Sluthate.com

[Duke Nukem]

This guy...this fucking guy...

http://sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=95043

Spoiler

 

[Positron]

I do like the Manosphere description of Sigma. It's basically "exactly the same as alpha but with no friends".

So just a mythical creature like "incel".

If you go back to the ethological definition, terms like "alpha" and "beta" are given in relation to the other animals in the same pack. If there is no pack, there is no rank.

 

[SpessCaptain]

Spoiler: Trying to work this all out

So let me get this straight;
You think a long term user here, someone who has witnessed what happens when you show your power level about things like this multiple times, decided to start up an account on Sluthate, a website he was aware we were watching and would dive on peadophiles at a moments notice, and decided to honestly post about his pedophilia under an account that we all knew belonged to him?

I know it's CRAZY right?
Like it was planned ALL FROM THE START.

 

[supdup]

There's no single one that could be considered greatest but societies like Athens, Ancient Rome, England 1500-1800 and early America all had four most important things for success of a society - 1. monogamy 2. female premarital chastity 3. good, decent religion 4. easily available prostitution.

You make a presumption that 1,2 and 3 are important for the success of a society. While there is some correlative data that demonstrates a level of the 3 things with societies that are assumed to be "successful". That correlation does not necessarily mean causation. There is an argument to be made that the break down of society caused the problems you proposed, not necessarily the other way around. That's the problem with using ancient historical references. We don't have all the information, the information we do have can be interpreted different ways and a lot of it is just educated inference. None of it is black and white.

There are more recent works that show that these cultures were not as monogamous as you think. In "Sex and empire: a Darwinian perspective", Scheidel talks about in Greek and Roman societies that men would have sex with slaves and there is no evidence that it carried a stigma in society nor was it penalized. That fact puts questions marks around whether these societies were monogamous.

It's okay to hypothesis on what this information means, but to forgo critical thought and just assume it's a black and white universal truth is intellectually bankrupt and turns a hypothesis into a dogmatic ideology.

What we have now is a completely deranged, omega based society I describe here (again, I am not claiming my blog is science, for science read Unwin's Sex and Culture)

One thing Unwin did not possess was how industrialization would play a roll in societies and he also just perceived things from a 1934 perspective that is not always accurate. I've read tibits of the book and one thing I'll point out that he said that struck me as he makes some pretty bold assumption to reach his conclusions. Here's a quote

"So far as we can judge, the human organism does
not tend to be promiscuous; usually a pair continue to consort
for so long as they are attracted to one another."

Of course Unwin did not have the last 80 years of research to use. Humans vary, some are more promiscuous than others. It can be argued promiscuity is natural, but so is monogamy. It depends on the person. There's more there, but I just wanted to demonstrate in a simple way how it's not intellectually sound to just assume these hypothesis and theories are definitive truth.

3b. DEVELOPED OMEGA SOCIETY

General description: These are modern feminist societies. These are societies which were once successful and are now in decline. Some of the reasons why they’re in decline, paradoxically, have to do with their success. This is because they essentially use their own wealth, that was created prior to feminism, to destroy their own substance, thanks to liberalism.

You assume that these societies are in decline, yet you have not qualified what that means. The reader should not take your assertion at face value without first knowing the reasoning behind your assertion

Unlike undeveloped omega societies these societies, these societies are comparatively rich. In fact, when compared to basically any prior society they are insanely rich. This is what enables them to be a lot different than undeveloped omega societies, as a developed omega society can very effectively enforce alimony or child support, just like it can very effectively deal with any perceived enemy. I once read that you can’t have real feminism without computers and I tend to agree with that.

You're again making assumptions without qualifications and expect your reader to simply understand. How does a society with a lot of money "effectively enforce alimony or child support"? How does it "effectively deal with perceive enemies"?

I would argue that even the richest society in the world can't always effectively do something. I believe you are making a weird connection between volume of money and public policy/national defense. I'm not sure those can be logically connected without further explanation of the mechanics.

In such societies there is no longer any real monogamy – things like adultery and no fault divorce are allowed.

Here you are redefining the word "monogamy" so you can argue against it. It's a form of the "no true scotsman" fallacy. While adultery would render a monogamous relationship no longer monogamous, it does not mean it happens to every monogamous relationship. No-fault divorce has no baring on monogamy. Once a couple is divorced, monogamy no longer applies. monogamy is not something that is forever, it only exists within the time frame of a monogamous relationship.

Just like in omega societies, alphas can no longer mate guard, but this time it is for a different reason – all mate guarding is banned because women have “rights” (which are actually massive privileges).

What is "mate guarding"? Is that the same thing as making your wife stay inside all day and never get a job? If so, this happens all the time is not banned.

