You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Autumn Neville / Puppychan / pawpawchan48 / puppkittyfan1 / Wolfertinger666 / Bunnyhazedayz / Salem - Degrading artist, perpetual victim, surrounds herself with a personal army of minors. Chaser for the trans fats, both literally and metaphorically. Tried to commit suicide via blueberry. “Pups gotta eat!” Now a with an equally obnoxious boyfriend.
The way she draws the thigh pudge makes it seem like those stockings are cutting off her circulation. Nothing wrong with a little thigh indent. This just seems like the poor girl is wearing Saran wrap.
And people bitch at Antoons over the sexual crap of some furry minor? She's already doing it herself! Jesus fucking Christ! This is why the woke police are destroying their credibility. At best Antoons just put a black bar on her pussy and just had blood come out of it. That's all. That doesn't make him a pedo. Just a retarded Edgelord of stupid. I could show you way worse artwork of cartoon minors getting sexualized by the internet but for the sake of this forum site. I'm not going to post them here. But Rule34 will give you an idea if you typed in Gwen and Ben 10 (The Series)
I could show you way worse artwork of cartoon minors getting sexualized by the internet but for the sake of this forum site. I'm not going to post them here. But Rule34 will give you an idea if you typed in Gwen and Ben 10 (The Series)
You take my comment too seriously. I'm saying from a point of view of a literally who that PuppyChan will claim people hate her because of this and that but the minute she gets fanart that let's just say sexualized her is when I draw the line. Sorry, I'm just retarded so mark this as shit comment no one cares about.
I wonder if her old artwork was drawn with a stylus tablet compared to her using just her finger on her phone to draw with Autodesk. Program and tools aside, her new stuff is borderline lazy. Does she even use layers? There's literally white pixels from the bucket fill tool not filling the white space in completely, she couldn't be arsed to do a touch-up with a 3-pixel brush?
I wonder if her old artwork was drawn with a stylus tablet compared to her using just her finger on her phone to draw with Autodesk. Program and tools aside, her new stuff is borderline lazy. Does she even use layers? There's literally white pixels from the bucket fill tool not filling the white space in completely, she couldn't be arsed to do a touch-up with a 3-pixel brush?
Along with that the colouring is fucking awful, the stockings in that Panties and Stockings character are poorly done, and she clearly doesn't know any colour theory, like you said she's too lazy to colour in, and uses the bucket tool, background is literally just gradients, and the fabrics are inconsistent and plain ugly. Just like her mental age, her art too is regressing.
God he even pulled the damn minor card, if you really hate the dude just let him die in the darkness. But since Antoons is the new commentary channel bait we'll have to see this ecosystem go through another edgy rando
Only an idiot would believe that. In non-suggestive versions of this pose, the character is usually lying down facing the camera: not their panty-clad ass with view of a big side-boob that's doing the ecchi squish. And of course, the classic "thicc thigh" stocking pinch. The sona is even looking at the viewer like "oh didnt see you there, hee-hee!" It's so obvious.
As her 18th birthday approaches I see she's gradually adding in suggestive/sexual elements to her art, probably to ease her fanbase in for when she does full-on furry porn lol. I guess they'll defend it as "hey bro leave her alone, this is artistic nudity not filthy hentai like you sick fucks think it is!!1!"
Only an idiot would believe that. In non-suggestive versions of this pose, the character is usually lying down facing the camera: not their panty-clad ass with view of a big side-boob that's doing the ecchi squish. And of course, the classic "thicc thigh" stocking pinch. The sona is even looking at the viewer like "oh didnt see you there, hee-hee!" It's so obvious.
As her 18th birthday approaches I see she's gradually adding in suggestive/sexual elements to her art, probably to ease her fanbase in for when she does full-on furry porn lol. I guess they'll defend it as "hey bro leave her alone, this is artistic nudity not filthy hentai like you sick fucks think it is!!1!"
That would be Tammy's role then since Autumn's drawn her with a bulge to suggest she never got bottom surgery... if she really wanted to go full DtM she'd post NSFW Tammy and Magna on a private account
More white spaces from where the paint bucket couldn't touch, a further lack of understanding for line weight, the left leg being substantially longer than the right leg, and glasses that are floating in mid-air instead of resting on her ears. Nah, I'm sure her art isn't regressing, you guys are just ablest and racist.
