Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

Would you rape Jess Phillips

  • Total voters
    2,411
akilah hughes gofundme.PNG


After having her name permanently attached to a landmark lawsuit she spectacularly lost, I think it's safe to say that Akilah Hughes hasn't learned a damn thing.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Scarface1, Dean Pentel, Nigero and 3 others
One of my problems with Sargon is that he doesn't seem to have coherent beliefs on a deep level,he seems to believe whatever justifies him or benefits him at the moment and waves off any idea that doesn't do one of those two things. For example he claims to be a classical liberal but as David Friedman said "the left co-opted liberalism and classical liberals now call themselves libertarians" .Bastiat was a classical liberal who said government should only deal with securing natural rights and not transfer wealth,yet I have never heard Sargon say that the UK government owning 40% of the GDP with a fiscal deficit and massive debt is a bad thing. Sargon is basically a leftist that wants free speech and no gender ideology but other than that I dont see how he is a classical liberal (and a lot of so called "classical liberals" fall under this description)

He also supports Trump even though he does not agree on anything with the republicans. For example I remember Sargon saying in a stream many years ago how having less guns makes sense since that means less crime and in the stream "answering your question" from sep 7 at around minute 2 he said he would compromise on less guns with the democrats if they were not unhinged(its a very classical liberal thing to not allow guns obviously).

I dont think he understand what classical liberals believed when it comes to economics,distribution of wealth or size of government since he wants government to provide things like welfare and healthcare,also watching a video from a few years ago he is one of those tardy people that believe that if you are 35 and working minimum wage its not your fault and there is nothing you can do to escape poverty because acquiring a useful skill or saving is just imposible for some reason,I assume that this is because he was one of those people until he got youtube famous and had to be on welfare("if it wasnt for welfare I would have been on the streets") because he didnt save any of his money.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Scarface1
thismanlies said:
View attachment 1656738

After having her name permanently attached to a landmark lawsuit she spectacularly lost, I think it's safe to say that Akilah Hughes hasn't learned a damn thing.
Click to expand...

What a strange way to write that, "help me pay this HURRRR DURRRR ALLEGED DUUUUUHHHH white supremacist." She's basically calling herself retarded, because all she was doing was alleging?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Drag-on Knight 91873, Dean Pentel, Daughter of Cernunnos and 3 others
Tatu Carreta said:
One of my problems with Sargon is that he doesn't seem to have coherent beliefs on a deep level,he seems to believe whatever justifies him or benefits him at the moment and waves off any idea that doesn't do one of those two things. For example he claims to be a classical liberal but as David Friedman said "the left co-opted liberalism and classical liberals now call themselves libertarians" .Bastiat was a classical liberal who said government should only deal with securing natural rights and not transfer wealth,yet I have never heard Sargon say that the UK government owning 40% of the GDP with a fiscal deficit and massive debt is a bad thing. Sargon is basically a leftist that wants free speech and no gender ideology but other than that I dont see how he is a classical liberal (and a lot of so called "classical liberals" fall under this description)

He also supports Trump even though he does not agree on anything with the republicans. For example I remember Sargon saying in a stream many years ago how having less guns makes sense since that means less crime and in the stream "answering your question" from sep 7 at around minute 2 he said he would compromise on less guns with the democrats if they were not unhinged(its a very classical liberal thing to not allow guns obviously).

