Ralph, your writing sucks. Like really sucks. I'm not just saying that because I hate you. It really does suck. Your sentence structure sucks and you misuse commas all over the fucking place.
Unlike the last hit piece that came off like a teenage girls Tumblr blog, this whole thing has a pretentious feel to it.
Fat Retard said:
I, myself, have noticed how fatter I look on camera
Get rid of that first comma. You look fat on camera because you're disgustingly fat, not because of the camera.
Ralph's dying liver said:
It’s a cheap joke, but still. That’s what it is, a joke.
That full stop is the most jarring part of the article. It completely breaks the flow when you don't need or want to break the flow.
Try:
"It's a cheap joke. But still, that's what it is, a joke." or
"It's a cheap joke. But that's all it is, a joke." or
"It's a cheap joke, but that's all it is, a joke."
Any of those flow better than that garbage you wrote.
Ralph's dead cat said:
WHY has it become a joke, though?
I know you probably capitalized the whole word for emphasis, but it looks bad. You don't need any extra emphasis, and if you wanted to anyway, use italics.
"Why has it become a joke, though?"
Wiggum said:
However, the earth-shattering audacity of his response to my joke should be examined in full.
Really? Is it really "earth-shattering audacity"? Seemed pretty fucking tame and lame to me. He didn't even tag in Twitter or Jack, or anything that would matter.
Pill Popping Trash said:
In my view, he’s clearly angling to get me and or Fuentes banned off Twitter with the way he’s falsely accusing both of us of being Nazis.
Ok, I wasn't going to say anything, but it's too much. You're using contractions too much. You can, there's really nothing wrong with it, but you shouldn't use them as much as you are in a "professional" piece you are trying to make money off of. Switch between the contraction and writing it out just to mix things up. He is. It is. It has, etc. In my humble opinion, it adds a bit to the sentence flow when you write them out sometimes. It also allows for greater emphasis when the reader has to read both words. For example, when you read "it's" it is quick and simple. But when you read "it is" there is naturally a bit of emphasis there that doesn't exist in the contraction. Maybe that's just me and how I read.
Also, it's "and/or" not "and or".
Backstabber that demends unquestioning loyalty said:
I suppose you could say he’s just trying to get our “
verified checks” taken away, but regardless, it’s clearly snitch-like behavior.
I've never seen it referred to as "verified checks" before. Even the page you link (also, you link way too many things) says "verified badge", and the commonly used term is "blue checkmark". This is just another oddly off-putting wording choice.
I also think this sentence should end after "taken away".
Also, the irony of you, Mr. "Help! Dlive Mods! Josh is making fun of me!" accusing someone else of snitch-like behavior... Plus, by your own mantra of going lower than your enemies to win, how can snitching be bad? If you have no problem going lower, then go lower and use your checkmark powers to snitch on his ban evasion.
The Aborted Retort said:
That’s distasteful enough, of course. But keep this in mind: Mr. Bonnell can’t even reply to me on his first, second, or third account because he himself
has been banned from Twitter for
violent speech and
ban evasion on
several occasions.
Ugh.
Lose the "even". "Mr. Bonnell can't reply" sounds better.
I don't like the usage of "he himself" here. This is just another piece that makes the whole article feel pretentious. You keep using all these phrases to make yourself sound smart. Everyone knows you are not smart.
Confirmed Cuck said:
Since I’m not a
confirmed cuck like Steven, I sincerely hope they don’t do that.
Oh but you are, Ralph. You are a confirmed cuck. Faith was sending nudes to Chris while she was in your shower. You are a cuck by the internet's definition of a cuck.
Alt-righter Nazi Ethan Ralph said:
This is a guy who has literally been banned from Twitter on multiple occasions, tweeting from an outlaw account even now, suggesting bogus enforcement on right-wing targets.
He did not suggest any kind of enforcement.
Liar said:
If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know, I don’t know what will.
It tells me you have no problem making things up and lying about events, even when people can easily see the truth. I'm sure that fact has no bearing on anything else going on with you...
Dumbass said:
The reason he can be so brazen and not care is because he knows Twitter will always let him come back.
How was Destiny's tweet "so brazen". Christ Ralph, you're making this out to be a much bigger event than it really was. It really shows how upset you are. How you just sit and seethe nonstop over every perceived slight.
Ralph's micro penis said:
Whereas, on the right, you’re usually nuked off the fucking map when they take you down.
Your use of profanity is jarring. It doesn't flow, it doesn't fit, it's just jarring. For fucks sake Ralph, take some writing classes or something.