New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1667552

Bo Erikson, CBS, had to ambush Biden 10 seconds before he hopped on his private jet in order to finally pry an answer out of his campaign.

Bo: Mr. Biden, what is your response to the New York Post story about your son?
Biden: I know you'd ask it. I have no response, it's a smear campaign. Right up your alley, those are the questions you always have.

And that's it. That's the only answer we're going to get out of him after three straight days, and it took an ambush question to even get it in the first place. That's not good enough. That's not even close to good enough. It doesn't help that Bo was immediately reprimanded by his news director at CBS as a result of this, chastising him for not "properly" framing the question as Russian disinformation, even though there literally is not a scrap of evidence that suggests any of this came from Russia.

View attachment 1667558

Paula Reid, CBS, jumped to Bo's defense to suggest that it's inappropriate to attack the reporter instead of the story, to which Ben Rhodes, Obama lackey, leaps in to berate Bo for "spreading Russian disinformation." So there we go, we have our narrative: Russia, Russia, Russia, and not a splinter of proof to back it up. As long as we flap anything away as "Russian propaganda" the proles will believe whatever we tell them to.
Why did Holzer scold him publicly on twitter instead of in private?
 
I'm kinda on the side of it doesn't matter. I've seen kids from great families with great parents turn into fuckups. It happens. While there's an argument that it's the parents fault, it's a pretty lame way of putting the blame on them. Especially because it can go both ways, the parent(s) was too lenient/didn't care, or the parent(s) was overprotective and the kid got destructive when he failed the expectations.

Hunter Biden is a dickhead for sure. But I can't say I wouldn't be a manic like that if my dad was a US Senator/Vice President. I can't sit here and tell people to stop letting opportunity pass you by and then belittle Hunter Biden for taking a job with a shady gas company making a ton of money. And then taking that money to blow coke out of a strippers asshole.

Boys will be boys. I still believe in that term, especially since it's become part of the third wave feminist rhetoric as horrible. If anything this shows that regardless of political party, people will reap the benefits of it in any way they can. There's a ton of Hunter Bidens in politics. Kids of rich, influential people that just don't give a fuck. Is it shameful? Yes. Do they really care? Not at all.
I agree, but I don't think the substantive issue is his conduct itself, rather how he managed to land lucrative positions when he regularly behaves like a standard hobo.
 
View attachment 1667552

Bo Erikson, CBS, had to ambush Biden 10 seconds before he hopped on his private jet in order to finally pry an answer out of his campaign.

Bo: Mr. Biden, what is your response to the New York Post story about your son?
Biden: I know you'd ask it. I have no response, it's a smear campaign. Right up your alley, those are the questions you always have.

And that's it. That's the only answer we're going to get out of him after three straight days, and it took an ambush question to even get it in the first place. That's not good enough. That's not even close to good enough. It doesn't help that Bo was immediately reprimanded by his news director at CBS as a result of this, chastising him for not "properly" framing the question as Russian disinformation, even though there literally is not a scrap of evidence that suggests any of this came from Russia.

View attachment 1667558

Paula Reid, CBS, jumped to Bo's defense to suggest that it's inappropriate to attack the reporter instead of the story, to which Ben Rhodes, Obama lackey, leaps in to berate Bo for "spreading Russian disinformation." So there we go, we have our narrative: Russia, Russia, Russia, and not a splinter of proof to back it up. As long as we flap anything away as "Russian propaganda" the proles will believe whatever we tell them to.
For real, does anyone here have a handle on what they're basing this Russian disinformation narrative from? I remember reading that there was some spook report that Guillani was being pulled into a Russian spy hoax or something but that doesn't feel like it's good enough to dismiss the story entirely.

I mean Tucker Carlson and other big right wing media personalities are staking their reputations on this, and they've said that this shit is airtight from the shit they've seen behind the screen. I refuse to believe that they would do something that retarded with no evidence. I suppose we'll have to wait a couple more days for something really big to drop.
 
For real, does anyone here have a handle on what they're basing this Russian disinformation narrative from? I remember reading that there was some spook report that Guillani was being pulled into a Russian spy hoax or something but that doesn't feel like it's good enough to dismiss the story entirely.

I mean Tucker Carlson and other big right wing media personalities are staking their reputations on this, and they've said that this shit is airtight from the shit they've seen behind the screen. I refuse to believe that they would do something that retarded with no evidence. I suppose we'll have to wait a couple more days for something really big to drop.
A bomb is sure to drop before the final debate.
 
For real, does anyone here have a handle on what they're basing this Russian disinformation narrative from? I remember reading that there was some spook report that Guillani was being pulled into a Russian spy hoax or something but that doesn't feel like it's good enough to dismiss the story entirely.

