Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Times article on the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPC)’s decision on dodgy as fuck online pharmacy, ClearChemist, who issue cancer drugs to body-hating teenagers on the orders of a couple of disgraced Gender Quacks.

A pharmacy that arranged home deliveries of life-changing medication for transgender children which bypassed NHS safeguards has been found to have “system-wide failures” by its regulator.
Clear Chemist dispensed medication, including puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, using online prescriptions issued by a clinic overseas that is not subject to British regulatory requirements.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/static/digital-technology-training-huawei-ict-academy-skills/?ilc=nativo


The pharmacy, which is based in Aintree, Merseyside, offered “quick, discreet delivery” to the patient’s home as part of its service.
The prescriptions were from GenderGP, a private company founded by Helen Webberley, who was fined in 2018 for running an unlicensed transgender clinic in south Wales and suspended by the General Medical Council. She initially moved the clinic to Spain and last year it was acquired by Harland International, which is registered in Hong Kong.
When The Times reported earlier this month that parents of transgender children could bypass safeguards by paying for online prescriptions dispensed by Clear Chemist it prompted an immediate inspection by the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPC).

The regulator has now announced the outcome, saying Clear Chemist was found not to be meeting some of the standards for registered pharmacies to ensure safe and effective care for patients and the public.
Inspectors found serious system-wide failures in the governance and management of risk at the pharmacy and a lack of safeguarding which presents a risk to patient safety, the regulator said.
“Inspectors considered the volume and type of medicines supplied, the age range and potential vulnerability of the patients, and the additional risks of working with prescribers based in the EEA [European Economic Area] and working outside UK regulatory oversight,” the GPC said.
The GPC issued an improvement notice requiring multiple changes to be made by the pharmacy, including to assess risks to patients from its services and to update its safeguarding procedures.
Clear Chemist’s arrangement for dispensing online prescriptions issued from an overseas clinic appeared to take advantage of a loophole that allows prescriptions for certain medicines written in a country within the EEA or Switzerland to be dispensed in Britain.
But guidelines from the GPC last year said pharmacies must not work with online providers who are trying to circumvent the regulatory oversight in place within the UK.
Children treated for gender dysphoria within the NHS must be referred by their GP, have a telephone assessment and between three and six therapy sessions, as well as two sessions with an endocrinology team before they can proceed. The NHS guidelines are being reviewed.
Duncan Rudkin, chief executive of the GPC, said: “We know that people receiving medicines from Clear Chemist have been concerned about how our actions may affect them.
“We want to reassure everyone that we have not asked the pharmacy to stop supplying medicines to patients undergoing treatment for gender dysphoria. We have directed the pharmacy to make improvements to make sure that people receive medicines that are safe and effective for them.
“Our inspectors will continue to work with the superintendent pharmacist to make the improvements needed and to support continuity of care for the pharmacy’s patients.”
Clear Chemist, owned by RB Healthcare, told The Times earlier this month that it sought to ensure that patients gave consent to notify their GP about their private treatment. It said it wrote to patients’ doctors as an additional safeguard, saying GPs could contact the company if they had concerns about treatment.

 
More from botched ballsack-labia “stealth” notyourdonut

it feels deeply unethical to tell these patients that they can achieve total stealth passing. This photo just screams male body.. the meaty shoulders, arms, torso. Without the scars underneath, these boob implants look to be the same size as big pecs on a fit dude. This entire body shape does not look female. They think these surgeons will carve them up like Nikita Dragun, instead you come out of surgery still looking like a junior varsity linebacker.

I’m going to spoiler it but it literally looks like a shirtless man.
CF39563C-284C-43F6-986C-9FDC835CD40F.jpeg

dudes talking about being bimbos teehee uwu
12DF565C-8935-469E-8A1E-2762FD27CB5D.jpeg
 
More from botched ballsack-labia “stealth” notyourdonut

it feels deeply unethical to tell these patients that they can achieve total stealth passing. This photo just screams male body.. the meaty shoulders, arms, torso. Without the scars underneath, these boob implants look to be the same size as big pecs on a fit dude. This entire body shape does not look female. They think these surgeons will carve them up like Nikita Dragun, instead you come out of surgery still looking like a junior varsity linebacker.

I’m going to spoiler it but it literally looks like a shirtless man.
View attachment 1694160
dudes talking about being bimbos teehee uwu
View attachment 1694163
Ballsack labia, ballsack tits.
 
Which butcher did this?

576DBD54-B663-4DAF-8822-1A7139D4E07D.jpeg

Dr. Jennifer Hyer
another obgyn
“These patients are the happiest patients in the hospital,” Denver Health gender surgeon Dr. Jennifer Hyer said. “After having this huge surgery they have these halos of happiness around them – almost like they’re glowing.”
article
 
There's a lot of talking about revisions in all of these screenshots, and the tone of the comments suggests that going in for multiple revisions is seen as normal or even expected. I don't know how this would compare to other types of complex reconstructive surgery for people who had had grievous injuries, cancer, whatever. It's weirdly flippant about something that seems like it should be a big deal.
 
