Netflix, Inc. indicted by grand jury in Tyler Co., Tx for promoting material in Cuties film

[Forgetful Gynn]

Oh good God fucking Jew sperging is invading the thread. Still this film is pretty heebed up, sorry, that's just a fact.

As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.

 

[Syaoran Li]

Given how Hitler himself went to the funeral for Polish First Marshall Jozef Pilsudski, it seems like the "untermenschen Slavs" line might be a bit of a strawman that stands in stark juxtaposition of actual facts. Almost on par with the juxtaposition of how Poland was considered an "oppressed occupied peoples" but are now "evil Nazis."

View attachment 1652713

As for the "they didn't destroy cities because they couldn't destroy cities" line, Nazi Germany had occupied most of the major cities of their enemies prior to the JewSA and Soviet Union entering the war. They could have easily sacked those cities for resources just like what has been done countless times throughout history, but they didn't, even despite the fact that such an act would have clearly benefited the beleaguered German war effort. Lol, even without a need for resources or some strategic benefit, it is self-apparent how the treatment of the local population differs under Nazi occupation and occupation by the "glorious allies" and the international clique.

View attachment 1652724

Also, since you bring up "The Blitz" then I guess it's fair to bring up the fact that Germany clearly had tried a peaceful approach to the UK prior to "The Blitz," which clearly would have jeopardized later hostile air actions over the UK.
View attachment 1652727


Edit:
Also, what is the actual purpose behind a "heavy bomber," and given how the answer to that question is quite obvious, how much does it speak to intent that Germany and Imperial Japan took little interest in heavy bombers, but the allies built them in massive numbers?

We get it, you're a homosexual who finds Nazis attractive.

If you want to get worked over by rock hard Aryan cock, just find some blonde gym bunny and pay him $20 to put on a leather SS cap and shout German obscenities while he rails you. You'll feel much better.

Anyone who spergs this much about the Jews and glorifies the Nazis is either a homosexual with a Nazi fetish OR is one of (((them))) and is doing some deep cover glowie shit on behalf of their bosses in Tel Aviv

why has this thread devolved into DER JUUUUUDEN again?

Because @mr.moon1488 is a faggot who fantasizes about being worked over by leather-clad Nazis

Or he's a Mossad agent. Not sure which one

Did the Joos steal his tendies?

They also invented AstroTurf because they hate real grass, they cancelled his favorite Joss Whedon shows for teh lulz, and then told all the girls at school he was a dork. They also used their secret Jew gold to bribe Chad and Tyrone to kick his ass in the lunch line.

Shalom Rabbi, anything else you want to try your talmudic shit on? lmfao Much like the Gunt that tongue in cheek thing eludes you. She is obviously also not 110 genders but thank you for the ethical class on National Socialism, not everything revolves around Nazi Germany. Ethics and codes of conduct have existed in societies before them and well after them. If this is the best way you got to cope with soft core child porn good luck. Next, you will tell me mongols and Russians were super ethical and good for raping Germans and other Slavic women on their road to victory. Your statement not only glows but also echoes a lot. It is a lot to presume that anyone who would not stand for this is literally invoking Hitler, but then again that's what the media and others like you and Dax like to do.

Nobody said the Soviets and Mongols were justified in their actions. Personally, I find the Soviet atrocities to be on par with those of the Nazis. The gulags were merely the leftist equivalent of the Final Solution and had a higher body count as well, the only difference was that Lenin and Stalin tried to put a fig leaf over their genocidal crimes by invoking politics as opposed to race or eugenics.

You're either a faggot or you're one of (((them)))

If it's the former, it's okay to be gay. If it's the latter, begone you Yahweh-worshipping hook-nosed Israelite scum!

Some say the (((Jew Spergers))) are paid agents of MOSSAD sent here to derail the thread to stop us uncovering (((Jewish Tricks)))

View attachment 1653467

This but unironically

Yes, I've "actually even read him," you insufferable snob. I'm not "disagreeing" with him about anything, I think he's a hack writer and contributed nothing of importance to the world, or even a little amusing.

