Gabriel Sickel / ThisIsGabe / KhordKitty / KhordiKit / Khordz / PianoKat / Xyniroz / Ghörfn / yiffyiff123 / Deborah Kay Butler / Buttercuppedbun - Deadbeat Wannabe-Actor MGTOW Pedo-zoophile - Divorced father of 2 sons. Tried grooming them as infants to be cub furries. Tried to groom a 17yo into sex. Ex-wife cucked him for a pedo. She took the kids. He fucked the family dog. His mom likes horse cock

[KhordKitty]

We didn’t say it was illegal

Illegal means "almost legal". That's like saying "I didn't say Hitler, I said Adolf". Again, if you guys want to authentically target people who actually broke the law then you shouldn't have to lie constantly. Clearly the purpose is NOT to expose illegality but to troll and to say "The sky is brown!" just to see who will respond "No, the sky is blue".

Why were you hanging out with a minor, bro?

Cuz there wasn't a big age difference at all.

I know I'm not gonna get an answer because he's going to give a non-answer, but can you explain this @KhordKitty:

That's the amazing thing about gullible types, they enjoy revealing to the world their complete lack of education:

".. while you used you puppet to seem child friendly "

You puppet? You Salam. Me Khord. Me go to cave now to make fire with sticks.

no one cares about your role as a background character in Wolf of Wall Street.

I literally was just asked which movies! If they didn't care then they wouldn't have asked the question. You clearly DO CARE, commenting on a thread made only for stalking myself. If you didn't care you wouldn't say anything.

"Yeah, i don't care about you! See, I'll prove it by talking about you repeatedly!"

did you not see anything wrong with trying to get with a minor?

It was legal, the age difference wasn't huge, and they were less then 8 weeks from their 18th birthday. Even today I don't think there is anything wrong with it. I don't regret it at all. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it.

We are well past the stage of needing to prove anything.

Twitter watches is proof? So if you watch someones twitter in 2010 and they do a crime in 2017 and you forget about the fact you were watching them on twitter.. AND THAT IS PROOF? Reallly?

If you find a talented artist on FA, commission them, and then see they also make art most likely viewed by pedobears, ... THAT IS TOTAL PROOF?

On KiwiFarms "beyond a reasonable doubt" means "Okay, this guy just did a crime, that means all 1,600 of his facebook friends are guilty too, and 900 of their Twitter watches as well."

The fact people have killed themselves over KiwiFarms is REALLY sad. Like, you guys are genuinely a hoot.

Gabe, in lieu of ignoring what his attorney, his parents, & even his friends have told him, has came here to represent his own defense.

I am not trying to defend myself at all. That's not the point of anything I'm saying. I'm just literally fact-checking in real-time. I couldn't care less if you think I'm a necropedozoo. I WANT you people to dislike me because you're all the exact type of people every single parent in America should try to prevent their kids from talking to or becoming.

Everytime I see a user popping in with trolling I just think "Another failure of parenting. No good parents would make a child who tries to stalk and abuse normal strangers. They'd build values."

When major magazines are talking about how the users of a website are deplorably creepy, that's saying something pretty huge. The point is, think whatever you want of me. I couldn't care less. I know for a fact I'm 100 times less creepy then every single user on their website. That's just a fact.

This way he can portray himself as the good guy while villainizing Deb for " robbing him of his children "

I have never said anything negative about my ex in public. When have I?

There is no justifiable reason for Gabe to continue talking here aside from the reason

I literally JUST said 10 reasons why I'm posting. I'm trying to figure out the psychology of trolls. Like, what justification could you have for cyberbulling? (and try to do an explanation that DOESN'T involve victim-blaming. I don't think anyone in the right mind believes that Chris-Chan should be cyberbullied by anyone.

 

[Pinball 2000]

hey @KhordKitty, I'd like you to answer this question that @Leonard Helplessness has asked you several times and you've repeatedly ignored. I'm going to quote it below for your convenience:

Hello, Gabe. Do you confirm or do you deny that these are your statements?

View attachment 1683038

 

[Wes Bluemarine]

It was legal, the age difference wasn't huge, and they were less then 8 weeks from their 18th birthday. Even today I don't think there is anything wrong with it. I don't regret it at all. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it.

21 is *just* when your brain is starting to mature enough to make good decisions/as well as being more resistent (hench why drinking is for 21+ instead of 18+ because your brain can't get addicted as easily compared to a younger brain)
This minor is 17 and hardly scratching the surface of legal adulthood, as well as having a undeveloped frontal cortex, which makes them more succeptable to manipulation by obese predators like you.
How old were you again?

