US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[Basil II]

View attachment 1659771

“If we do not find an answer to Alzheimer’s, within the next 19 years every single solitary bed that exists in the US will be occupied by an Alzheimer’s patient”

...So we're gonna' have like 900,000,000+ Alzheimer's patients by 2039? I mean we've got a lot of beds, dude. I don't even know how we'd measure the number of beds in the U.S. but it's way fucking higher than our total population. Like, every hotel room, every mattress warehouse, every sleeping bag, every spare bedroom, just packed with Alzheimer's Patients, huh?

This is not the dystopia I signed up for and I want off this ride right now. I'm not fucking ready for the Alzheimer's Bedpocolypse.

I can't blame him for supporting his own self interest.

 

[TFT-A9]

I can't blame him for supporting his own self interest.

I'm not sure there's enough of a brain left up there to manifest much of a self-interest anymore

 

[Shadow Cid]

'Voters don't deserve to know if I will or not until I am elected.'

I just couldn't bring myself to vote for someone who said that about any policy. I'd be more offended that they didn't bother to deflect or change the subject.

 

[Basil II]

I'm not sure there's enough of a brain left up there to manifest much of a self-interest anymore

even if the brain is gone the nose still seeks youthful hair.

 

[Screw Danlon]

View attachment 1659771

“If we do not find an answer to Alzheimer’s, within the next 19 years every single solitary bed that exists in the US will be occupied by an Alzheimer’s patient”

...So we're gonna' have like 900,000,000+ Alzheimer's patients by 2039? I mean we've got a lot of beds, dude. I don't even know how we'd measure the number of beds in the U.S. but it's way fucking higher than our total population. Like, every hotel room, every mattress warehouse, every sleeping bag, every spare bedroom, just packed with Alzheimer's Patients, huh?

This is not the dystopia I signed up for and I want off this ride right now. I'm not fucking ready for the Alzheimer's Bedpocolypse.

Biden’s just saying that in 2039 he’s going to build a mountain of beds and lie on it.

 

[Atomic Wangler]

Lighting and makeup make a big difference. Remember the 'Why Why Why' incident? He looks just as ghoulish there.
View attachment 1659840

Fuck any of those "cursed" images with blatant post processing, this single frame is true terror.

 

[RodgerDodger]

The problem will be for how long ballots will keep appearing after election day. Unless there's a cutoff date they will continue to find boxes of them until the outcome sways in the correct direction

View attachment 1659771

“If we do not find an answer to Alzheimer’s, within the next 19 years every single solitary bed that exists in the US will be occupied by an Alzheimer’s patient”

...So we're gonna' have like 900,000,000+ Alzheimer's patients by 2039? I mean we've got a lot of beds, dude. I don't even know how we'd measure the number of beds in the U.S. but it's way fucking higher than our total population. Like, every hotel room, every mattress warehouse, every sleeping bag, every spare bedroom, just packed with Alzheimer's Patients, huh?

This is not the dystopia I signed up for and I want off this ride right now. I'm not fucking ready for the Alzheimer's Bedpocolypse.

You would think that Biden's handlers might figure out that it would be better to steer away from topics that focus the viewer/voters into thinking about Alzheimers and Dementia and their candidate at the same time?

 

[RA-5C Vigilante]

The Alzheimers apocalypse would be the worst disaster in recent memory.

Wait what the fuck were we talking about

 

[Stoneheart]

Has Kamala China aids? she looks ill at the hearing.

 

[Salubrious]

Has Kamala China aids? she looks ill at the hearing.

Nah, every time she's on video conference they give her the weirdest lighting.

It was so bad several months ago that people were actually speculating as to whether or not she was getting her skin whitened for the VP run.

 

[verissimus]

Romney btfo by Biden : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVRBNIRPYGw

 

[MidUSA]

Feels like it's a pretty bad idea for Biden to do anything that makes people associate him with altzheimers.

It's really not a connection they want people to make, internally.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

Found a higher res version.
It's real.

View attachment 1659664
Fallout: New Vegas 2 looking great.

They've given up on keeping his hair dyed already? That was a brief experiment.

If they had any sense of humor at all they'd do his hair like Trump's, even doing a temporary dye or some kind to match the yellow, and have him show up at rallies parodizing Trump. Too bad his campaign is the worst garbage ever. They could make him likeable if they weren't all so out of touch with reality.

 

[Getting tard comed]

News people are reporting this prediction model as a negative for Trump. https://pollyvote.com/en/components/models/mixed/keys-to-the-white-house/

Spoiler: The 13 Keys

Key	Topic	Threshold condition
1	Party Mandate	After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats inthe U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previousmidterm elections.
2	Contest	There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination.
3	Incumbency	The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president.
4	Third party	There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5	Short-term economy	The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6	Long-term economy	Real per-capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7	Policy change	The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8	Social unrest	There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9	Scandal	The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10	Foreign/military failure	The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11	Foreign/military success	The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12	Incumbent charisma	The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13	Challenger charisma	The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

Incumbant president needs 8/13 of these to be true for him to win according to the model. The creator of the model have him 7/13. I give Trump 11/13, I think a more critical non TDS perspective gives Trump at minimum a 9/13. What do you all think?

Tagging @Hollywood Hulk Hogan so a resident TDSer can answer this. (Please do not sperg and make me regret this.)

