2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sure. Here are a few examples, but I'm sure I could find many others:


https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jared-kushner-first-step-act-criminal-justice-reform-1467867

https://www.axios.com/trump-kushner-second-thoughts-408d5a33-725d-442a-88e4-d6ab6742c139.html
Now do I necessarily believe this story? Not really, but it shows that he either played a big role in justice reform or Trump wants it to appear that he played a pivotal role in the First Step Act.

https://www.salon.com/2020/06/22/jo...e-most-powerful-person-in-trumps-white-house/
Another questionable source I know, but I mean these things do add up.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/who-is-jared-kushner

https://www.businessinsider.com/iva...ner-are-finally-registered-republicans-2020-3

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/442599-kushner-plan-keeps-legal-immigration-levels-neutral


Basically, people are right not to trust him on face value, and his presence as an unelected family member power player should naturally raise suspicions
Okay, this is almost entirely meaningless noise.

Trump said Kushner could be a liberal. Am I supposed to be outraged about that? I don't care about that comment. Not even a little bit. And why should I care what his father did? Kushner donated to Democrats? Trump himself gave money to Kamala and Hillary. Am I supposed to be upset that criminal justice reform was passed? Well, I'm not. It does no one any good to have people in prison, who taxpayers have to support, when they don't need to be. And then when they get out, they have a hard time finding a job with their criminal records and supporting themselves, which just leads to higher rates of recidivism. The best solution is to not even start that chain of events. So if I'm supposed to be outraged, I'm not.

You said "do I necessarily believe this story? Not really." and "another questionable source" but that adds up to you? You are just the kind of mark the mainstream media loves. If they throw enough bullshit at the wall eventually you'll start to believe there must be something there.

How at this point can you still believe these stories based on anonymous sources? Just this week we got a taste of how these high level sources are really low level beaurocrats. How do these stories still have credibility to you?

And citing John Bolton is even worse. Just this week he said Trump wouldn't leave if he lost. The man clearly has a bone to pick yet you still believe even one word out of his mouth? Why? You even quoted that Kushner and Ivanka would get Trump to nominate a liberal. Is Amy Coney Barrett a liberal? Is Gorsuch? Is Kavanaugh?

I specifically asked you for a policy that has been implemented and you responded with an immigration plan that wasn't passed. So again I ask you, give me a policy or policies that have actually been implemented.

I don't have a problem with Trump hiring family to work in the administration. I mean, that's literally the role of a First Lady, which every administration has. And I don't have a problem with him surrounding himself with people he trusts. The problem is not that there's too many people outside the Washington swamp, it's that that there's not enough. Most people in government don't have political science degrees, and that's probably a good thing. Have you seen the idiots who work their whole careers in government? Kushner has done a far better job on foreign policy than John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, who spent their whole lives in government. And Ben Rhodes, who was a failed novelist before Obama picked him off the trash heap to do the Iran deal.

So yeah, you gave me nothing. In fact, you gave me less than nothing.
 
Chad unmasked Republican versus jibbering, nervous thicc eyebag virgin cuckmask wearing Democrat.
True, in fact there is no need for Republicans to vote any further because I'm confident we will win at this point

Trump won't get a majority of minorities, but it will make libtard tears extra salty if he peels off just enough of the nonwhite vote to carry himself to victory.
Alot of Blacks are voting Republican cause of Kamala and racist stuff Biden has done in the past
 
True, in fact there is no need for Republicans to vote any further because I'm confident we will win at this point
The point of Trump warning people about vote by mail fraud is to get people to vote in-person at the polls, be it early or on Election Day. It's why the majority of Republicans do not trust VBM, why they are double digits ahead in Florida's early in-person voting, and why they will be the vast majority of voters come Election Day. Trump has to get them out to secure his re-election, no ifs, ands, or buts.
 
The point of Trump warning people about vote by mail fraud is to get people to vote in-person at the polls, be it early or on Election Day. It's why the majority of Republicans do not trust VBM, why they are double digits ahead in Florida's early in-person voting, and why they will be the vast majority of voters come Election Day. Trump has to get them out to secure his re-election, no ifs, ands, or buts.
That makes me even more confident since you guys are going to be voting. I'm sure we will win. Trump 2020!!!!!! And if we lose it's definitely cause those loser democrats are making multiple copies of mail in ballots and throwing trump ballots in the trash wtf loser cheaters. If Biden wins I ragequit wahh
 
Trump will be in Scranton next week... With those projection screens ready to expose Biden (not like Hunter).
I'm not sure how good of an idea it is to be confident about Trump taking Pennsylvania. On one hand, joggers are rioting in Philly, on the other hand, Philly is the biggest city. Not sure if it's bigger than all of the rural towns combined though.
 
I'm not sure how good of an idea it is to be confident about Trump taking Pennsylvania. On one hand, joggers are rioting in Philly, on the other hand, Philly is the biggest city. Not sure if it's bigger than all of the rural towns combined though.
It's a pretty misleading title anyway. The first man voting for Trump in the video did not say he was confident in Trump taking Pennsylvania, but that he had a chance of taking it, which is a fair assumption.
 
The policies are not for black people to the exclusion of everyone else.

Saying you want to improve access to funding to help black owned small businesses doesn't mean the funding is only for black owned small businesses. It just means you want to improve access to funding, which will help black owned small businesses. And white owned small businesses. And latino owned small businesses.

Why is he singling out the positive benefits to black people? Because he's talking to black people. The same reason he talks about the positive benefits of tariffs on Chinese steel to steelworkers. Because he's talking to steelworkers.
Kind of fucked up
 
Okay, this is almost entirely meaningless noise.

