Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remember. Governor Cuomo did NOT use the National Guard for the BLM protests. Also, he's literally rounding up the Jews right now because COVID BAD!

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WKBW) — The New York National Guard is being deployed to airports across the state to assist the state health department in the travel advisory screening process, 7 Eyewitness News has learned.

A total of 36 states and two U.S. territories are currently on the advisory list, meaning anyone arriving at a New York airport from one of those areas must quarantine for 14 days or face possible fines. Essential workers are excluded.

The initiative will vary from airport to airport and is being phased in starting today, a representative from the New York National Guard said. Guard members were seen working in this capacity at the Buffalo Niagara International Airport on Friday.

There is no word on when members of the guard will arrive at the Buffalo airport. They will be in uniform but will not be armed.

The goal is to free up health department employees for other duties while members of the guard collect information from travelers.

The following is a statement from the Office of Public Affairs for the New York National Guard:

"The New York National Guard will be working with the Department of Health in an administrative capacity to assist with travel advisory screenings at airports across the state. This is in addition to the missions New York National Guard members are currently conducting in support of New York's COVID-19 response. These include staffing 15 testing centers across the state, assembling COVID-19 test kits for the Department of Health, and assisting in medical supply logistics operations.

The Soldiers and Airmen will be in uniform. They will not be carrying weapons. The mission will begin next week. We have not yet determined troops to task numbers yet."

The move is generating a variety of responses; some feel the soldiers' presence will intimidate air travelers, others think it is a good idea to keep people after, while others think it will reinforce the seriousness of the pandemic to those who are not taking it seriously.

When 7 Eyewitness News posted a picture of a soldier in-training at the Buffalo Niagara International Airport, many questioned why Governor Andrew Cuomo was using the National Guard in the airports when he did not use them during the violent protests this past year.

The Republic Minority Leader of the NYS Senate, Robert Ortt, is also not happy with the move by the Governor to use uniformed service members for travel screening.

“I strongly disagree with the Governor’s decision to activate the National Guard for use in his airport tracking program. While we must be diligent about protecting our communities from the threat of COVID-19, the use of uniformed service members at our airports goes too far. As a former member of the New York National Guard, I do not believe that these outstanding men and women should be used as political tools or deployed to enforce politically driven policies,” said NYS Senator Ortt in a statement to 7 Eyewitness News.

My favorite part is the fourth to last paragraph, where intimidating and scaring people is seen as a POSITIVE.
 
They tried once with Bird Flu. It failed. They tried again with Swine Flu. It failed. Now they're trying with Bat Flu, and it's working.
Question is, why did it work this time, let alone on a global scale? My money's on a lethal combination of a general downfall of average intelligence (thanks rotting educational systems) and more so, social media. With people having world news shoved in their face 24/7 everywhere they go it's become infinitely easier to fearmonger the hell out of every little thing, and its effectiveness has now peaked thanks to any differing opinions being shut down or waved off as heretical to the modern god known as science.
 
My buddy in Melbourne reports he and his wife can't leave the state anytime soon. They need permission from the government to move to another state, which could take weeks if not months, and will likely be denied.

All because about 10 people in Victoria have le coof and they're under serious lockdown.
 
I'm amazed that everyone hasn't left that absolute joke of a state. It was 50th state in personal freedoms according to a study I read some time ago. It's probably 6,794th by now.
To be fair, the state is divided up into NYC, and literally everyone else. So there are plenty of people "upstate" that are 6-7 hours by car away from NYC.

Buffalo for example is literally 1 hour and 45 minutes from Toronto. A lot of upstate NY is closer to Canadian major cities than NYC.

USUALLY, policies upstate aren't as Draconian as NYC. Cuomo isn't rounding up the Jews in Buffalo for example.


But yeah, I get your point in general.
 
To be fair, the state is divided up into NYC, and literally everyone else. So there are plenty of people "upstate" that are 6-7 hours by car away from NYC.

Buffalo for example is literally 1 hour and 45 minutes from Toronto. A lot of upstate NY is closer to Canadian major cities than NYC.

USUALLY, policies upstate aren't as Draconian as NYC. Cuomo isn't rounding up the Jews in Buffalo for example.


But yeah, I get your point in general.

Honestly, I sometimes do forget that NYC doesn't equal NY state. People sometimes think Chicago equals Illinois as a whole as well, but people simply live in the shadow of these overpriced metropolises.

It really does feed into my theory that places with higher population density tend to have less personal freedom, but one could argue that it's out of necessity.
 