I dont think he understand what classical liberals believed when it comes to economics,distribution of wealth or size of government since he wants government to provide things like welfare and healthcare,also watching a video from a few years ago he is one of those tardy people that believe that if you are 35 and working minimum wage its not your fault and there is nothing you can do to escape poverty because acquiring a useful skill or saving is just imposible for some reason,I assume that this is because he was one of those people until he got youtube famous and had to be on welfare("if it wasnt for welfare I would have been on the streets") because he didnt save any of his money.
Click to expand...
When Sargon says "classical liberal" he doesn't mean classical liberal in the actual classical sense of the term. He pretty much means "90's American liberal." Much like Tim Pool, Sargon is one of those pro-West center left people who got left behind as the western left plunged into hari kari insanity. Unlike Tim Pool though, Sargon considers himself a deep thoughts philosopher so he has to make his beliefs sound deeper and more structured than they actually are.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Exterminatus, Pointless Pedant, Scarface1 and 6 others
Rekkington said:
What a strange way to write that, "help me pay this HURRRR DURRRR ALLEGED DUUUUUHHHH white supremacist." She's basically calling herself retarded, because all she was doing was alleging?
Click to expand...
It's her attempt at a left wing version of (((coincidence))). Dogwhistling for retards, if you will, since she doesn't want to lose thirty grand again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dean Pentel, Water-T, 6thRanger and 2 others
Tatu Carreta said:
One of my problems with Sargon is that he doesn't seem to have coherent beliefs on a deep level,he seems to believe whatever justifies him or benefits him at the moment and waves off any idea that doesn't do one of those two things. For example he claims to be a classical liberal but as David Friedman said "the left co-opted liberalism and classical liberals now call themselves libertarians" .Bastiat was a classical liberal who said government should only deal with securing natural rights and not transfer wealth,yet I have never heard Sargon say that the UK government owning 40% of the GDP with a fiscal deficit and massive debt is a bad thing. Sargon is basically a leftist that wants free speech and no gender ideology but other than that I dont see how he is a classical liberal (and a lot of so called "classical liberals" fall under this description)

He also supports Trump even though he does not agree on anything with the republicans. For example I remember Sargon saying in a stream many years ago how having less guns makes sense since that means less crime and in the stream "answering your question" from sep 7 at around minute 2 he said he would compromise on less guns with the democrats if they were not unhinged(its a very classical liberal thing to not allow guns obviously).

I dont think he understand what classical liberals believed when it comes to economics,distribution of wealth or size of government since he wants government to provide things like welfare and healthcare,also watching a video from a few years ago he is one of those tardy people that believe that if you are 35 and working minimum wage its not your fault and there is nothing you can do to escape poverty because acquiring a useful skill or saving is just imposible for some reason,I assume that this is because he was one of those people until he got youtube famous and had to be on welfare("if it wasnt for welfare I would have been on the streets") because he didnt save any of his money.
Click to expand...
On his "Robin Hood" account he's saying a lot of stuff against welfare.
 
MrJokerRager said:
Is Sargon buddies with Styx or something that people were referencing him and gamergate when Trump retweeted Styx?
Click to expand...
Yeah, Carl used to plug his channel pretty heavily back in the day. Styx also ended up carrying him through the Richard Spencer debate and stopped it from being a bigger disaster than it already was.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Scarface1, 6thRanger, MrJokerRager and 1 other person
TheImportantFart said:
Styx also ended up carrying him through the Richard Spencer debate and stopped it from being a bigger disaster than it already was.
Click to expand...
With this in mind, I can just imagine an image of the extremely skinny Styx holding up Sargon as high as he can like Sargon is some kind of a big baby with his archetypical black shirt being too short as he's being carried up (via Lion King style ) and showing his bellybutton while his arms flail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Placebo, Dean Pentel, Water-T and 3 others
Panthera Rosea said:
With this in mind, I can just imagine an image of the extremely skinny Styx holding up Sargon as high as he can like Sargon is some kind of a big baby with his archetypical black shirt being too short as he's being carried up (via Lion King style ) and showing his bellybutton while his arms flail.
Click to expand...
It's that black button up he wore when kissing Milo and when dealing with Pan-European politics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger
Tatu Carreta said:
One of my problems with Sargon is that he doesn't seem to have coherent beliefs on a deep level,he seems to believe whatever justifies him or benefits him at the moment and waves off any idea that doesn't do one of those two things. For example he claims to be a classical liberal but as David Friedman said "the left co-opted liberalism and classical liberals now call themselves libertarians" .Bastiat was a classical liberal who said government should only deal with securing natural rights and not transfer wealth,yet I have never heard Sargon say that the UK government owning 40% of the GDP with a fiscal deficit and massive debt is a bad thing. Sargon is basically a leftist that wants free speech and no gender ideology but other than that I dont see how he is a classical liberal (and a lot of so called "classical liberals" fall under this description)

He also supports Trump even though he does not agree on anything with the republicans. For example I remember Sargon saying in a stream many years ago how having less guns makes sense since that means less crime and in the stream "answering your question" from sep 7 at around minute 2 he said he would compromise on less guns with the democrats if they were not unhinged(its a very classical liberal thing to not allow guns obviously).

