Leighanna Rose Walsh / Princess of the Crystal / ScarletJusticeWitch / Wetflame - Irish Phil & Pro Ronald McDonald Cosplayer.

[MerriedManJr]

No. Mutual respect here or there's nothing, as I've already said.

And again, you're a hypocrite. I pointed out to you several examples of straight up transphobia which you seem to be okay with. But you're more representative of the trans community than I am.

Right.

Stop disrespecting women online. Disrespecting women online is against the juggalo code of ethics.

 

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

Gee, I don't know, how about you simply ASK THEM?


And here I was thinking I was free to type what I wanted, silly me, I had always been whatever-you-typed. No seriously, what does that even mean?.

it's funny, because for years I was banned from forums in no small part to being outspoken and saying things people didn't want to hear. And the people who had the same abusive, egdelord posting style as you tended to get behind those measures. You don't really care about a right to speak out for people that aren't you. People like me had no voice for the longest time. Where were you then?

 

[Roger Rabbit]

it's funny, because for years I was banned from forums in no small part to being outspoken and saying things people didn't want to hear. And the people who had the same abusive, egdelord posting style as you tended to get behind those measures. You don't really care about a right to speak out for people that aren't you. People like me had no voice for the longest time. Where were you then?

We have an edgelord style? Says the edgelord.

 

[Fallensaint]

(1)If this was true, then there wouldn't be a near universal rejection of everything I'm saying. (2)There is little true diversity here, you still have to succumb to a group mentality. I could never be a regular poster here. (3)Nobody remotely critical of the anti-SJW bottom line could be.

(4)Deadnaming someone is intentionally going out of your way to be disrespectful and hurtful to someone on the basis of them being trans. As someone so kindly put, normal people don't have deadnames. (5)People deadname trans women specifically to attack them. You generally have to go to conscious effort to dig it up and use it. It's a ocnscious choice to be transphobic.

(1) black or white fallacy
(2)Hasty generalisation
(3)Personal incredulity
(4) Appeal to emotion
(5) Slippery slope fallacy

 

[Picklechu]

Anti-SJWs and their "logic".

The irony is I've pointed out it's completely irrational to call suicide an individual choice when certain groups are much more likely to engage in it, and nobody's actually responded to that. Just throw red herrings.

Certain demographics are more or less likely to do all kinds of things. Are you telling me that all of these statistics are due to external factors? Your logic is flawed. No one holds a gun to a transexual's head and says "Kill yourself." In order to commit suicide, one must choose to perform an action or series of actions which lead to one's death.

 

[autism420]

it's funny, because for years I was banned from forums in no small part to being outspoken and saying things people didn't want to hear. And the people who had the same abusive, egdelord posting style as you tended to get behind those measures. You don't really care about a right to speak out for people that aren't you. People like me had no voice for the longest time. Where were you then?

Banned from posting your opinions on a privately owned website? Yeah, no fucking shit. Are you new to the internet?

 

[Ivan Komarov]

it's funny, because for years I was banned from forums in no small part to being outspoken and saying things people didn't want to hear. And the people who had the same abusive, egdelord posting style as you tended to get behind those measures. You don't really care about a right to speak out for people that aren't you. People like me had no voice for the longest time. Where were you then?

Handing out bans to people like you for shitting autism all over our sites.

 

[Arkangel]

If this was true, then there wouldn't be a near universal rejection of everything I'm saying. There is little true diversity here

Incorrect. It only seems that way to you because the people posting in this thread just happen to share similar opinions. Also, not everyone on this forum is interested in discussing the same subjects.

Nobody remotely critical of the anti-SJW bottom line could be.

Except many people here share similar contempt for certain Anti-SJW types such as MRAs. I personally find both sides to be equally reprehensible.

Deadnaming someone is intentionally going out of your way to be disrespectful and hurtful to someone on the basis of them being trans.

As I said, before, we're not required to respect people's sensibilities on this forum. Or anywhere on the internet. If you think people are required to kiss people's asses over hurt feelings then the internet is not for you.

As for deadnaming, as I stated before, we're not legally required to refer to people by arbitrary names they give themselves, especially if they haven't gone through the legal process of getting their name changed.

Example, I have no problem reffering to Brianna Wu (Formally known as "John Flynt Walker") by her new name and gender because at least she had the testicular fortitude to go out and try to make herself look more like a woman and getting surgery and her name changed. Of course Brianna Wu is a terrible person for reasons not related to being trans.

I have no respect for people who expect other people to refer to them by egotistical arbitrary names without going through the process of earning them.

 

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

People obsess over these cheap, dumb jokes because lolcows get mad at them, and people like to fuck with lolcows.

