US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
California Democrats had a chance to ban it and failed because the GOP proposed the ban. And now they are butthurt that the Republicans have decided to join the game.
It's shit either way.
Having party operatives show up to your door, begin to preach about how evil the other side is, and then say "sign here" as they give you a pre-filled out ballot is not how a democracy should fucking operate. Either show up to the ballot box with an ID, or fuck off.
 
"Please don't vote, please god don't vote. I'm begging you."

Also, yeah, Texas is too close to call but he cancels an Austin event because people are honking at him like a little bitch. Uh, isn't winning Texas more important than being a little bitch boy? Also, for some reason, Biden is fucking campaigning in Minnesota where Dems haven't lost in 40+ years. What the fuck is he doing? Making sure his 60+ lead is locked in or something? And even there Trump voters are shitting in his mouth so much he had to call them ugly people.

Yeah, it is obvious he's nowhere near as strong as the media wants you to think he is. They need him to win because if he doesn't, the media is fucked for the next decade.
He's campaigning in Minnesota because they might actually lose Minnesota this year.
 
Here are the election maps for Predictit and Betting Odds. Both are basically in sync with each other.

Screenshot 2020-10-31 183937.png


Screenshot 2020-10-31 183949.png
 
So what is Joe and the Ho going to defund to get SIXTY FOUR BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR to funnel into construction schemes?

They're talking about building 400K houses.

That means they're planning on spending $1.6 million PER HOUSE.

They'd be better off giving 20% of that money to 400K homeless and burning the rest.

Late and gay, but learn to do basic math.

6.4*10^10/400,000 = $160,000
 
Late and gay, but learn to do basic math.

6.4*10^10/400,000 = $160,000
OK, fine.

64 billion dollars a year

For 10 years

640,000,000,000

in those 10 years, they'll build 400,000 houses.

1,600,000

You forgot that it's 64 billion dollars a year, for 10 years, to build 400K homes in that same 10 years.
 
OK, fine.

64 billion dollars a year

For 10 years

640,000,000,000

in those 10 years, they'll build 400,000 houses.

1,600,000

You forgot that it's 64 billion dollars a year, for 10 years, to build 400K homes in that same 10 years.

Great, now that we've established that you 100% read it

They would invest $13 billion over 10 years to build 400,000 new units for homeless people.

So you're still wrong lol
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: heathercho

seems the crap mainstream media are spinning the Hunter stuff as his "sleazy" lifestyle choices.... Lol....
 
Great, now that we've established that you 100% read it



So you're still wrong lol
A Biden-Harris administration will invest $640 billion over 10 years to make sure all Americans can have a decent home they can afford. They will also strengthen fair housing laws so that our communities can move away from a past of segregation to a future of opportunity.

The new administration would also push for a $100 billion Affordable Housing Fund to build affordable housing in areas of the country where it is scarce.

They would invest $13 billion over 10 years to build 400,000 new units for homeless people.

OK, so, it's either a 640 billion dollar plan over 10 years, where they'll invest 13 billion (1.3 billion each year) with the hopes of building 400,000 homes for homeless, and 100 billion for other affordable housing, with the rest of the 527 billion dollars vanishing into people's pockets OR it's 753 billion dollars, where they'll build 400,000 homes for the homeless and, with the Dem's records, put down 3 mobile homes in a vacant lot for the rest of the money.

So the plan is 400,000 houses PLUS !!MYSTERY NUMBER!! of houses.

At 640,000,000,000 for the entire plan.

Meaning, the 13 billion dollars they'll actually supposedly spend on buying some crack den apartment buildings and refurbishing them, will come out to $32,500 per unit, meaning either they'll build Soviet block tenements again for "housing projects" like the last big Dem housing project, or they're completely fucking lying, since you couldn't buy a PARKING SPACE for $32.5K in the big cities where homelessness is a problem.

Either way, they'd be better off lighting the fucking money on fire.

This is just a way to slorp up 640 billion (or more) into people's pockets and have jack shit to show for it.

You know, just like the Clinton Foundation and Haiti.
 
The huge Trump march going on in Beverly Hills has got to be horrifying and terrifying the Hollywood Crowd. Not to mention scaring the shit out of the Biden Campaign staff. I mean Biden fled Texas because of honking car horns. I've said it before but Biden looks an awful lot like Mondale '84. Another wimpy dem Veep who never had any chance at the big show.
 

