War BREAKING NEWS: Nancy Pelosi says Congress will discuss using 25th Amendment powers which could REMOVE Donald Trump amid fears COVID steroid treatment - Retard President going to the group home with Chris



Trump claims he is 'cured' in first interview since COVID hospital treatment​

6hrs ago
34159448-0-image-a-40_1602176038400.jpg

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she would lead a discussion on Friday about invoking the 25th amendment to remove President Donald Trump from office amid fears the medication he is taking for his COVID treatment are affecting his mental health.

'Come here tomorrow,' she told reporters on Capitol Hill Thursday. 'We're going to be talking about the 25th Amendment.'


She refused to give any more details - a move that will likely stoke speculation and build suspense over the next 24 hours.

'I'll talk to you about that tomorrow,' she said when asked about it. 'I'll talk to you about it tomorrow. I'm not talking about it today except to tell you if you want to talk about that I'll see you tomorrow.'

Pelosi spoke after Trump was interviewed on Fox Business Network in a frenzied almost hour-long interview where he suggested Gold Star families may have infected him with COVID, claimed again he was 'cured,' equivocated over whether he is still on powerful steroids, demanded AG Bill Barr indict Joe Biden and Barack Obama and twice called Kamala Harris a 'monster.'

She indicated Friday's conversation was related to concerns about the steroid Trump is taking. Some doctors have raised concerns about dexamethasone, which can cause insomnia, mania, mood swings, and rage. It has shown promise for treating patients with a severe case of COVID who are getting supplemental oxygen.

The 25th Amendment's doomsday clause, section four, allowed a president to be removed from office against his will because of incapacity, whether physical or mental.

But it could only be used to remove Trump with the assistance of Mike Pence and members of his Cabinet, which currently appears unlikely.

It does however allow Congress to appoint a body to assess the president's fitness - which gives Pelosi an opening and in the context of an election campaign, a chance to taunt her long-term enemy Trump, who for years has called her 'Crazy Nancy.'

Pelosi has been sounding the alarm on Trump's mental state for the past few days after he issued a surprising tweet on Tuesday calling off negotiations on a COVID relief bill. His move crashed the stock market.

'I've quoted others to say that there are those who say that when you're on steroids and/or if you've had COVID-19 or both - that there may be some impairment of judgment. But, again, that's for the doctors and scientists to determine, but it was very strange, really surprising and I'm rarely surprised, when the president took to the tweet and saying that he wants the Senate to have full focus on this confirmation of the justice and turned attention away, so we're stopping negotiations,' she told Bloomberg News.


The speaker had been in talks with Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin on a new deal with the tweet was issued. When the tweet hit the internet she was on a conference call with Democratic lawmakers where she blamed Trump's medication for his decision.

She's also questioned if Mnuchin was warned about the president's move.

'I almost wonder if Steve Mnuchin knew the president was going to do that,' she said at her press conference Thursday.

Trump admitted in an interview with Fox Business on Thursday he is taking the powerful steroid but he said called it a 'not heavy' drug.

'I think the public deserves to know the health condition of the President,' Pelosi said during her weekly press conference on Capitol Hill.

'Mr President, when was the last time you had a negative test before you tested positive? Why is the White House not telling the country that important fact about how this spread made a hotspot of the White House?' she added.

Congress, however, has a limited role in the 25th amendment, which gives executive power to the vice president should the president become incapacitated.

A president can voluntarily hand over power on a temporary basis - George W. Bush did when he was unconscious for a colonoscopy. But if Trump would refuse, then Vice President Mike Pence and a majority of the cabinet could force the issue, and, if Trump objected to it, there would be a deciding vote by Congress.

Trump indicated to Fox Business that he was no longer taking medication to combat the virus but then said he was going to take dexamethasone a little bit longer. It is a powerful steroid given to those with COVID who have trouble breathing.

'I think I'm taking almost nothing. I think I'm finished with just about everything,' Trump said of his medical regime.

Then he said he had 'a little bit longer' on the dexamethasone.

He added: 'I think you go a little bit longer on - they have a steroid. It's not even, it's not a heavy steroid, yet they have that go a little bit longer, but I'm not taking - I'm almost not taking anything, I feel great.'

'I'm almost not taking anything,' he said of the cocktail of medications his medical team had him on. His treatment regime included the dexamethasone, an experimental anti-viral drug that Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is testing to supply antibodies that help a patient fight the disease, and the antiviral drug remdesivir.

He said he would be tested for the virus again 'soon.'

'I'll be tested very soon but I'm essentially very clean. They say it's over a period of six seven days,' he said.

He also announced he is cured from COVID.

'I'm ready to go except for the quarantine situation,' he told Fox Business's Maria Bartiromo on Thursday morning in a telephone interview. 'I don't think I'm contagious at all.'

'Remember this: when you catch it you get better. And then you're immune,' he said.