Question is, why did it work this time, let alone on a global scale? My money's on a lethal combination of a general downfall of average intelligence (thanks rotting educational systems) and more so, social media. With people having world news shoved in their face 24/7 everywhere they go it's become infinitely easier to fearmonger the hell out of every little thing, and its effectiveness has now peaked thanks to any differing opinions being shut down or waved off as heretical to the modern god known as science.
I think the fact that COVID wasn't as bad as initially expected is half the reason behind this.

All the experts and professional guessers were predicting this thing would be another SARS or Swine Flu (both with ~10% IFR). Instead, it turned out to be much less lethal, murking just 0.2-0.4% of those infected (its only advantage being faster spread & early cover-up).
They went into the motions of another super pathogen scenario, only to have all those motions wind up either 1) infective or 2) completely self-destructive.

Their "better safe than sorry" cost 30-45% of their constituents their jobs, cost many more to burn their savings, and caused even more untold mental health effects, and inconvenienced almost everyone.
It SHOULD have been political suicide, except for the fact public opinion was still divided on whether the virus with a lethality rate 25-50x weaker than the last two perceived world-enders was actually the real thing this time. Suddenly, the path to retaining power (and even getting some bonus authoritarian powers too!) was keeping enough people convinced that COVID is somehow even remotely the worst thing to happen to us this century.
That and a mix of of Sunk-Costs Fallacy.
 
kek any updates on THE VACCINE THAT WILL SAVE US ALL? Last time I checked Johnson and Johnson had to stop trials because someone got a mysterious disease.
People get mysterious diseases all the time, shouldn't read too much into that. Moderna has started submitting information to Canada and the EU has given them them approval to submit an application. They're using a rolling review process instead of putting it all in one package. I have read the US might get an emergency use authorization by the end of the year, maybe next month. I don't know about Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, or all the other candidates at earlier stages. It seems every other week someone kills a batch of mice and announces a new vaccine.
 
Honestly, I sometimes do forget that NYC doesn't equal NY state. People sometimes think Chicago equals Illinois as a whole as well, but people simply live in the shadow of these overpriced metropolises.

It really does feed into my theory that places with higher population density tend to have less personal freedom, but one could argue that it's out of necessity.
Also it's easier to get away with activity x when there are fewer people around to witness it/stop you.
 
Question is, why did it work this time, let alone on a global scale? My money's on a lethal combination of a general downfall of average intelligence (thanks rotting educational systems) and more so, social media. With people having world news shoved in their face 24/7 everywhere they go it's become infinitely easier to fearmonger the hell out of every little thing, and its effectiveness has now peaked thanks to any differing opinions being shut down or waved off as heretical to the modern god known as science.

Social media, while a thing in the late 2000s, was not as rampant and prevalent as it is now. Combine it idpol and now we live in a constant present with “controversies” cropping up so folks can get their daily outrage. Perfect recipient to create mass hysteria.
 
I've noticed these "If I can't be happy, neither can you" types popping up a lot more lately re: the lockdowns:
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 2.36.44 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 2.36.44 AM.png
    82.3 KB · Views: 97
  • Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 2.36.52 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 2.36.52 AM.png
    71.6 KB · Views: 84
  • Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 2.36.57 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 2.36.57 AM.png
    48.2 KB · Views: 85
I've noticed these "If I can't be happy, neither can you" types popping up a lot more lately re: the lockdowns:
I've got a friend with chronic Lyme, and he's been extremely enthusiastic about lockdowns because suddenly everyone else is stuck at home just like he is and every class he could ever want is available online. I'm glad he's happy, I guess - but I also want to punch his enthusiastic pro-lockdown Facebook posts.
 
I've got a friend with chronic Lyme, and he's been extremely enthusiastic about lockdowns because suddenly everyone else is stuck at home just like he is and every class he could ever want is available online. I'm glad he's happy, I guess - but I also want to punch his enthusiastic pro-lockdown Facebook posts.

I'm pretty sure that's not a real disease.
 
It is. I had the mild version a decade or so ago and it was no fun. The long-term version has a lot of overlap with fibermialgia and other munchie-type deseases so I get why you'd say that though.

Well, if the doctors can't detect any actual infection, it's not real. If they can, it is, of course. "chronic" infection of a disease like that should not be possible, if you are talking on the order of years.
 
I've noticed these "If I can't be happy, neither can you" types popping up a lot more lately re: the lockdowns:
See this a lot. This bitch is just flexing for pity points, she's admitted to being a recluse so lockdown must have been a breeze for her. She needs to stop showing off her privilege.

Somehow I'm not just responsible for my own and my families well being, I must agree to be kept under house arrest for an indefinite period so that 90 year old nursing home residents and 400ib diabetics don't catch a chest cold.

Absolutely nothing stopping the chronically unwell and the very old from staying at home and refusing to go out. Heck I will happily see the government give every fatty in the country unlimited Uber Eats if it means I can go back to living normally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back