Joe Biden’s silence on Hunter’s emails speaks volumes: Goodwin​

By Michael Goodwin
Ed Koch never missed an opportunity to tell his side of a story. When a newspaper or television report said something about him he saw as wrong or unfair, the late New York mayor invariably fired off a letter of complaint.

The habit was so pronounced that I once asked him why he bothered, especially when the issue was minor. His answer: If you don’t object, your silence is assumed to be agreement.

Attention, Joe Biden. This is why your silence in the face of serious allegations of corruption is highly suspicious. It makes you look guilty.

If you are innocent, why don’t you say so?

As a very strange presidential campaign enters the final days, one of its strangest features is taking center stage. The Democrats’ presidential nominee, who has spent most days in his Delaware basement, has not disputed charges that he was secretly involved in his family’s business schemes, including while he was vice president.
Doubly strange, Biden also has remained silent about the explosive claim by a former partner in one family venture. Retired Navy Lt. Tony Bobulinski told The Post and others that he met with Joe Biden in 2017 to discuss a partnership with Chinese executives tied to the ruling Communist Party, a deal where Bobulinski says the former vice president is the “big guy” who had a concealed 10 percent stake.

Biden’s failure to offer straightforward denials is baffling because the charges are serious enough to help President Trump. Yet even that prospect has not stirred the Biden campaign to action, nor has it deputized surrogates to make denials for him.

There is only silence. Instead of a thundering, “NO, Hell NO,” we get crickets.

Although Biden initially called allegations tied to e-mails found on son Hunter Biden’s laptop a “smear” and “Russian disinformation” and claimed at the second debate he had “never taken a penny from a foreign source,” he refuses to address specific questions.

For example, one of the e-mails on the laptopthanked Hunter for arranging a meeting with Joe Biden when he was vice president. The sender was an adviser to Ukrainian energy company Burisma, which was paying Hunter up to $83,000 month as a director.

Hunter and Joe Biden Hunter and Joe Biden in 2016.Teresa Kroeger


At first, the Biden camp said no such meeting was on Joe’s schedule, but aides then allowed one might have taken place anyway. What should voters make of that?

Such a meeting would demolish the claim Joe Biden has made for years, that he “never” discussed with Hunter the son’s foreign business deals. The claim was never credible, but it would be proven false beyond a doubt if he did meet with a Burisma official at Hunter’s request. That, in turn, would open the former veep to questions about what else he did over his 47 years in Washington to help Hunter cash in on his father’s power.

The refusal to contest the initial charges grows even more bizarre in the aftermath of Bobulinski’s additional
allegations, which include compelling evidence in the form of e-mails, messages and recordings. Biden’s failure to challenge the second set of charges would be fatal in almost any other campaign because the situation looks dirty and directly links him to China when most voters have an unfavorable view of that nation.

Although many news organizations ignored The Post’s revelations and Twitter froze the paper’s feed in an obvious plot to protect Biden, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson’s interview with Bobulinski alone drew nearly 8 million viewers. And Trump brings up the topic repeatedly at rallies, meaning many millions of people have heard of the charges, making Biden’s silence risky.


He remains the front-runner only because Big Media is also doing something unheard of: refusing to press their favored candidate on the issue.

Operating like mobsters who took a vow of omerta instead of journalists looking for facts, most major outlets either ignored The Post’s stories or ran transparent efforts to knock them down. More glaring, those outlets don’t use the few opportunities where Biden takes press questions to ask about anything involving Hunter’s deals or Bobulinski’s allegations.

What did you know, Joe, and when did you know it would be a good start.

Naturally, The New York Times is leading the protection racket. It has known for weeks that Biden was the “big guy” in the China deal, yet won’t publish it. Most egregious, Saturday’s paper ran a long story on how Biden “Agonizes Over Son Weaponized by the Right.”


Writer Mark Leibovich does not even mention Bobulinski’s allegations, or acknowledge that the charges are no longer just about Hunter’s business, but also implicate Joe. Instead, Leibovich aims to create sympathy for the candidate on the eve of the election.

The intentionally misleading article reflects the complete corruption of the Times. That conclusion is confirmed by yet another front-page story Saturday on Trump’s taxes, which bemoans his use of “so-called depreciation losses,” as if he alone uses that legal tax feature. It’s a near certainty The New York Times also claims depreciation losses on its buildings and equipment, producing tax reductions that help pay reporters’ salaries.