I mean Tucker Carlson and other big right wing media personalities are staking their reputations on this, and they've said that this shit is airtight from the shit they've seen behind the screen. I refuse to believe that they would do something that retarded with no evidence. I suppose we'll have to wait a couple more days for something really big to drop.
Frankly after the Russian collusion narrative completely collapsed (Does anyone even remember Robert Mueller anymore?) I trust exactly nothing that the media has to say about Russians peddling influence or attempting to collude or coerce anyone. The entire previous narrative for this was so abysmally fake that when Mueller had to lurch his way into Congress and admit that he found absolutely fucking nothing, that tombstone-jawed caveman tried to redefine a core tenant of the U.S. Judicial system--innocent until proven guilty-- in order to say that he had no evidence of Trump being innocent.

Their story failed so badly that they tried to rewrite the fucking core of our justice system just to try and land one last, cheap shot at Trump, and they expect me to believe anything they say about Russian influences after that? Nah. Go fuck yourself, media. It wasn't Russian then, it isn't Russian now.
 
I agree, but I don't think the substantive issue is his conduct itself, rather how he managed to land lucrative positions when he regularly behaves like a standard hobo.
I went to law school for a year so I know how some of these things work (I got out of there and into a better career). It wasn't an Ivy League place, just a big state school, but things were the same. The politicians kids were usually (not always) the dumbest. Inflated egos, thought they walked on water. They were cool guys/girls to hangout with but when it came down to it they were really lacking. They didn't have a purpose for being there other than to keep on going. Those people can't be firefighters, cops or carpenters. They have to be lawyers because it's the only thing they can be good at. It's why I have this twisted sense of remorse for Hunter Biden, knowing that he really is just a normal, flawed guy that grew up with a Senator dad.

While I'm ranting I'll clear my point up. These lucrative positions are everywhere, if you are in that group of people that can get them. This really isn't a D vs R kind of thing because they both do it. In my opinion it's shameful that the VPs son gets a job at a shady company because he disgraces the normal, everyday, hardworking American on a global scale.
 
I trust exactly nothing that the media has to say about Russians peddling influence or attempting to collude or coerce anyone.
Have you seen the WaPo's attempt to explain this away as a Russian disinformation op with Giuliani as a useful idiot? It's the most ridiculous guilt by association smear I've ever seen. Their argument is that because Giuliani went to Ukraine and talked to a couple pro-Russian politicians as part of his investigation, he must somehow be compromised and this laptop must be a hoax. Oh, and with some "unnamed intelligence sources" thrown in for good measure.

A bomb is sure to drop before the final debate.
I'm hyped for early next week. Monday or Tuesday would be the perfect time to drop whatever even bigger bombshell they've been teasing with this slow drip of leaks.
 
Last edited:
I went to law school for a year so I know how some of these things work (I got out of there and into a better career). It wasn't an Ivy League place, just a big state school, but things were the same. The politicians kids were usually (not always) the dumbest. Inflated egos, thought they walked on water. They were cool guys/girls to hangout with but when it came down to it they were really lacking. They didn't have a purpose for being there other than to keep on going. Those people can't be firefighters, cops or carpenters. They have to be lawyers because it's the only thing they can be good at. It's why I have this twisted sense of remorse for Hunter Biden, knowing that he really is just a normal, flawed guy that grew up with a Senator dad.

While I'm ranting I'll clear my point up. These lucrative positions are everywhere, if you are in that group of people that can get them. This really isn't a D vs R kind of thing because they both do it. In my opinion it's shameful that the VPs son gets a job at a shady company because he disgraces the normal, everyday, hardworking American on a global scale.

I think the worst part about this is not that there is nepotism. The American Voters are not idiots. We know at some level our national politicians will use their power for personal gain. Selling access, making companies "pay" for speeches that are in no way campaign contributions, or leveraging a position to get your kids a sweetheart job, well, that how the game is played.

All that is demanded in exchange for this is that the public trust be maintained. You can charge 100k to give a speech at Goldman Sachs. But under no circumstances are you to pocket 100k of the Public Tax money. As an example of acceptable grift vs. Unacceptable.

Another thing you can do is leverage your position on foreign governments to advance the national interest. But under no circumstances should you use your position of public trust to leverage PERSONAL interests from foreign governments. That is the mistake the Bidens made here.
 
While I'm ranting I'll clear my point up. These lucrative positions are everywhere, if you are in that group of people that can get them. This really isn't a D vs R kind of thing because they both do it. In my opinion it's shameful that the VPs son gets a job at a shady company because he disgraces the normal, everyday, hardworking American on a global scale.
And this was going on during the Obama-Biden years where they got rid of jobs and hired overseas. Obama says you'll need a magic wand to bring some of the jobs back, and I guess Biden brought back the auto industry. However most of the money those hardworking blue collar Americans could have made during those 2 terms is imaginable, and Hunter and Joe made billions while those workers who were put out of their jobs struggled to find a new one.

