Leighanna Rose Walsh / Princess of the Crystal / ScarletJusticeWitch / Wetflame - Irish Phil & Pro Ronald McDonald Cosplayer.

[Cuck Norris]

lol. That's exactly it. None of you are free speech advocates at all.

What you are for is forwarding the interests of the abusive & privileged, even if you're from marginalised groups yourself. Which is terrible sad. But that's the bottom line of thi site, as we established.

C'mon dude you're not even trying.

 

[Pikimon]

She/He/Xer is really fat and gross looking and looks like she could make babies cry with her face. I would say she dresses like my grandmother but then-again my grandmother had the sense not to wear nean purple shawls that look lile someone stole some ugly clearence sale drapes from Anna's Linens

 

[Rabbit Bones]

I'm sure trannies would be thrilled to know their self appointed leader is now comparing their plight to that of a prostitute.

 

[autism420]

lol. That's exactly it. None of you are free speech advocates at all.

Free speech does not apply to a privately owned website.

 

[Bassomatic]

Don't flatter yourself; you're not a crusader or a hero. You get banned for being an annoying bitch.

People with Autism can't tell that, hence why he's throwing his victim tranny card around.

Soon we'll be told "don't call anybody"

 

[Arkangel]

lol. That's exactly it. None of you are free speech advocates at all.

Getting banned from a privately owned forum is not a violation of free speech.

Governments can respect free speech. Private sectors are not required to do so.

 

[Angry]

And again, you're a hypocrite. I pointed out to you several examples of straight up transphobia which you seem to be okay with. But you're more representative of the trans community than I am.

The reason that there are so many transpeople lolcows is because a lot of them go "you're transphobic (/ablist/misgynist/whatever other defense they feel like using) if you try to tell me I'm acting like an idiot", so people generally don't point out how foolish a lot of them act. As a result, they just keep acting making asses of themselves over and over until they escalate into lolcow territory.

If you look around, absolutely nobody gets lolcow status just for being trans.

 

[ULTIMATEPRIMETIME]

lol. That's exactly it. None of you are free speech advocates at all.

What you are for is forwarding the interests of the abusive & privileged, even if you're from marginalised groups yourself. Which is terrible sad. But that's the bottom line of thi site, as we established.

If we aren't free speech advocates, why did we unban you so you could give us your opinions?

 

[Roger Rabbit]

lol. That's exactly it. None of you are free speech advocates at all.

What you are for is forwarding the interests of the abusive & privileged, even if you're from marginalised groups yourself. Which is terrible sad. But that's the bottom line of thi site, as we established.

Yes, but we usually DO at least get the side of the story of the people we talk about. We usually allow them to say their complaints. But they usually give us material instead, so they get dealt with by worse people, like Encyclopedia Dramatica or /b/. Be grateful it was just us dealing with you.

 

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

Incorrect. It only seems that way to you because the people posting in this thread just happen to share similar opinions. Also, not everyone on this forum is interested in discussing the same subjects.



Except many people here share similar contempt for certain Anti-SJW types such as MRAs. I personally find both sides to be equally reprehensible.



As I said, before, we're not required to respect people's sensibilities on this forum. Or anywhere on the internet. If you think people are required to kiss people's asses over hurt feelings then the internet is not for you.

As for deadnaming, as I stated before, we're not legally required to refer to people by arbitrary names they give themselves, especially if they haven't gone through the legal process of getting their name changed.

Example, I have no problem reffering to Brianna Wu (Formally known as "John Flynt Walker") by her new name and gender because at least she had the testicular fortitude to go out and try to make herself look more like a woman and getting surgery and her name changed. Of course Brianna Wu is a terrible person for reasons not related to being trans.

I have no respect for people who expect other people to refer to them by egotistical arbitrary names without going through the process of earning them.

You're basically saying you're not required to not be bad people on the internet.

Okay. But I'm certainly not required to not mention that you're bad people. And it shouldn't be so hilarious that I do point this out. It's a statement of fact, but there are some people that seem to take offence to it.

You're a bad guy or oyu're not. Shit or get off the pot. Don't pretend to be appealing to greater ideals if you have no problem bullying people to suciide. Many "libertarians"only like to look at rights on paper and not how they play out in real life. You don't have much of a right to freedom of expression if you're too afraid to speak up, ever.

Also, wow, you so don't get to decide what a valid trans woman is. You can say I can't police you or whatever bollocks, but your reasoning is completely fucked up and wrong. Srugery shouldn't be a rquirement and sayng so just pushes people into a box. There's no one way for a woman to look, and to say otherwise is only proving the feminists you hate so much right taht you're misogynistic as fuck and hold that women should have to go to extra efforts just because they're women. I present mostly femme, but I don't tend to wear makeup often for a number of reasons. It doesn't mae me less of a woman.

