Leighanna Rose Walsh / Princess of the Crystal / ScarletJusticeWitch / Wetflame - Irish Phil & Pro Ronald McDonald Cosplayer.

yeah but it's formed from a misunderstanding of what transgender is meant to mean, and how that word is constructed. you don't just randomly add ed to the end of things.

also posting dictionary definitions is some kind of antiSJW bingo square I swear. Ask the people who actually use these terms, who are specific experts in this field. Dictionaries are for general catch alls.
You guys can feel free to shoot me, but she's right. The proper term today is the adjective transgender (without the -ed, as it is not a verb), ex. 'that person is transgender', not 'that person is a transgender/that person is transgendered'.
 
Last edited:
Could have sworn I responded to this.

1) I have boundaries you guys lack. I don't make fun of trans women's appearance(except if they go after mine first, and even then I feel bad afterwards, sorry, transgirls can be catty), I don't set up threads documenting people and posting about them in a derogatory fashion, I don't post alongside people who misgender and "question"the entire concept of transgenderism uncritically... I don't erase vulnerable people's experiences, claim them to have "victim coplexes" to invalidate their concerns or think it's okay to Deadname people. Basically I don't do what you guys do, in general, and you're pushing a false equivalence here. I actually care when I hurt someone and am mindful if someone is in a difficult situation that causes them to lash out in a certain way. You're not. At all. And you continue to do hurtful and oppressive things long after you're called out on them.

2) I don't think this sort of response is acceptable to mine or CWC's content. I'm not infallible and sometimes I will say or do dumb things that deserve to be taken apart. But a collected effort of people who are largely more privileged of me to document my life in a derogatory fashion, mocking my appearance etc. is very different to that.

I don't believe in ganging up on vulnerable people, or letting transphobic/ableist shit fly, full stop. Sometimes,. like anyone, I'll fuck up but I do my best to learn and do better. Whereas this forum has constrcuted a framework where it doesn't have to accept responsibility for it's actions, and blames suicide entirely on the victim.

You didn't answer the question. Any of the questions.

My question wasn't HOW DO YOU FEEL about what what we're doing - my question was (and I'll bold this shit for you)

Why do you think it's okay to laugh at Chris' content? Especially given that the mocking (yours too) formed a huge part of why Chris' work ended up as "colorful" as you describe? Why do you think your content (read: facebook posts, tweets, etc) deserves to be "protected" when you're exhibiting some of the same behavior that originally attracted us (and you, you yourself admitted to enjoying laughing at Chris) to Chris?

Why do you claim the high ground given the the hypocrisy you've stated?


I'm even okay with CWC lolcow stuff, as I've followed it for years, as long as there are boundaries. i think it's okay to have a bit of fun with the stuff people like CWC say, but this thread is filled with outright transphobia and ableism, which is not cool.

Also, Chris did say a lot of outright racist and homophobic shit, even if that's largely down to his shitty upbringing at least there's something valid to attack with Chris.
 
yeah but it's formed from a misunderstanding of what transgender is meant to mean

BAAWWW HOW DARE THOSE OXFORDS TRANSPHOBICS TO NOT SAY WHAT TRANS REALLY IS, IS HOW I SAID IT!!!

I don't erase vulnerable people's experiences

We dont erase anything, lolcows normally do it when they talk stupid things, but we have archive.today

and blames suicide entirely on the victim.

because in the cases we see here is always their fault
 
She's just ignoring how much we hate super spergy anti-SJWs as much as SJWs themselves because it doesn't fit with her vision of us as fedora-clad Mountain Dewrito consumer MRA dudebros mocking strong independent women. If she gave the slightest fucks, she'd notice that the biggest lolcows associated with this forum are almost universally the MRA/Sluthate type.

This place basically exists to dump on people who can't behave like a decent, functional human being. And the keyword really is behave: nobody here is making fun of people for having cancer or being in a wheelchair or even being transgender or autistic, provided that they can act like a reasonable fucking person and keep their feels in check. It all comes down to the silly, stupid shit you say and do in public.
 
She's mostly likely of mixed ancestry. If she's of German ancestry, it's likely Sinti and it would be normal to have a regular German name. Roma people generally change their names and hide their ancestry when they move, pretending to be italian/hispanic/whatever.