Only an idiot would believe that. In non-suggestive versions of this pose, the character is usually lying down facing the camera: not their panty-clad ass with view of a big side-boob that's doing the ecchi squish. And of course, the classic "thicc thigh" stocking pinch. The sona is even looking at the viewer like "oh didnt see you there, hee-hee!" It's so obvious.
As her 18th birthday approaches I see she's gradually adding in suggestive/sexual elements to her art, probably to ease her fanbase in for when she does full-on furry porn lol. I guess they'll defend it as "hey bro leave her alone, this is artistic nudity not filthy hentai like you sick fucks think it is!!1!"
Eh puppychan is at that age where people have puberty and discover their sexuality and that stuff so its most likely that tho there could be context i could be missing and if im am wrong then please correct me.
Eh puppychan is at that age where people have puberty and discover their sexuality and that stuff so its most likely that tho there could be context i could be missing and if im am wrong then please correct me.
Trust me I understand it, but the issue I have with her is that she's always virtue signalling about "protecting minors from being groomed" and similar things yet she's constantly trying to portray these suggestive images as the opposite of being even a little sexual. If she's going to preach like that to people, then she ought to practice it and put the suggestive artwork on the side account and filter the followers so people younger than her won't see it-- she has 40k followers on her main so it's impossible to do that compared to a smaller private one. Either way, she should just own it and not try to disguise it as part of her wholesome 100 big chungus uwu image; then I wouldn't sound so critical of it. Her followers shouldn't dogpile other minors for how they reply, esp since Autumn's doing it to herself. Feels hypocritical to me.
And an interesting development just happened:
This artist blocked Autumn for unknown reasons, but brought it to people's attention today that she tried to contact them via puppydansen, which until today was self-titled her NSFW alt. Their main issue was that puppychan's 17 and had been potentially exposing minors following this account to nsfw content and/or attempting to follow 18+ accounts while not being legally 18 (I believe adult art accounts put "no minors" just as a legal disclaimer/safeguard). Others in the thread mention having to unfollow Autumn because apparently her likes show up on their feed and one post was IRL porn of a woman.
Other's thoughts:
Apparently this small buzz was enough to catch Migz's attention, and... actually talk to Autumn about it? Not sure how effective that was since she IMMEDIATELY changed the title of puppydansen to say "side account" and wrote an apology tweet once she got caught redhanded.
Puppychan admits it herself that the acct was nsfw.
I'm pretty sure she's had to apologize for this before, but un-deleted her side account not that long after saying she got rid of it. I wish we had an idea of what content puppydansen has on it but we only have this to go off of, (courtesy of a Twitter user who will probably be suspended for posting it directly under this post).
Trust me I understand it, but the issue I have with her is that she's always virtue signalling about "protecting minors from being groomed" and similar things yet she's constantly trying to portray these suggestive images as the opposite of being even a little sexual. If she's going to preach like that to people, then she ought to practice it and put the suggestive artwork on the side account and filter the followers so people younger than her won't see it-- she has 40k followers on her main so it's impossible to do that compared to a smaller private one. Either way, she should just own it and not try to disguise it as part of her wholesome 100 big chungus uwu image; then I wouldn't sound so critical of it. Her followers shouldn't dogpile other minors for how they reply, esp since Autumn's doing it to herself. Feels hypocritical to me.
And an interesting development just happened:
View attachment 1694468
This artist blocked Autumn for unknown reasons, but brought it to people's attention today that she tried to contact them via puppydansen, which until today was self-titled her NSFW alt. Their main issue was that puppychan's 17 and had been potentially exposing minors following this account to nsfw content and/or attempting to follow 18+ accounts while not being legally 18 (I believe adult art accounts put "no minors" just as a legal disclaimer/safeguard). Others in the thread mention having to unfollow Autumn because apparently her likes show up on their feed and one post was IRL porn of a woman.
Apparently this small buzz was enough to catch Migz's attention, and... actually talk to Autumn about it? Not sure how effective that was since she IMMEDIATELY changed the title of puppydansen to say "side account" and wrote an apology tweet once she got caught redhanded. View attachment 1694540 View attachment 1694541
Puppychan admits it herself that the acct was nsfw. View attachment 1694543
I'm pretty sure she's had to apologize for this before, but un-deleted her side account not that long after saying she got rid of it. I wish we had an idea of what content puppydansen has on it but we only have this to go off of, (courtesy of a Twitter user who will probably be suspended for posting it directly under this post).
I know the chances of Twitter actually enforcing their rules is low, and especially since Puppychan is gonna be 18 in what, a couple of weeks anyway, aren't kids...not supposed to have accounts made for looking at, posting, and creating NSFW content?
