UK Envoy to WHO Calls for End to Global COVID-19 Lockdowns: They're "Doubling" World Poverty - But remember, "the science is settled"!


The debate over how to respond to Covid-19, which shows no signs of disappearing anytime soon, continues to rage the world over. In the UK, there is an increasingly loud chorus of scientists and experts claiming that strict social distancing measures are doing more harm than good. The UK’s envoy to the World Health Organisation (WHO) has called for governments across the globe to cease national lockdown measures because of the socio-economic downturns they are producing. In an interview with The Spectator’s Andrew Neil, Dr David Nabarro slammed what he called the “ghastly global catastrophe” being caused by the use of lockdowns as “the primary means of controlling this virus.” He said that lockdowns should only be utilised to “buy you time to reorganise, regroup rebalance your resources” and to “protect your health workers."

The scientist offered up the grim prophecy that if the lockdowns continue on the current trajectory then there will be a “doubling” in the levels of world poverty and child malnutrition by 2021. Lockdowns make “poor people an awful lot poorer” he said. “I want to say it again: We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of controlling this virus…Look what's happening to poverty levels - it seems we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition because children are not getting meals at school and their parents, in poor families, are not able to afford it,” he added.

Dr Nabarro, who previously worked as a Special Representative of the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, elaborated to The Daily Mail that too often the options that governments can take to combat the spread of Covid-19 are presented as a “stark choice” between lockdown or a Covid-19 rampage resulting from no lockdown. He said that he has now “become more and more convinced” that lockdowns should only be used as “a last resort.” “This is because of the way they impact on people’s livelihoods, mental health, non-Covid illnesses, access to education and more.” He has called upon governments to “develop better systems” by “work[ing] together and learn[ing] from each other” to beat the virus.

“If clusters and outbreaks do appear, they should be slowed and then suppressed promptly and that is why localised and targeted movement restrictions, implemented jointly by local actors and national authorities, will be needed from time to time. They should be kept as time-limited as possible.”
Dr Nabarro’s comments come hot on the heels of a letter which was written by Oxford University’s Dr Sunetra Gupta and has been signed by more than 6,500 scientists which warns that lockdowns and stringent social distancing measures are having “damaging physical and mental health impacts.”
The scientists claim that most of the population is not at risk of dying if they catch Covid-19 and that the majority should therefore be Abel to continue their lives as normal while the vulnerable are given extra protection.

“Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal,' the scientists say… keeping these [lockdown] measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed,” the letter says. Globally, there are around 36 million confirmed cases of Covid-19, with over 1 million deaths. In the UK, there are approximately 576 thousand confirmed cases, with 42,679 deaths so far.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since when did authoritarians worry about the economy instead of their agenda? Too bad the damage has already been done.
 
Last edited:
Masks and lockdowns are gay as fuck, but I don't see this changing anytime soon. People are already afraid of each other and the air they breath, and no amount of evidence is going to change their thinking.

The media and "experts" got the majority of people scared to death of, what's essentially, a common cold. No amount of back-peddling is going to make people forget, sorry WHO.
 
I prefer breathing fresh air, but I also like the idea of thwarting facial recognition software. Would this work?
I honestly think these mask mandates are being enforced so that these companies that make facial recognition software can figure out how to identify you even when you're wearing a mask/face paint.
 
Leftists are pathologically anti-economic in the same way Young Earth Creationists are anti-science, they literally think that economic growth depends solely on printing money, so the fact that the shut downs have had catastrophic economic consequences are of little surprise. You'd have to be a retard (leftist) to have ever thought that a prolonged shut down wouldn't have major consequences.

They aren't anti-economics as much as they flat-out DENY economics.... their feelings rule all, and they know, in their heart of hearts, that economic arguments are all lies cooked up by crooked bankers and cackling-evil businessmen to keep everyone poor.... there are no bad people in liberal la-la-land... just misunderstood ones... so the only reason you're poor is because someone else took all your money.

Witness how many in positions of high authority believe, unhesitatingly, in the grade-schooler's fallacy that you can make wealth by just printing money.

They don't know lockdown is hurting the economy (it's just haircuts, bro) , and if they do they have no idea why, and have no desire to find out, either. Their master plan has always been complete collapse of independent business, loss of all private wealth, and everyone being on the UBI-dole because to their sensibilities, this despotic system of passing around your meager government goods tokens for shoddy basics will at least be fair.


But most just have TDS and are gleefully setting the system aflame to smoke out Trump, unaware that if he loses in November, the fires they lit don't just miraculously go out and all the burned things don't magically re-generate.... that is the depths of their inability to understand anything, such is their devotion to emotional temper-tantrums expressed through letting cities burn.

If it feels right, do it. Long-term consequences are a conspiracy theory...
 