Edit: adding actual reason for this dumb fuck why the drinking limit is 21+

 

[Sintharia]

Participating in furry dance competitions, even winning them, doesn't make you a star. Hate to break that to you. They're competitive because so many people want to participate. A lot of furries see it as a way to rub elbows with popufurs, or become popufur themselves. Even Khord thinks this means something to anyone, given that he's attempting to tout it like some huge accomplishment.

 

[ExplosiveTeddybear]

Cuz there wasn't a big age difference at all.

You were 12 years older than her, you fucking pedo.

 

[KhordKitty]

How old were you again?

27

obese predators like you

Flirting with people who are of the age of consent isn't predatory. It's flirting. It's normal.

Every single person I've ever talked to about it has agreed there is nothing wrong with it. That's because THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT.

Look, I don't really know how many more ways to say it: Absolutely every single person in my life had never told me that there is anything remotely wrong with flirting with someone who is within the legal age of consent. I have not tried to do anything that I felt was wrong. There is absolutely no point in trying to convince me of it because honestly the age of consent law in there for a reason:

It's when our Government has decided that it's appropriate for you to make choices about your body. And obviously there is NOTHING of value that can be learned from a group of people who think it's moral to cyberbully, cyberstalk, and to pressure strangers into suicide.

You guys have your morality completely backwards. Again, this is a failure of your parents.

Let me send you some raw data:

According to a study by Buunk and colleagues (2000) the majority of 30 year old male participants minimum preferred age of a partner for a casual experience was 18. For 20 year olds it was 16.

So that means, for a 27 year old to hit on someone 8 weeks shy of their 18th birthday IS IN FACT a statistically acceptable preferred age: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...his rule states that by,not someone who is 18.

But of course, this is just another example of "Pearls to Swine". You are swine. And I don't mind getting messy because I enjoy learning more about the psychology of you pigs.

Participating in furry dance competitions, even winning them, doesn't make you a star.

Obviously. The point of what I was saying was connected to the idea of how you should measure intellect.

"Is someone a moron if they have zero life accomplishments?"

Not necessarily. You can be a genius and never accomplish anything. That's okay. You can be an idiot and win the lotto a few times, that's fine too.

But at what point that you have built a certain skill set are you not allowed to call yourself an idiot? If someone walks into walls and speaks in gibberish, has an IQ of 0 BUT is able to construct a lamp in 15 minutes, is able to fix a chair in 20 minutes, and built an oven out of supplies they found in the forest, I'd say at that point they can't be called an idiot.

Idiocy can be measured by a mastery in any and all skillsets.

Even Khord thinks this means something to anyone, given that he's attempting to tout it like some huge accomplishment.

If you think I've been bragging then you're literally missing the point. Here is the point:

1. I'm not a genius. But because of what I've done I can't also be an idiot.
2. Those who have failed at their goals certainly can use advice. For this reason, I don't think KiwiFarms advice is helpful.

It's like saying "Hey, you are terrible at walking! You should make sure to use your feed, not your elbows!"
and me responding "I am walking with my feet. I know how to jog fluently"
"FLUENT JOGGER? WOW, SO BRAGGADOCIOUS!"
and I'd respond "Wow KiwiFarms, are you trying to use long words? Maybe there ARE some intelligentsia here!"

You were 12 years older than her, you fucking pedo.

27-17 = 12?
... "umm scratch that about the intelligentsia part."

 

[SIGSEGV]

27-17 = 12?
... "umm scratch that about the intelligentsia part."

You're retarded enough to keep posting in this thread, what makes you think that you understand math?

 

[KhordKitty]

You're retarded enough to keep posting in this thread, what makes you think that you understand math?

If you want me to stop, ask me to stop. That's the only way I'll stop.

 

[SIGSEGV]

If you want me to stop, ask me to stop. That's the only way I'll stop.

Stop being a pedophile.

 

[Spoonomancer]

If you want me to stop, ask me to stop. That's the only way I'll stop.

Stop being a Hebephile Pedophile

 

[Rat Lord]

Notice how he eagerly answers every single question someone asks over his musical/movie career, believing as if thats the most important thing of all to answer, and even gets mad and defensive when someone says they don't care.

But when it comes to answering serious questions he tiptoes around them like a fucking dipshit, only answering the lower hanging fruit while completely ignoring the bigger ones.

 

[Lady Pigroach]

I wonder if Gabe watched Cuties.

 

[Racoober]

Hey @KhordKitty did you really say these things? Asking for a friend.

Hello, Gabe. Do you confirm or do you deny that these are your statements?

View attachment 1683038

 

[Rat Lord]

Gabe you keep saying you want to answer questions, well here's a question we all want answered! Why won't you answer this one goddamm question? Oh right! Because you can't twist it in any way possible :^)

Hello, Gabe. Do you confirm or do you deny that these are your statements?

