Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Because they know their hair is unattractive and hard to deal with, so they have to desperately rationalize the fact that not even black men think black women are attractive. The extreme self-love of obese, nappy-haired black women is directly proportional to the absolute loathing everyone else has towards them. Ditto obese women generally.
If that was true the Congo Wars would have had a lot fewer rapes.

Obesity obviously isn't much of a problem there, though.
 
I found this comment under a video of toxic sludge lake in china.

dumb take.png


video in question
 
Well, let's take a look at a physically demanding job that has minimum physical fitness standards as part of mandatory readiness.

That's right... THE KILLBOT FACTORY!

Males, Two Mile Run
apftmale.jpg

Too confusing, Didn't Understand: A male must run two miles at the MOST in 17 minutes. (To be honest, if you take that long, you're either injured, drunk, got lost, or stopped to take a nap) Top Score (100) is 13 minutes 18 seconds. For the record, my lazy ass was between 12:50 and 13:30 my whole career, so I might be a little biased.

Well, if the military, who has done study after study and study on male and female athletic performance (To the point of having schools like Master Fitness and Physical Fitness Specialist you could go to) had that, well, what was it like for women, who are totes the same as men, right?

Well... let's look:

Army+Physical+Fitness+Test+(APFT)+Standards+FEMALE +2+mile+walk_run.jpg


Too Confusing, Didn't Understand: The female MINIMUM was TWENTY ONE MINUTES. To be honest, if you couldn't walk that, or stop and take a quick nap and finish it in 21 minutes, you had no business behind the trigger. Max score was... drumroll please... 15 minutes 48 seconds. One minute, 12 seconds less than the MINIMUM for males.

Well surely, that can't be fight. It must have to do with patriarchy and women's inherent cis-ness, right?

Well, it got so bad for female troops passing, they completely redid the PT test under the Obama administration to a hybrid fuckup of a system.

Which, in turn, because it was crossfit bullshit sold to the DoD by scammers selling blue butter to chronic TBI sufferers, have resulted in more injuries.

But then... the results came in.

Despite all the event and time and score massaging.

EIGHTY FOUR PERCENT OF FEMALES FAILED compared to 28% of males. And this was some shit that units had trained for for MONTHS in order to look good.

True, the main part was the Leg Curl, where a whopping 73% failed.

Now, the fucking excuses are ongoing. "Oh, it still needs work" and "It's the test's fault..." and "They were unfairly graded" being the top hits.

Finally, a little bit of personal anecdote, since I'm old and like to tell stories.

Back in the day, I was a cross country runner in JR High and High School. Good enough that when I moved to High School I was put on the Varsity Team as a freshman.

Now, this is at 12-16, (I was a year ahead because of reasons) I was able to SMOKE female runners who had been running for years longer than me.

Well, of course you did, Crazy Drunken Uncle Johnny, you were a pinnacle of physical perfection, you might say (say it, dammit), but I wasn't the only runner who could do that. The slowest male on the JUNIOR VARSITY team was faster than the faster female on the female Varsity Team. A female could letter in Cross Country or Track with scores that would get you dropped from the male team.

And yes, outliers do matter. They love to show female outliers and compare them to soy-golem bugmen, so let's turn it around.

When I ran marathons, full marathons, with US ARMY on my chest, and placed in top 20, I finished WAY before the first female. Hell, my times were close to women who had only completed a half marathon.

During a sport the Army used to have called "Combat Cross Country", which was probably the most grueling thing I had ever done, even worse than Iron Man competitions, the male teams required scores so higher than the females it was damn near unreal.

We're not talking straight running. You ran in full gear (for your position), your pack weighed at the beginning and end. You had to rappel down a cliff, cross a river with a raft you carried 100m, do fire and manuever under the eyes of graders, qualify with your weapon (If you were a sixty gunner, and each time had to have ONE, it sucked for you), ID armored vehicles and aircraft within 5 minutes, patient carry, unload a truck, put up a tent, all of it timed and graded.

Having been a sports competitor, I can flat out say, there wasn't a woman born that could compete with the male teams. I used to do the 2-mile run with a cigarette in my mouth (because I was a crazy person), and we used to drink beer between the tests, and once I got rank I was a grader.

Physically, men smoked the women every time.

Funny thing, women with bigger breasts HATED the pushups and situps. See, you're watching for the shoulder plane to 'break', and if they had big ol' honking milkers, their tits would hit the ground, meaning the pushup doesn't count. and the plane STILL isn't broken. Situps, you had to break a certain angle, and the same women with big old honking dirty pillows would have their tits hit first.

But, back on target, since you're probably getting bored:

Having been a competitor, this fucking lunatic is totally wrong. Number one, female sports AREN'T full of cis-normative women.

You show me a competitor in female sports, I'll give you 60% odds she's a carpet muncher and the top in the relationship. If she's not, she's aggressive as fuck when it comes to fucking.

The whole thing read like someone who was writing down what they fantasize women's sports are like.

TL;DR: Get a fucking job, slut.
 
If Anne Boleyn was black, then how come Elizabeth I was so pale?
4E37BB17-F19A-48BD-B8A4-9A2DE33F3F26.jpeg
I draw the line at race bending actual people. If it were some fantasy drama like Game of Thrones, I wouldn’t care, but if you’re trying to be historically accurate, the least you can do is cast someone with the proper race/ethnicity.
 
Well, let's take a look at a physically demanding job that has minimum physical fitness standards as part of mandatory readiness.

That's right... THE KILLBOT FACTORY!

