US Vice Presidental Debate - Cop vs Neocon

WELCOME TO THE 2020 VICE PRESIDENT DEBATE!!!
skynews-kamala-harris-mike-pence_5120284.jpg


Time: Starts at 6pm-7:30pm PST / 8pm CST-9:30pm CST / 9pm-10:30pm EST

Where to watch:

Kiwifarms stream:

Location: University of Utah in Salt Lake City

Moderator: Susan Page, the Washington bureau chief for USA Today


A new campaign front on Covid-19​

It is difficult to overstate how much this debate has been shaped by the Covid-19 pandemic, from President Trump’s hospitalization with the disease to the last-minute skirmish between the Biden and Trump camps over whether Mr. Pence — who has interacted with White House advisers who have since tested positive for the coronavirus — should stand behind a protective plexiglass screen.
Mr. Pence, as the head of White House task force on the coronavirus, will presumably be pressed to account for the faltering White House response to a pandemic that has killed over 200,000 people in the United States. Since returning from the hospital, Mr. Trump has sought to recast the entire discussion on the pandemic, arguing that the virus is in fact not that serious and that Americans should continue to live their lives.
Will Mr. Pence carry Mr. Trump’s argument to Ms. Harris and the American public Wednesday night? Many polls suggest that it defies the fears of most Americans struggling to navigate the pandemic.
Mr. Pence is also likely to be pressed to defend Mr. Trump’s actions since his illness was diagnosed — leaving the hospital against the counsel of many medical professionals, minimizing the threat of the virus and dramatically removing his mask when he returned to the White House. The president has offered himself as evidence that Covid-19 can be beaten; does Mr. Pence agree with that?

For Mr. Pence, it’s not simply a matter of embracing an argument that the president thinks might help him win re-election. This is almost certainly Mr. Trump’s last campaign. At 61, Mr. Pence is looking at continuing his career in politics. How he handles those questions could end up defining him for a long time.

How does Harris finesse attacking Trump?​

Vice-presidential candidates have only two things to accomplish in a debate: Defend the person at the top of your ticket. And attack the person at the top of the opposition ticket.
But that basic rule of thumb got a little more tricky for Ms. Harris. With Mr. Trump’s Covid-19 diagnosis and him just being back at the White House after three nights in a hospital, harsh attacks against an ailing president might be politically unwise. The Biden campaign pulled down its negative advertising attacking Mr. Trump as soon as he disclosed his diagnosis. Joseph R. Biden Jr. has stepped carefully in talking about the president.

Ms. Harris, a former prosecutor and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has established her credentials as a tough interrogator with her questioning of officials like William P. Barr, the attorney general. She knows how to make a case. But can she attack Mr. Trump’s handling of the virus — which has come to define his presidency — without veering toward an overly personal attack on a president battling a potentially lethal disease?

It means threading a needle. Ms. Harris was an inconsistent debater during the Democratic primary — she had some good moments, and some not-so-good moments before she dropped out. She has never stepped onto a this prominent a stage.

How does Harris handle going off script?​

Ms. Harris, most often remembered for her “that little girl was me” debate moment with Mr. Biden during the primary, is talented at delivering the slashing-when-prepared debate lines. That is, after all, the same skill set that she developed as a prosecutor and that elevated her during Senate committee hearings to star status among Democrats as she has bore in on Republican witnesses.

To that end, Ms. Harris arrived in Salt Lake City last Friday — the same day Mr. Trump was checked into the hospital — to begin her on-the-ground debate preparations. Karen Dunn, who readied Senator Tim Kaine to debate against Mr. Pence four years ago, is leading those efforts, which have also included Rohini Kosoglu, Symone Sanders and Liz Allen. Pete Buttigieg, who has played the role of Mr. Pence in Ms. Harris’s preparations, was spotted in town as well.
But debates are not set pieces and Ms. Harris will have to defend not just her own record but also Mr. Biden’s — and no candidate can be prepared for every eventuality, no matter how many index cards she studies, especially in 2020.
“This time it will be about requiring some level of knowledge — if not mastery — of Joe’s record, the Vice President Mike Pence’s record, Trump’s record and then of course defending my own record,” Ms. Harris said on Hillary Clinton’s podcast last week. “So that’s different.’’
Notably, Mr. Biden has undertaken some public rehearsals for his debates, including two televised town halls. Ms. Harris has been mostly cloistered since joining the ticket. The debate will be, by far, the most freewheeling exchanges of her time as vice-presidential candidate.

