placement was again terminated due to escalating aggressive behaviour. The second placement, in June 2015, broke down after Barbie attacked a member of staff, and was noted to have exhibited “extreme and excessively sexualised behaviour towards female staff.” This is the first time in the reports we have available to us that Barbie’s behaviour moves from being described as aggressive or violent to both violent and sexual.
Staff in the care homes said that they felt Barbie’s “physical assaults had a premediated feel”, noting that she only ever attacked female staff members or housemates.
Staff said that Barbie dealt with staff “as though they exist only in relation to her needs, with no expectation of an exchange which could be friendly or reciprocal”, and that she “shows no curiosity towards other people except in regard to how they might be used to meet her needs or are likely to harm her.” They noted that she “has a strong sense of grievance and often feels that things have gone wrong, or have been done wrongly in regard to her care. This leads her to make many official complaints.”
In 2014, when Barbie was 14 years old, she began to refuse to attend school and her formal education ended. Her refusal to attend school was noted to have been “partly a reaction to not achieving ‘perfect’ exam result.”
In 2015 Barbie began sharing a house with a transgendered person. By Christmas of that year Barbie had begun to wear makeup and to say that she identified as a female and wanted to undergo gender reassignment surgery.
She was sent to the Tavistock clinic in England, which specialises in transgender adolescents, for an assessment in March of 2017. That assessment stated that, whilst Barbie presented as ticking all of the correct boxes for gender dysphoria, Barbie had a lack of affect when describing how she had been impacted by gender dysphoria “as though she was reciting from something she had learned.” The reports states that “All the facts were correct but there was no emotional impact.” The assessor said that it was impossible to actually determine if Barbie had gender dysphoria as “In discussion with me it was very noticeable that she has researched the area and was therefore able to provide a tick-box list of symptoms that are required to the formation of this diagnosis.”
The report went on to say that Barbie was: “on the verge of an offensive attack at all times”, that she “presents a high level of risk to those around her”, that she was “controlling, callous and unemotional”, that she attempted to control others in order to feel safe, that “control is achieved through manipulation and at times violence and sexual violence”, and that “hurting others gives her a sense of power and control. The mental stalking and physical pinning down of others in a sexual and/or violent way allows her to project the fear of violation into another.”
It was also noted in the report that Barbie attempted to “manipulate and emotionally blackmail” those around her and would seek to provoke other people, “usually vulnerable” people, into attacking her. She was 15 years old at the time this assessment was conducted.
On the 1st of May 2018 Barbie tried to kill a social worker. By this point Barbie had become a repeat visitor to the courts on charges of assault and criminal damage. Barbie was in a moving car with two social care workers when she decided to attack the female driver of the car.
Barbie repeatedly told the woman “I am going to kill you” whilst trying to gouge out the woman’s eyes. She wrapped herself around the body of the care worker, tore clumps of hair out of the woman’s scale, bit her, and clawed at her face, tearing her eyelids.
The social worker was able to stop the car and Gardai were called. The social worker required hospitalisation and, when interviewed by Gardai, Barbie was found to have put a large lump of hair from the social worker in her pocket.
According to reporting in the Irish Independent Barbie told Gardai that hearing the woman “scream and cry while asking me to stop” was “music to her ears.” She explained to Gardai that she had planned assaults on staff for weeks or sometimes months and had a list of staff she wanted to assault for various reasons. Apart from expressing disappointment at not killing the social care worker she was “gleeful about what happened.” Later that day she told a psychiatrist that she had plans to murder care workers. Gardai expressed concern for the safety of care staff.
Following the assault Barbie was detained in Oberstown Children Detention Campus. Whilst there she made repeated threats of self-harm and suicide, saying that she planned to kill herself to “end the emotional pain” that she said she felt upon “not being recognised as a woman.” She was referred to a Professor Harry Kennedy for a risk assessment. Professor Kennedy stated that Barbie’s “threats of suicide are instrumental, designed to achieve another purpose, to manipulate clinicians towards complying with her wish to be referred for gender reassignment.”
Professor Kennedy went on to say that Barbie’s claims that she was self-harming by cutting herself “are not currently supported by any scarring evidence.” He said that Barbie “exhibits callous and unemotional thoughts, communications and behaviours”, and that she “does not reason about acts of violence according to conventional ‘moral’ foundations.” He went on to say that Barbie engaged in “acts of physical and sexual violence which at times are instrumental –prepared and goal directed – particularly towards women.” He noted that this was “a risk factor for further violence.”
Based upon a documented history of falsely claiming to be ill, including intentionally falsifying a monitoring test for blood pressure, Professor Kennedy stated that “all aspects” of Barbie’s account of “ symptoms, mental states, beliefs and preferences are unreliable for clinicians to assess. Risk assessment is therefore not reliable and risk management is particularly difficult.”
