New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
Zuckerberg is saying he was told by someone at the FBI that it was Russian disinfo.

It was brought up here pages back that this sort of feels like a proxy war between the CIA and FBI, and while I have no doubt Facebook would censor this because it hurts Biden, at this point I can't also ignore the idea the FBI would meddle as well. They flat out tried to do it in 2016 and the fake pee tapes. They have sat on the laptop for a year and did nothing.

I really do get a feeling it's true that Biden dropped those 30+ CIA informant names to the CCP and got them killed.

Look, Don Biden got dem chinks WHACKED, capiche?
 
I really do get a feeling it's true that Biden dropped those 30+ CIA informant names to the CCP and got them killed.
It seems unlikely that any Biden would know the names of 30 CIA agents, though it's within the realm of possibility Joe heard enough intel he could give China a lead. It's also possible he convinced CIA to put an officer in one of his son's business ventures (assuming they actually had employees). Hunter could have revealed the NOC to the Chinese, which would in turn expose an entire ring.

Just imagine, Queef Hildawg having to vote FOR the man who retired her from politics to remain President. Be still my beating heart.
A wonderful image, but if the Republican party wins the popular vote, the Republican electors cast the votes for President.
 
While I don't think anything will actually come of all this in terms of reducing big tech power I did enjoy big Ted going in raw no lube on Jack.

Jack just comes across as really slimy and dishonest. Got the same vibes when he was on Rogan talking to beanie man.
Agreed nothing will come of this and it's fun to see Jack be a snake, but Jack and his team know that being a snake is how you get out of this with minimal damage. He can just say nothing answers and then continue doing his thing no prob, like they've all done up to this point. He pulled the "We realize that was a mistake and fixed it :)" and that's proven to be successful so far.
 
Yes, Ted Cruz is raking Dorsey over the coals for his bullshit, but is he actually gonna do anything about it?
Ted Cruz is gonna do to jack what he did to Trump! Talk tough, do nothing, in a short time they'll be best buds.

Cruz is going cucky again. He was saying that the Trump should stop talking about hunter shit.

Dude they fucking impeached him for looking into that. Gotta wonder how many repubs are in on the scam...
 
I have never in my life wanted New York City to return to it's Republican roots more than this moment finding this out. And there's a good chance it could. When is the last time there were spontaneous pro-Republican parades through NYC like there was earlier this week? I don't think Reagan even made that happen.

Just imagine, Queef Hildawg having to vote FOR the man who retired her from politics to remain President. Be still my beating heart.

Unfortunately that also isn't how it works. Electoral college votes work like this: there's a pool of electorates the size of the votes in each state. New York is worth 29 votes, so the Dems and the Republicans both have 29 people they've elected as 'electorates', decided by the party (each party running theoretically also has those, but whatever). When the state goes 'blue' or 'red', the state is voting on whether the Dems or the Republicans get to send their electorates to the electoral college vote. The electors are then obligated (but not required) to vote for whichever candidate their party has nominated. If New York goes red all the Dems - Hilldawg included - just sit on their hands, they don't get the right to vote in the EC. (states that split them like Nevada and Maine obviously give the # per party that they won, allowing both sides to go). This is why faithless electors basically just don't happen, because you're sending a republican in to vote for a republican, or a democrat to vote for a democrat. Neither one of them is going to willingly vote for the other side, which is exactly why their party chose them in the first place. (which is why it was a waste to go crying to the EC hoping they'd be faithless, and why it was such a deal when some of Hillary's electoral voters said they'd be faithless if expected to vote for her)

So tl;dr if New York goes red, Hillary will do nothing but sit home and seethe. If it goes blue, Hillary gets to vote for Biden, the end.
 
That is Barr’s job to handle, really. Right now Barr and co. are waiting to see if they have 4 more years to clean house, or 2 months. Timetables matter when it comes to dealing with this level of corruption. Sure the Senate can send a guy to arrest Dorsey right now, but then Twitter would pull every media card they had with all of the mainstream outlets to push any panic button they had, just for the sake of more chaos.
"Trust the plan"

None of these fuckers will ever get prosecuted. White collar laws only apply to the proles.
 
