Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Caustic Gelatin]

Argh white text on that background was a bad choice. Aren't faggots are supposed to be good at shit like that?

Graphic design? No they are not (despite a lot of them claiming to be designers).
The entire point is to format information into layouts that make it easier to read. This eyesore hurts to just glance at while scrolling. Not only is it bad to put white text on light (gradient) colored backgrounds, the kerning and leading looks absolutely fucked because they needed to squash MORE words into whats already bloated mess.

I would say "Its bad and they should feel bad", but seeing what they look like in real life I would say they already do.

 

[Ghostse]

I love the people crying about the Hunter Biden emails "there's no crime!"

If there's no crime, why did he lie and why are they trying to cover it up?

 

[Dante Alighieri]

I love the people crying about the Hunter Biden emails "there's no crime!"

If there's no crime, why did he lie and why are they trying to cover it up?

What was one of those common phrases early on in Trump's presidency with regards to the Mueller/Russia bullshit? If there's smoke there's fire?

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

I love the people crying about the Hunter Biden emails "there's no crime!"

If there's no crime, why did he lie and why are they trying to cover it up?

Plus you've gotta love how every time it's a Democrat in trouble, they drop their lofty woke high morals and instantly pivot to "Okay so technically nothing illegal occurred, probably."

 

[Eris!]

Plus you've gotta love how every time it's a Democrat in trouble, they drop their lofty woke high morals and instantly pivot to "Okay so technically nothing illegal occurred, probably."

This is why you cannot co-exist peacefully with amoral people. They will hold you against the coals for the slightest technicality, but wiggle and squirm out of all their own wrongdoings. You can't reason with amoral people. Adherence to reason is a moral precept. You can't catch them in hypocrisy, because they don't care. The only solution is to put them down like rabid dogs. Society, especially democracy, assumes as a given a certain amount of common ground on matters of morality, epistemology, and social structure. Without that common ground, no society can exist.

We need to stop giving them trials. We need to stop giving them the benefit of the doubt. We need to stop applying morals to people who don't have them.
Identify them and their associates. Kill them. Until we do this, society will remain in its fundamentally broken state, and people will perpetually ask "Why is everything so fucked?"

 

[Gehenna]

This is why you cannot co-exist peacefully with amoral people. They will hold you against the coals for the slightest technicality, but wiggle and squirm out of all their own wrongdoings. You can't reason with amoral people. You can't catch them in hypocrisy, because they don't care. The only solution is to put them down like rabid dogs. Society, especially democracy, assumes as a given a certain amount of common ground on matters of morality, epistemology, and social structure. Without that common ground, no society can exist.

We need to stop giving them trials. We need to stop giving them the benefit of the doubt. We need to stop applying morals to people who don't have them.
Identify them and their associates. Kill them. Until we do this, society will remain in its fundamentally broken state, and people will perpetually ask "Why is everything so fucked?"

That is some STRONG glow right there.

 

[Eris!]

That is some STRONG glow right there.

Glowies ask you to blow up the federal building where they keep all the depositions that could implicate Hillary and Bill for the whitewater scandal. They don't ask you to blow up Hillary and Bill.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

That is some STRONG glow right there.

Eh it's a black pill to be sure. For any peaceful society to work there requires some kind of altruism or shared belief in "the system". It's just too easily hijacked by malicious actors.

 

[HumanHive]

This is why you cannot co-exist peacefully with amoral people. They will hold you against the coals for the slightest technicality, but wiggle and squirm out of all their own wrongdoings. You can't reason with amoral people. You can't catch them in hypocrisy, because they don't care. The only solution is to put them down like rabid dogs. Society, especially democracy, assumes as a given a certain amount of common ground on matters of morality, epistemology, and social structure. Without that common ground, no society can exist.

We need to stop giving them trials. We need to stop giving them the benefit of the doubt. We need to stop applying morals to people who don't have them.
Identify them and their associates. Kill them. Until we do this, society will remain in its fundamentally broken state, and people will perpetually ask "Why is everything so fucked?"

