Female Moles Grow Testicles to Fight Through Their Brutal Underground Existence


If any animal understands the horrors of trench warfare, it has to be the mole. Faced with an enemy, there's no time for pleasantries. No place to hide. Aggression is all that matters.



To help them fight in this brutal world, evolution has granted the female mole a generous dose of 'roid rage' by tacking some testicles onto her ovaries – resulting in a unique bit of anatomy called an ovotestis.

Now, researchers have a better understanding of how this fascinating biological change came about.

"The sexual development of mammals is complex, although we have a reasonably good idea on how this process takes place," says geneticist Darío Lupiáñez from the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics.

"At a certain point, sexual development usually progresses in one direction or another, male or female. We wanted to know how evolution modulates this sequence of developmental events, enabling the intersexual features that we see in moles."

Just like a more typical mammalian ovary, ovotestes nurture and release eggs for fertilisation. They also happen to have a lump of testicular tissue stuck to one side.

While it's not capable of making sperm cells, it does have what are known as Leydig cells for churning out a masculine-sized serving of androgens, or male sex hormones.
Usually the development of testicular tissue in mammals relies on the presence of a gene on the Y chromosome to ramp up testosterone production early in development.

Lacking a Y chromosome makes it a lot harder for an embryo to kick off the chain of events that produce testes. So just how it happens in female moles, which have two X chromosomes instead of an X and Y, has long been a mystery.

An in-depth analysis of their genomes now reveals just how this quirk of nature came about in the first place.

"We hypothesised that in moles, there are not only changes in the genes themselves, but particularly in the regulatory regions belonging to these genes," says geneticist Stefan Mundlos from the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics.

To test this, Mundlos and his colleagues pulled out all of the stops to map out the chromosomal remodelling the Iberian mole (Talpa occidentalis) underwent to modify their ovaries into testosterone factories.

We're talking not just mapping the gene activity in different regions of their sex organs, but a recording of the epigenetic edits to their DNA and an examination of datasets describing how entire mole chromosomes have changed structurally.
They compared their results with genomes in other animals, as well as specific genetic changes found in the American star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata); another critter with ovotestes.

The result is a better understanding of how the mole's genome has been shuffled around over time in order to deliver a perfectly timed dose of regulatory growth factors.

Specifically they found a region involved with testicular development is flipped, adding extra code to a region that activates the pro-testicular growth factor gene FGF9.

They also found two extra copies of a gene that controls for androgen synthesis

"The triplication appends additional regulatory sequences to the gene – which ultimately leads to an increased production of male sex hormones in the ovotestes of female moles, especially more testosterone," says lead author, Francisca Martinez Real from the Institute for Medical Genetics and Human Genetics in Germany.

Testing out these changes in transgenic mice resulted in females with similar amounts of androgens as the males, supporting the researchers' hypothesis of large scale genomic changes being responsible for the testosterone surge.

"Our findings are a good example of how important the three-dimensional organisation of the genome is for evolution," says Lupiáñez.

"Nature makes use of the existing toolbox of developmental genes and merely rearranges them to create a characteristic such as intersexuality. In the process, other organ systems and development are not affected."

To the female mole, the evolution of intersex has been a winning formula for survival.

Far from being aberrations, the blurring of lines throughout the animal kingdom is a constant reminder that Mother Nature simply doesn't give a hoot about clear boundaries between male and female.

This research was published in Science.
 
Jesus fucking christ. Mother nature DOES care. The Mole is still FEMALE. It cannot impregnate or reproduce with other females. This is just possible because of the extreme competition and pressures put on moles. It demonstrates the extremity of their struggle. That females need to be supplemented with male androgens in order to be reproductively successful. Otherwise this would be a quirky mutation that never would have evolved. There's still a clear delineation between the sexes. Not to mention while the female mole gets male androgens, this could consequently shorten their lives or lead to other problems. It isn't "GURRRL POWARRRR" like these fucking retards think. It is a random chance feature that is only propagated due to extreme competition, and probably would not be otherwise seen.

Female humans are completely different from moles. Female humans are not attractive to males if they have more male features than female features.
 