He stated that gender reassignment had “no place to play” in the management of Barbie’s suicide risk. He noted the prominence of “callous unemotional traits” in Barbie’s personality and a “egocentric, egosyntonic attitudes towards violence to others.”
Professor Kennedy said that Barbie was unlikely to change her behaviour over the short to medium term and that it was evident that Barbie would continue to assault others and that Barbie “should continue to be held responsible for any such assaults by being charged and processed through the courts”. He said that “only a secure care placement would be appropriate” to Barbie’s needs. He added “This should not be in a hospital setting.”
Barbie was meant to be released from Oberstown on the 7th of November, 2018 but the Child and Family Agency [CFA] sought a special care order from the High Court to allow them to detain Barbie in Coovagh House Special Care Unit. Special Care Units are secure, residential facilities designed to house adolescents when their behaviour poses a real and substantial risk to their life, health, safety, development, or safety.
Barbie was strongly against the idea of being placed into a Special Care Unit and argued against that placement in the High Court. She stated she would not engage in therapy if placed in a Special Care Unit, that she was not a risk to others or to herself, and that it was unfair to place her into such care.
The High Court, when considering the application, considered material from a number of medical professionals. One of those, Dr. Eamon Raji, told the court that Barbie “does not present with a psychiatric illness but has numerous personality disorder traits in the realms of a Cluster B personality disorders, namely narcissistic, anti-social and emotionally unstable.” He asked Barbie if she posed a risk to society or to others and said that “she was clearly not concerned with this and was surprised that I had felt she is a risk to others based on her history.” However, his report noted that, when they discussed Barbie’s attempted murder of a social worker, she appeared “animated and pleased with herself in recounting the event and circumstances surrounding the assault and reports feeling cheated from (sic not) knowing the bodily harm she had caused.”
Barbie stated that she wished to cut off her penis, stating that “I don’t like having male genitalia and I am quite disgusted by this.” During the proceeding it was also reported that Barbie’s long-term ambition was to move to Los Angeles to work as a sex worker and in the adult film industry in order to fund plastic surgeries.
The court decided that placement in a Special Care Unit was in the best interests of Barbie and the order was granted in December of 2018. Barbie later appealed this decision, leading to a Court of Appeal judgement from Justice Whelan. In her judgement Justice Whelan found that “in the circumstances, the Special Care Order was both necessary and proportionate and was validly made.”
Since then Barbie has been the subject of a number of these orders. But as she approached her 18th birthday, the age at which she would legally be an adult and therefore able to decide to leave state care, Tusla engaged in what the Irish Independent called “a race against time to prevent a homicidal teen’s release into the community.”
Coming up to her 18th birthday on the 25th of December, 2019, Barbie told a social worker she had “a continuing wish to murder and to rape” and that these wishes were “a source of pleasure” to her. The Gardai Public Protection Unit was briefed on Barbie, such was the fear of what would happen if she was able to simply leave state care.
At a hearing held eight weeks before Barbie’s 18th birthday the court was told that there had been “no progress really on any front…there is a real risk that somebody will end up dead.” Tulsa tried to find suitable accommodation for Barbie but she refused to live in a facility with male staff, “notwithstanding her wish in relation to female staff to murder and to rape them.”
Barbie’s mother submitted an affidavit to the court recording her “very, very great concern for her own safety” something which, given Barbie was just arrested for threatening to kill her mother, would appear to have been prescient.
On the 24th of September of this year a nationwide bulletin was issued to garda stations regarding a “homicidal teenager” who was due to be realised into the community after the High Court had ruled there was no legal basis to continue her detention. The bulletin noted that the teenager had repeatedly expressed a wish to rape and murder women, and that the teenager’s own mother had fled her home for her own safety following advice from the gardai.
We now know that that bulletin was referring to Barbie Kardashian. According to reporting in the Herald Barbie was at that time on bail, facing charges of sexually assaulting two women and of threatening to kill or seriously harm a third.
Barbie has now been remanded in custody in the women’s section of Limerick prison and charged with threatening to kill two people, one of them her mother. A file is currently being prepared by the Director of Public Prosecutions.
Attachments
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
What is her Kiwifarms account?
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
One of the most regular criticisms trans women face when we share our stories of misogyny is that our experience isn’t as bad as those born female, and that we aren’t as oppressed as other women.
But there isn’t a ‘right’ type of oppression you have to suffer in order to qualify for womanhood. If anything, reducing what makes you a woman down to the abuse you face alone is quite bleak, and reductive. Being a woman is about so much more than that.
I saw a comment just like this on Twitter the other day. The poster said that trans women couldn’t possibly know what it means to be female, because, unlike girls in China who have been subject to horrific human rights abuses, such as infanticide, we wouldn’t know what it means to be persecuted as a result of being born female.
And while it is certainly true that I wouldn’t know what that would be like, it doesn’t mean that I can’t express solidarity or share how being trans feminine has exposed me to much of the ill treatment that the gender has become accustomed to.
