Here's an anecdote about that: a good friend of mine has been dating this 24 year old girl who is super into politics and very right wing (so is my buddy so they seemed like a good match). She's been totally onboard the Trump train since he came down the golden escalator back in 2015 and they chat daily about the kind of political spergery that you'd only see on forums like this. Earlier this week he asks her if she voted yet and she gave this whiny "I have so much stuff going on with my community college semester and (insert other inane early 20's minutiae), I just don't have TIME to vote this year" diatribe. My friend had to severely browbeat this dumb bitch who spent the entire time during the summer riots this year ranting nonstop about how our republic was under attack to go to the fucking polls for half an hour to cast her ballot for Trump. He's less than sanguine about a future relationship with her now.
Any candidate who counts on the youth vote to turn out for them in any election does so at their own peril.
The only presidents who successfully pulled that feat off in living memory were Bill Clinton in 1992 and Barack Obama in 2008 and both of them had a high amount of working class and middle class support across generational and racial lines.
With Clinton in '92, it was a feat because he was a dark horse candidate who did the impossible in winning over the MTV Generation while Obama in '08 was pretty much going to win anyway but he was a smooth talker and tapped into that wider resentment many newly registered Millennials had for Bush and the GOP.
To be fair, the college thing is due to High schools and public institutions hammering in how college is the "be all end all" for getting somewhere in life and acting like college is more important than getting an actual job.
Generation Z is the generation where the differences between the Early/Core/Late subgroups really stand out.
That right there gives me hope that the Core and Late Zoomers will be less susceptible to the "college trap" that
@GrimProphet mentioned earlier. They've seen how it screwed over the Millennials and the very Early Zoomers financially and turned them into woke zealots. Some will still fall for it, but it won't be in the high numbers that the Millennials had. The Millennials made the mistake of thinking any degree is fine so long as you have one and it fucked them over.
The males are all "based and redpilled" as it is already and I suspect a lot of the women will be "semi-based and purple-pilled" after 2020 if they avoid the college trap. Especially the White women (and to a lesser extent, the Asians and Latinas)
Plus there's the brutality and thuggery of the BLM riots and the austerity of the lockdowns and how the media is browbeating anyone who dares to disagree in the slightest, even if it's just in a "I agree with the message but not the tactics" sort of way. All of this will drive anyone away regardless of gender, especially if they think it can be beat (which is why I think a Trump win this year will be crucial)
Then you've got the "Mean Girls on PCP"-tier antics of Woke Twitter and SJW women in general, plus all the rampant violence found among joggers and woke punk dykes that disproportionately affect women and children, and the fact that the Woke Left is rife with disgusting troons, bearded male feminists, and hood rat joggers, all of whom are known to be extremely predatory. This will repel a lot of younger women who see this as they're growing up, especially if they won't see it as inevitable and invincible.
These Zoomer girls sure as hell won't become Alt-Right 4chan shitposters, but they'll be a lot less amenable to the Woke Left than their Millennial and Early Zoomer aunts and older sisters.
