You joke, but:
View attachment 1698448
This after the Economist quietly sounded the alarm.
Ah, yes. Latinos are the cause of most dictatorships in LATIN AMERICA. Very astute.
You know, I think he meant that most dictators and military juntas were hispanic (which if you only count military dictators, as in not commies or feudalism or what the romans called "dictators" during their republic, well he'd be right) but the way he worded it is so fucking retarded he somehow managed to turn it into "ah yes, the floor here is made of floor."
I'm still wondering why the fuck the dems ever though hispanics would automatically translate into votes for them. I mean, never mind the fact that hispanics on average are on the conservative and libertarian sides, so expecting them to reliably vote for progressive authoritarians has to be the most retarded idea I've ever encountered (and for reference I have read all about the misadventures of the great CWC, and the entirety of El Quijote, and neither even compare) but even when they vote left. What the fuck made the dems think they would never wind up voting for a third party? I mean, that's not just Hispanics, the left in general always has a bad tendency to implode into single issue parties. Bringing in tons of voters who all have a single identity and more than likely one or more common issues is just a recipy to get overcome by whoever realizes how to play that game!
Also lol at putting machismo in quotes. Had he not used that I'd imagine he's using the english term, but with quotes and in context it seems quite clear he means the spanish term. Which tells me he doesn't actually know spanish. (Reminder: "Machismo" is the spanish word for "Mysoginy", it got its english definition from "macho" being used in similar contexts. Also btw last time I said the english version had no solid translation. I should've said "that I know of" because as it turns out the archaic term "hombría" would fit for a word that has that connotation in spanish, I just forgot it existed like a tard because to be fair it's been ages since I heard it. "Masculinidad" I guess would kinda fit too but that doesn't usually carry the same, ya know, "emphasis", it's more just to mean male characteristics in general not bravado and all that, kinda like using "dummy" instead of "FUCKING RETARD".) Sorry for going off tracks point is he accidentally claimed all Latinos are mysoginists, which by feminist rules is a big no no, so he's a FUCKING RETARD.