Incidentally, death threats on the internet are meaningless, as is doxing, usually, unless it's credit card info or something like that. Worst case scenario people order pizzas to your house, which is kind of shit if you're on a diet, but usually inconvenient at best, annoying at worst.

Finally, from my experience, most trans members here get treated exactly as your average member would.

I'm not mad. Of course I despise the majority of people here for being abusive trash(and have a right to after 10+ years of being abused by people like this), but I'm not going to get aggressive any time soon. And clearly d0xing upsets a lot of people so it's not up to you to decide it's irrelevant. Pretty much all of you have declared anything you do to others acceptable. It's a forum of group sociopathy that's been documented in studies like the one this guy mentions:

Trans people(and sex workers to think of another example) have met with much worse for being d0xed.

 

[Vorkken]

People like me had no voice for the longest time. Where were you then?

Likely not born yet.

Go make the tweet.

 

[Skeletor]

Being too autistic for a Sonic message board is a remarkable accomplishment.

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

credit to @PurpleMonkeyDishwasher for finding this
Also I found her DeviantArt:
http://roseweave.deviantart.com/

That is the single worst 3D model of Fluttershy I have ever seen.

 

[autism420]

I'm not mad.

lol

 

[Boundman]

If this was true, then there wouldn't be a near universal rejection of everything I'm saying. There is little true diversity here, you still have to succumb to a group mentality. I could never be a regular poster here. Nobody remotely critical of the anti-SJW bottom line could be.

Deadnaming someone is intentionally going out of your way to be disrespectful and hurtful to someone on the basis of them being trans. As someone so kindly put, normal people don't have deadnames. People deadname trans women specifically to attack them. You generally have to go to conscious effort to dig it up and use it. It's a ocnscious choice to be transphobic.

That's like saying because society doesn't tolerate the idea we should kill blacks, society is not diverse enough. The reason you get universally rejected almost everywhere you go is because, like racists, you're being ridiculous. I've read the OP, I've read the ED article, and your main issue is you take yourself way too seriously. The whole social justice thing would be completely tolerable if you didn't make everything about it, I have many friends with the same political leanings as you, they just don't take themselves so seriously and so they're not lolcows.

You talk about how you have a great grip on logic, how we're all a forum of transphobes and all transexuals in the forum are just whipped into it, and it reeks of self-importance. How could us, the foolish transphobes, not see the light of your logic and so allow you to salvage the poor lost trans people in the community, who so desperately need your guidance?

Also, by denying trans people in this forum their opinion by writing them off as "misguided" or "whipped into shape", you're saying you know better and they need you to form an opinion on something. Denying someone their ability to speak their opinion is a facet of objectification. Objects need you to guide them, people don't. Please don't reduce the trans people who actively come onto this forum and enjoy themselves to nothing.

People are assholes, people will always use things to get a rise out of you. I won't reveal much about myself, but I know, because I've had things about myself used against me too. And the second you let go of that self-importance and ego and join in, they can't use it against you.

 

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

Handing out bans to people like you for shitting autism all over our sites.

lol. That's exactly it. None of you are free speech advocates at all.

What you are for is forwarding the interests of the abusive & privileged, even if you're from marginalised groups yourself. Which is terrible sad. But that's the bottom line of thi site, as we established.

 

[Blueberry]

@ScarletJusticeWitch

do you think it is ok for trans people to use their trans status as a tool to defraud people out of thousands of dollars (approximately 30K)?

Do you support transgender people abusing the public with malicious and fraudulent dishonesty?

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

Off the cuff remark, not an attempt to make a logical argument. It holds no bearing on the rest of my argument and should not be held as such.

Fallacy fallacy.

Incorrect. You made a claim about your skill at creating a logical argument, and Fallensaint cited a fallacy in that very post to demonstrate you do not have the skill you think you do. It was relevant to the subject at hand, whereas you just tossed out the name of a fallacy without trying to make a coherent argument.

And you continue to wonder why most people don't bother listening to you?

 

[LiquidCooledGonads]

I think she's trying to reach Holden's record for responses.
The lack of crytyping is disappointing, though.

 

[ULTIMATEPRIMETIME]

I'm not mad. Of course I despise the majority of people here for being abusive trash(and have a right to after 10+ years of being abused by people like this), but I'm not going to get aggressive any time soon. And clearly d0xing upsets a lot of people so it's not up to you to decide it's irrelevant. Pretty much all of you have declared anything you do to others acceptable. It's a forum of group sociopathy that's been documented in studies like the one this guy mentions:

Trans people(and sex workers to think of another example) have met with much worse for being d0xed.

Lol you weren't doxed

 

[Hat]

it's funny, because for years I was banned from forums in no small part to being outspoken and saying things people didn't want to hear.

Don't flatter yourself; you're not a crusader or a hero. You get banned for being an annoying bitch.