How race and gender play​

Mrs. Clinton, the only woman to serve as a major-party presidential nominee, warned Ms. Harris, in so many words, about the corrosive role that sexism will play onstage.

“You should also be prepared for the slights, the efforts to diminish you, you personally, you as a woman, who is about to be our next vice president,” Mrs. Clinton said on her podcast. “So I do think there will be a lot of maneuvering on the other side to try to put you in a box.”

Academic studies have shown that women face different barriers in terms of public perception, and Ms. Harris is not just a woman but also the first woman of color on a major-party ticket.

Jennifer Lawless, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia who has studied gender dynamics, said that women generally had to show they were capable of standing up to “being bullied” but that Ms. Harris faced an extra hurdle.
“Because she is also a woman of color, she also has to walk that ‘Don’t look too angry’ line,” Ms. Lawless said. “These are cliché. But they’re cliché because they’re true.”
The mild-mannered Mr. Pence is unlikely to bully or even directly broach any gendered lines the way Mr. Trump might. But the impact of audience perception remains.
For months, the Trump campaign has tried to raise doubts about Mr. Biden’s fitness while attempting to cast Ms. Harris as its true foil, the real — and more liberal — power center in a potential Biden White House.
“She symbolizes everything that ‘Make America Great Again’ wants to push back on by virtue of being a Black woman,” Ms. Lawless said.

Attack or defend?​

In 2016, Mr. Pence had a clear three-step strategy every time his vice-presidential rival, Mr. Kaine, attacked Mr. Trump. He offered a quick defense of Mr. Trump (Step 1); moved quickly to talk about the aspirations of a Trump presidency (Step 2); and swung into an attack on the Democrats (Step 3).
But striking the balance between attack and defend could be a particular challenge for Mr. Pence this time.
For one thing, after four years, there’s more to defend. This would have been a much different debate nine months ago, when Mr. Pence could have talked about the humming economy, job growth and a generally confident electorate. Now, Mr. Pence is going to be talking about the pandemic, the failure so far of Congress and the White House to come up with a stimulus plan and an economy that has gone off the rails.
For another, Mr. Trump has not had much luck attacking Mr. Biden so far; the former vice president has proved an elusive target, certainly when compared with Mrs. Clinton. Perhaps Mr. Pence will have more success.
But he has a third task as well: attacking Ms. Harris. Mr. Trump’s efforts at portraying Ms. Harris as a stalking horse for more liberal policies, who would be the power behind a Biden presidency, has resonated with the right. But those voters were already with Mr. Trump. The task for Mr. Pence is to make them resonate with any remaining undecided voters.

A preview of 2024?​

Almost every vice-presidential debate is about two elections at once: the current one and the one that will follow — because so many vice presidents, and vice-presidential candidates, eventually run for president. (A quick recent list: John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, George H.W. Bush, Al Gore and, of course, Mr. Biden.)
This face-off is especially significant because of how soon both Mr. Pence and Ms. Harris could be leading their parties, given the ages of Mr. Trump (74) and Mr. Biden (77) and the specter of the coronavirus, from which Mr. Trump continues to recover.

Mr. Biden has already talked about himself as a “bridge” to the next generation of Democratic leaders. If he wins, he will be enabling Ms. Harris to cross that bridge as the first among equals among Democrats vying for that leadership mantle.
Mr. Trump has evinced no interest in transitioning out of power or the spotlight, but Mr. Pence is widely believed to have presidential ambitions of his own. The former governor of Indiana has treated his vice presidency mostly as an exercise — often a difficult one — to maintain zero political daylight between himself and Mr. Trump. But plenty of other Republicans are already circling around the 2024 election and seeking the mantle of Trumpism; Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas has been building his profile, and the former United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley was recently in New Hampshire.

Competitors:

Senator Kamala Harris

kamala-harris.jpg



Vice President Mike Pence
1037d09778d6c83f7ea0c0174ba627bd4a-mike-pence.rsquare.w1200.jpg



After the debates a poll will be posted on who you think won this debate. Just as a reminder, on October 15th there will be a Second Presidential debate providing that Trump can make it still, although I doubt Biden or his team would feel comfortable with Trump in the room. Have fun.