Funny, because I feel the same way with Saint Augustine of Hippo, Richard Dawkins, Muhammad, Karl Marx, Moses Maimondes, John Calvin, and Cotton Mather but the fact is that all of their works had major impacts on the world and they contributed a lot, even if all of these people were peddling a shit ideology and their impacts were often negative (Marx, Muhammad, Mather, Calvin) or mixed at best (Augustine, Dawkins)

 

[alreadyhome]

Funny, because I feel the same way with Saint Augustine of Hippo, Richard Dawkins, Muhammad, Karl Marx, Moses Maimondes, John Calvin, and Cotton Mather but the fact is that all of their works had major impacts on the world and they contributed a lot, even if all of these people were peddling a shit ideology and their impacts were often negative (Marx, Muhammad, Mather, Calvin) or mixed at best (Augustine, Dawkins)

I didn't say that de Sade didn't have an impact on the world, I said he contributed nothing of importance.

 

[Syaoran Li]

I didn't say that de Sade didn't have an impact on the world, I said he contributed nothing of importance.

Meh, I disagree.

De Sade was a pioneer in several genres. Aside from the obvious genres of extreme literature and porn, he was also a major influence and contributor to the horror and satire genres, as well as an influence on a lot of the Gothic novelists and poets of the 19th Century.

He was a scumbag and a psychopath, but he did lay the groundwork or help lay the groundwork for quite a few major genres and movements even if he was outclassed by later writers

Horace Walpole was another major influence on the Gothic literary movement and on horror, but he was more or less a one-hit wonder. It just happened to be that one book was a gamechanger

 

[alreadyhome]

Meh, I disagree.

De Sade was a pioneer in several genres. Aside from the obvious genres of extreme literature and porn, he was also a major influence and contributor to the horror and satire genres, as well as an influence on a lot of the Gothic novelists and poets of the 19th Century.

He was a scumbag and a psychopath, but he did lay the groundwork or help lay the groundwork for quite a few major genres and movements even if he was outclassed by later writers

Horace Walpole was another major influence on the Gothic literary movement and on horror, but he was more or less a one-hit wonder. It just happened to be that one book was a gamechanger

De Sade didn't lay groundwork OR pioneer ANY genre or movement; every thing he did, had been done, especially with regard to the hyperbolic, in comedic writing hundreds of years before him. His "extreme literature" as you call it drew from actually brilliant writers, such as Rabelais, even though I don't care for him, as well as popular literature of his time, much of it great - French fables, German ghost stories, morality plays, poetry, and fairy tales. You confuse popular trash with popular things of value, and then simply conflate the two.

 

[Syaoran Li]

De Sade didn't lay groundwork OR pioneer ANY genre or movement; every thing he did, had been done, especially with regard to the hyperbolic, in comedic writing hundreds of years before him. His "extreme literature" as you call it drew from actually brilliant writers, such as Rabelais, even though I don't care for him, as well as popular literature of his time, much of it great - French fables, German ghost stories, morality plays, poetry, and fairy tales. You confuse popular trash with popular things of value, and then simply conflate the two.

That's like saying Columbus did nothing of importance because Leif Ericsson landed in the New World first.

Hate on the "popular trash" like a hipster pseudo-intellectual all you want but often times we have to accept that it does sometimes have an impact by virtue of surviving and not falling into total obscurity, even if it's not technically the first to do it.

Another thing De Sade popularized (even if he didn't invent it himself) is that his extreme stories did not have a moral to the story. He dropped any pretense of morality and was blunt about it, which was actually pretty groundbreaking for the time, especially as time went on and the libertines of the 1700's gave way to the stricter morality and conservatism of the 1800's.