Trump said Kushner could be a liberal. Am I supposed to be outraged about that? I don't care about that comment. Not even a little bit. And why should I care what his father did? Kushner donated to Democrats? Trump himself gave money to Kamala and Hillary. Am I supposed to be upset that criminal justice reform was passed? Well, I'm not. It does no one any good to have people in prison, who taxpayers have to support, when they don't need to be. And then when they get out, they have a hard time finding a job with their criminal records and supporting themselves, which just leads to higher rates of recidivism. The best solution is to not even start that chain of events. So if I'm supposed to be outraged, I'm not.

You said "do I necessarily believe this story? Not really." and "another questionable source" but that adds up to you? You are just the kind of mark the mainstream media loves. If they throw enough bullshit at the wall eventually you'll start to believe there must be something there.

How at this point can you still believe these stories based on anonymous sources? Just this week we got a taste of how these high level sources are really low level beaurocrats. How do these stories still have credibility to you?

And citing John Bolton is even worse. Just this week he said Trump wouldn't leave if he lost. The man clearly has a bone to pick yet you still believe even one word out of his mouth? Why? You even quoted that Kushner and Ivanka would get Trump to nominate a liberal. Is Amy Coney Barrett a liberal? Is Gorsuch? Is Kavanaugh?

I specifically asked you for a policy that has been implemented and you responded with an immigration plan that wasn't passed. So again I ask you, give me a policy or policies that have actually been implemented.

I don't have a problem with Trump hiring family to work in the administration. I mean, that's literally the role of a First Lady, which every administration has. And I don't have a problem with him surrounding himself with people he trusts. The problem is not that there's too many people outside the Washington swamp, it's that that there's not enough. Most people in government don't have political science degrees, and that's probably a good thing. Have you seen the idiots who work their whole careers in government? Kushner has done a far better job on foreign policy than John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, who spent their whole lives in government. And Ben Rhodes, who was a failed novelist before Obama picked him off the trash heap to do the Iran deal.

So yeah, you gave me nothing. In fact, you gave me less than nothing.
I agreed that he's done a good job on foreign policy in the middle east.

Yes, I'm mad about the first step act. Look at what has been going on. We clearly have an underincarceration problem not an overincarceration one. Jivanka seed the media with this kind of stuff, so no I don't trust them to make conservative policy and neither does anyone else with a brain. Obviously that doesn't mean he can't be used at all.
 
I saw a snippet on the crawl of the news this afternoon, Biden is coming to a small private hangar at Mitchell Int'l Airport outside of Milwaukee. Didn't catch the time, and I've not seen anything else on it.

Link / Archive

Yeah, that went really well for him.

Screenshot 2020-10-30 at 11.21.42 PM.png




Biden events should be re-classified as bullying. They don't rally anyone except his opponents. His campaign is officially an exercise in masochism.
 
I'm mad about the first step act.
Well, I'm not.
We clearly have an underincarceration problem not an overincarceration one.
You don't solve an underincarceration problem by locking up people who shouldn't be in jail. Then all you've done is create a future recidivism problem and you still have solved the initial problem of the people who should be in jail. Treat the cause, not the effect.
 
Did in-person early voting today, I don't know if it was due to the time I went or what but there wasn't a crowd at all.
We don't have straight line party voting in our state anymore, so I had to individually select each candidate. What I noticed and can't understand is that there were several judgeships and the county tax assessor position with only a single candidate (all dems). Why the Republicans didn't run anyone for those positions is baffling to me, since we're a fairly large metropolitan area in a red state.

Later when I went for a walk I passed by a house whose front yard had both a Biden-Harris sign and what is most likely a new production "Reagan-Bush 84" sign. Possible obnoxious virtue signaling but also a possible confirmation of something I theorized earlier:
Part of the problem, I think, is that there is a certain type of suburban voter that only voted Republican because they liked the economic benefits of extreme free-trade/outsourcing and cheap migrant labor, both things that Trump and his base have been hostile too and have tried to roll back. So they're drawn to Biden-Harris because it would be a restoration to that status quo.
 
Yeah, that went really well for him.

View attachment 1697094

View attachment 1697098

Biden events should be re-classified as bullying. They don't rally anyone except his opponents. His campaign is officially an exercise in masochism.
Biden looks like an NPC in an out-of-bounds area.
On the youth vote, did anyone really expect Zoomers to try and vote? They're probably the laziest, most depressed, demotivated generation humanity has ever spawned.
Until the next one.
 
BECAUSE DRUMPF IS FINISHED TEXAS IS GONNA FLIP BLUE SHITLORD

Austin I'm guessing, which is full of Californian migrants and fags and resembles nothing like the rest of Texas. They must think that Austin and the cities can flip Texas blue, like they said Beto would do.

I lived in Texas from 2009 to 2013, Dallas area. The entire time I lived there, I always heard people saying it was going to be the year Texas went blue, and they were probably saying it before that too.


We truly need a system for earning one’s right to vote. People who exploit the ignorance of others and those who are ignorant enough to believe this do not deserve to vote.

I was thinking the other day about how the left in particular are always whining about 'uninformed voters'. They believe that's why people don't vote the way they want (it's not). However, it's interesting to me that they can view that as a key issue yet vehemently oppose any kind of standards for voting rights that would prevent the 'dumb masses' from getting a say.

half of the ballots are of incumbent Democrats with no Republican challengers, and I couldn't think of any write-ins that would even be worth a damn.

I'm in Chicago so I have a few like that too. I'm just going to write in Rich Evans.
 
Remember back in early October when Trump contracting Oriental bat AIDS was the big story?
Hahaha that's what everybody said when RBG died. Let's check back in on Halloween and see if you still think the very first thing that happened in October was "the surprise".
Well, it's time.

1604115097705.png


I mean, could you have imagined? Here's looking forward to all the fun and wackiness that November will bring.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back