- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
Interesting. Could this be the mark of Sarah Palin 2.0?
View attachment 1651886
This is my shocked face:

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting. Could this be the mark of Sarah Palin 2.0?
View attachment 1651886
Palin I feel was like Dubya; they were both decent and respected governors, iirc. However, as soon as they got on the main stage (VP fronteunner in 08 for Palin, and Bush's entire presidency), every thing started to crumble. Dubya for instance, was a fantastic orator when he was governor, and when he became president, in came the Bushisms.Interesting. Could this be the mark of Sarah Palin 2.0?
View attachment 1651886
Or among your own generation you tend to pick your friends, but with older relatives that doesn't happen. Vaguebooking and oversharing are pretty rampant among young people too, especially the trashy ones.I’ve got a theory that boomers introduced to the Internet later on in life still have to pass through the same phases of online maturity that millennials who grew up with it did.
It’s the reason your 50 year old mom uses a million emojis for everything or your weird aunt overshares about her personal life while posting vague comments to start drama. You know, like “certain people just don’t value friendship anymore :/”
I never thought I’d see the day when my Dad shows me a truly stupid meme that he thinks is funnier than I do, but here we are.
At any rate, it looks like the Scully and C-SPAN are collectively still in the phase where they think “I got hacked!!!1!!” is a really clever defense while everyone under 30 will immediately roll their eyes and smell bullshit.
She lacks the charm and "Hope and Change" peddling and imagery of Obama.
There is no lightning in her bottle to capitalize on.
View attachment 1651941Focus group: Michigan swing voters think Harris will act as president
Alexi McCammond
![]()
Sen. Kamala Harris during Wednesday's vice presidential debate. Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images
Several Michigan voters who are sticking with President Trump think that if Joe Biden gets elected, Sen. Kamala Harris will be running the show — and her Wednesday debate performance reinforced their view.
Why it matters: These are some of the few voters for whom the vice-presidential pick has outsized importance in how they view the two tickets, and for now that's benefitting Trump.
This was the biggest takeaway from our special post-vice presidential debate Engagious/Schlesinger focus group with 13 voters who chose Barack Obama in 2012 but Trump in 2016.
What they’re saying: “Biden’s not going to make it four years, so Kamala Harris is going to be president and I have zero trust she can be president, so I’m just picking the lesser of two evils at this point,” said Shelley D. Everyone else in the group agreed.
- Two of them will vote for Biden, both because of the coronavirus pandemic and the economy.
- While a focus group is not a statistically significant sample like a poll, the responses show how some voters are thinking and talking about the 2020 election in crucial states.
- Biden leads Trump by about 6 percentage points in Michigan in the RealClearPolitics polling average.
Between the lines: These voters thought Harris did too well at the debate, with many saying they’re now fearful she’ll boost Biden’s chances to win because of how she connects with the American people.
- And while some even liked what Harris had to say at the debate, they remain skeptical of change. “I’m going to have to stick with [Trump] because I don't know if the Left will make due on the promises they’re saying right now,” said Adam M.
- Others described feeling “scared” because Harris “actually did a better job than Pence,” as one participant put it.
- “I’m fearful of this woman because she knows how to strike chords with the people of America,” said Matt T. “She’s basically utilizing everything that has happened this year to attack the Trump campaign and she does it in such a way that she’s making really strong points, but I don’t think they’re true. So she’s coming across very powerful.”
- Some mocked her hand gestures, but most thought she appeared more prepared for the debate than Pence.
- Several Trump voters described Pence’s debate performance as lacking “energy” and “emotion,” and they were largely frustrated that he didn’t answer most of the questions asked.
- Guy D., who’s voting to re-elect President Trump, said he felt “a little disappointed” watching Pence Wednesday night “because it seemed like he didn’t get to the point.”
"These voters thought Harris did too well at the debate, with many saying they’re now fearful she’ll boost Biden’s chances to win because of how she connects with the American people."
What?
![]()
The weird thing about gender politics is that the left thinks that if they have a Strong Woman on the ticket, women are more likely to vote for that ticket. Meanwhile, in the real world if there's one thing guaranteed to piss off women it's a Strong Woman politician.
Kamala Harris isn't even a strong woman, she's just a back-stabbing, self-important bitch and that's why she never even broke into the double digits in her home state of California. People can smell "conniving, two-faced harpy" from a mile away, and Harris has it so bad that even as a Strong, Independent Woman POC Yass Queen Slay Woman of Colour Oppressed Minority, the entire Democratic base went, "Fuck that bitch" so hard that even California wasn't interested in her.The weird thing about gender politics is that the left thinks that if they have a Strong Woman on the ticket, women are more likely to vote for that ticket. Meanwhile, in the real world if there's one thing guaranteed to piss off women it's a Strong Woman politician.
You're describing voter enthusiasm via proxy of whether they're willing to spend money on memorabilia of their candidate. Do you think...people unwilling to spend money on memorabilia of their candidate are just as likely to show up to vote as those who do?Not true. Trump supporters are pretty obviously going to be willing to spend money on Trump memorabilia than the vast majority of candidates' supporters.
Looking how 2008, 2012 and 2016 went, usually the winner sold more merchandise.You're describing voter enthusiasm via proxy of whether they're willing to spend money on memorabilia of their candidate. Do you think...people unwilling to spend money on memorabilia of their candidate are just as likely to show up to vote as those who do?
I wonder which state is gonna be the “Wisconsin” for me this time? I had my eye on Michigan but Wisconsin was the biggest shock and I never thought I’d see that in my life.
My candidates
- Maryland (thanks to Klacik)
- Delaware
- Oregon
- Yes, even New York.
Minnesota has a higher than 50% for Trump in my opinion. I’m talking about Big surprises, so New Hampshire and the rest of Maine have a higher chance too.
If Trump wins Maryland, I'll eat my hat.
No way that'll happen.
I wonder which state is gonna be the “Wisconsin” for me this time? I had my eye on Michigan but Wisconsin was the biggest shock and I never thought I’d see that in my life.
My candidates
- Maryland (thanks to Klacik)
- Delaware
- Oregon
- Yes, even New York.
Minnesota has a higher than 50% for Trump in my opinion. I’m talking about Big surprises, so New Hampshire and the rest of Maine have a higher chance too.
Sarah Palin was brought in to shore up the religious right with McCain, in part because Karl Rove's tactic was to maximize their attendance, which is why so many social issues, particularly gay issues, appeared in 2004. Anti-gay motions were cheap red meat to the base, and Democrats were terrified of touching the gays like they were lepers. Even Saint Obama, who didn't endorse gay marriage until late in his first term with all the enthusiasm of someone being forced to swallow a live goldfish. Hell, he didn't have anything to do with it passing, it came down to the courts.Interesting. Could this be the mark of Sarah Palin 2.0?
View attachment 1651886
In minecraft.This company needs to die. In a fire.