 

[Vorkken]

lol. That's exactly it. None of you are free speech advocates at all.

What you are for is forwarding the interests of the abusive & privileged, even if you're from marginalised groups yourself. Which is terrible sad. But that's the bottom line of thi site, as we established.

What are my privileges? List them.

 

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

If we aren't free speech advocates, why did we unban you so you could give us your opinions?

1) You still banned me in the first place. Clearly, "SJWs" are under more restrictions than anti-SJWs, no matter how abusive those anti-SJWs become.

2) You've made it clear that you don't want my opinions regardless. You're not inviting them. It was the whim of one admin that saw me back.

 

[ULTIMATEPRIMETIME]

Don't pretend to be appealing to greater ideals if you have no problem bullying people to suciide.

This website has driven no one to suicide.

1) You still banned me in the first place. Clearly, "SJWs" are under more restrictions than anti-SJWs, no matter how abusive those anti-SJWs become.

2) You've made it clear that you don't want my opinions regardless. You're not inviting them. It was the whim of one admin that saw me back.

I didn't make anything clear, or banned you. In fact, all I've been doing is reply to you politely.

Also, you were banned for spamming the forums, not trans-misogyny.

 

[autism420]

You're basically saying you're not required to not be bad people on the internet.

Okay. But I'm certainly not required to not mention that you're bad people. And it shouldn't be so hilarious that I do point this out. It's a statement of fact, but there are some people that seem to take offence to it.

You're a bad guy or oyu're not. Shit or get off the pot. Don't pretend to be appealing to greater ideals if you have no problem bullying people to suciide. Many "libertarians"only like to look at rights on paper and not how they play out in real life. You don't have much of a right to freedom of expression if you're too afraid to speak up, ever.

Also, wow, you so don't get to decide what a valid trans woman is. You can say I can't police you or whatever bollocks, but your reasoning is completely fucked up and wrong. Srugery shouldn't be a rquirement and sayng so just pushes people into a box. There's no one way for a woman to look, and to say otherwise is only proving the feminists you hate so much right taht you're misogynistic as fuck and hold that women should have to go to extra efforts just because they're women. I present mostly femme, but I don't tend to wear makeup often for a number of reasons. It doesn't mae me less of a woman.

So we are bad people because we discuss stupid and funny people on the internet? This is bullying people to suicide?

Turn the fucking computer off .

 

[Zvantastika]

it's funny, because for years I was banned from forums in no small part to being outspoken and saying things people didn't want to hear. And the people who had the same abusive, egdelord posting style as you tended to get behind those measures. You don't really care about a right to speak out for people that aren't you. People like me had no voice for the longest time. Where were you then?

Have you ever wondered that maybe, just maybe, you were getting banned not for what you said but because you were defending and pushing wrong ideas (defending a molester, seriously?) all over the place?.
I care for what other people say, but you can't blame me if I stop caring when that person starts talking crap or nonsenses.
I'm sorry if you had a hard time in your life, but don't expect me to cope up with you if you haven't learned ANYTHING from those experiences and continue on with your weird attitude despict knowing it will bring you these kind of attention.

 

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

Yes, but we usually DO at least get the side of the story of the people we talk about. We usually allow them to say their complaints. But they usually give us material instead, so they get dealt with by worse people, like Encyclopedia Dramatica or /b/. Be grateful it was just us dealing with you.

You don't seem particularly interested in my side of the story at all. Anything I post that goes into detail gets TL;DRed and ignored but yet you'll welcome lengthy posts d0xing people.

Nobody's even tried to be remotely respectful or treated me like a human being here, but yet I'm at fault for being "smug".

 

[Rabbit Bones]

I present mostly femme

 

[Ivan Komarov]

1) You still banned me in the first place. Clearly, "SJWs" are under more restrictions than anti-SJWs, no matter how abusive those anti-SJWs become.

2) You've made it clear that you don't want my opinions regardless. You're not inviting them. It was the whim of one admin that saw me back.

You can keep crying, but it won't change how websites don't need to cater to you.

 

[Roger Rabbit]

1) You still banned me in the first place. Clearly, "SJWs" are under more restrictions than anti-SJWs, no matter how abusive those anti-SJWs become.

2) You've made it clear that you don't want my opinions regardless. You're not inviting them. It was the whim of one admin that saw me back.

You people give men and women a bad name. SJWs, especially the ones like you, Chris and Vade, show the worst of humanity.

 

[Le Bateleur]

(1) black or white fallacy
(2)Hasty generalisation
(3)Personal incredulity
(4) Appeal to emotion
(5) Slippery slope fallacy

Spoiler: Fallacies, you say?