In some of her pics she clearly has browner undertones to her skin, and she has the hooked nose common with Roma people. I work with Roma people, and I say she likely has
Roma heritage.

It's one thing to pull the whole ~Gypsy princess~ oh my grandmother was totally living in a caravan shtick, but actually outing yourself as Roma doesn't tend to have the same
connotations.

Again I actually work with Roma as my volunteer work, so I know
a bit with regards this. But still relatively little
overall.
Is German Lutheranism especially common among the Romani?
What little knowledge I have would suggest not. Pre-transition Sagal indicated that he/she had very conservative German
Lutheran parents.

Also, the Sinti don't typically refer to themselves as Roma.
 
Last edited:
@ScarletJusticeWitch

please answer all my questions in the order in which they were asked

1. why do you insist on being a drama whore and seeking attention on all corners of the internet? was your childhood so horrible that this is the only way you know how to elicit attention and responses from people?

2. do you really believe that half-assed crossdressing makes you an expert on the struggles of women and entitles you to special privileges that empower your identity in any way, shape or form? if you do, then please go on to explain to us how old you were when you first got brain damage

3. how do you claim not to support harassment of females when there is irrefutable evidence that you have stalked and harassed women in the past?

4. how can you continue to defend yourself after you have been banned from countless websites for your stupidity? wouldnt you think that after getting banned the fifth time onwards that its probably not other people that are in the wrong? are you really naive enough to think that you have banned from countless places across the internet because of a bias towards homosexuals and crossdressers, and if you do is it because you suffer from some form of mental illness that makes it difficult for you to accept reality?

5. there are many transexuals that are able to integrate with society and be freely accepted without being judged. what do you associate as the reason that you are not able to do so? if you answer with anything other than because you are an attention seeking drama whore then what made you become such a pathological liar?

6. are you actually surprised that you suffer abuse from people when you purposely go out of your way to insult others by spreading your self-serving, egotistical agenda and if so, when did you fully master how to utilize the victim card on the internet?

7. how often do you shower?

8. how do you claim to be of superior character to anyone here when you go out of your way to stereotype people you never met before, support fraud and scamming people out of money by creating fake charities, stalk and harass innocent people all while believing that crossdressing and looking like a metrosexual ronald mcdonald in drag automatically identifies you as a woman who has suffered from the chains of oppression? what makes you any better than us, and for that matter considering your a-loggish attitude, what makes you any better than Christian Weston Chandler?

9. do you wake up from dreams of chloe sagal sodomizing you?
 
Last edited:
Except several people on your forum are attacking me in a transphobic manner. This thread is doing so, calling into question my womanhood on the basis of my appearance.

Try again. As long as there are people calling a trans woman "he" you can't claim to be trans friendly.

Again, we aren't going to treat you how you want to be treated because you act like a smug, demanding, entitled twat waffle and make a spectacle of yourself. No one on this Earth is obligated in any way to treat you decently or call you by your preferred pronouns. You bring this behavior and treatment on yourself by the way you act.

No one is under any obligation to call you by female pronouns, and when you don't look even the least bit feminine people are going to call you by male pronouns. People look at you and all they see is a dumpy guy in drag. Bitching about it and acting like a retarded chimp on the internet isn't going to change that.
 
Last edited:
If this was true, then there wouldn't be a near universal rejection of everything I'm saying. There is little true diversity here, you still have to succumb to a group mentality. I could never be a regular poster here. Nobody remotely critical of the anti-SJW bottom line could be.

Deadnaming someone is intentionally going out of your way to be disrespectful and hurtful to someone on the basis of them being trans. As someone so kindly put, normal people don't have deadnames. People deadname trans women specifically to attack them. You generally have to go to conscious effort to dig it up and use it. It's a ocnscious choice to be transphobic.

You seem to be under the misconception that people automatically deserve respect just because they're trans. They don't. If they act like decent human beings then we treat them with respect. If they act like mongoloids, like Brianna Wu, ADF, Chloe Sagal, and so on then they are undeserving of our respect. Respect is earned.
 
Back