UK Envoy to WHO Calls for End to Global COVID-19 Lockdowns: They're "Doubling" World Poverty - But remember, "the science is settled"!


The debate over how to respond to Covid-19, which shows no signs of disappearing anytime soon, continues to rage the world over. In the UK, there is an increasingly loud chorus of scientists and experts claiming that strict social distancing measures are doing more harm than good. The UK’s envoy to the World Health Organisation (WHO) has called for governments across the globe to cease national lockdown measures because of the socio-economic downturns they are producing. In an interview with The Spectator’s Andrew Neil, Dr David Nabarro slammed what he called the “ghastly global catastrophe” being caused by the use of lockdowns as “the primary means of controlling this virus.” He said that lockdowns should only be utilised to “buy you time to reorganise, regroup rebalance your resources” and to “protect your health workers."

The scientist offered up the grim prophecy that if the lockdowns continue on the current trajectory then there will be a “doubling” in the levels of world poverty and child malnutrition by 2021. Lockdowns make “poor people an awful lot poorer” he said. “I want to say it again: We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of controlling this virus…Look what's happening to poverty levels - it seems we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition because children are not getting meals at school and their parents, in poor families, are not able to afford it,” he added.

Dr Nabarro, who previously worked as a Special Representative of the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, elaborated to The Daily Mail that too often the options that governments can take to combat the spread of Covid-19 are presented as a “stark choice” between lockdown or a Covid-19 rampage resulting from no lockdown. He said that he has now “become more and more convinced” that lockdowns should only be used as “a last resort.” “This is because of the way they impact on people’s livelihoods, mental health, non-Covid illnesses, access to education and more.” He has called upon governments to “develop better systems” by “work[ing] together and learn[ing] from each other” to beat the virus.

“If clusters and outbreaks do appear, they should be slowed and then suppressed promptly and that is why localised and targeted movement restrictions, implemented jointly by local actors and national authorities, will be needed from time to time. They should be kept as time-limited as possible.”
Dr Nabarro’s comments come hot on the heels of a letter which was written by Oxford University’s Dr Sunetra Gupta and has been signed by more than 6,500 scientists which warns that lockdowns and stringent social distancing measures are having “damaging physical and mental health impacts.”
The scientists claim that most of the population is not at risk of dying if they catch Covid-19 and that the majority should therefore be Abel to continue their lives as normal while the vulnerable are given extra protection.

“Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal,' the scientists say… keeping these [lockdown] measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed,” the letter says. Globally, there are around 36 million confirmed cases of Covid-19, with over 1 million deaths. In the UK, there are approximately 576 thousand confirmed cases, with 42,679 deaths so far.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since when did authoritarians worry about the economy instead of their agenda? Too bad the damage has already been done.
 
Last edited:
You've also said we should just keep the whole thing locked down for months on end, which is why some people think you're a rich kid.

People are also saying I am a janitor/nurse/orderly. Which is it? I wish you guys would at least get your story straight

Funny how you never provide sources for your claims but demand them of others. You're the one making the accusation they're fake. The burden of proof lies with the accuser, not the accused.

You've been pretty assmad about being asked to do something unselfish. Why are you so against it? Were you just raised to be a selfish piece of shift? That would explain your actual racism and anger.
You were the one spouting claims in this one. Let's see your source.
 
People are also saying I am a janitor/nurse/orderly. Which is it? I wish you guys would at least get your story straight


You were the one spouting claims in this one. Let's see your source.

You've seen the receipts in dozens of threads. Yet we're still waiting for you to provide one. Do some work for once.

And by the way, just because you push a mop doesn't mean you don't have your parent's money to spend. Plenty of trust-fund kids have jobs to fill their time. It would certainly explain your entitlement and immaturity.
 
You've seen the receipts in dozens of threads. Yet we're still waiting for you to provide one. Do some work for once.

And by the way, just because you push a mop doesn't mean you don't have your parent's money to spend. Plenty of trust-fund kids have jobs to fill their time. It would certainly explain your entitlement and immaturity.

I have provided citations, you guys just ignore them. In this thread, you are the one making claims so it's on you to provide the source. Right-wing conspiracy blogs and pictures your boomer uncle shared on FB don't count, btw.

I wish I was a trust fund kid. That'd be pretty sweet
 
I have provided citations, you guys just ignore them. In this thread, you are the one making claims so it's on you to provide the source. Right-wing conspiracy blogs and pictures your boomer uncle shared on FB don't count, btw.

I wish I was a trust fund kid. That'd be pretty sweet

You're the one claiming I'm lying. Prove it. I'm tired of doing the work for you when you just ignore it anyways.
 
I have said, on this forum, that masks are a good compromise between lockdowns and doing nothing, but you seem pretty assmad about being asked to wear a mask. Is it really that hard to breathe through a mask when you're a mouthbreather?

Also lol at me having alts
Masks are for retards. Masks aren't feasible long term, shit up the environment and are rife with other issues.
It's not Ebola.
 