Like the Twitter poster, I agree that not all women face the same types of challenges. For example, women of colour in the UK face a very specific type of sexism – called misogynoir in the case of Black women.
Disabled women often have their physical boundaries broken: strangers feel more comfortable to touch them without consent and speak to their assistants rather than them, and they’re at an increased risk of sexual violence.
Women who live in parts of the world most affected by the climate crisis are also impacted severely: they are more likely to live in poverty and are unable to move around freely, an experience to which most people in the UK can’t relate.
But trans women also face a certain type of discrimination that most cisgender women won’t have been subject to. We have to contend with hate crime, and trans women of colour in particular suffer high rates of violence and murder specifically because they are trans.
We are all united by the fact that the reason we face this type of abuse in the first place is because we are women.
It should go without saying that women come in all shapes and sizes, from different backgrounds. We have never been a homogenous group, which is something that feminism – especially Black and queer feminism – has been pointing out for decades.
So all of us should be able to relay our own stories of oppression without being told that we can’t because we haven’t experienced one particular type of persecution.
As a trans feminine person I still face misogyny in a way that most cisgender women can relate to. I regularly get cat-called and sexually harassed (according to YouGov research from 2016, 64% of women of all ages had experienced unwanted sexual harassment in public places) and I have been stalked by several men (the Office of National Statistics said in 2013 that one in six women will experience stalking in their adult life).
As a feminist, I am dedicated to human rights and pushing back against those who claim inequality and sexism doesn’t exist in society. I’ve been called every name under the sun: feminazi, extremist, b*tch, c**t – you name it.
When I talk about this with my girlfriends, every single one of them has been through something similar. I’m fortunate in that my friends listen when I speak up about what’s happened to me and they also know that because I am trans, I will go through things that they won’t.
I know what it’s like to grow up in a world that largely doesn’t understand what it is to be transgender. When I was younger, I was repeatedly name-called and bullied for being an effeminate boy, ‘pansy’ or ‘f****t’ – to the point of being sexually abused.
More than a quarter of trans people are subjected to domestic abuse, and one in four have experienced homelessness at some point – many as a result of their identity and being kicked out.
On top of that, we have to contend with people piling in and telling us we’re not women, that we shouldn’t be able to use certain toilets, or changing rooms, or refuges – even though statistics show how likely we are to need them.
So yes, the oppression we face is different, and yes, I as a trans feminine person I will never know what it’s like to be denied an abortion, to have trouble accessing sanitary products or what it is to be a victim of genital mutilation as child – but none of these things are universal experiences to all women (and some trans men may have been through them – this doesn’t mean they’re women).
Transgender people know who they are – the chants ‘trans women are women’, ‘trans men are men’ and ‘non-binary people are non-binary’ pay tribute to that. It’s not saying that we’re all the same, simply that our differences shouldn’t divide us or deny trans people’s experiences.
It’s not like we have a choice to be anything different and all the Twitter trolls in the world are not going to change that.
Importantly, we shouldn’t be hosting a ‘who is more oppressed’ competition, but instead uniting to rid the world of misogyny, gender based violence and discrimination.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2019
Victimhood is not a personality, neither is having a vagina.
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2017
Somewhere... somehow... this is England's fault.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
You just spent a whole article hosting a who is more oppressed competition lol
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
The Irish sent him to England for 'Treatment' which is pretty funny. Also he apparently wants to emmigrate to Los Angeles, which would be kind of fitting.
The Irish courts have made an order essentially gagging the Media from reporting on Barbie. The article I'm posting is from some irish focused webzine that's probably based out of the country. The Irish court systems are notorious for clamping down hard on cases where they might get some criticism.
Incidentally one YouTuber is calling Barbie the next Yaniv.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2017
I fucking knew it.
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2016
Is there any way we can get Ronald McDonald to give him a conjugal visit?
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2016
Meanwhile, the actual cis women being screamed at by trannies because they don't know what it's like to be oppressed are being quietly forced back into the kitchen.
Third Wave feminism is doing more to undo the works of the First and Second wave of feminism than literally every other movement combined. If this crazy shit keeps up, I'm putting cash down that women will be chained to the kitchens once the normies snap.
Third Wave feminism is doing more to undo the works of the First and Second wave of feminism than literally every other movement combined. If this crazy shit keeps up, I'm putting cash down that women will be chained to the kitchens once the normies snap.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2018
There could be thousands of concentration camps in every country where trans women get slaughtered and killed in the millions every day just the way troons on Twatter claim they are more oppressed than anybody else. That still wouldn't make them or their experiences female
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2019
I mean if it were up to me no one could argue "she" hasn't been oppressed enough.
Damien Thorne
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2020
He is going to get his ass kicked and probably shanked. Women’s prisons are not where they house willing victims usually.