I dont think he understand what classical liberals believed when it comes to economics,distribution of wealth or size of government since he wants government to provide things like welfare and healthcare,also watching a video from a few years ago he is one of those tardy people that believe that if you are 35 and working minimum wage its not your fault and there is nothing you can do to escape poverty because acquiring a useful skill or saving is just imposible for some reason,I assume that this is because he was one of those people until he got youtube famous and had to be on welfare("if it wasnt for welfare I would have been on the streets") because he didnt save any of his money.
Click to expand...

Part of Sargons issues is most of his beliefs are either reactionary or gained through osmosis. If you look at his earlier work he was clearly closer to the norm of joe public-a mixture of leftwing and right wing beliefs but not particulary deep. 6+ later of reading outrage articles, mingling with edgelords and having your politics shaped purely by online bullshit has left him both incoherant and disconnected.
Combined with the endless lovebombs of his autistic fanbase have not only given him a skewed idea of the political world but a completly unrealistic sense of his ability and his grasp of UK polictics and ideology. What you get is an incoherant quilt of left wing and right wing idea's with the relentless shitshow that is online bitching.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Adolf Hitler, Popper Whiting, Exterminatus and 9 others
MrJokerRager said:
Is Sargon buddies with Styx or something that people were referencing him and gamergate when Trump retweeted Styx?
Click to expand...

Sargon also had the autistic dream of having Trump tweet about Gamergate. I interpreted the references to mean that as we are living in a clown world were Trump retweets a relatively unknown youtuber, there was therefore a chance that he would tweet about Gamergate. Carl would then happily discharge himself without even needing to visit the local transsexual massage parlor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LurkTrawl, GenericReviewerDraco and IAmNotAlpharius
soulless guarantee said:
Sargon also had the autistic dream of having Trump tweet about
Click to expand...
Did we ever find out for sure if he was serious or merely pretending to be retarded? Jim and co speculated that he was trolling during the stream itself, and I'm still trying to catch up with this thread as I stopped paying attention to Carl somewhere around 2015, just before all the good shit happened.

I only watched the Gamergate 2.0 stream a while ago for the first time, and it is simply amazing. Sargon came across sounding like a complete lunatic. Like full on, Hitler-in-the-bunker-ordering-phantom-armies-around tier delusion. Summoning the Killstream for some mysterious proclamation, taking his time to hype it up as if it was going to blow their fucking minds. Instead it just baffled them in the worst way possible. Sargon went up to people who didn't even fucking like him, expecting them and the rest of the Internet to perform some Herculean effort to influence the behaviour of the President of the United States, with the endgoal being to trigger the libs in a way that would amuse only Sargon and really no one else.

Just imagine how out of touch and self-absorbed you'd have to be to pitch a plan like this with a straight face. Sargon once again conflating his little Youtube niche of politisperging with actual real life politics, which is made even more bizarre because he was already busy doing his IRL political career at the time, but for some reason he decided to go out of his way to work on and present this pointless, childish plot.

No wonder the others' first instinct was to assume he was joking. Because the only alternative would be that they were talking to someone who's legitimately insane.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: not william stenchever, Scarface1, A Useless Fish and 1 other person
Chive Turkey said:
It seems the prophet has graced the Reichstag with his presence.
View attachment 1653648

I'm dying to know precisely how cringe his little speech was.

Dank is a gud boi who was unexpectedly thrust into the public and political spotlight through no real choice of his own. He's the person Carl pretends to be whenever he embarks on one of his galaxy-brained schemes. He didn't really want to be the leader of the Skeptics/Liberalists/UKIP, but people put the laurel wreath on his head and somebody's got to do it. He'd rather just play video games, honest!

Beyond the fact that that image is obvious bullshit and Sargon mostly does what he does for the sake of his ego, the differences in their respective tribulations are telling. Nobody in their right mind would think Dankula deserved half the shit that rained down on him, he did nothing wrong. In contrast, every bad thing that happened to Carl is quite literally his own fault. All his mistakes and pratfalls are directly caused by something else he did or said, which in 99% of cases he didn't need to do or say. And the best part is that he's either too arrogant or stupid to possess the foresight to realize how obvious it is that his past behaviour will come back to torpedo whatever new master plan he will concoct in the future.
Click to expand...
Could be in front of a committee rather than the entire Bundestag itself.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ira the Weatherman
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back