Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Apparently there are ancestral chromosomes and then parental chromosomes. They discovered that as the zygote is becoming an embryo, the maternal chromosomes influence gender.
No big accepted organisation says that Y does not determine gender.

Few examples:

1. National Human Genome Research Institute

The presence or absence of the Y chromosome is critical because it contains the genes necessary to override the biological default - female development - and cause the development of the male reproductive system. Overall, what this means is that beyond its role in sex determination and fertility, the Y chromosome

2. World Health Organisation

sex determining region of the Y chromosome

3. The Government

The Y chromosome is present in males, who have one X and one Y chromosome, while females have two X chromosomes.

4. CDC

A female has two X chromosomes, and a male has one X and one Y chromosome.

5. Literally any Biology book im existance.
It's a starting ground for sure
Starting ground that almost no one supports given the low citations, and a starting ground, that if it said what you think it did would be debunked by everyone with at least basic knowledge in biology.
No it's not settled. Read the Abstract. You're clearly unsettled by the idea that gender determination isn't patriarchal after all
It's been settled ever since 1905, after which it was rechecked every decade lr two, and conclusion was always the same.
There's even studies that show the number of days after menstruation can influence it too. I'm open minded


https://scholar.google.com/scholar?...q=gender+after+menstruation&hl=en&as_sdt=0,43
Link to an actual study instead of linking to a Google Scholar "Gender after Menstruation" search.
I already gave you the study now you sit here and shit bricks
And we, quite literally, pointed out that it's:

1. Not peer-reviewed
2. Literally only 2 other scientists saw it
3. It goes againt basic biology.

Tldr: It's shit.
Real Jews don't gossip.
They do. Not all jews are as crazy about their religion as you are.
 
Link to an actual study instead of linking to a Google Scholar "Gender after Menstruation" search.

That is a whole page of studies.

They do. Not all jews are as crazy about their religion as you are

Yes. There are many people whose ancestors stood at Mt. Sinai who have forgotten The Torah

Even in conservative Jewish sects.


You get really defensive when we bring up how your vagina is a gaping black hole. I doubt you'd be this sensitive about it if it weren't true.

So half the time when I'm silent you say it's because I agree with what you're saying or don't have a defense. Then when I do say something it's because I agree even though I just said I don't agree.

You bend and twist and manipulate what my silence means depending on what is said. That's called narcissitic reframing.

Either way, you're mis-identifying my motive.

I'm not sensitive about my vagina. No pun intended.

I comment on the issue because it gives me an opportunity to deconstruct lies and myths about women.


You only have 2 knees dipshit.

Guess I was drinking more than I realized last night. Oops

Sentence should have been "I delivered on all 4s, on my knees".

"On all 4s[fours]" is an expression that circulates in homebirth circles
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is a whole page of studies.






Yes. There are many people whose ancestors stood at Mt. Sinai who have forgotten The Torah

Even in conservative Jewish sects.







So half the time when I'm silent you say it's because I agree with what you're saying or don't have a defense. Then when I do say something it's because I agree even though I just said I don't agree.

You bend and twist and manipulate what my silence means depending on what is said. That's called narcissitic reframing.

Either way, you're mis-identifying my motive.

I'm not sensitive about my vagina. No pun intended.

I comment on the issue because it gives me an opportunity to deconstruct lies and myths about women.






Guess I was drinking more than I realized last night. Oops

Sentence should have been "I delivered on all 4s, on my knees".

"On all 4s[fours]" is an expression that circulates in homebirth circles
Quote specific peer reviewed studies accepted in the mainstream as theory. Should be easy since you have a whole page.
 
That is a whole page of studies.
It's a Google Scholar search. It tells me nothing. Find a study, cite it, we can debate. I am not going to go through, what amounts to, you linking me a google search.

Btw, ever gonna respond to the fact that every credible institution debunked your linked study about Y-Chromosomes?
Quote specific peer reviewed studies accepted in the mainstream as theory. Should be easy since you have a whole page.
No need to go that far. Peer-reviewed only might suffice too.
 
Last edited:
Even the "study" she is trying to cite does not say that the Y chromosome does not determine the sex of the fetus. It's talking about how Maternal chromosomes MIGHT pair with the paternal chromosome to take part in picking the paternal X or Y to determine the fetus's sex.
 
Even the "study" she is trying to cite does not say that the Y chromosome does not determine the sex of the fetus. It's talking about how Maternal chromosomes MIGHT pair with the paternal chromosome to take part in picking the paternal X or Y to determine the fetus's sex.
Which is what is driving me mad. It doesn't even hide that in any way - it says in the first paragraphs that it proposes a new model, a hypothesis on how the selection could be influenced by both sides, nothing more. It is entirely a "this COULD be how it works" paper. It takes such a tremendous amount of mental gymnastics to turn that into "this is part of a revolutionary new proven science, challenging the patriarchy and doing away with what was established", it boggles my mind, even in THIS THREAD.
 
Which is what is driving me mad. It doesn't even hide that in any way - it says in the first paragraphs that it proposes a new model, a hypothesis on how the selection could be influenced by both sides, nothing more. It is entirely a "this COULD be how it works" paper. It takes such a tremendous amount of mental gymnastics to turn that into "this is part of a revolutionary new proven science, challenging the patriarchy and doing away with what was established", it boggles my mind, even in THIS THREAD.