You'd think as one of the biggest social media sites they'd have rules in place for that to at least cover their asses. I'm not a legal beagle but I do recall reading somewhere that children aren't allowed to create pornographic content in the US even if it's fictional, not that it's ever enforced as we can see. Please rate me as dumb and autistic if I am wrong.
If she's gonna be horny online, because let's face it we were all horny teens on the net once, don't do it under the guise of "It's just art bro I'm just a kid don't groom kids bruh"...or tell everyone you're a teenager online in the first place.
Also lmao right as you bring up the possibility of futa porn there it is
EDIT: I need to look at actual tweets because it's 2 weeks from now not months, I am a sped speed reader
Trust me I understand it, but the issue I have with her is that she's always virtue signalling about "protecting minors from being groomed" and similar things yet she's constantly trying to portray these suggestive images as the opposite of being even a little sexual. If she's going to preach like that to people, then she ought to practice it and put the suggestive artwork on the side account and filter the followers so people younger than her won't see it-- she has 40k followers on her main so it's impossible to do that compared to a smaller private one. Either way, she should just own it and not try to disguise it as part of her wholesome 100 big chungus uwu image; then I wouldn't sound so critical of it. Her followers shouldn't dogpile other minors for how they reply, esp since Autumn's doing it to herself. Feels hypocritical to me.
And an interesting development just happened:
View attachment 1694468
This artist blocked Autumn for unknown reasons, but brought it to people's attention today that she tried to contact them via puppydansen, which until today was self-titled her NSFW alt. Their main issue was that puppychan's 17 and had been potentially exposing minors following this account to nsfw content and/or attempting to follow 18+ accounts while not being legally 18 (I believe adult art accounts put "no minors" just as a legal disclaimer/safeguard). Others in the thread mention having to unfollow Autumn because apparently her likes show up on their feed and one post was IRL porn of a woman.
Apparently this small buzz was enough to catch Migz's attention, and... actually talk to Autumn about it? Not sure how effective that was since she IMMEDIATELY changed the title of puppydansen to say "side account" and wrote an apology tweet once she got caught redhanded. View attachment 1694540 View attachment 1694541
Puppychan admits it herself that the acct was nsfw. View attachment 1694543
I'm pretty sure she's had to apologize for this before, but un-deleted her side account not that long after saying she got rid of it. I wish we had an idea of what content puppydansen has on it but we only have this to go off of, (courtesy of a Twitter user who will probably be suspended for posting it directly under this post).
Wrong just because ponychan might done something bad doesn't mean that a 30 year old man should animate her a 17 year old btw shooting period blood from her underparts.
Trust me I understand it, but the issue I have with her is that she's always virtue signalling about "protecting minors from being groomed" and similar things yet she's constantly trying to portray these suggestive images as the opposite of being even a little sexual. If she's going to preach like that to people, then she ought to practice it and put the suggestive artwork on the side account and filter the followers so people younger than her won't see it-- she has 40k followers on her main so it's impossible to do that compared to a smaller private one. Either way, she should just own it and not try to disguise it as part of her wholesome 100 big chungus uwu image; then I wouldn't sound so critical of it. Her followers shouldn't dogpile other minors for how they reply, esp since Autumn's doing it to herself. Feels hypocritical to me.
And an interesting development just happened:
View attachment 1694468
This artist blocked Autumn for unknown reasons, but brought it to people's attention today that she tried to contact them via puppydansen, which until today was self-titled her NSFW alt. Their main issue was that puppychan's 17 and had been potentially exposing minors following this account to nsfw content and/or attempting to follow 18+ accounts while not being legally 18 (I believe adult art accounts put "no minors" just as a legal disclaimer/safeguard). Others in the thread mention having to unfollow Autumn because apparently her likes show up on their feed and one post was IRL porn of a woman.
Apparently this small buzz was enough to catch Migz's attention, and... actually talk to Autumn about it? Not sure how effective that was since she IMMEDIATELY changed the title of puppydansen to say "side account" and wrote an apology tweet once she got caught redhanded. View attachment 1694540 View attachment 1694541
Puppychan admits it herself that the acct was nsfw. View attachment 1694543
I'm pretty sure she's had to apologize for this before, but un-deleted her side account not that long after saying she got rid of it. I wish we had an idea of what content puppydansen has on it but we only have this to go off of, (courtesy of a Twitter user who will probably be suspended for posting it directly under this post).