Presidential debate thread-
Night one

Previous Democratic debates-
First Democratic debate (two nights)
Second Democratic debate
Third Democratic debate
Fourth Democratic debate
Fifth Democratic debate
Sixth Democratic debate
Seventh Democratic debate
Eighth Democratic debate
Ninth Democratic debate
Tenth Democratic debate
Eleventh Democratic Debate

Democratic primary results-
Super Tuesday
Mini-super Tuesday
 
Last edited:
Beating Kamala Harris in a debate is like beating Revolution 60 - I'd be much more surprised if you couldn't.
Biden should have just went with Tulsi for his VP picks, fits both Woman and POC shit he signed up for but doesn't have the condescension that Harris has that gives a burn out high school teacher a run for his money.
 
Biden should have just went with Tulsi for his VP picks, fits both Woman and POC shit he signed up for but doesn't have the condescension that Harris has that gives a burn out high school teacher a run for his money.

Tulsi proved herself willing to buck the party line by actually going after Stronk Brown Wamman Kamala in the debates, she's basically been excommunicated. She would have been the smart pick to lure back moderates, but why make the smart pick when you can make the gimmick pick?
 
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you guys rate the performances of these people this night?

Mike Pence: ?

Kamala Harris: ?

The Moderator (forgot her name lol): ?

ETA: The Fly That Landed On Pence's Hair: ?

Mike Pence: The traditional debate system heavily favors Pence. If Harris had tried IBS, he would have gotten wrecked but thankfully that didn't happen. He managed to skillfully dodge questions that were Kafka traps like the one regarding the environment or had time to formulate his answers like with his pro-life stance that is sure to trigger the libs and own the libs. He was also polite, calm, and reserved, but when he laid into Harris, he really smacked her around like with shooting down the "soldiers are losers and suckers" and "fine people" hoaxes. He focused on policy rather than style and I loved his unifying message to the clear gimmie question for Harris. His main problem is that he did not go after Harris's prosecutor record enough and that he needs to be faster when it comes to answering questions. I'd give him an 8.

Kamala Harris: Most punchable face ever. The only positive is that she got away with defending her shitty record as a district attorney. Everything else was a crapshoot. She all but confirmed that yes, we're packing the court when we get to the White House, failed to land any body blows on Pence, got flustered several times as shown by her being anxious. Did I also mention DRUMPF DRUMPF DRUMPF and her message of division? I'd give her a 2.

Overall, Trump does not pick up votes but Harris caused Biden to lose some. Overall, I was pleased by Pence's performance. If he runs in 2024, I might vote for him.

The Moderator: 2. Only stopped Pence on the DA response. Other than that, was a fucking wimp.

worthless

Finished watching the debate on the chat stream.

I don't really have much to say. Pence is a better traditional debater than Trump, however, Biden is a better traditional debater than Harris. So through this notion, I can tell you that Pence won, although not without flaws. I think he is a little too slow on answering questions; I like how he's firm and whatnot, but he needs to deliver simpler answers in order to go within the time limit because there were quite a few times, actually the majority of the debate, where he'd finish answering the last question before moving onto the other one. I think he lacks the speed that Trump has and that's a problem. He doesn't interrupt nearly as much as him, but he's slow, very, very, very slow. He's good at giving good blows, but he's slow and sometimes didn't answer the question in time or get all he needed to say in a condensed manner. He's ok, but speed is what he needs.

Harris, on the other hand, pizza shit. Utter piece of shit. All of her answers were just MUH DRUMPF at the end of it. Never did she elaborate on any specific policy proposals or anything of that nature, the whole time every answer had to be rounded off with Drumpf, just like she acted back during the debates. She has nothing else on her mind than Drumpf. At least Biden talks about policy proposal instead of saying MUH DRUMPF every single time. I pointed this out during the fucking Democratic debates, but I'm gonna say it again: Harris is/was the worst fucking debater on that stage last year. She can't do shit. She's smug, the way she presents herself is all so fake, and her answers aren't delivered with concern, but just mere vitriol. She only got the up on Pence once and that was through answering the abortion question when asked before he did despite both of them going on a tangent before answering it.


I think what really pointed to me thinking Pence won however was the last question with the 8th-grade girl talking about how she's division or whatnot. Pence gave a unifying answer where he said "we're always debating but after those debates, we can come together as people" and Harris veered off into a "use your voice to vote for me and Biden" or whatever. Not really aiming to unify or say a general answer, it's all about the campaign or Trump in her answers. Nothing about unification, just blatant fearmongering and propaganda pushing.
Solid analysis if I'd say so myself.

wait a minute, I saw you in the lolcow.tv stream.
 
