Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

1602343718736.png
 
Jusging by the UK and Ireland flags being different it seems the Paddy victim complex strikes again. Also lol at North Korea and Venezuela being on the list of oppressed countries.
And don't forget: China's also there for some fucking reason. One of the most powerful, affluent, and influential countries on the planet that is currently undergoing some sick and twisted bullshit under the hood is somehow a victim compared to the US and Europe.
 
The basic rules for character creation begin with a player choosing their character's race, and every race has positive ability modifiers that boost a character's core attributes. Until recently, Kobolds and orcs also included a negative; a -1 to Intelligence for orcs, and a -1 to Strength for the tiny kobolds. These negative ability scores were intended to "balance" the race, but in light of the wave of protests surrounding racial injustice around the world, Wizards released a statement in June announcing that they would take steps to address racial insensitivity within the 5e game system, including dropping those negative ability scores.

...

Orcs are strong, therefore they are fighters and barbarians: terrible, angry and brutal. Kobolds are tiny and, therefore, weak. Even the orc's other racial trait, "Menacing," (also removed) leaned into a negative stereotype. The idea that biology determines character abilities does not represent the idea that "kobolds are weaker than orcs." Abilities are tied to scores, so any character of any race could be better at any ability than any other, but the built-in and immutable modifiers pigeon-holed characters into more roles that also reinforces racist stereotypes. The game is fantasy, but immutable ability modifiers tie into harmful real-world stereotypes.
Imagine getting this close, yet so far from the conclusion.

Dumbass, this phenomenon exists in the real world through sexual dimorphism. Generally speaking, women tend to have weaker upper-body strength compared to men. This doesn't mean all men are stronger than all women, it's just that men typically have an advantage. A woman who works out regularly is obviously going to be a lot stronger than a man who just sits on his ass and eats Doritos and Mountain Dew all day.

Of course, since this deemed "problematic," this had to be removed, and yet this change isn't enough to satisfy them, according to the article.
 
Imagine being this moron and pretend this is a excellent answer,

View attachment 1653354

If you dont like freedom you can fuck off to Mexico if you feel like it
"My country is a lot better than the one I live in now!"
"Then why don't you live there instead?"
"Don't wanna."

Okay, then kindly shut the fuck up.

Also, "you're all better off because we're here"? In what quantifiable way? Simply because you're Mexican? That's racist logic. That'd be no different than if I moved to Mexico and claimed they were better off with my living there simply because I'm white.
 
"My country is a lot better than the one I live in now!"
"Then why don't you live there instead?"
"Don't wanna."

Okay, then kindly shut the fuck up.

Also, "you're all better off because we're here"? In what quantifiable way? Simply because you're Mexican? That's racist logic. That'd be no different than if I moved to Mexico and claimed they were better off with my living there simply because I'm white.

The entire thread is just her screeching that she is on america out of spite for "USA destroying her country", last time i checked you were not Venezuelan Karla, thankfully she is getting ratio to hell

Screenshot_703.png
 
1602354014253.png

1602354047516.png


If you mean "Women willingly took dick from Party Members, so they could get something to eat", that's the only kind of sex work that exists in communist regimes, other than what the 1 fellow mentions.

1602354280019.png

They legit don't read history.

1602354397523.png

"They'll get luxury credits, despite the constant commie claim that post-capitalist existence will by without currency. See, it's not currency, we called it something different!"
Shut the fuck up, commie; no one is sleeping with you now, and no one is going to sleep with you in a commie utopia, either.
 
Last edited:
Did anyone notice that companies cannot win regarding BGLT+ stuff?

If a company says 'Shagging the same gender is inherently unhealthy', the company would not just get boycotts and bad reviews but also be cancelled, threatened, sued (and other legal actions), and even subjec to violence, including those who partake wi the company. Actual death and rape (not jus threats) are not out of the question.
If a company stays ilent on the issue, the company would still get a subtler cancellation and threat because 'silence is violent compliance'.
If a company outright preaches 'if the hearts fit, the bodies fit' and even massively funds pro-BGLT+ legislation, the company would... still be cancelled and threatened?

I honestly do not kno why. They claim tha the company does not actually care about BGLT+ rights and only wants money, bu these same people do not extend the same logic to companies that oppose the BGLT+ narrative. They claim tha the company is only supporting BGLT+ rights after the fact instead of actively promoting these, bu those companies go way beyond saying 'We do not discriminate on the basis of orientation or gender identity.'

The biggest problem involves Gay Pride Month. These companies celebrate BGLT+ pride but get hate by both anti-BGLT+ people and pro-BGLT+ people. However, once June is over, these same companies get even more hate over daring ending pride celebrations just because Gay Pride Month is over.

(I blame cultural Marxism.)

I mean... not even 'BIPOC' social justice warriors whine about others no longer celebrating Black History Month once February is over!
2020-10-10 15.11.24 tw.tinf.io 8644e0d95459.jpg

...never mind.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I don’t really know what’s stupider; the fact that DND deadass thought messing with stats would help solve racism (which only showed their actual racial biases) or that people aren’t satisfied and want more.

What will it take for companies to realize there’s no winning with these people?
View attachment 1653393
View attachment 1653397

If you mean "Women willingly took dick from Party Members, so they could get something to eat", that's the only kind of sex work that exists in communist regimes, other than what the 1 fellow mentions.

View attachment 1653411
They legit don't read history.

View attachment 1653414
"They'll get luxury credits, despite the constant commie claim that post-capitalist existence will by without currency. See, it's not currency, we called it something different!"
Shut the fuck up, commie; no one is sleeping with you now, and no one is going to sleep with you in a commie utopia, either.
I’m just giggling at the fact that used a Zone-tan meme, even if it’s edited. Can you imagine how they’d flip if they knew where it came from?
Did anyone notice that companies cannot win regarding BGLT+ stuff?

If a company says 'Shagging the same gender is inherently unhealthy', the company would not just get boycotts and bad reviews but also be cancelled, threatened, sued, other legal action, and even subjec to violence, including those who partake wi the company. Actual death and rape (not jus threats) are not out of the question.
If a company stays ilent on the issue, the company would still get a subtler cancellation and threat because 'silence is violent compliance'.
If a company outright preaches 'if the hearts fit, the bodies fit' and even massively funds pro-BGLT+ legislation, the company would... still be cancelled and threatened?

I honestly do not kno why. They claim tha the company does not actually care about BGLT+ rights and only wants money, bu these same people do not extend the same logic to companies that oppose the BGLT+ narrative. They claim tha the company is only supporting BGLT+ rights after the fact instead of actively promoting these, bu those companies go way beyond saying 'We do not discriminate on the basis of orientation or gender identity.'

The biggest problem involves Gay Pride Month. These companies celebrate BGLT+ pride but get hate by both anti-BGLT+ people and pro-BGLT+ people. However, once June is over, these same companies get even more hate over daring ending pride celebrations just because Gay Pride Month is over.

(I blame cultural Marxism.)

I mean... not even 'BIPOC' social justice warriors whine about others no longer celebrating Black History Month once February is over!
View attachment 1653524
...never mind.
Ah yes Blactober; where people blackwash characters of different ethnicities (including Asian!) while ignoring actual black characters. Truly progressive. There could be a Year of the Black designated and you’d still see shit like this happen.

Personally I’m also confused on people’s stances on corporations; they’ll shit on them saying they’re only after pink bucks but then throw a fit when a corporation isn’t catering to them and validating their identities. It’s so confusing.
 
Last edited:
Back