Let me phrase my disagreement in the following way:
Animals are not ‘moral beings’, as in they do not have moral obligations. A dog which steals food is disobedient, not immoral. So do we have moral obligations towards animals? Should we abuse them?

No, we should not abuse them because by abusing them we develop immoral habits which we would inflict upon other moral beings, whoever they are. Treating animals morally is simply good practice.

The same logic applies to serial killers and other amoral monsters.

 

[Gehenna]

Eh it's a black pill to be sure. For any peaceful society to work there requires some kind of altruism or shared belief in "the system". It's just too easily hijacked by malicious actors.

The premise doesn't make it glow, its an unfortunate reality.

The saying to kill people en masse definitely DOES glow.

 

[Godzilla@1989]

I know of her cause she was in a few Disney movies in the late 2000s and I have younger siblings. She's basically another child star that was chewed up but hasn't been spat out yet (it's only a matter of time)

Wasn’t she butt buddies with Selena Gomez at one point?

She doesn't really believe in this shit, right?

Add it to the pile of forgotten anti-Trump tunes, together with the ones made by Cake, Franz Ferdinand, Death Cab for Cutie, Bon Jovi, Green Day, Prophets of Rage, every rapper not named Kanye West and countless others I won't bother to research.

Which Bon Jovi song was it that bashed Trump?

 

[BubbleButt]

The premise doesn't make it glow, its an unfortunate reality.

The saying to kill people en masse definitely DOES glow.

What's wrong with killing all humans?

 

[Corn Flakes]

What's wrong with killing all humans?

I don't know about killing all humans, but the Destroy All Humans! remaster was fun.

But that's neither here nor there.

 

[Adamska]

I love the people crying about the Hunter Biden emails "there's no crime!"

If there's no crime, why did he lie and why are they trying to cover it up?

Impulse at this point given it's like the third or fourth or fifth time Joe had to bail out his idiotic and corrupt son. He has a habit of hiding and using his money and influence to bail his family out. Like his coked out daughter a few years before that too.

 

[ForTheHoard]

I gave up hoping for decency from the entertainment industry after I found out Steven King was a deranged raving lunatic during BushII (and has gotten even worse sense then). Whenever I see someone who's an actor or musician who has views that aren't unhinged I'm shocked

I'm not sure if it got brought up here, but he had a wave of middle aged hipsters on Twitter calling him a poser.

 

[Eris!]

Animals are not ‘moral beings’, as in they do not have moral obligations. A dog which steals food is disobedient, not immoral. So do we have moral obligations towards animals? Should we abuse them?

Exactly my point. With regards to amoral beings the only appeal that can be made is one of power. You can't reason with a dog, you can't lay down rules it will feel morally obligated to follow. You can only train it, either rewarding good behavior or punishing bad behavior. Pure self-interest is all that has power over it.

No, we should not abuse them because by abusing them we develop immoral habits which we would inflict upon other moral beings, whoever they are. Treating animals morally is simply good practice.

You should not behave morally by habit, but by perpetually making deliberate, conscious, well thought out choices. You should avoid doing things by habit in general. A man should always be conscious.

 

[HumanHive]

Exactly my point. With regards to amoral beings the only appeal that can be made is one of power. You can't reason with a dog, you can't lay down rules it will feel morally obligated to follow. You can only train it, either rewarding good behavior or punishing bad behavior. Pure self-interest is all that has power over it.


You should not behave morally by habit, but by perpetually making deliberate, conscious, well thought out choices. You should avoid doing things by habit in general. A man should always be conscious.

Humans live by habit. Each action reinforces the next. You cannot easily separate a man from what has become his routine.

 

[Eris!]

Humans live by habit.

This is substantial as "humans are social creatures." It's argument by idiom.
No. Humans are conscious beings who act as they choose to act.

You cannot easily separate a man from what has become his routine.

I said it's how you should be, not that it's easy.

 

[HumanHive]

This is substantial as "humans are social creatures." It's argument by idiom.
No. Humans are conscious beings who act as they choose to act.

I said it's how you should be, not that it's easy.

