Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Or the dumbass use of Beethoven at all, when even the "van" prefix to his surname underscores his geographical origin (although in his case the name just signifies his family once lived near a beet farm). Also the use of Bach. Yes, you would usually mean Johann Sebastian Bach, but in any case where you had to disambiguate it you would specify, for instance, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach or his son, identically named J.S. after his grandfather, who was a painter. You hear C.P.E. often enough, too, that you will hear their full names often on stations that play classical music like NPR. This is just a purely dumb article, by a dumb person, saying dumb things. It's yet more SJW bullshit where the "social justice" measure presented as a good idea would benefit literally fucking nobody in even the most infinitesimal way.
I don't see why we don't do the reverse.
 
@Elwood P. Dowd here's the tweet they used for the story. At least the comments are calling them out.

6541.png
https://tw.tinf.io/Slate/status/1320179628066091011 (https://archive.vn/3cWEh)

Don't miss this attack on Beethoven from Vox last month:
6543.png
https://www.vox.com/switched-on-pop/21437085/beethoven-5th-symphony-elitist-classism-switched-on-pop (https://archive.vn/hp4n0)
 
The latter thing is especially stupid. Beethoven wrote vulgar operas, he made music for the masses, something that made him slightly unpopular among the high class people. They listened to him anyway because he was that good.
 
That's very :optimistic: of you, buddy.

These people have been threatening to move to Canada ever since Dubya was first elected. What makes you think they'll actually go so far as to harm their pansy-ass selves? They'll just film themselves crying on TikTok and whine for another 4 years.
Will they REE loud enough to fuck up American diplomacy so they can later blame Trump for it?
Nah, they'll just say we're white supremacists.
Or will they try to make up some bullshit about how "Black Christianity" is a co-option of what the whites attempted to shove down their throat mixed with "authentic African traditions", and is therefore liberating? Their own ideology is an evolution of hippie-Jesus style Christianity anyhow.
 
Last edited:
No, you're right.
Does anyone have that one copypasta that summarizes what "The left can't meme" is really about? The main takeaway was just that their ideologies require a lot of additional information and beliefs as a foundation, so you can't make a mind-catching meme as easily as the right can.
If it was just the additional info required /pol/ spergs couldn't meme either, given how much obscure and/or memory holed shit is integral to their worldview.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NoReturn
The latter thing is especially stupid. Beethoven wrote vulgar operas, he made music for the masses, something that made him slightly unpopular among the high class people. They listened to him anyway because he was that good.
No, he was the highest of high art back then, but in the 19th century you didn't have much division between classical and popular music. Singers sang Mozart alongside Stephen Foster.
 
Or will they try to make up some bullshit about how "Black Christianity" is a co-option of what the whites attempted to shove down their throat mixed with "authentic African traditions", and is therefore liberating? Their own ideology is an evolution of hippie-Jesus style Christianity anyhow.
An unfortunate number of black churches today are just race church. They care more about hating whitey and voting blue no matter who than about praising God.
 
Dear Gods of the Internet, please make this one of those things where only the people involved and their close friends show up. Let them sit there and realize how foolish they look, how little they are wanted, and let it sink in while they pat each other for a job well done out of obligation. Let them go home and think about their lives.
Amen.
 


Note: It is a little scary to admit that I've now started mentally referring to articles like this as " @CatParty stories." Which I do.
phillip ewell.png

Phillip Ewell, lovecraftian horror


Ewell’s “scapegoating” of Schenker and his intellectual descendants “occurs in the much larger context of Black-on-Jew attacks in the U.S.,” Jackson wrote. Ewell “only attacks Schenker as a pretext to introduce his main argument: that liberalism is a racist conspiracy to deny rights to ‘people of color.’”

Beginning a series of sweeping statements about Black values, culture and families, Jackson said Ewell “is uninterested in bringing Blacks up to ‘standard’ so they can compete. On the contrary, he is claiming that those very standards are in themselves racist.” African Americans “have the right to embrace their own culture as precious -- i.e. rap music, hip hop, etc. -- and study and teach it in universities,” he added, “so that the products of the ‘defective,’ ‘racist’ White culture -- i.e. classical music -- be shunted aside.”

Jackson said Black people should set “different priorities” and that a “fundamental reason for the paucity of African-American women and men in the field of music theory is that few grow up in homes where classic music is profoundly valued.”

Drawing comparison to his own white family, Jackson said that classical music was prized by his own working-class Jewish immigrant grandparents.

The line of thinking echoes, to some degree, a recently retracted commentary by Lawrence M. Mead in Society that blamed long-term poverty among Black and Latinx families on their "culture."
Looks like he tried to cancel the wrong jewish musician. Ewell is going to do some walking back, guaranteed. He's uppity enough to think he can challenge jewish university dominance. How foolish.

