Bigot Brigade Something Awful and Friends - The roller-coaster train-wreck embarrassing downfall of a Web 1.0 giant and its tick offspring like from Cloverfield

1602802480421.png

1602802657632.png

1602802700117.png
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: fhqwhgads, User Name, Brain Problems and 2 others
They've totally derailed the Dear Jeffrey thread now. Mods should have closed it a couple of days ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brain Problems
Sabrina said:
my trans wife
Click to expand...
What always got me about this was somehow how he felt the need to point out his "wife" is a tranny. It might sound banal but if you want to be a true and honest woman and want to recognize your partner to be a true and honest woman wouldn't you just naturally write "my wife"? Why feel the need to specifically point out the wife is trans in a completely unrelated context? Gee, it's almost like it's a special status and special recognition they're going for instead of "just" wanting to be female and blend in. Funny how much insight such a sentence can give you.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Littlest Shitlord, Questionable Ceviche, Next Task and 11 others
AmpleApricots said:
What always got me about this was somehow how he felt the need to point out his "wife" is a tranny. It might sound banal but if you want to be a true and honest woman and want to recognize your partner to be a true and honest woman wouldn't you just naturally write "my wife"? Why feel the need to specifically point out the wife is trans in a completely unrelated context? Gee, it's almost like it's a special status and special recognition they're going for instead of "just" wanting to be female and blend in. Funny how much insight such a sentence can give you.
Click to expand...
This is exactly it, they're basically saying it's ok to ban people's cis wives but not ok to ban trans wives, because it's a "protected class," and this isn't a job and that's not how this works. You can fire anyone for the same infractions, but not their gender, and that applies to every gender, not just trans people. There are no laws about who can and can't be banned from private internet forums for their social status, but if you did want to extrapolate the law to apply to YOUR forum, that argument still doesn't hold water.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Next Task, Shrekking Crew, Brain Problems and 4 others
Sabrina said:
This is exactly it, they're basically saying it's ok to ban people's cis wives but not ok to ban trans wives, because it's a "protected class," and this isn't a job and that's not how this works. You can fire anyone for the same infractions, but not their gender, and that applies to every gender, not just trans people. There are no laws about who can and can't be banned from private internet forums for their social status, but if you did want to extrapolate the law to apply to YOUR forum, that argument still doesn't hold water.
Click to expand...
Goons have once again found a way to give men more privileges than women.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: The Littlest Shitlord, Questionable Ceviche, User Name and 9 others
Sabrina said:
This is exactly it, they're basically saying it's ok to ban people's cis wives but not ok to ban trans wives, because it's a "protected class," and this isn't a job and that's not how this works. You can fire anyone for the same infractions, but not their gender, and that applies to every gender, not just trans people. There are no laws about who can and can't be banned from private internet forums for their social status, but if you did want to extrapolate the law to apply to YOUR forum, that argument still doesn't hold water.
Click to expand...

Don't come near me or my wife's penis ever again.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: The Littlest Shitlord, Next Task, Strange Looking Dog and 14 others
Baggywrinkle said:
All these goons with mid-00 regdates coming out of the woodwork to declare that lowtax was always unfunny and shitty, despite over a decade of encouraging and buying into all of his fruitless money-grabbing schemes. Even gamequoter showed up, who I have nothing against, but all the goons rubbing their lady erections all over his single post for several pages will probably keep him away for another few years.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure gimmick accounts like gamequoter were the reason the paywall went up in the first place.

Imagine harboring a grudge for two decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: George Floyd Sneed and Brain Problems
Sabrina said:
This is exactly it, they're basically saying it's ok to ban people's cis wives but not ok to ban trans wives, because it's a "protected class," and this isn't a job and that's not how this works. You can fire anyone for the same infractions, but not their gender, and that applies to every gender, not just trans people. There are no laws about who can and can't be banned from private internet forums for their social status, but if you did want to extrapolate the law to apply to YOUR forum, that argument still doesn't hold water.
Click to expand...

It's always been the case that you can be as abusive as you want to actual women on SA. Just not the superior male women.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Next Task, Sabrina, George Floyd Sneed and 4 others
The tranny shit never sat well with me because the most left wing marxist countries on earth (laos, vietnam, china, cuba, nepal, venezuela) don't have an epidemic of nerds injecting themselves with offbrand hormones to change their physical sex. The way I look at it, right wingers should be grateful for this soros funded operation because your political opponents are castrating themselves without you having to lift a finger
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Kabuki Actor, Strange Looking Dog, White Devil and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back