Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

What's the real conflict here? Does she really think she can win in court or is the act of suing just a method of venting anger?
 
Venting her neverending anger, mostly. I don't think Melinda actually believes her lawsuits will go anywhere, she certainly has no idea how to strategize or plan how a lawsuit would go. Not procedurally, legally, or logistically. She wouldn't be able to handle discovery, subpoenas or depositions. She would have no idea how to respond to defense motions. She has no money to spend on legal research, or any other kind of research. If it ever came down to testimony, Melinda has no idea what questions she is allowed to legally ask, and what she's not. She has no idea what is legally submittable as evidence and what would be excluded.

Just as an example, she thinks that she'd be allowed to subpoena the defendants' medical records. This is so intensely unrealistic that I can only shake my head at her stupidity and her ignorance. Yet she keeps returning, over and over, to this daydream that she will somehow be allowed to subpoena the private medical records of the defendants. Melinda's full of grandiose, unrealistic daydreams like this.
 
Last edited:
So who do you guys think will get slapped with vexatious litigant status first? Russell Greer or Melinda here?
If anyone's taking a beating, it's probably Melinda. Although I doubt that Marshall would be able to pronounce "vexatious litigant."
 
Because the no-no melanin word is a racial slur. Like just about every racial slur, it used to do exactly what you said. Insult a person by calling then a slur meant to portray their ethnicity in a negative light due to the connotations the word carries. You saying that you treat everyone you meet as individuals while calling them slurs meant to belittle an entire ethnic group is incredibly hypocritical. Not that I'd expect anything less of you, but it's fun to point these things out.

I don't agree with your flawed logic.

There's good and bad in every race and racial slurs are reserved for the bad



Venting her neverending anger, mostly. I don't think Melinda actually believes her lawsuits will go anywhere, she certainly has no idea how to strategize or plan how a lawsuit would go. Not procedurally, legally, or logistically. She wouldn't be able to handle discovery, subpoenas or depositions. She would have no idea how to respond to defense motions. She has no money to spend on legal research, or any other kind of research. If it ever came down to testimony, Melinda has no idea what questions she is allowed to legally ask, and what she's not. She has no idea what is legally submittable as evidence and what would be excluded.

Just as an example, she thinks that she'd be allowed to subpoena the defendants' medical records. This is so intensely unrealistic that I can only shake my head at her stupidity and her ignorance. Yet she keeps returning, over and over, to this daydream that she will somehow be allowed to subpoena the private medical records of the defendants. Melinda's full of grandiose, unrealistic daydreams like this.

I've plenty of practice at discovery and subpoenas and depositions. I worked for an attorney.

I also get free access to case law research sites because I am alumni at GMU

You're a total *#$@!

Legs, too.
👆👆👆 Patriarchal sexism


Where's the moral principle written that a woman must "keep her legs shut"?

I asked that to the fat guy "AnOnimus" or whatever his name was and he couldn't answer

Now you can try


Post pics of you in high heels squatting in a thong.

You know, I was just admiring my ass in the mirror this morning. "Lookin' good Tamar!" All the work I do as a SAHM has paid off in a way.

Haha. Although I own a great pair of heels and a few thongs, you know I don't give away my milk for free. The only dudes that ever saw me naked asked for my hand in marriage and/or a long term relationship.

Also, even though some of you are Goy, I'd be really sinning if an Israelite brother or Lost Sheep were on this thread and saw that.


I'm not the one who continually claims to be leaving. I come here to read what you write because it's hilarious, as well as for the same reason people slow down to see road accidents. I also have several people here I consider friends, plus some fun acquaintances.
Perhaps you are titillated by describing your masturbatory habits to us, maybe you think that @Deadpool will be interested or something. I can't imagine any other reasons.
Tell us about your other problems with addictive behavior.


Deadpool is a Christian. I haven't the slightest interest in him. I'm repulsed by any man who watches porn. It's a sign of depravity, perversion, and spiritual sickness


If you had documents proving your Ashkenazi bloodline you would've posted them by now.

No, not everything needs to be on this thread.


white person being comfortable enough to call a black person a nigger doesn't generally bode well for their opinions of black people as a whole.

On the flip side, black people have taken control of the word "nigger" in other ways by using it as a word equivalent to "brother".

IE "What's up my nigga?"

Under limited circumstances I've also seen white and hispanic dudes allowed to use the word "nigger"/or "nigga" in black circles where the white or hispanic dude is accepted as a trustworthy member of the group


Suuuuuure. That's what you said the last time, isn't it

Yup. And that's why Marshall probably doesn't take me too seriously about me leaving.

My mercy has been used to take me for granted. Story of my life.

The only cure for that, to get him to know I'm serious, is to just stay away from him. Time will show him
 
I'm repulsed by any man who watches porn. It's a sign of depravity, perversion, and spiritual sickness
So what about women like you, who have been addicted to porn?
The only cure for that, to get him to know I'm serious, is to just stay away
If staying away is a method to communicate how serious you are, you aren't serious. You're just playing a waiting game.
We all know that you'll crawl back to him, just like you crawl back here.
 

Attachments

  • CBracist.jpg
    CBracist.jpg
    99.1 KB · Views: 34
Yup. And that's why Marshall probably doesn't take me too seriously about me leaving.

My mercy has been used to take me for granted. Story of my life.

The only cure for that, to get him to know I'm serious, is to just stay away from him. Time will show him
Oh, it'll show him.
It'll show him he was completely right.
 
So what about women like you, who have been addicted to porn?