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

News people are reporting this prediction model as a negative for Trump. https://pollyvote.com/en/components/models/mixed/keys-to-the-white-house/

Spoiler: The 13 Keys

Key	Topic	Threshold condition
1	Party Mandate	After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats inthe U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previousmidterm elections.
2	Contest	There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination.
3	Incumbency	The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president.
4	Third party	There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5	Short-term economy	The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6	Long-term economy	Real per-capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7	Policy change	The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8	Social unrest	There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9	Scandal	The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10	Foreign/military failure	The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11	Foreign/military success	The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12	Incumbent charisma	The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13	Challenger charisma	The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

Incumbant president needs 8/13 of these to be true for him to win according to the model. The creator of the model have him 7/13. I give Trump 11/13, I think a more critical non TDS perspective gives Trump at minimum a 9/13. What do you all think?

Tagging @Hollywood Hulk Hogan so a resident TDSer can answer this. (Please do not sperg and make me regret this.)

I'm not reading all that crap

 

[The Notorious RGB]

“If we do not find an answer to Alzheimer’s, within the next 19 years every single solitary bed that exists in the US will be occupied by an Alzheimer’s patient”

...So we're gonna' have like 900,000,000+ Alzheimer's patients by 2039? I mean we've got a lot of beds, dude. I don't even know how we'd measure the number of beds in the U.S. but it's way fucking higher than our total population. Like, every hotel room, every mattress warehouse, every sleeping bag, every spare bedroom, just packed with Alzheimer's Patients, huh?

This is not the dystopia I signed up for and I want off this ride right now. I'm not fucking ready for the Alzheimer's Bedpocolypse.

It's only single-person beds. Not bunk beds, not double beds, not convertible couches, etc.
But seriously, Alzheimers? Is this really the best talking points they have?

News people are reporting this prediction model as a negative for Trump. https://pollyvote.com/en/components/models/mixed/keys-to-the-white-house/

Spoiler: The 13 Keys

Key	Topic	Threshold condition
1	Party Mandate	After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats inthe U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previousmidterm elections.
2	Contest	There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination.
3	Incumbency	The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president.
4	Third party	There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5	Short-term economy	The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6	Long-term economy	Real per-capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7	Policy change	The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8	Social unrest	There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9	Scandal	The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10	Foreign/military failure	The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11	Foreign/military success	The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12	Incumbent charisma	The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13	Challenger charisma	The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

Incumbant president needs 8/13 of these to be true for him to win according to the model. The creator of the model have him 7/13. I give Trump 11/13, I think a more critical non TDS perspective gives Trump at minimum a 9/13. What do you all think?

Tagging @Hollywood Hulk Hogan so a resident TDSer can answer this. (Please do not sperg and make me regret this.)

Trump as a minimum gets 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11 and 12, (That's while 9 and 13 could be easily argued and 8 might even be to his advantage.

 

[Puff]

News people are reporting this prediction model as a negative for Trump. https://pollyvote.com/en/components/models/mixed/keys-to-the-white-house/

Spoiler: The 13 Keys

Key	Topic	Threshold condition
1	Party Mandate	After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats inthe U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previousmidterm elections.
2	Contest	There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination.
3	Incumbency	The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president.
4	Third party	There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5	Short-term economy	The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6	Long-term economy	Real per-capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7	Policy change	The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8	Social unrest	There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9	Scandal	The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10	Foreign/military failure	The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11	Foreign/military success	The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12	Incumbent charisma	The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13	Challenger charisma	The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

Incumbant president needs 8/13 of these to be true for him to win according to the model. The creator of the model have him 7/13. I give Trump 11/13, I think a more critical non TDS perspective gives Trump at minimum a 9/13. What do you all think?

Tagging @Hollywood Hulk Hogan so a resident TDSer can answer this. (Please do not sperg and make me regret this.)

I count 9 1,2,3,4,7,10,11,12,13. I kinda want to throw in 6 to make the total 10.

 

[soy_king]

News people are reporting this prediction model as a negative for Trump. https://pollyvote.com/en/components/models/mixed/keys-to-the-white-house/

Spoiler: The 13 Keys

Key	Topic	Threshold condition
1	Party Mandate	After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats inthe U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previousmidterm elections.
2	Contest	There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination.
3	Incumbency	The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president.
4	Third party	There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5	Short-term economy	The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6	Long-term economy	Real per-capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7	Policy change	The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8	Social unrest	There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9	Scandal	The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10	Foreign/military failure	The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11	Foreign/military success	The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12	Incumbent charisma	The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13	Challenger charisma	The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

Incumbant president needs 8/13 of these to be true for him to win according to the model. The creator of the model have him 7/13. I give Trump 11/13, I think a more critical non TDS perspective gives Trump at minimum a 9/13. What do you all think?

Tagging @Hollywood Hulk Hogan so a resident TDSer can answer this. (Please do not sperg and make me regret this.)

Which ones were you thinking? I give him 10/13 (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13). I can't really give Trump "No major scandals" because the media has consistently tried to spin scandals against him, and a large proportion of the population still believe them.

Have the media clarified which ones they believe Trump has, because if so, I suspect they're implicitly conceding that Biden is uncharismatic.

 

[Bland Crumbs]

Which ones were you thinking? I give him 10/13 (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13). I can't really give Trump "No major scandals" because the media has consistently tried to spin scandals against him, and a large proportion of the population still believe them.

Have the media clarified which ones they believe Trump has, because if so, I suspect they're implicitly conceding that Biden is uncharismatic.

Even without the manufactured scandals Stormy Daniels is a legit scandal. Dude fucked around on his wife and paid the whore off.

The funny thing is if the MSM and DNC had not gone so hard on the narratives that have now been debunked Stormy could have been actual ammunition.

 

[It's HK-47]

Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine in…

nypost.com

https://archive.is/6CGa3

Imagine being such a crackhead that you fall asleep smoking crack.