These relentless propaganda attacks on the president reveal that the media and tech bias against Trump has metastasized into something foul and sinister.

SEE ALSO​

Hunter Biden

Obama officials were 'bothered' by Hunter Biden Burisma job, new book reveals

The whole point of a free media is to inform the public of important facts. But the Times, The Washington Post, CNN and the broadcast networks, along with Twitter and Facebook, have turned that duty on its head. Now they conspire to hide critical information from voters.

Donald Trump has been far from an ideal president. Yet his most important policies yielded both peace and prosperity for our nation, the fundamental yardsticks of presidential success.


At the same time, Trump has been mercilessly hounded by an out-for-blood media working in confederation with unscrupulous members of the Obama-Biden administration. He became just the third president to be impeached thanks to a partisan abuse of power orchestrated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and abetted by back-stabbing deep staters.

Trump’s success is a sufficient reason to vote for him. If you require another, consider the reprehensible conduct of Democrats, the media and tech giants.

They must not be rewarded with victory. That way lies disaster.


Dumb & dumber​

Mayor de Blasio’s Department of Education continues to dumb down everything it touches. The latest attack on standards is an order barring schools from lowering grades of students who don’t show up or turn in late assignments.

The educrats should listen to Bronx mother Veronica Flores. “This is not how the world works,” she tells The Post. “No one is going to hand you anything.”

She gets it. Too bad City Hall doesn’t.

Broadway’s viral hits​

Because we all need to laugh, reader Harold Theurer imagines show titles when Broadway finally reopens.

“The COVID King”

“A Long Days Journey Into Quarantine”

“Phantom of the Wuhan”

“Annie Get Your Vaccine”

“Two Scientists of Corona”

“The Book of COVID”

“Assassins” — a musical about governors who forced infected patients into nursing homes.
——-

 
The huge Trump march going on in Beverly Hills has got to be horrifying and terrifying the Hollywood Crowd. Not to mention scaring the shit out of the Biden Campaign staff. I mean Biden fled Texas because of honking car horns. I've said it before but Biden looks an awful lot like Mondale '84. Another wimpy dem Veep who never had any chance at the big show.
I actually would not compare any pre-90's election with current politics. There was a far greater tendency for entire states to flip flop all over the place - see Reagan's nationwide sweep, which would be insanity to contemplate today no matter how popular the candidate in question was - but now the vast majority of the country is locked down one way or the other, with a long term trend towards Democrat control thanks to urban populations. It's the "can work anywhere" group versus the "has to live somewhere" group. One cosmopolitan slum is much like the other, so the urban poor vote that way. One cosmopolitan high rise is much like the other, so the elites vote that way. Meanwhile rural resource gatherers are fucked in the ass by globalization, but the "can work anywhere"'s don't care. After all, why not just move when the taxes go up and jobs dwindle to nothing? On to the next host. That's what the elites do and the poor do as well, only the latter travel as "refugees".

More to the point though, anyone predicting a Trump sweep is fooling themselves. It's a very close race.
 
I actually would not compare any pre-90's election with current politics. There was a far greater tendency for entire states to flip flop all over the place - see Reagan's nationwide sweep, which would be insanity to contemplate today no matter how popular the candidate in question was - but now the vast majority of the country is locked down one way or the other, with a long term trend towards Democrat control thanks to urban populations. It's the "can work anywhere" group versus the "has to live somewhere" group. One cosmopolitan slum is much like the other, so the urban poor vote that way. One cosmopolitan high rise is much like the other, so the elites vote that way. Meanwhile rural resource gatherers are fucked in the ass by globalization, but the "can work anywhere"'s don't care. After all, why not just move when the taxes go up and jobs dwindle to nothing? On to the next host. That's what the elites do and the poor do as well, only the latter travel as "refugees".

More to the point though, anyone predicting a Trump sweep is fooling themselves. It's a very close race.
The Democrats have adopted a federalization strategy where any Democrat, whether rural or urban will for example toe the same line on gun control. A case in point is Vermont which has no history of "mass shootings" and yet adopted laws similar to other Democrat states like Colorado or California.

Republicans are far behind on that strategy but thanks for Trump are catching up now.

But now its a urban vs rural divide rather than Blue vs Red states or whites vs niggers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back