I'm glad that's one of Trump's talking points at his rallies.
 
Last edited:
Who the hell cares. Hunter isn’t running for president and the current president’s son does speeches and interviews while hopped up on coke.

Everyone already knows Hunter has had a past with drugs and his own father has forgiven him. Y’all act like drugs aren’t an issue for millions of people and that the current president isn’t the king of nepotism himself.
 
I'm kinda on the side of it doesn't matter. I've seen kids from great families with great parents turn into fuckups. It happens. While there's an argument that it's the parents fault, it's a pretty lame way of putting the blame on them. Especially because it can go both ways, the parent(s) was too lenient/didn't care, or the parent(s) was overprotective and the kid got destructive when he failed the expectations.

Hunter Biden is a dickhead for sure. But I can't say I wouldn't be a manic like that if my dad was a US Senator/Vice President. I can't sit here and tell people to stop letting opportunity pass you by and then belittle Hunter Biden for taking a job with a shady gas company making a ton of money. And then taking that money to blow coke out of a strippers asshole.

Boys will be boys. I still believe in that term, especially since it's become part of the third wave feminist rhetoric as horrible. If anything this shows that regardless of political party, people will reap the benefits of it in any way they can. There's a ton of Hunter Bidens in politics. Kids of rich, influential people that just don't give a fuck. Is it shameful? Yes. Do they really care? Not at all.
I went to law school for a year so I know how some of these things work (I got out of there and into a better career). It wasn't an Ivy League place, just a big state school, but things were the same. The politicians kids were usually (not always) the dumbest. Inflated egos, thought they walked on water. They were cool guys/girls to hangout with but when it came down to it they were really lacking. They didn't have a purpose for being there other than to keep on going. Those people can't be firefighters, cops or carpenters. They have to be lawyers because it's the only thing they can be good at. It's why I have this twisted sense of remorse for Hunter Biden, knowing that he really is just a normal, flawed guy that grew up with a Senator dad.

While I'm ranting I'll clear my point up. These lucrative positions are everywhere, if you are in that group of people that can get them. This really isn't a D vs R kind of thing because they both do it. In my opinion it's shameful that the VPs son gets a job at a shady company because he disgraces the normal, everyday, hardworking American on a global scale.
Hunter didn't just take a job with a shady gas company, he made it possible for them to bribe his dad as VP into coercing a foreign government for financial gain. That's the high crime and misdemeanor mentioned in the Constitution. Which is why it's important to prosecute and bankrupt them in the process, as an example to the rest. That was SOP back in the day before the FBI enabled these criminals.
 
You know if nothing else it looks like this may cause a backstabbing/handbiting wave in the media at least. This is yet another spotlight on their complete lack of bipartizanship. Some journos seem to still prefer to seek the glory of the front page blockbuster story over establishment money. I can foresee even more serious online shitfights and scream heavy board meetings coming from this. The most optimistic thing I could see is disgruntled former reporters letting loose on how they were forced to lie through their teeth over the riots and Covid. I hope there will be some "If I'm going to go down, I'm taking as many of you fuckers down with me as I can" coming out of the MSM.

Which would be more than helpful right now because there is no Biden without the media gloss over his entire campaign.It's the only thing that ever gave him spotlight. His actual work as a politician was spotty at very best. If the media is in a big catfight and big tech is in an uproar too, that would be more than enough to give Trump a large boost.
 
Last edited:
And this was going on during the Obama-Biden years where they got rid of jobs and hired overseas. Obama says you'll need a magic wand to bring some of the jobs back, and I guess Biden brought back the auto industry. However most of the money those hardworking blue collar Americans could have made during those 2 terms is imaginable, and Hunter and Joe made billions while those workers who were put out of their jobs struggle to find a new one.

I'm glad that's one of Trump's talking points at his rallies.
The auto industry isn't even back. That's one of the biggest shames for us too. California says they will ban the sale of gasoline powered cars in 15 years. Why isn't the US government incentivizing Tesla, GM and Ford to make electric cars everyone can afford? Incentivize them to make those cars here with American workers. Cradle to grave kind of stuff, not just "oh this part was made here/this car was designed in America".

The entire city of Detroit is sitting empty, in a region that needs help. You bring these companies there to modernize cars, with the economics for workers (who want jobs), and watch social problems disappear.

If we started making electric cars affordable we would change the entire industry, and in the process be 10 years ahead of European or Asian carmakers. My gripe with that is that these cars have to be made in America with American parts.
 
Back