- Joined
- May 18, 2014
She looks like a foot with dreadlocks.
Unpopular Opinions about Video Games
- Thread starter punchabunch
- Start date
She looks like a foot with dreadlocks.
Groundbreaking-maize
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
Cool, the poster child of the "no can make peepee hard" mentality.
Male characters must still look like movie stars however, unless you're playing a way out or some shit.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2019
Phasmophobia is okay but the game is the definition of FOTM streamer bait.
Bioshock Infinite is a bad game.
(lacklustre and boring with high production values, typical AAA game)
- Joined
- May 24, 2019
Watching Matthewmatosis tear it to shreds was one of the best parts of Bioshock Infinite existing, tbh, he even says "nigger" a couple of times in his critique video and didn't get demonetised, the madlad.
![LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV]](http://uploads.kiwifarms.st/data/avatars/l/61/61177.jpg?1699571951){kind=avatar}
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
Bioshock Infinite was the only good Bioshock
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
Is Ubisoft apolitical?
Honestly, I think many of their games have political themes but it's not abrasive enough to be an issue.
Most of their franchises are copy paste so the themes are the only thing that sets them apart.
Honestly, I think many of their games have political themes but it's not abrasive enough to be an issue.
Most of their franchises are copy paste so the themes are the only thing that sets them apart.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
They're French, the only thing strong about them is their body odor.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
I don't know what's worse with them: their Ubisoft game model or their Ubisoft monetization model.
Almost all their games now have a set season pass. And microtransactions, even in single player affairs.
If you'd really want to play a Ubisoft game, wait a year or for a sale to get all the content.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
It's the main reason why I'm hoping Horizon Zero Dawn, God of War, and Ghosts of Tsushima all do well for their sequels next gen. They're all direct competitors to Ubisoft's bullshit and are in the same genre. They're not parceled out DLC bullshit or season pass faggotry. They all contain a complete game where as Ubisoft looks to cut shit out and sell it on top of the base price.
If you can take the wind out of Ass Creed that's a big hit to Ubisoft that would maybe make them change their ways.
Groundbreaking-maize
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
starborn427614
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2020
It's worth one (1) playthrough at the very least. It's like a popcorn flick in the way you end up having more fun just turning your brain off and vegging out.
- Joined
- May 26, 2020
An absolute disappointment of a game. Aside from the (admittedly lovely) visuals, it was a complete letdown. Then again, I'm a complete nerd for the first two games, so I may be biased.
I wouldn't call her cute, but I loved the gameplay and storyline, certainly intrigued for what the sequel has to offer.
On topic for the thread:
Every Assassin's Creed game after Rogue sucked camel dong. Unity, too (even though it released simultaneously with Rogue). The last few would be passable games (but probably not big franchise starters) if they'd been released under a different IP, but tagging AC onto it creates expectations. Which were firmly not met. Which, funnily enough, is true for Bioshock Infinite, IMO.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2020
If an antagonist is described as "no one really knows his true motives," it means that the writers just got lazy.
Doubly so if it is some Illuminati-like organization. I hate that overused trope so much.
Doubly so if it is some Illuminati-like organization. I hate that overused trope so much.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2016
That kind of thing only works if the antagonist is some Lovecraftian nightmare whose very existence is beyond our comprehension. At least in that scenario it's a being that literally cannot be understood. Anything else though, I agree.
Tanner Glass
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2016
I think done right it can be well-written. I think the issue more is "this other game did it so we'll do it too" that you see a lot of.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
The Boss's arc was that she was fully committed to being a tool of the state, a disposable soldier. She was willing to die and be branded a traitor after being a hero. Big Boss saw that, it left such a deep scar in him he questioned his loyalty to the existing axiom of what a soldier is supposed to, he questioned his country and figured he could make it right with child soldiers and dangerous hamsters in his own nation. Plus generous amounts of disposable soldiers in every room unless they were a boss.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2020
Tight eventful 10 hours games are better than 200 hours big map, full of outpost captures and quest markers games that never end (Looking at you AC Odyssey). I also prefer tight movies than TV series. Might influence my judgment.
Edit : i used the word tight too much this post is unconfortable
Edit : i used the word tight too much this post is unconfortable
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2016
I've been noticing that whenever a game company re-releases or localizes an old game, the common response is that you could just emulate it instead.
I'm not big into emulation. I do it occasionally, mostly for stuff I'm pretty sure is never coming stateside like the original Shin Megami Tensei games and Mother 3, or when I want an experience that simply isn't possible in the base game (like playing FF6 on GBA with the original SNES soundtrack). I think it's a good thing when developers decide to re-release old stuff because it means those games can still exist on modern hardware. The 2000s were almost 20 years ago, those consoles are getting old and will stop working one day. Having those games on modern consoles remedies that problem.
Granted, it's hard to argue against the fact that emulation is free and depending on the emulator you can run damn near anything. I just think that being able to own older games on current systems is a net positive.
I'm not big into emulation. I do it occasionally, mostly for stuff I'm pretty sure is never coming stateside like the original Shin Megami Tensei games and Mother 3, or when I want an experience that simply isn't possible in the base game (like playing FF6 on GBA with the original SNES soundtrack). I think it's a good thing when developers decide to re-release old stuff because it means those games can still exist on modern hardware. The 2000s were almost 20 years ago, those consoles are getting old and will stop working one day. Having those games on modern consoles remedies that problem.
Granted, it's hard to argue against the fact that emulation is free and depending on the emulator you can run damn near anything. I just think that being able to own older games on current systems is a net positive.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
This isn't always possible though due to a number of reasons (usually legal issues with the developer/publisher) and it can end up with emulation/piracy as the only option once the old hardware stops working (Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire, The Matrix: Path of Neo, anything by Silicon Knights, etc)