All those French fables and German fairy tales were essentially morality fables and De Sade's important since he popularized the concept of horror, depravity, and brutality freed from the confines of moralism

Even if he wasn't the first one to do it, he was the first one that got remembered for it in the eyes of the public. Just because something is "popular trash", does not mean its unimportant. Columbus was not the first European to land in the New World, but he was the first one who actually mattered and that the wider masses took notice of.

This isn't punk rock where if someone's actually heard of it and enjoys it unironically, it's branded as automatically fake and therefore bad and worthless somehow.

 

[moocow]

Oh good God fucking Jew sperging is invading the thread. Still this film is pretty heebed up, sorry, that's just a fact.

lol it was bound to happen. We need to coin a new law to complement Godwin's, only with jews instead of nazis.

 

[alreadyhome]

That's like saying Columbus did nothing of importance because Leif Ericsson landed in the New World first.

Hate on the "popular trash" like a hipster pseudo-intellectual all you want but often times we have to accept that it does sometimes have an impact by virtue of surviving and not falling into total obscurity, even if it's not technically the first to do it.

Another thing De Sade popularized (even if he didn't invent it himself) is that his extreme stories did not have a moral to the story. He dropped any pretense of morality and was blunt about it, which was actually pretty groundbreaking for the time, especially as time went on and the libertines of the 1700's gave way to the stricter morality and conservatism of the 1800's.

All those French fables and German fairy tales were essentially morality fables and De Sade's important since he popularized the concept of horror, depravity, and brutality freed from the confines of moralism

Even if he wasn't the first one to do it, he was the first one that got remembered for it in the eyes of the public. Just because something is "popular trash", does not mean its unimportant. Columbus was not the first European to land in the New World, but he was the first one who actually mattered and that the wider masses took notice of.

This isn't punk rock where if someone's actually heard of it and enjoys it unironically, it's branded as automatically fake and therefore bad and worthless somehow.

He didn't popularize the concept of horror, depravity, brutality, or the curious "freedom from morality" - they were all extremely popular long before his time, and across all genres - prose, poetry, music, painting, theater, philosophy, and religious art. He also did not popularize things not having a moral. What kind of literature, theater, and little skits do you think royalty and aristocratic classes entertained themselves with? Also, I'm not hating on popular trash because it's popular; I contrasted it to popular things of value. I said that his work is unimportant, which word naturally qualifies my idea of what is unimportant, not yours. Learn to read, and stop misrepresenting what I said as "anti" popular fiction. I just dislike de Sade, you retard.

 

[Syaoran Li]

He didn't popularize the concept of horror, depravity, brutality, or the curious "freedom from morality" - they were all extremely popular long before his time, and across all genres - prose, poetry, music, painting, theater, philosophy, and religious art. He also did not popularize things not having a moral. What kind of literature, theater, and little skits do you think royalty and aristocratic classes entertained themselves with? Also, I'm not hating on popular trash because it's popular; I contrasted it to popular things of value. I said that his work is unimportant, which word naturally qualifies my idea of what is unimportant, not yours. Learn to read, and stop misrepresenting what I said as "anti" popular fiction. I just dislike de Sade, you retard.

Imagine being this butthurt over me saying De Sade was important or pointing out that his works got popular and did not fall into obscurity like previous immoralist works eventually did. Granted, most of DeSade's writings were like "sleeper hits" that didn't gain recognition until long after his death.

Justine was infamous mainly due to the depictions of anti-Christian and anti-moralist sentiments in addition to all the violence, sexual depravity, pedophilia and brutal rape but it was also banned after it was released and later resurfaced in the pulp literary market alongside other De Sade works while 120 Days of Sodom was first published in the early 20th Century and was previously considered a lost work.

You're the retard here and you're a pseudo-intellectual

 

[FunPosting101]

Why in the fuck is a thread about netflix potentially suffering legal consequences for a soft-core CP film full of discussion about jews, nazis, hitler(lol redundancy)and probably the holocaust too for all I know(I'm not reading 10+ pages to find out if this one is true or not, fuck you.)?

