New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
Here's why the public doesn't care about this and the press wont spread it:

A: It's leaked by extremely partisan operatives who do not seem trustworthy to the majority of people.
B: No raw data dump, just selective leaking. Why were the text messages censored?
C: Has a foreign taint on it with Bannon's chinese buddies.

DUMP THE FUCKING RAW DATA
 
I know it's not a serious spin. That isn't going to stop people from using that exact same logic though. That's the point.

So if i'm following your logic correctly, there shouldn't be a focus on the pedo stuff because "people" will use that reasoning to automatically dismiss it out of hand. Instead, we should focus on the corruption allegations because of... reasons? Who exactly is your audience that will dismiss pedophilia allegations but see the light in regards to foreign dealings?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Home Again
I have a friend that's absolutely convinced that the stories are false, not because of Russia or whatever, but because there's no way CNN or Fox would pass on reporting if they were true. It'd just be too lucrative.

We're living in separate realities at this point.

Fox has covered this . . .
 
I have a friend that's absolutely convinced that the stories are false, not because of Russia or whatever, but because there's no way CNN or Fox would pass on reporting if they were true. It'd just be too lucrative.

We're living in separate realities at this point.
To be fair, if you hadn't figured out yet just how left biased and TDS the MSM was, that's actually a really good point.

I don't know how reliable this is, but there are articles that CNN has missed it's profit target by 100 million dollars.

 
I'm surprised this had to be spelled out for people, but thank you for your efforts.

Bonus points for adding that slut of a mother, Halie, tricked Hunter into sleeping with her and after Hunter was finally able to do the right thing and break it off she was resentful and pushed these bogus allegations. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
Checked cuckchan a bit ago and it seems like the (((narrative))) is "Hunter is a chad for fucking underage girls. Pedophilia is okay."
 
Bonus points for adding that slut of a mother, Halie, tricked Hunter into sleeping with her and after Hunter was finally able to do the right thing and break it off she was resentful and pushed these bogus allegations. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
You guys really do make a lot out of Hunter sleeping with his dead brother's wife, and very little out of Beau's wife sleeping with his degenerate child-molesting brother while his own corpse was still warm.
 
So if i'm following your logic correctly, there shouldn't be a focus on the pedo stuff because "people" will use that reasoning to automatically dismiss it out of hand. Instead, we should focus on the corruption allegations because of... reasons? Who exactly is your audience that will dismiss pedophilia allegations but see the light in regards to foreign dealings?
You aren't following my logic at all. That's the problem. I already spelled it out a couple pages ago so you can reread that if you want to understand where I'm coming from.
 
If you think that was a serious spin, then you really do need to take a breather.
If you don't think that spin will mostly work if and that's a big if the msm and silicon valley decides they actually need to react and get behind it, then you need to adjust your confidence in people way down
 
I want a special prosecutor to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden.

I want the same special prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton and her fucking emails.

I want them to have a mandate to investigate not only what Hunter did, but what other politicial families were involved. Kerry, Pelosi, and Schumer's kids were all mentioned already, back as the impeachment started.

Unfortunately unless there's an active electoral blowout Nov 3rd this won't be over until December at the earliest.

I want these things too, but 4 years have proven Trump isn't the guy to get it done.

He's good at the economic and diplomatic stuff, working on deals while the Democrats aren't paying attention. But he's completely failed to uproot the institutional rot in politics and government, mostly because it's beyond his capabilities right now, but also because he's trying to do normal Presidential things that need to get done too.

I hear a lot of cope like "you have to expose the swamp monsters before you drain the swamp", or "Trump is exposing the swamp and that's a win". It's true to an extent that Trump's presence is making them crawl out of the woodwork and show their faces. But they aren't being depowered, uprooted, investigated, shut down, or otherwise removed.

We're 4 years into alleged swamp-draining, and the intel agencies are still screwing Trump over, the criminals have cable news gigs, Big Tech is flexing more power than ever, and a corrupt senile 47 year politician is being carried to a close race for the Presidency through openly shady means. The closest thing we had to serious consequences was Trump getting impeached for investigating Biden's corruption.

Anyone who was going to clean house needs a lot of political capital to get it done. Trump has none. He has a grassroots movement and is slowly reforming the GOP into populism, but he doesn't have Congressional committees who'll cover for him, deep state connections to protect him, experienced reformers who will inform him, a political machine to enforce discipline, or the basic credibility to make accusations that stick.

(That doesn't mean he's naive, necessarily. Trump has frequently called out dirty or disloyal people and been proven right later on. But he lacks the organization or attention span to actively root them out, and he lacks the back bench of loyalists to replace them. He also lacks the personality to dig deep into bad organizations and do detailed reforms--he prefers "fire and forget", then making top-down executive orders.)

If Trump gets re-elected, I expect the bluster about Biden to instantly die down. The FBI will eventually unclench once they realize Joe Biden isn't getting power back, Hunter probably gets an official slap on the wrist, and everyone gets to quietly fade away with just some spicy rumors to float around them.
 
Last edited:
If you don't think that spin will mostly work if and that's a big if the msm and silicon valley decides they actually need to react and get behind it, then you need to adjust your confidence in people way down
I think you're dramatically overestimating people's tolerance for pedophilia, or how much that stuff sticks.
 
So if i'm following your logic correctly, there shouldn't be a focus on the pedo stuff because "people" will use that reasoning to automatically dismiss it out of hand. Instead, we should focus on the corruption allegations because of... reasons? Who exactly is your audience that will dismiss pedophilia allegations but see the light in regards to foreign dealings?
The basic allegations of the corruption stuff are pretty iron-clad at this point, and it can't be spun away from Joe, the candidate. The Hunter deviant stuff is interesting and could be used as a hook, but for electioneering, it's only useful as an hors d'oeuvre to get people interested in the emails and business partners detailing corruption. I think they really got the order of the leaks wrong.
 
Bizpacreview covered how Biden's corruption network included people like NY Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator Chuck Schumer, CAGovernor Gavin Newsom, ex CA Governor and Jellow Biafra antagonizer Jerry Brown, Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Rick Scott and NYT shareholder Carlos Slim. Basically a massive chunk of the Democrat/Media elite. No wonder the NYT is keen to kill the story.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/1...den-targets-in-lucrative-energy-scheme-988304
https://archive.vn/wip/xr14W

Can you imagine how fucked the US would be if Biden wins on the back of a media effort to suppress a story about how his family are corrupt perverts?
I'm going to need a source on how has been, autistic and aging punk performer Jello Biafra figures in all this.
 
The basic allegations of the corruption stuff are pretty iron-clad at this point, and it can't be spun away from Joe, the candidate. The Hunter deviant stuff is interesting and could be used as a hook, but for electioneering, it's only useful as an hors d'oeuvre to get people interested in the emails and business partners detailing corruption. I think they really got the order of the leaks wrong.
I agree that they're iron clad, I just don't think the average person cares that much. Given how much they've been hammered with allegations of foreign ties with Trump, they're going to see it as "politics as usual". And when you start bringing in Pelosi, Kerry, and the rest of the merry Ukraine gang, it'll only reinforce that perception.

EDIT: Although if something like the China/spy angle actually pans out, that probably would do the trick.
 
Back