I watched porn in revenge for "eye for eye". Teach the guy a lesson. I didn't instigate it as a way of life.

It served its purpose. The dude quickly learned that seeing his SO enjoying other naked men didn't honor our Covenant. He became extremely jealous (rightfully so) and expressed other unpleasant feelings. This drove him to repentance. Mission accomplished.

Unfortunately, some people have to learn the hard way instead of listening to good advice




And very few people agree with your flawed logic. So now you see where we're coming from, no?

I'd rather be among the minority. The majority is usually in the wrong.
 
Where is the moral code written that the minority is more right than the majority? Dumb Goyim.

"Do not follow the crowd when it does what is wrong; and don’t allow the popular view to sway you into offering testimony for any cause if the effect will be to pervert justice." (Ex. 23:2)


I thought you believed that watching porn is a sin.

An eye for an eye doesn't mean you get free rein to sin just because someone else did it.

I get what you are saying. Yes, "eye for eye" doesn't mean you should commit the same sin, only deliver the injury they gave you.

But how do you deliver the injury sometimes without mimicking the behavior?

Watching porn is whoredom (זְנוּת). Whoredom is a sin when it is done intentionally to break faith with a Covenant partner. If someone is a victim of sex trafficking, and forced into whoredom, the oppressor/kidnapper is to blame.

I think revenge porn is justified as revenge. I draw the line at revenge affairs/revenge sex. I do not believe revenge affairs/revenge sex is allowed. That is adultery and sleeping with Goy is never allowed. The women of Israel are not allowed to take the seed of Goy men. The men of Israel are not allowed to give their seed to Goy women. Both men and women Israelites are not supposed to lust after Goy either.

However....

"if someone injures his neighbor, what he did is to be done to him — break for break, eye for eye, tooth for tooth — whatever injury he has caused the other person is to be rendered to him in return." (Lev. 24:19-20)​



Also, I found this verse recently which surprised me. Elohim says he will not punish the women for doing whoredom because the men broke faith first:


"I won’t punish your daughters when they act like whores, or your daughters-in-law when they commit whoredom; because the men are themselves going off with whores and sacrificing with prostitutes." (Hosea 4:14)
 
I get what you are saying. Yes, "eye for eye" doesn't mean you should commit the same sin, only deliver the injury they gave you.

But how do you deliver the injury sometimes without mimicking the behavior?

Watching porn is whoredom (זְנוּת). Whoredom is a sin when it is done intentionally to break faith with a Covenant partner. If someone is a victim of sex trafficking, and forced into whoredom, the oppressor/kidnapper is to blame.
Wrong, dummy. It's gazing upon someone's nakedness. I'm pretty sure that Ham didn't gaze upon his father's nakedness intentionally to break faith with his wife, but he was cursed for it anyway.
 
I think revenge porn is justified as revenge
So you think that it's ok for a partner in a relationship to take pornographic images of their partner given to them in privacy and share them to others or thev embarrass or humiliate them in public?
Didn't you say that you had recorded yourself with Marshall? Should he take revenge by sending us those files? But you say he wronged you, so his revenge isn't justified. If he were describing your breakup,. I'm sure he'd say otherwise.
In any case, we'll see who puts up the revenge porn first. Lol. How do you think I know that you're a porn addict, Melinda?
 
Last edited:
I asked that to the fat guy "AnOnimus" or whatever his name was and he couldn't answer

She still thinks AnOminous is fat because of the picture of John Goodman he had in his avatar

She’s calling Sir Dank a nigger because of his avatar.

She was calling Kitsuna arrogant because she didn’t like the angle their avatar was drawn.
:story:
This will never fail to make me laugh. Our avatars supposedly portray who we are in real life. What about me then, Mel? I’ve been a dead octopus/ethot, a deformed dick demon, an evil bear plushie, a Cheshire Cat, a young girl picking her nose, and now I’m a black priest. Which one is the real me?
 
"Do not follow the crowd when it does what is wrong; and don’t allow the popular view to sway you into offering testimony for any cause if the effect will be to pervert justice." (Ex. 23:2))
That doesn't prove your point, this quote is just telling you not to follow evil even if it's popular among the masses, not that the majority is always wrong. It's more that the majority can be wrong, and not to follow if they should be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YourUnclesDad
She still thinks AnOminous is fat because of the picture of John Goodman he had in his avatar

She’s calling Sir Dank a nigger because of his avatar.

She was calling Kitsuna arrogant because she didn’t like the angle their avatar was drawn.
:story:
This will never fail to make me laugh. Our avatars supposedly portray who we are in real life. What about me then, Mel? I’ve been a dead octopus/ethot, a deformed dick demon, an evil bear plushie, a Cheshire Cat, a young girl picking her nose, and now I’m a black priest. Which one is the real me?
And I guess I'm just a transparent squarehead.
 
I don't agree with your flawed logic.

There's good and bad in every race and racial slurs are reserved for the bad
The whole reason for racial and ethnic slurs is to insult people based on whatever race or ethnicity they are. The word is meant to represent all the negative stereotypes someone could prescribe to a race or ethnicity, then insult the person they're directing by telling them they exhibit those stereotypes through use of the slur. The entire point of racial and ethnic slurs is to paint an entire race or ethnicity in a bad light, it isn't reserved for just "the bad ones". Me calling you a dirty kike means that I am taking all the negative stereotypes of Jews (Greedy, hook nose, selfish, etc.) and prescribing them to you. It is both an insult on the individual and on the entire ethnic group.
 
Back