 

[Forgetful Gynn]

Why in the fuck is a thread about netflix potentially suffering legal consequences for a soft-core CP film full of discussion about jews, nazis, hitler(lol redundancy)and probably the holocaust too for all I know(I'm not reading 10+ pages to find out if this one is true or not, fuck you.)?

Because 109 countries weren't wrong.

 

[Piga Dgrifm]

Why in the fuck is a thread about netflix potentially suffering legal consequences for a soft-core CP film full of discussion about jews, nazis, hitler(lol redundancy)and probably the holocaust too for all I know(I'm not reading 10+ pages to find out if this one is true or not, fuck you.)?

Autism.

Which was created by the Jews in order to incite hatred against Sonic the Hedgehog because Sonic was going to expose their plot to take over the world using the power of bagels. Stay woke sheeple.

 

[Blue_Snow]

Literally nothing will come of this, let alone in regards to netflix itself

most likely noting will come from it.

 

[Smithfield Ham]

Moving on from that gay shit, any updates about the trial yet?

 

[Zebedee]

My favorite is when one group does a raid, capture the pregnant women, slice open the wombs, tear out the feteses then impale the unborn on sticks.

What a wonderful world

Jesus fucking Christ. I mean I knew the Japs were evil bastards before WWII but still, that’s just stone cold and sadistic.

Makes one wonder if the countrymen who survived such an attack ever sought reparations from that.

 

[Basil II]

Given how Hitler himself went to the funeral for Polish First Marshall Jozef Pilsudski, it seems like the "untermenschen Slavs" line might be a bit of a strawman that stands in stark juxtaposition of actual facts. Almost on par with the juxtaposition of how Poland was considered an "oppressed occupied peoples" but are now "evil Nazis."

View attachment 1652713

As for the "they didn't destroy cities because they couldn't destroy cities" line, Nazi Germany had occupied most of the major cities of their enemies prior to the JewSA and Soviet Union entering the war. They could have easily sacked those cities for resources just like what has been done countless times throughout history, but they didn't, even despite the fact that such an act would have clearly benefited the beleaguered German war effort. Lol, even without a need for resources or some strategic benefit, it is self-apparent how the treatment of the local population differs under Nazi occupation and occupation by the "glorious allies" and the international clique.

View attachment 1652724

Also, since you bring up "The Blitz" then I guess it's fair to bring up the fact that Germany clearly had tried a peaceful approach to the UK prior to "The Blitz," which clearly would have jeopardized later hostile air actions over the UK.
View attachment 1652727


Edit:
Also, what is the actual purpose behind a "heavy bomber," and given how the answer to that question is quite obvious, how much does it speak to intent that Germany and Imperial Japan took little interest in heavy bombers, but the allies built them in massive numbers?

Based department? Yeah I have a huge one.

 

[DeadFish]

Jesus fucking Christ. I mean I knew the Japs were evil bastards before WWII but still, that’s just stone cold and sadistic.

Makes one wonder if the countrymen who survived such an attack ever sought reparations from that.

No. It was what native Americans did to settlers.

 

[Zebedee]

No. It was what native Americans did to settlers.

Well then, you learn something new every day.

 

[Uncle Warren]

Moving on from that gay shit, any updates about the trial yet?

I too would like to know but some faggots are shitting up this fucking thread with their bullshit.

 

[Ctrl+Alt+Rt]

As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.

So then you can provide facts and authentic proof that the producer Sylvain De Zangroniz – who grew up in Spain & Morocco and makes films about the Muslim community and whose earliest work was directing a movie literally called Islam School Welkoum – is actually an Israeli Jew? Or that the director, Maïmouna Doucouré, who is black and grew up in a polygamist Senegalese Muslim family and makes films about Muslim girls, is actually a Jew?

Here's a neat trick: if you assume everyone's Jewish, it's like the Jews are to blame for everything! Proof up or stop sperging.