I mean, not to beat a dead horse, but as I have said on multiple occasions, Melinda no read the good. She has very obvious problems reading what's in front of her and deriving even the plain text statement of basic english. I'm not sure if that's because of untreated paranoiac delusions, if her reading comprehension is seriously degrading that badly, or what. Combine that with her almost pathological need to have secret knowledge and feel elite leading her to believe several patently absurd things about the way the physical world works to say nothing of the legal or social realms, and you get a woman desperate to believe in anything that sets her apart from the crowd, even if it's to her ultimate or even immediate detriment.
 
We knew you were a freak of nature & all but tell us more about having 4 knees, please.
I wanna know more about how she’s breastfeeding 24/7 with her goblin permanently dangling from her nipple and also drinking wine at the same time. She complains so much about constantly breastfeeding on demand. Wonder if she just lets the demon starve while she drinks so much she believes she has four knees. Or better yet, just pours the alcohol down its throat.
 
Guess I was drinking more than I realized last night. Oops
Yeah oops you accidently got wasted alone with 6 children two of which are below toddler age, one having medical problems, and all 6 of them being dumber than dog shit. If there was an emergency all they'd know to do was scream about the Torah, and fling essential oils and possibly their own feces around. I mean if they can't flip the bird correctly how the fuck could they handle a serious emergency. Great responsible parenting there Melinda.
 
Yeah oops you accidently got wasted alone with 6 children two of which are below toddler age, one having medical problems, and all 6 of them being dumber than dog shit. If there was an emergency all they'd know to do was scream about the Torah, and fling essential oils and possibly their own feces around. I mean if they can't flip the bird correctly how the fuck could they handle a serious emergency. Great responsible parenting there Melinda.
Not to mention that alcohol is readily passed through breastmilk which is incredibly damaging for breastfeeding children.

The accepted standard is maximum a single standard drink per day, with 2 hours between finishing the drink and breastfeeding. Anything more or anything closer to consumption can directly lead to dangerous amounts of alcohol in the baby's system which, on top of making them feel bad, can cause severe developmental issues, including brain damage.

My wife isn't a fucking degenerate so when we had children she researched the optimal way to care for them. Turns out drinking while breastfeeding is almost as bad as drinking while pregnant, and no, "one glass of red wine a day" is NOT safe for fetuses. Any amount of alcohol consumed while pregnant is dangerous.

Edit: Not to mention the effects of alcohol on the mother, including increased difficulty with letdown and the increased risk to the child due to impaired judgment, i.e dropping them.
 
You are all bigots for not acknowledging Melinda's rich cultural history related to what you might call "alcoholism" or "neglecting my children because I'm too drunk to care". That is just ignorant, and has no place in a nice place like Kiwifarms! Melinda is a proud redneck, and her people have a rich history of alternative child rearing practices revolving around the mass consumption of the products of the fermentation process. She also engages is unorthodox partnering within her gene pool, which is just a brave and stunning white trash thing to do! 👏👏👏
 
You are all bigots for not acknowledging Melinda's rich cultural history related to what you might call "alcoholism" or "neglecting my children because I'm too drunk to care". That is just ignorant, and has no place in a nice place like Kiwifarms! Melinda is a proud redneck, and her people have a rich history of alternative child rearing practices revolving around the mass consumption of the products of the fermentation process. She also engages is unorthodox partnering within her gene pool, which is just a brave and stunning white trash thing to do! 👏👏👏
#imbredlivesmatter
 
Apparently Mommy was a drug abuser and Daddy was mentally ill. Melinda becoming a drunk wouldn't be at all out of the question with that sort of family history. Not to mention how eagerly she's anticipating the legalization of marijuana. I bet if we poked around Daddy had some substance abuse issues, too. And they're probably not the only ones in her family tree with problematic histories of substance abuse and mental illness. It goes hand-in-hand with child abuse and child neglect.

You can go to any AA or NA meeting or any rehab and hear family histories like Melinda's all day long.
 
The accepted standard is maximum a single standard drink per day,
Just clarifying because I was not aware what exactly this meant. Answer for anyone curious

standard “drink” as 12 ounces of 5% beer; 8 ounces of 7% malt liquor; 5 ounces of 12% wine; or 1.5 ounces of 40% (80 proof) liquor. All of these drinks contain the same amount (i.e., 14 grams, or 0.6 ounces) of pure alcohol.
Source

Anyway, CDC agrees with all of your claims. What worries me, though, is that if she drank enough to get drunk, that likely poisoned/made retarded the kid she was breastfeeding
However, exposure to alcohol above moderate levels through breast milk could be damaging to an infant’s development, growth, and sleep patterns. Alcohol consumption above moderate levels may also impair a mother’s judgment and ability to safely care for her child. Excessive alcohol consumption while breastfeeding could also affect the infant’s sleep patterns and early development. A 16-day-old infant was exposed to alcohol and unspecified benzodiazepines in breastmilk. The infant was admitted to the intensive care unit for cardiac and respiratory arrest, the infant survived

Same source and a bit from NCBI.
 
Just clarifying because I was not aware what exactly this meant. Answer for anyone curious


Source

Anyway, CDC agrees with all of your claims. What worries me, though, is that if she drank enough to get drunk, that likely poisoned/made retarded the kid she was breastfeeding


Same source and a bit from NCBI.
Wonder how CPS would feel if they knew about Mel slowly poisoning her infant?
 
Lets be perfectly honest here, the child she's breast feeding is hers and @Marshall Castersen's. There is at least a 60% chance that the child was retarded from birth. I'm sure the alcohol @TamarYaelBatYah forced into it's vulnerable little system didn't help though.
It would probably be an improvement.
 
Back