- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Then no one is going to believe you.I'm not sure I want to make them public.
You said yourself that you are "always angry".That's always your default hypothesis, unsupported by facts
Lots of government employees sit behind their desks on the internet, often Google searching peoples names to see who they can discriminate against
Yes. If there is one, however, point me to it, and I will admit my mistake.You sure about that?
The link to that article shows just why you keep getting dismissed. Lawsuits require base minimum ability to read. I said, and I quote, "does not have a vexatious litigant law". The fact that the courts have decided to grant themselves the ability to do so via caselaw, does not make my words non-valid. There is no law, although courts have taken measures to squash vexatious litigants.
Why would you spy on his phone?Last time I spied on Marshall's phone I saw he has like 15 fake emails. I have no idea which ones are attached to what.
Now you know why we laugh at you. Be honest, this does sound funny, no?""The Court will not consider any complaint filed that is in smaller than a 12-point typeface."
Scott sent a letter and another filing to Martin, this time in fonts the judge found were "almost illegible.""
Exactly.In other words, they don't exist