Currently on vacation, Ewell said he’d seen some of “worst comments” being circulated online. He characterized them as anti-Black in that they express assimilationist but still racist views: that Black people should aspire to whiteness.
" Aspire to whiteness" == wanting to hold blacks to the same standards as others. What dens of retardation universities have become. Keep on lowering the standards, as has been the norm these last 70 years, and watch people keep living up to those lowered standards. And if they don't? Just lower them further, or get rid of them altogether. Failure cannot exist if we never assess performance!
 
View attachment 1686248
Phillip Ewell, lovecraftian horror



Looks like he tried to cancel the wrong jewish musician. Ewell is going to do some walking back, guaranteed. He's uppity enough to think he can challenge jewish university dominance. How foolish.


" Aspire to whiteness" == wanting to hold blacks to the same standards as others. What dens of retardation universities have become. Keep on lowering the standards, as has been the norm these last 70 years, and watch people keep living up to those lowered standards. And if they don't? Just lower them further, or get rid of them altogether. Failure cannot exist if we never assess performance!
Yeah good luck to this guy after doing something that stupid. When he was attacking whites he was free to do it because that's part of the program, but now that he's attacking (((whites))) he's about to get his whole life destroyed.
 
Best part about that article is when they don't even "fullname" Beethoven, it's Ludwig van Beethoven and not Ludwig Beethoven like in the article. Fucking entryist tourists coming in demanding shit when they make even such basic mistakes.
Isn't the Van/Von suffix supposed to mean "of" or "from"? It just shows their ignorance as well.
 
View attachment 1686248
Phillip Ewell, lovecraftian horror



Looks like he tried to cancel the wrong jewish musician. Ewell is going to do some walking back, guaranteed. He's uppity enough to think he can challenge jewish university dominance. How foolish.


" Aspire to whiteness" == wanting to hold blacks to the same standards as others. What dens of retardation universities have become. Keep on lowering the standards, as has been the norm these last 70 years, and watch people keep living up to those lowered standards. And if they don't? Just lower them further, or get rid of them altogether. Failure cannot exist if we never assess performance!
Standards are just an arbitrary line drawn by society, you only perceive it as "lowering standards" because you're thinking along a narrow line, and don't perceive the growth in other areas. /sneed
 
Or the dumbass use of Beethoven at all, when even the "van" prefix to his surname underscores his geographical origin (although in his case the name just signifies his family once lived near a beet farm). Also the use of Bach. Yes, you would usually mean Johann Sebastian Bach, but in any case where you had to disambiguate it you would specify, for instance, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach or his son, identically named J.S. after his grandfather, who was a painter. You hear C.P.E. often enough, too, that you will hear their full names often on stations that play classical music like NPR. This is just a purely dumb article, by a dumb person, saying dumb things. It's yet more SJW bullshit where the "social justice" measure presented as a good idea would benefit literally fucking nobody in even the most infinitesimal way.
And so are we also not supposed to refer to Faulkner, or Steinbeck? Or we can't reference Reagan, or Eisenhower? What about Hitler? We might be referring to Fred Hitler who lives down the street? This is all so stupid. If we say Jesus, we have to say which one so they know we aren't referring to the baseball player Jesus Alou? Fuck this stupid noise.
 
I can't help but smile every time I see them talking about "allies", because it betrays their intentions so beautifully.

An "ally" is not a friend. An "ally" isn't even a peer. It's not someone who's equal to you, or someone you have any sort of relationship with outside of your "alliance". An "ally" is simply someone you are currently working with to achieve an objective. Once that objective is reached and the alliance serves no purpose anymore, it's dissolved and you have no obligation towards the former ally. You are free to knock them over the head, throw them to the curb and stop them along with everybody else you and your ally have previously cast aside.

You see it happening so often, too. Someone who's considered an "ally" gets thrown under the bus the moment their usefulness runs out, or they are seen to be part of "the enemy". An "ally" to these people is nothing but someone they can feel morally justified in betraying as soon as it's convenient. Their allies are the first ones to go to the wall if they get their way.
 
I can't help but smile every time I see them talking about "allies", because it betrays their intentions so beautifully.

An "ally" is not a friend. An "ally" isn't even a peer. It's not someone who's equal to you, or someone you have any sort of relationship with outside of your "alliance". An "ally" is simply someone you are currently working with to achieve an objective. Once that objective is reached and the alliance serves no purpose anymore, it's dissolved and you have no obligation towards the former ally. You are free to knock them over the head, throw them to the curb and stop them along with everybody else you and your ally have previously cast aside.

You see it happening so often, too. Someone who's considered an "ally" gets thrown under the bus the moment their usefulness runs out, or they are seen to be part of "the enemy". An "ally" to these people is nothing but someone they can feel morally justified in betraying as soon as it's convenient. Their allies are the first ones to go to the wall if they get their way.
I know I'm probably repeating what all of these other users have said, but being this militant over fucking identity politics of all things is stupid.
 
Back