Nice fallacy fallacy. Humans can choose to act, but their routine often thinks for them. You see this with criminal behavior. There is a key period where intervention is possible, but once a criminal lifestyle is well establish there is almost no helping them.

 

[MirrorNoir]

If Pelosi died tomorrow of natural causes, another Pelosi will replace her. San Francisco is a district of elite smug snakes who will gladly put another one in that position. Unless anyone here has been to San Francisco in the last 10 years, the people are either foreign white eurocucks, super woke mud people, niggers and smells like shit and piss even in the business district. Its no longer the San Francisco from the movie Bullet with Steve McQueen or the Dirty Harry movies. The only person who bothered to even primary Pelosi was some superwoke progressive dipshit that nobody had ever heard of. That is how safe her seat is in San Francisco.

I don't blame the GOP in their future endeavors to defy the mainstream press more and more. I acknowledge the GOP is filled with cucks but hopefully with Tucker's influence and other politicians like Ted Cruz who have completely changed themselves, GOP could still have a place in a post Trump world hopefully 2024.

Worse case scenario is that Waters, AOC, or one of the anti-semite squad will become the new Queen Bee of the DNC as far as Majority/Minority leader.

AOC primaried out of a job the one person Pelosi was grooming to be her replacement, something she did after she allowed countless potential successors lose their seats, in part due to the fact that she cut a deal with the Progressive forces in the DNC House membership to make Anthony Weiner her heir only for him to be outed as a sex pest pervert, which caused Nancy to consolidate all power around herself. Hell, had AOC not happened, Pelosi would be winding down her career, as she only got to stay (then) minority leader because she promised to retire around 2020, until AOC happened and fucked everything up.

If Pelosi goes, then Waters or Talib will take the spot if not AOC herself. Which would be super fucking bad for everyone.

Obama never came to Mitch and tried to make a deal. Obama was too damn lazy to even talk with democrats on the Hill let alone republicans.

Big contrast with Trump who is trying to get seals happening even when Pelosi and Schumer would rather politic.

IIRC the biggest moment that damned Obama in my eyes (when I found out about it after the fact) was when he was having surrogates tell one of the top big GOP wigs in the House (either Priebus or Ryan) to help him reach a grand bargain on something early on in his Presidency but was such a huge prima donna that he didn't even bother to meet face to face with the GOP guy and didn't even know what he looked like. So while he was having his flunkies making overtures for a grand bargain deal in private, he holds a press conference with big name House Dems and GOPers in the audiences and says "fuck you Republians! No fucking deal!" and didn't know that the guy he was trying to have his surrogates get to sell out the GOP was front row and was utterly livid that Obama was a two faced piece of shit.

That sounds actually cozy. Depending on the dictator that would be superior to the farce of a system we have now, where figureheads are set to battle every 4 years for control of jack squat, while the real power hides unscatched behind the curtains, untouchable, unaccountable. Democracy as we have it is like parasites attached to an organism, sucking sucking sucking. Unless excised, none of these elections seem anything but a circuses.

Problem with dictatorships are:

1. Snitching literally kills and you have a LOT of people snitching (oftentimes lying in the process) on people to the secret police to settle vendettas, old scores, and try and eliminate competition/steal the guy you are snitching on's stuff.

2. If you live in the city, you are in dystopian hell if you are poor. If you are middle class, you might not starve but you are constantly being watched and can lose everything and get your family killed too if you say or do the wrong thing.

3. If you live in rural areas, you are double fucked as the elites don't give a shit about you and just want you to die out of their sight. So poverty and economic decay is twice as bad for rural poor and you still have to deal with snitches trying to kill you AND you are only seen as redneck fodder who are too dumb to do anything but kill, as places like China and North Korea explicitly use rural soldiers when they need to slaughter city poor/middle class folks during riots.

4. Everything is censored and technology (along with education) is horded solely for the rich and peasants/middle class have to deal with bottom of the barrel tech/education. Under a modern dictatorship, the internet will only be for the elites and even then, tightly monitored and poor people will be made to drop out of school in the seventh/eighth grade to work to help support the family.