Males, Two Mile Run
View attachment 1696612
Too confusing, Didn't Understand: A male must run two miles at the MOST in 17 minutes. (To be honest, if you take that long, you're either injured, drunk, got lost, or stopped to take a nap) Top Score (100) is 13 minutes 18 seconds. For the record, my lazy ass was between 12:50 and 13:30 my whole career, so I might be a little biased.

Well, if the military, who has done study after study and study on male and female athletic performance (To the point of having schools like Master Fitness and Physical Fitness Specialist you could go to) had that, well, what was it like for women, who are totes the same as men, right?

Well... let's look:

View attachment 1696618

Too Confusing, Didn't Understand: The female MINIMUM was TWENTY ONE MINUTES. To be honest, if you couldn't walk that, or stop and take a quick nap and finish it in 21 minutes, you had no business behind the trigger. Max score was... drumroll please... 15 minutes 48 seconds. One minute, 12 seconds less than the MINIMUM for males.

Well surely, that can't be fight. It must have to do with patriarchy and women's inherent cis-ness, right?

Well, it got so bad for female troops passing, they completely redid the PT test under the Obama administration to a hybrid fuckup of a system.

Which, in turn, because it was crossfit bullshit sold to the DoD by scammers selling blue butter to chronic TBI sufferers, have resulted in more injuries.

But then... the results came in.

Despite all the event and time and score massaging.

EIGHTY FOUR PERCENT OF FEMALES FAILED compared to 28% of males. And this was some shit that units had trained for for MONTHS in order to look good.

True, the main part was the Leg Curl, where a whopping 73% failed.

Now, the fucking excuses are ongoing. "Oh, it still needs work" and "It's the test's fault..." and "They were unfairly graded" being the top hits.

Finally, a little bit of personal anecdote, since I'm old and like to tell stories.

Back in the day, I was a cross country runner in JR High and High School. Good enough that when I moved to High School I was put on the Varsity Team as a freshman.

Now, this is at 12-16, (I was a year ahead because of reasons) I was able to SMOKE female runners who had been running for years longer than me.

Well, of course you did, Crazy Drunken Uncle Johnny, you were a pinnacle of physical perfection, you might say (say it, dammit), but I wasn't the only runner who could do that. The slowest male on the JUNIOR VARSITY team was faster than the faster female on the female Varsity Team. A female could letter in Cross Country or Track with scores that would get you dropped from the male team.

And yes, outliers do matter. They love to show female outliers and compare them to soy-golem bugmen, so let's turn it around.

When I ran marathons, full marathons, with US ARMY on my chest, and placed in top 20, I finished WAY before the first female. Hell, my times were close to women who had only completed a half marathon.

During a sport the Army used to have called "Combat Cross Country", which was probably the most grueling thing I had ever done, even worse than Iron Man competitions, the male teams required scores so higher than the females it was damn near unreal.

We're not talking straight running. You ran in full gear (for your position), your pack weighed at the beginning and end. You had to rappel down a cliff, cross a river with a raft you carried 100m, do fire and manuever under the eyes of graders, qualify with your weapon (If you were a sixty gunner, and each time had to have ONE, it sucked for you), ID armored vehicles and aircraft within 5 minutes, patient carry, unload a truck, put up a tent, all of it timed and graded.

Having been a sports competitor, I can flat out say, there wasn't a woman born that could compete with the male teams. I used to do the 2-mile run with a cigarette in my mouth (because I was a crazy person), and we used to drink beer between the tests, and once I got rank I was a grader.

Physically, men smoked the women every time.

Funny thing, women with bigger breasts HATED the pushups and situps. See, you're watching for the shoulder plane to 'break', and if they had big ol' honking milkers, their tits would hit the ground, meaning the pushup doesn't count. and the plane STILL isn't broken. Situps, you had to break a certain angle, and the same women with big old honking dirty pillows would have their tits hit first.

But, back on target, since you're probably getting bored:

Having been a competitor, this fucking lunatic is totally wrong. Number one, female sports AREN'T full of cis-normative women.

You show me a competitor in female sports, I'll give you 60% odds she's a carpet muncher and the top in the relationship. If she's not, she's aggressive as fuck when it comes to fucking.

The whole thing read like someone who was writing down what they fantasize women's sports are like.

TL;DR: Get a fucking job, slut.
It's interesting how extreme the degree of difference is. Men's athletic records are obviously better than women's but the margins actually aren't that huge. The men's record for 2 miles is 7:58 and the women's is 8:58.

When it comes to fighting sports, though...it gets funny fast.


 
Men's athletic records are obviously better than women's but the margins actually aren't that huge. The men's record for 2 miles is 7:58 and the women's is 8:58.
That's enormous in a competitive sport. What it means effectively is that there will never, ever be a female champion who beats the highest male's record, because the bell curves containing the possible outcomes are always going to have a longer tail on the male side. The odds of it happening are absurdly remote.
 
That's enormous in a competitive sport. What it means effectively is that there will never, ever be a female champion who beats the highest male's record, because the bell curves containing the possible outcomes are always going to have a longer tail on the male side. The odds of it happening are absurdly remote.
Certainly, a woman doesn't have a chance at winning a professional marathon for example since the men's record is over 10 minutes better. It's just not quite such a vast gap as was showing up in some of those military fitness test issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoReturn
It's interesting how extreme the degree of difference is. Men's athletic records are obviously better than women's but the margins actually aren't that huge. The men's record for 2 miles is 7:58 and the women's is 8:58.

When it comes to fighting sports, though...it gets funny fast.


Give the girl in that second one credit. She knew she had absolutely no chance of even landing one punch after about five seconds and she held in there and ate punches for two or three minutes until her bell finally rang.
 
Back