I don't really get why people don't like masks. I get to opt out of facial recognition software for the rest of my life thanks to the mask mandate - if anyone asks why you are wearing a mask after the pandemic ends, you can just say it's fresh on your memory and that it's better safe than sorry. Combine with Reflectacles or some other privacy-oriented eyewear and non-graphic, non-branded thrift-store clothing for maximum anonymity.
I prefer breathing fresh air, but I also like the idea of thwarting facial recognition software. Would this work?
7B9BAAEB-261B-40F3-A0B9-515024B647BB.jpeg
 
You're the one claiming I'm lying. Prove it. I'm tired of doing the work for you when you just ignore it anyways.
I will prove you wrong using math. I know you're slow and numbers are for book lernin ivory tower rich kids like me, but bear with me.
It'd be impossible to be a 99.95% survival rate. There's been 210k deaths in the US alone. If it's a 99.95% survival rate, that'd mean that only 1 in 2000 people who get it die. So that would mean that even if everyone caught it, it'd be 210,000 x 2000 = 420,000,000 people in the US. However, the population the US alone is 360,000,000 and the high-end estimates for exposure are only about 10%. So that'd mean math has proven you to be wrong yet again.
 
People are also saying I am a janitor/nurse/orderly. Which is it? I wish you guys would at least get your story straight

I have no idea what you do / are, besides constantly horny for Latino women. I just said you have also argued for shutting the entire country down, which is the topic of the thread, and not your and moobs unresolved sexual tension. I pointed out that is where the rich kid accusations come from. The janny jokes are people mocking you for your constant power leveling about 'working in the medical industry.'
 
I will prove you wrong using math. I know you're slow and numbers are for book lernin ivory tower rich kids like me, but bear with me.
It'd be impossible to be a 99.95% survival rate. There's been 210k deaths in the US alone. If it's a 99.95% survival rate, that'd mean that only 1 in 2000 people who get it die. So that would mean that even if everyone caught it, it'd be 210,000 x 2000 = 420,000,000 people in the US. However, the population the US alone is 360,000,000 and the high-end estimates for exposure are only about 10%. So that'd mean math has proven you to be wrong yet again.

99.95%* for the average person. This has been made clear to you. And even among the group most at risk, the survival rate is 94%.

You really need to stop distorting numbers to fit your narrative.
 
@muh_moobs dude you're wasting your time. Social justices warriors can't be educated, they can't even think that there might be a different opinion. If a normal person saw the global community walking back by saying things like "oh, the COVID death toll might be lower", and "oh, lockdowns may have hurt more than they helped," they would start thinking "hey, there's something deeper here!" SJWs must think whatever helps turns the world into their Venezuelan utopia.
 
99.95%* for the average person. This has been made clear to you. And even among the group most at risk, the survival rate is 94%.

You really need to stop distorting numbers to fit your narrative.
Even then, assuming the average person makes up as low as 50% of the country, that would still not be enough people to fit your numbers.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: muh_moobs
No, it's just incredibly cringy to randomly start bitching about someone who hasn't even entered a thread yet.

Meh. I come here for laughs. Whether laughing at someone so unimaginative they need a gimmick or some other loser makes no difference to me.

Even then, assuming the average person makes up as low as 50% of the country, that would still not be enough people to fit your numbers.

The "average person" is anyone under the age of 70 who doesn't have pre-existing health conditions. The only people that die of this thing are old people who were about to die anyways.

But yes, lets just throw away the future and sacrifice our children to Moloch so the soy-infused can feel better about themselves. You're a joke. Just go away and shill for that racist meat puppet you're hoping will become president.

@muh_moobs dude you're wasting your time. Social justices warriors can't be educated, they can't even think that there might be a different opinion. If a normal person saw the global community walking back by saying things like "oh, the COVID death toll might be lower", and "oh, lockdowns may have hurt more than they helped," they would start thinking "hey, there's something deeper here!" SJWs must think whatever helps turns the world into their Venezuelan utopia.

Well, considering that Venezuelans have turned to eating their pets due to food shortages and unemployment, the lockdowns sure are moving us towards the "superior future".
 
Last edited:
I prefer breathing fresh air, but I also like the idea of thwarting facial recognition software. Would this work?
There was a period in 2011 where people were demonstrating that you could effectively stump biometrics of the time with asymmetrical, high contrast (eg black and white) face paint but I always thought that was a double-edged sword. There's also ol' reliable: stitching infrared LEDs into a hoodie, or hat and collar. The moment that stops working is the moment Reflectacles also stop working.
 
Let's acknowledge the fact that being forced to wear masks and rebreathe CO2 for extended periods damages your blood oxygen levels. Being forced to stay isolated indoors also causes your immune system to atrophy. It's almost like things are being done to intentionally weaken everyone's immune systems for a 2nd batch of covid propaganda. The seasonal flu is already being labeled as the Round 2 Coof. Hmm, I wonder why they keep focusing on the Coof, instead of the FED and the ongoing largest transfer of wealth in Human History.
 
Back