View attachment 1683038

 

[Wes Bluemarine]

27

Flirting with people who are of the age of consent isn't predatory. It's flirting. It's normal.

Every single person I've ever talked to about it has agreed there is nothing wrong with it. That's because THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT.

Look, I don't really know how many more ways to say it: Absolutely every single person in my life had never told me that there is anything remotely wrong with flirting with someone who is within the legal age of consent. I have not tried to do anything that I felt was wrong. There is absolutely no point in trying to convince me of it because honestly the age of consent law in there for a reason:

It's when our Government has decided that it's appropriate for you to make choices about your body. And obviously there is NOTHING of value that can be learned from a group of people who think it's moral to cyberbully, cyberstalk, and to pressure strangers into suicide.

You guys have your morality completely backwards. Again, this is a failure of your parents.

Let me send you some raw data:

According to a study by Buunk and colleagues (2000) the majority of 30 year old male participants minimum preferred age of a partner for a casual experience was 18. For 20 year olds it was 16.

So that means, for a 27 year old to hit on someone 8 weeks shy of their 18th birthday IS IN FACT a statistically acceptable preferred age: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/meet-catch-and-keep/201405/who-is-too-young-or-too-old-you-date#:~:text=This rule states that by,not someone who is 18.

But of course, this is just another example of "Pearls to Swine". You are swine. And I don't mind getting messy because I enjoy learning more about the psychology of you pigs.

"Flirting or coquetry is a social and sexual behavior involving spoken or written communication, as well as body language, by one person to another, either to suggest interest in a deeper relationship with the other person, or if done playfully, for amusement."

Flirting is fine, but flirting with someone who, like i said, BARLEY has a adult brain is borderline pedophilia .
Also curious on how you were ignoring the part where i talked about devoloping brains?

--
"KHORDKITTY : According to a study by Buunk and colleagues (2000) the majority of 30 year old male participants minimum preferred age of a partner for a casual experience was 18. For 20 year olds it was 16. So that means, for a 27 year old to hit on someone 8 weeks shy of their 18th birthday IS IN FACT a statistically acceptable preferred age: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/meet-catch-and-keep/201405/who-is-too-young-or-too-old-you-date#:~:text=This rule states that by,not someone who is 18."

That doesn't mean its good and acceptable. 30 year old men who look for 18 year olds are creeps who dont want to look for a wife their age. You're preaching about how its morally wrong for people to be bullying you on the internet, but are a-ok with giving older teenagers trust issues/trauma if you happen to not be able to keep your dick in your pants?

 

[Jolyne THICCujoh]

Illegal means "almost legal".

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Cuz there wasn't a big age difference at

I'm pretty sure a 9-10 year age difference with a fucking HIGH SCHOOLER is a big deal.

commenting on a thread made only for stalking myself.

Gabe makes fun of people for misspellings when he can't even understand the definition of stalking.

It was legal, the age difference wasn't huge, and they were less then 8 weeks from their 18th birthday. Even today I don't think there is anything wrong with it. I don't regret it at all. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it.

Here that boys and girls? She was EIGHT WEEKS FROM TURNING 18, meaning it 100% AWWRIGHT for Gabe to try and skeet into her guts.

The fact people have killed themselves over KiwiFarms is REALLY sad. Like, you guys are genuinely a hoot.

Why not add yourself to the kill count? You're a waste of space AND looking for fame.

Everytime I see a user popping in with trolling I just think "Another failure of parenting. No good parents would make a child who tries to stalk and abuse normal strangers. They'd build values."

The same could very well be said to you, leaving your kids to get fuckin FOOD SAMPLES.

Flirting with people who are of the age of consent isn't predatory. It's flirting. It's normal.

Predators flirt with people much younger than them because they're much easier to manipulate for their whims.

And lest you forget, @KhordKitty ...

Hello, Gabe. Do you confirm or do you deny that these are your statements?

View attachment 1683038

 

[Spoonomancer]

one thing I had noticed is that he gave me a movie acter non-reply when I had posted that Twitter screencap, without even bringing up validity of the conversation.

Hello, Gabe. Do you confirm or do you deny that these are your statements?

View attachment 1683038

@KhordKitty will you confirm or deny this, or are you too fat and you will not read it? We've been asking you for pages.

 

[DemDer]

27

That's not okay. Why is this okay to you?

 

[SIGSEGV]

That's not okay. Why is this okay to you?

Because he's a fat predator.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

Answer the question, Fatberg.

Hello, Gabe. Do you confirm or do you deny that these are your statements?

View attachment 1683038