This should be fucking illegal. The "doctors" who are willing to create this monstrosity deserve to be hanging from fucking lampposts.

I have never seen this before, and I don't want to see it again. The point of being in medicine is to HEAL PEOPLE, not to mutilate them into some inhuman monstrosity because they have a mental disorder. I've seen a lot of shit in my time, and this..this is something else. Who the fuck sees a request for a vagina to be created in addition to a penis and goes "Yeah, I should totally do that?". This is beyond the disgusting surgeries trannies get - this should be criminal.
I don't see what the big deal is. The standard tranny surgery is already nothing but butchery so if anyone wants to go full circus freak with their insane fetishism at this point that's their prerogative. It's far too late to pretend anyone involved in this has any genuine morals.
 
Anyway, he‘s not wrong when he says ‘it doesn’t look like a proper vagina should’, in fact, I would describe it as
"a second belly button, and a spare arsehole"

After seeing that pus filled monstrosity, I went back to check whether it came from the same surgeon as this abomination from a few pages ago. Spoiler - it doesn't. This is by Katherine Gast, not Jennifer Hyer. It's curious that with the women surgeons it's all about the holes, while the men are a group of Slartibartfasts who work more on the contours and landscaping.

And it looks like the owner of the pepperpot abdomen has changed tack, and is eschewing surgeons for the old fashioned penis pump.

untitled1.jpg


Sadly the mods of that sub got there first. Although the obvious question is if he wants a bigger cock (not that I saw anything that looked vaguely penile in those photos), why have it cut off in the first place.
 
Isn't Hyer the doc who gave Kevin Gibs his am hole? And who has been dodging his questions and concerns ever since?
Yep. The very same butcher. If you hate yourself, there are pictures here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/kevin...the-artwork-of-kevin-gibes.65259/post-6476645

I don't see what the big deal is. The standard tranny surgery is already nothing but butchery so if anyone wants to go full circus freak with their insane fetishism at this point that's their prerogative. It's far too late to pretend anyone involved in this has any genuine morals.

To be fair, any doc in this practice ought to be stripped of their license and made to be a pariah. Unfortunately, opposing this shit can get you to lose your license in some countries...
 
There's a lot of talking about revisions in all of these screenshots, and the tone of the comments suggests that going in for multiple revisions is seen as normal or even expected. I don't know how this would compare to other types of complex reconstructive surgery for people who had had grievous injuries, cancer, whatever. It's weirdly flippant about something that seems like it should be a big deal.
It's the same on Susan's, yet nobody tells people in advance that they will probably need revisions.
 
More from botched ballsack-labia “stealth” notyourdonut

[...]

I’m going to spoiler it but it literally looks like a shirtless man.
View attachment 1694160
dudes talking about being bimbos teehee uwu
View attachment 1694163
That's because it is a shirtless man.

LOL, when he said he was "stealth," but somehow kept getting pinged by San Franciscans, I knew he was nowhere even close to his delusion of passing. And those obvious bolt-ons, on his man-bod, aren't going to help.

There's a lot of talking about revisions in all of these screenshots, and the tone of the comments suggests that going in for multiple revisions is seen as normal or even expected. I don't know how this would compare to other types of complex reconstructive surgery for people who had had grievous injuries, cancer, whatever. It's weirdly flippant about something that seems like it should be a big deal.
Honestly, with a surgery this complicated, I would expect it to be done in stages. Maybe do the first, major surgery, then wait six months to a year for everything to heal and settle in before going back and doing cosmetic work.

I'm not a surgeon, but have known a combat vet who, over the course of a year and a half, underwent major reconstructive surgeries that were less complicated than creating a neovag (it was reassembling previously-existing structures, not creating something entirely new). It took three procedures to restore function, because it was understood that there was only so far all that meat and bone and other structures could be tweaked at one time. He also had two susequent, minor procedures that were partly cosmetic. but also decreased pain and improved function.

But that's not what happens with GRS. It's a one-shot deal. The surgeon radically rearranges all of that flesh into something that didn't even exist before, and that's it; they're done. Over and over again, we've seen horror stories of patients who had terrible post-op complications, and ghastly outcomes, but the original butcher wouldn't do a revision, and trying to find another butcher who will is nearly impossible.

After seeing that pus filled monstrosity, I went back to check whether it came from the same surgeon as this abomination from a few pages ago. Spoiler - it doesn't. This is by Katherine Gast, not Jennifer Hyer. It's curious that with the women surgeons it's all about the holes, while the men are a group of Slartibartfasts who work more on the contours and landscaping.
Are Katherine Gast and Jennifer Hyer actual women, though? Or are they transgender, like Marci Bowers is? Gast looks obviously trans to me; Hyer is--well, ambiguous. And I'd expect a trans surgeon to be much more likely to be "all about the holes" than an actual woman.
 
Back