That’s normally the way these things work. Vast conspiracy’s are unwound by small and petty acts of human stupidity. Such as the original WTC bombers being rounded up, because they wanted the deposit on their rental van back. Watergate involved a similar very trivia thing involving a Small check being cashed.
I'm reminded of the mob being undone by the IRS.
 
irreversible.jpg

No wonder the NPC meme was so effective it got labeled as "hate speech". There's a reason why Bezmenov said that at some point legislation and debate simply aren't sufficient to counteract the process. At some point there will be war, and either the useful idiots will be killed during it or they will be killed after it by those they helped bring to power. To look at the faces and hear the voices of the demoralized is to stare into the very face of the utterly dehumanized through indoctrination.

Socialism/Communism utterly strips all moral fiber and logical acuity in favor of the ideology which pits all opposed or neutral to the ideology as the enemy, and the enemy is deserving of any evil that befalls them (hence the mass rape campaigns, the public genocide/lynchings, the evils of the gulags, Black Maria vans etc.). As for those under the ideology? They must refrain from ever speaking anything that would undermine the champions of the ideology (hence the tolerance of pedophilia and silencing of victims in Stalin's government).

Victims are silenced. Truths that would undermine the ideology or its champions are erased or concealed. Any and all cruelty is justified against those opposed to the ideology and/or its champions. It's expected you, being faithful to the ideology, are to spy on your fellow ideologues continually to watch for treachery, and if found you must expose them, report them, shame them and regard them as dead to you no matter who they are (spouse, child, etc.)

In short: Socialism is literally a cult. It meets all the qualifications of a cult by any definition. It's the world most successful, widespread and enduring cult without deity.
So when you see/hear people speaking this way like "I'd support [ideological champion] even if he raped my child", just remember that, historically speaking-- people did:

1914: Arctic Sex Comedy Biography of Young Stalin pg 39

Sverdlov may have disapproved of Stalin’s seduction of the thirteen – year – old, the latest in a line of adolescent girls romanced by the thirty – something Georgian. And Stalin may well have thrown him out in order to enjoy more privacy with his little mistress. But this was far from the end of the scandal. ... At night, Lidia would creep into his room, recounts Stalin’s first biographer, Essad Bey, who must have talked to fellow exiles. Certainly she was not shy about recalling what underwear he favored—“He wore white underwear and a sailor – striped vest,” she confided to her interviewer in 1952 when Stalin was almost worshiped as a demigod."
... The affair might have remained tolerable, but there was worse to come: Lidia fell pregnant with Stalin’s child.
... For decades there were rumours of Stalin’s rape or seduction of a girl in Turukhansk and his fathering a child. [...] The stories were repeated in biographies and sensational newspaper articles but seemed outlandish, presumably just anti-Stalin myths. But it is confirmed by the KGB in General Serov’s 18 July 1956 memorandum to First Secretary Khrushchev and the Politburo. Serov, a brutal Stalinist secret policeman, had the sense to separate himself from Beria [known major serial pedophile and rapist] and attach himself to Khrushchev. After Stalin’s death, he assisted Khrushchev in the arrest and execution of Beria, becoming the first Chairman of the KGB, the new version of the secret police. His memo was read in secrecy at a Politburo meeting and signed by all Stalin’s old henchmen before being consigned to the top secret “Special File.”
Keep it secret. Keep them silent. Whatever it takes for the ideology...
 
This is why faithless electors basically just don't happen, because you're sending a republican in to vote for a republican, or a democrat to vote for a democrat. Neither one of them is going to willingly vote for the other side, which is exactly why their party chose them in the first place. (which is why it was a waste to go crying to the EC hoping they'd be faithless, and why it was such a deal when some of Hillary's electoral voters said they'd be faithless if expected to vote for her)
The rules on faithless electors differ by state. In 2016 in my state of WA we had four faithless electors, three of whom voted for Colin Powell, a Republican, even though the state was a solid Democrat win. All of them were fined $1000 each for this.
 
The rules on faithless electors differ by state. In 2016 in my state of WA we had four faithless electors, three of whom voted for Colin Powell, a Republican, even though the state was a solid Democrat win. All of them were fined $1000 each for this.
Interesting. I'm not sure it's right to fine faithless electors. Technically it's the electors right to vote for whomever, and the party's responsibility to make sure they pick electors who will vote for who the party nominated. It's our education's fault that most people voting don't realize what they're technically voting for.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Tucker Carlson said tonight that on Monday this week a source provided a collection of confidential information regarding the Biden family. They believe the information is legit. When Tucker was in LA to do the interview with Bobulinski they requested the producer in NY to ship the documents overnight, however they never arrived. A large national carrier (probably UPS or FedEx) told them that it had been opened and the contents were missing.
 

Attachments

  • tucker.mp4
    6.9 MB
Back