My puzzle box is missing a few pieces. Maybe some of you can find them for me:
Both Pence and Harris did a bit of question dodging in the form of running out the clock with flowery language (Pence a bit more than Harris). Harris dodged one of the most important questions, though, about packing the court. Half of this debate was complete non-answers tbh.
Pence got in a few "gotcha's" on Harris and Harris responded with what was essentially "how dare you attack my record!?" Harris probably got a one-up on Pence for covid shit though.
Who won? Like any other debate, It depends on what side of the aisle you stand on. It certainly wasn't the BTFO moment a lot of posters here are trying to make it out to be.

I say Pence, moreso because he brought up key points that Harris never answered, and then implied is true.
Sure Pence dodged questions, but considering he's the VP, and the whole $750 tax thing. The questions should be dodged. Since, again the sources of said "information" was an "anonymous source," TMZ, and some rando.

Also, picking your running mate based on race is a bit of a misnomer when your running mate's career involved fucking over said race's lives, and bringing it up over and over is incredibly important.
For example, Bringing up Kamala's career will mean people will look into it, or be told to look into it when they do not have any information - for example, right now, from me to you.


Google her career, it's hilarious.
And she thinks she knows everything about it.
And that everyone should strive to the same heights.

Not only is that narcissistic it's also incredibly hilarious that she thinks her failures are achievements somehow.
 
It was season six, the one with the goat with two butts. I hadn't seen that one. It wasn't that great.
Now wait a minute.

You said that you skipped out on a big portion of the first presidential debate in the thread on the subject, as you had errands to do or some shit, yet you still somehow managed a very strong opinion on the subject, despite not even having fully watched it by your own admission. Yet here, during the second presidential debate, you just now don't have a strong opinion either way on it, because it was "boring" so you (conveniently) just decided to skip it.

That sounds like bullshit.
 
I'm willing to admit Biden won the first debate, and I think Pence wiped the floor with Harris
Biden was even cattier than Kamala was, by far. Trump oafed his way to being annoying, nullifying his natural advantages. It was a mess, but Biden did not win anything. I'm actually surprised that Kamala came off as more composed and rational than him, and she's someone who barely breaks a triple digit IQ.

fly for vice president
amazon fly for president.jpg

Amazon nixed this merch fast.

pretty fly.png
Need to make of these for Pence, but have the fly on upper left side of head wearing a pretty bow, and pence looking upwards towards it with glee in his eyes.
 
Biden should have just went with Tulsi for his VP picks, fits both Woman and POC shit he signed up for but doesn't have the condescension that Harris has that gives a burn out high school teacher a run for his money.

I mean, if he wanted to decisively win? Yeah, sure - but Tulsi bucks the DNC apparatchiks. Kamala will do or say anything to get her hands on some big, meaty power to beat others with as a cudgel - much more to the DNC's liking. By every available metric, Biden could also have picked the corpse of Lenin for his running mate and he would still be ahead in all of the polling by margins beyond that of Clinton. The DNC correctly believed this election would wind up being a referendum on Trump rather than a "so what's your plan, democrats?"

As far as the polling is concerned, I don't think this debate will have a huge impact, even if Harris is the real nominee. As far as the election itself is concerned, if you believe in the Silent Majority coming through, you're still going to believe that; if you don't, then you still don't.

But in a way, Kamala being a complete shit-show of a VP stapled to a much stronger presidential contender must be very nostalgic for ol' Joe. I-It's sortof like poetry; it's like they rhyme.
 
Defining image
This night can best be summed up as.

1602125939827.png
VS.
1602126393975.png


Someone fill in this cuck above with the smug liberal glasses guy meme we usually post. I couldn't find it.

Hey now, I was staying out of this thread until they tagged me, in which case I mentioned that I stopped watching it about 5 minutes in and they got all upset about it for some reason. This is on them.
Hey, fair enough. But when shit's getting worthy for a pasta feast, we all know where to dine.
 
I watched the debate on abc news and within 30 seconds of it being over they put up a close-up of Mike Pence's face on the screen, they said it looked like he had pink eye! Un fucking believable!!! It looked like a broken blood vessel from sneezing too hard or something like that. How pathetic and desperate do you have to be to a. spot that b. crop the photo c. make the accusation?!?!? They called the White House a "hot bed" for coronavirus before the debate, like, I'm sure. These people are crazy.

Your network is a "hot bed" for AIDS. faggots.
 
Back