He claimed to be healthy and raring to go at many points in the 55-minute interview, in which he raged against Hillary Clinton and the investigations against him, said he would not participate in the next debate since it's virtual, and called Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris a 'monster.'

'I'm a perfect physical specimen and I'm extremely young. And so I'm lucky that way,' said the president, who at 74 and overweight is in the high risk category for COVID.
 
How would they even pull this off? Who decides? Can Pence, the Senate, or White House staff stonewall it?

Congress can’t actually do it. It would have to be instigated by Trump’s cabinet and then Congress.
Instead of wondering why now, you should be asking what she knows about Trump’s cabinet.
 
Honestly, do they understand the fire they are playing with here? There’s what, 6 weeks to the election?

Even if they get Trump declared non compos mentis AND Pence takes over AND that causes the spoiling of all ballots with Trump’s name on it... if they are willing to go this hard to the mat for what at this moment seems like a Pyrrhic victory, do they really think the barrel of that gun won’t turn on Kamala once Biden is 25th in February, and with justified outrage behind it?

nothing is more dangerous than a group who feels they have righteous fury on their side and nothing to lose.
 
I think Pelosi is aware her pork barrel bill isn't going to get pushed through, not even with average Americans begging for yet another $1200 stimulus. Worse, enough people are distrustful of Pelosi (and everyone related to her) that they didn't immediately blame Trump for the bill's failure, as she anticipated, but instead looked into the bill themselves and realized "this isn't worth aone-time check."
 
Congress can’t actually do it. It would have to be instigated by Trump’s cabinet and then Congress.
Instead of wondering why now, you should be asking what she knows about Trump’s cabinet.
What? That they have close affiliations with Wall Street?

That's a can of worms both sides don't want to open.
 
His treatment regime included the dexamethasone, an experimental anti-viral drug that Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is testing to supply antibodies that help a patient fight the disease,
Lmao, my cat takes this medication. Once again they are acting like it's some shady experimental shit when it's not and people (and cats) have been using it for years without an issue.
 
Honestly, do they understand the fire they are playing with here? There’s what, 6 weeks to the election?

Even if they get Trump declared non compos mentis AND Pence takes over AND that causes the spoiling of all ballots with Trump’s name on it... if they are willing to go this hard to the mat for what at this moment seems like a Pyrrhic victory, do they really think the barrel of that gun won’t turn on Kamala once Biden is 25th in February, and with justified outrage behind it?

nothing is more dangerous than a group who feels they have righteous fury on their side and nothing to lose.
So a thought occurred to me here - "why would the Dems engage in such incredibly risky behavior? Assuming they possess an OUNCE of political acumen they know they're riding a very pissed-off tiger right now."

And one of the most logical options for this is "They have NO CHOICE."

Why would they be forced into this hazardous course of action? Why would the election itself take a backseat to just getting Orange Man out of power? Is it because they're in unbelievably deep shit if Trump gets a second term? Like maybe they've done some things that would get their lives destroyed by a very angry Cheeto president?

I can't imagine why they'd sideline literally EVERYTHING in favor of removing Trump from power.
 
I have been seriously considering this possibility for months now and the only thing I can't quite figure out is the "why" of it. Everything they're doing seems to be predicated on a desire to become politically irrelevant within a decade, but god damn if I can figure out why they'd want that.
I'm not so sure anyone is trying to lose (I think the option of incompetence is usally the most likely when it comes to things like this) but if anyone was trying to intentionally lose it's possible it'd be because they don't want to deal with whatever reputational damage Covid 19 will do to whichever party is in power since it's inevitable mistakes will be made in retrospect.
 
I'm not so sure anyone is trying to lose (I think the option of incompetence is usally the most likely when it comes to things like this) but if anyone was trying to intentionally lose it's possible it'd be because they don't want to deal with whatever reputational damage Covid 19 will do to whichever party is in power.
This does make a bit of sense, basically playing Hot Potato. It doesn't really jibe with a lot of Dems' strident insistence that they'd totally know how to handle this, but it's possible not everyone got the memo.
 
I mean what kind of idiot would turn down a virtual debate and instead do a fucking rally while infected with covid? Oh right, someone who doesn't give a shit about others' wellbeing.

I don't have any moral qualms or issues if they brought those peaceful protests to your neighborhoods where you lot live and just burned it all down in the name of reparations and social justice.

1601943667760.jpg
 
Yeah, cause they'll TOTALLY succeed like they did with the impeachment.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Grumpy
I have been seriously considering this possibility for months now and the only thing I can't quite figure out is the "why" of it. Everything they're doing seems to be predicated on a desire to become politically irrelevant within a decade, but god damn if I can figure out why they'd want that.
Maybe they actually make more money when they're losing? Pelosi in particular has profited immensely off of Trump's stock market, and that's nothing to say of all the various groups throwing money at the DNC, BLM, planned parenthood, etc.
Orange man bad seems pretty profitable. A bunch of my left leaning friends are absolutely throwing money and free labor at the DNC right now, way more than they ever did before.
 
Back