Jesus fucking christ. Mother nature DOES care. The Mole is still FEMALE. It cannot impregnate or reproduce with other females. This is just possible because of the extreme competition and pressures put on moles. It demonstrates the extremity of their struggle. That females need to be supplemented with male androgens in order to be reproductively successful. Otherwise this would be a quirky mutation that never would have evolved. There's still a clear delineation between the sexes. Not to mention while the female mole gets male androgens, this could consequently shorten their lives or lead to other problems. It isn't "GURRRL POWARRRR" like these fucking retards think. It is a random chance feature that is only propagated due to extreme competition, and probably would not be otherwise seen.

Female humans are completely different from moles. Female humans are not attractive to males if they have more male features than female features.
Wear the dress bigot.
 
"Nature makes use of the existing toolbox of developmental genes and merely rearranges them to create a characteristic such as intersexuality. In the process, other organ systems and development are not affected."
Too bad for transmen that it isn't like this for them. The T wrecks havoc on their bodies and is toxic to the female reproductive system, which is why most of them get hysterectomies.
 
Watch every tranny on twitter go "SEE? SEE! THIS TOTALLY MEANS THAT ME, BEING A BIOLOGICAL MAN, PUTTING ON A DRESS, AND TAKING FUCKLOADS OF HORMONES TOTALLY MAKES ME A 100% WOMAN! GENDER DOESN'T EXIST! WOMEN CAN HAVE DICKS! NATURE VALIDATES ME"
they did the same thing with clownfish and lizards, even though they aren't even in the same taxonomic class as humans.
 
BTW, the front line article in this dreck is arguing about how Nuclear Power is heavy on emissions because it requires people harvesting material and building infrastructure, of course it doesn't mention how "green" energy requires the exact thing with even greater amount and a fraction of the benefit in power. The conclusions is that we only need to pour trillions of dollars on alternative energy sources and they'll magically work better.
 
Jesus christ, why are you faggots getting so worked up over this? Its just a cool animal with weird features and explaining how they evolved like this. Does zoology trigger you now?
Nigger, did you even read the fucking article?

To the female mole, the evolution of intersex has been a winning formula for survival.

Far from being aberrations, the blurring of lines throughout the animal kingdom is a constant reminder that Mother Nature simply doesn't give a hoot about clear boundaries between male and female.

This is a load of pseudo-scientific horseshit and bullshit inferences to justify a specific point of view. It also patently fucking wrong, because, drumroll:

Lacking a Y chromosome makes it a lot harder for an embryo to kick off the chain of events that produce testes. So just how it happens in female moles, which have two X chromosomes instead of an X and Y, has long been a mystery.

You can't be intersex if you posses two X chromosomes. I'm sorry we're asking for accuracy in scientific articles. I know its a lot to ask. It means the female mole is still female, has all the characteristics of a female. Its also not every female mole. You need specific pressure for it, which is not humanity. Mother nature very much cares, and it wouldn't waste the extra energy if it wasn't needed. Mother nature is a right cunt and cruel as all fuck. It will subject you to unimaginable pain and suffering just so genes can be passed on. Or it will kneecap the development of species for this sole purpose. Mother nature absolutely cares about the boundaries between male and female. If they're not necessary, it will make something asexual or hermaphroditic. If it does, it will make something sexually dimorphic. Humans are extremely sexually dimorphic and these qualities are absolutely necessary for our reproductive strategy. In fact if you are NOT sexually dimorphic it HURTS your reproductive success. Excessive testosterone in females and estrogen in males are littered with all sorts of awful fucking complications and can render you sterile and riddle you with cancers, destroy your bones and heart, make you psychotic and prone to mood swings and include loss of secondary sexual characteristics. The mole isn't affected because its a fucking mole. Its evolved to have this specific feature so testosterone doesn't wreak fucking havoc on its organ systems.

We do not have this feature. So opposing sex hormones will wreak havoc on OUR organ systems, not to say anything of the mental effects. So again, this is wrong once more and only serves to reinforce ideology listed. Certain people will hold this up and go: "See, see! There's no biological gender!" When that is patently untrue. Mother Nature absolutely gives a fuck about clear boundaries between male and female and a lot of intersex humans are functionally sterile or have reproductive issues.

Sorry for picking apart a shit article. Yeah, its interesting, but it is painted with the brush of the author's opinions. I don't want to see your opinions.
 
Back