Last edited:
They aren't anti-economics as much as they flat-out DENY economics.... their feelings rule all, and they know, in their heart of hearts, that economic arguments are all lies cooked up by crooked bankers and cackling-evil businessmen to keep everyone poor.... there are no bad people in liberal la-la-land... just misunderstood ones... so the only reason you're poor is because someone else took all your money.

Witness how many in positions of high authority believe, unhesitatingly, in the grade-schooler's fallacy that you can make wealth by just printing money.

They know lockdown is hurting the economy, but they have no idea why, and have no desire to find out, either. Their master plan has always been complete collapse of independent business, loss of all private wealth, and everyone being on the UBI-dole because to their sensibilities, this despotic system will at least be fair.


But most just have TDS and are gleefully setting the system aflame to smoke out Trump, unaware that if he loses in November, the fires don't just miraculous go out and all the burned things re-generate.... that is the depths of their inability to understand anything, such is their devotion to emotional temper-tantrums expressed through letting cities burn.

Well I for one look forward to being assigned a job by the Manufactorum. It'll be so great to work for 18 hours and be compensated with two meals of soylent per day.
 
Most countries tried to have their cake and eat it. Either go full on lockdown or you don't lockdown at all.

Economy is still fucked regardless of lockdown or not.
I think a lot of the economic damage could've been mitigated if the lockdowns didn't keep getting extended by two weeks and the politicians didn't come up with increasingly arbitrary (and impossible) requirements to reopen. Sure, we'd still be in a recession if the lockdowns largely ended in June, but that's a far better alternative than entire industries rotting away and the looming prospect of a new depression.
 
I think a lot of the economic damage could've been mitigated if the lockdowns didn't keep getting extended by two weeks and the politicians didn't come up with increasingly arbitrary (and impossible) requirements to reopen. Sure, we'd still be in a recession if the lockdowns largely ended in June, but that's a far better alternative than entire industries rotting away and the looming prospect of a new depression.
They kept getting extended by two weeks because they didn't shut the borders and still left tons of stuff open. If you're going to have a lockdown, you need to crush the virus, half-assing the lockdowns is worse than not locking down at all.
 
They kept getting extended by two weeks because they didn't shut the borders and still left tons of stuff open. If you're going to have a lockdown, you need to crush the virus, half-assing the lockdowns is worse than not locking down at all.

The real answer was to stop being bugmen and restrict travel to and from China. Not pander to the PRC and tell people they were racists for asking the government to close the borders.

But no, instead everyone had to be on house arrest.
 
They kept getting extended by two weeks because they didn't shut the borders and still left tons of stuff open. If you're going to have a lockdown, you need to crush the virus, half-assing the lockdowns is worse than not locking down at all.
But the lockdowns weren't initially about crushing Corona, they were about "flattening the curve" so that the hospitals wouldn't get overwhelmed. It was seemingly accepted back then that case numbers would rise since viruses don't die out completely, rather it was supposed to be about keeping hospitalizations and deaths as low as humanly possible.

Of course, that goal gradually mutated into trying to starve Corona out (impossible, even with vaccines diseases like Polio still exist), hence the politicians and "experts" being too eager to impose more lockdowns and finding any excuse to make the reopening process take forever. They're so obsessed with short term cases that they can't see the economic disaster they're creating in the long term, which will make everything so much worse for the world.
 
The real answer was to stop being bugmen and restrict travel to and from China. Not pander to the PRC and tell people they were racists for asking the government to close the borders.

But no, instead everyone had to be on house arrest.
It's both, we needed a 2 month long lockdown from February with foreign travel nigh on completely shut down for 2 years at least. R0 would have plummeted.

But the lockdowns weren't initially about crushing Corona, they were about "flattening the curve" so that the hospitals wouldn't get overwhelmed. It was seemingly accepted back then that case numbers would rise since viruses don't die out completely, rather it was supposed to be about keeping hospitalizations and deaths as low as humanly possible.
Yeah cus they decided to wait almost 2 months before doing anything about it.

Of course, that goal gradually mutated into trying to starve Corona out (impossible, even with vaccines diseases like Polio still exist), hence the politicians and "experts" being too eager to impose more lockdowns and finding any excuse to make the reopening process take forever. They're so obsessed with short term cases that they can't see the economic disaster they're creating in the long term, which will make everything so much worse for the world.
When you strangle a person they start kicking a screaming even if they can't overpower you. This is their kicking and screaming to save the shitpile of a society they built.
 
How, exactly, does a person spread a pandemic?

The definition of "pandemic" is a global epidemic. So much for "I work in medicine".

I know you're stupid, but you can't possibly be this stupid. While the virus is all over the world, people are still able to spread it and expose others who haven't been exposed yet.

Again, I know you're known for being slow around here, but even you can grasp this one.
 
Back