Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

Would you rape Jess Phillips


  • Total voters
    2,411
Carls main issue seems to be he cant grapple with the idea of we have to set some arbitrary number we all agree on is close enough, because we being outside the persons head can never tell when they are mature enough, and the person themselves could also arguably feel ready when they are not and find out so after they do it. The correct answer to the original dude who asked him about it is "I can never know if you are ready, arguably neither can you truly until after the deed is done which we as a society have set a ground rule of 16-18 depending on country". In some ways hes being very postmodernist questioning this narrative and rule.
He actually did say that an arbitrary cutoff age is necessary in his first response to this woman. The problem is he's way too set on defending himself and never admitting he said something stupid in the heat of the moment during a debate, so he keeps downplaying that and equivocating. "Look, we have to set an age of consent, but, you know, maybe some eleven year olds can consent to sex, I mean who can say?" It's very much postmodernist bullshit and he falls back on this sort of talk a lot to weasel out of topics he doesn't have an intellectual answer to. But you can't do that with optics poison like pedo shit. Even if he's not defending child molestation from a legal standpoint, he's muddying the waters from a moral standpoint.
 
Helicopter rider afficianado, Dame Pesos, has screengrabbed all the times Sargon tweeted at WigOnHead with his alt Twitter account.

dame screengrab.PNG


 
His whole deal was "leftists are trying to take away our freedom to do xyz" now hes turning it around.
We often debate how much of Carls original persona was fake and when he developed these fascistic beliefs. But what I want to know is what the fuck was the point of the whole division with the alt right if he essentially believes in exactly the same things as them.
This makes him look like the Trotsky of fascism. IE everything is wrong unless it was his idea and he gets to be at the forefront.

The reason why he specifically picked a fight with the alt-right was unknowingly revealed by him during the confrontation he had with Jim. It was also the exact reason why he later picked a fight with Jim and Ralph.

Listen to what he just said when asked why he considers the alt-right to be his enemy. It has nothing to do with their views or what they advocate for. It specifically has to do with the fact that they like to make fun of him. And more importantly, he can't one up them and get a win over them. Every conflict he's had over the past few years has had to do with him not being able to handle his ego taking a hit. He doesn't like being the butt of a joke or laughed at.
 
Listen to what he just said when asked why he considers the alt-right to be his enemy. It has nothing to do with their views or what they advocate for. It specifically has to do with the fact that they like to make fun of him. And more importantly, he can't one up them and get a win over them.
There's a tweet (which I can't find right now) where he essentially said he would've been okay to help the alt-right achieve their goals if they hadn't been so mean to him.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Tatu Carreta
I love how in his conversation with destiny he still bitches about IBS when the only thing they did was making fun of him lol.
I wonder if realizes he was the one who started the drama and not the other way arround
 
I watched an old destiny vs Sargon debate for like 20 minutes and you have to be a intellectually stunted tard to believe this is something worthwhile to listen too,Destiny is constantly putting his hand over his face,doing autistic faces and motions and getting fake flustered at any opponent he debates as to make it seem that his opponent is being unreasonable and ridiculous (and also he interrupts constantly) meanwhile Sargon is smug chuckling for the same reason and interrupting.
None of them want to start the talk saying what they actually believe because that would left them with no wiggle room so they start the debate by saying
Destiny: "What do you think about Transgender women Sargon?"
Sargon: "I dont know,its complicated,what do you believe?"
Destiny: "I dont know I am asking you"
Sargon: "Well I am asking you..."

And they do that for the first two minutes.

I used to watch Sargon when I was younger,very inexperienced when it came to the real world and just watched basic bitch feminist videos like 6 years ago,the target demographic for youtube intellectuals debating has to be people that were like me because lets be honest,if you were actually smart and wanted hear arguments about transgenderism and feminism you would just read a book rather than watch a cringe inducing Sargon vs Destiny debate,and even if you want to watch intellectual stuff on youtube you could watch people who have a trajectory in their field instead of Sargon(who was a minimum wage worker and failed game dev) and Destiny (who plays games for a living).
 
I used to watch Sargon when I was younger,very inexperienced when it came to the real world and just watched basic bitch feminist videos like 6 years ago,the target demographic for youtube intellectuals debating has to be people that were like me because lets be honest,if you were actually smart and wanted hear arguments about transgenderism and feminism you would just read a book rather than watch a cringe inducing Sargon vs Destiny debate,and even if you want to watch intellectual stuff on youtube you could watch people who have a trajectory in their field instead of Sargon(who was a minimum wage worker and failed game dev) and Destiny (who plays games for a living).

In fairness, I don't think you have to be an "intellectual" to have a debate on the merits of issues like transgenderism, feminism, what have you. I also used to enjoy Sargon's vids, often I found he would bring up some intersting factoid I hadn't heard of before or would put things in a perspective I hadn't considered. Discussing philosophical perspectives and tying them into modern day issues can be fun, but you need to keep yourself grounded. The problem with Sargon is that he started think that because he enjoyed debating and discussing issues like this that it made him a fucking modern day Socrates.
 
It seems the prophet has graced the Reichstag with his presence.
lol.jpg


I'm dying to know precisely how cringe his little speech was.
Sargon is a fart huffer I can't really stand, his bum chum Dankula I do like because of the mad lads series and his cheeky chappie scottishness.
Dank is a gud boi who was unexpectedly thrust into the public and political spotlight through no real choice of his own. He's the person Carl pretends to be whenever he embarks on one of his galaxy-brained schemes. He didn't really want to be the leader of the Skeptics/Liberalists/UKIP, but people put the laurel wreath on his head and somebody's got to do it. He'd rather just play video games, honest!

Beyond the fact that that image is obvious bullshit and Sargon mostly does what he does for the sake of his ego, the differences in their respective tribulations are telling. Nobody in their right mind would think Dankula deserved half the shit that rained down on him, he did nothing wrong. In contrast, every bad thing that happened to Carl is quite literally his own fault. All his mistakes and pratfalls are directly caused by something else he did or said, which in 99% of cases he didn't need to do or say. And the best part is that he's either too arrogant or stupid to possess the foresight to realize how obvious it is that his past behaviour will come back to torpedo whatever new master plan he will concoct in the future.
 
I don't know where he was but that's not the German parliament. That looks like this:
View attachment 1655159

He probably only addressed a small fraction of the Reichstag in one of the private meeting rooms. I know here senators and MPs can invite outside speakers to give talks in smaller rooms on a given topic, and I would assume their German equivalents can do the same. Usually only 20 - 30 members show up out of 443.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back