The best that the alpha can do is to have a sequence of wives and have slightly above average number of children. So women today consider alphas somewhat attractive based on this. Betas lose a lot of their value, as women no longer need their resources, unlike in alpha societies (as the state now mostly provides for women) nor they are a member of a coalpha coalition any longer, since it has dissolved (else you wouldn’t get an omega society). This means that betas are quite undesirable in their youth but become somewhat desirable again when used up sluts in their 30s want an additional source of income. These sluts use betas as meal tickets to feed them and worthless kids they had with omegas or alphas (much more likely omegas). Coalphas are in a worst position, since they are too smart to allow themselves to be meal tickets, plus their traits like intelligence and morality are hated by modern society and repel women. So, who dominates in these societies? Omegas, of course. Most immoral and dumbest men are now the ones who are most successful in terms of evolution. Stupid omegas are the most successful ones because they, like I said, don’t care about contraception or child support.

This is just a bunch of nonsense generalizations with no basis in anything besides yours and FSchmidts minds. It completely ignores the huge amount of variation in human culture and society that it renders such simplistic categorization completely useless.

 

[JU 199]

Spoiler: Trying to work this all out

Dove's true power level is his absolute stupidity.

It's the Rosetta Stone of all his actions. For example-

Dove:"I'm gonna dox u all lol"

Kiwis: "Dox us"

Dove: "EHHHH give meh ur dox loool"

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Might wanna slow down there. P. creepy to cyberstalk someone on SH.

 

[JU 199]

@Ass Manager 3000 please im not stupid. Didn't you fucking get the joke with the way i wrote that? You are asking me to dox you all,even tough i have no interest nor never claimed anything like that nor have the possibilities to do so. Neither do you,so stop being so proud about your "doxing" skills or how im a noob at doxing people because im asking their facebook. All you guys do is just search bullshit that floats around the net,whose owners are too stupid to let be public. You never archieved a real dox where hacking is involved.

I don't believe that. I think you tried to play us and failed.

 

[Dove]

@Ass Manager 3000 Whatever you say buddy

I didn't even state anywhere i was going to dox people

 

[chimpburgers]

@Ass Manager 3000 Whatever you say buddy

I didn't even state anywhere i was going to dox people

And you looked like someone with a limp dick when you didn't do it. I would have liked to at least see you try instead of being such a dullard.

 

[sugoi-chan]

I spent the past day hip deep in @ScarletJusticeWitch's thread. Anything interesting happen here in the last twenty page or is it just Dove being a tard over and over again?

 

[SpessCaptain]

@Ass Manager 3000 Whatever you say buddy

I didn't even state anywhere i was going to dox people

Lol keep saying that maybe someone other than yourself will believe it.

 

[JU 199]

Anything interesting happen here in the last twenty page or is it just Dove being a tard over and over again?

@Dove meandered in-between elite troll and internet tough-guy. That's it really.

 

[sugoi-chan]

@Dove meandered in-between elite troll and internet tough-guy. That's it really.

So same ol' @Dove then.

Thanks.

Post your pic or go away, Dove.

 

[Shidoshi]

@Shidoshi Is that supposed to be proof of anything?

Spoiler: Shidoshi attempt at detective

"Shortly after" aka 2 hours

By the way,in my mrz's HDD account i have various posts arguing with "Samsung". Do you want to accuse me of being a lunatic talking to myself too? I think you're trying a little too hard m8

Shortly after not immidiately after, fuckboy.

Well considering your tormented past, being autistic and having a borderline complex it's not out of the question. at you asking for kiwis facebook accounts to doxx them. You're supposed to do it yourself pussy, that's the whole point.

Spoiler: Trying to work this all out

So let me get this straight;
You think a long term user here, someone who has witnessed what happens when you show your power level about things like this multiple times, decided to start up an account on Sluthate, a website he was aware we were watching and would dive on peadophiles at a moments notice, and decided to honestly post about his pedophilia under an account that we all knew belonged to him?

That gif

 

[ON 190]

That gif

JonTron is always appropriate. True fact.

 

[Frank Rizzo]

So Dove got trolled and he wants to deny he got trolled eh?

SHOCKING!

 

[ON 190]

So Dove got trolled and he wants to deny he got trolled eh?

SHOCKING!

He's a right tricky one, he is. @Dove, are you, in fact a spy from MI6?

 

[Stratomsk]

This thread exploded in the last couple of days and it is STILL going? Dear god. The final 25 pages and we'll have to remember it with @Dove's shitposting.

 

[Cthulu]

That's a tremendous amount of buthurt there @Dove. Maybe you can find a cream or something to take the swelling down.

 

[chimpburgers]

This thread exploded in the last couple of days and it is STILL going? Dear god. The final 25 pages and we'll have to remember it with @Dove's shitposting.

For a SHer, he's boring and unfunny as fuck.

I'd rather have @Holden shitpost here some more to get to the 1000th mark cause sometimes he throws some twists into his comments.