Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

From the article:
By contrast, former vice president Joe Biden and Sen. Kamala D. Harris have consistently worn masks in public, and have held socially distanced events. When two people around Harris tested positive for the coronavirus in October, she canceled travel for several days. Asked about the difference between their approaches, Fauci said Biden's campaign "is taking it seriously from a public health perspective." Trump, Fauci said, is "looking at it from a different perspective." He said that perspective was "the economy and reopening the country."
Dr. Fauci has consistently been unwilling to look outside of his own lane in terms of the pandemic. Which I can't entirely knock him for, he is a doctor after all and he is tasked with handling the medical aspect of this. But that starts to wear thin when the doctor(s) consistently disregard the socioeconomic angle of the pandemic. They both need to be weighed. And when anyone under 70 is looking at a 99% survival rate (with people over 70 facing a 95% survival rate) it might be time to consider letting people make some money and not subject them to state-enforced poverty and familial destruction.
 
From the article:

Dr. Fauci has consistently been unwilling to look outside of his own lane in terms of the pandemic. Which I can't entirely knock him for, he is a doctor after all and he is tasked with handling the medical aspect of this. But that starts to wear thin when the doctor(s) consistently disregard the socioeconomic angle of the pandemic. They both need to be weighed. And when anyone under 70 is looking at a 99% survival rate (with people over 70 facing a 95% survival rate) it might be time to consider letting people make some money and not subject them to state-enforced poverty and familial destruction.

I actually agree with Fauci's comments for the most part. Trump is looking at it from an economic and reopening the country perspective and that is the proper way to look at it given what we know now.

Even the WHO has come out against harsh lockdown measures. Their effectivness is limited and when the restrictions are lifted after much pain, the virus comes roaring back.
 
From the article:

Dr. Fauci has consistently been unwilling to look outside of his own lane in terms of the pandemic. Which I can't entirely knock him for, he is a doctor after all and he is tasked with handling the medical aspect of this. But that starts to wear thin when the doctor(s) consistently disregard the socioeconomic angle of the pandemic. They both need to be weighed. And when anyone under 70 is looking at a 99% survival rate (with people over 70 facing a 95% survival rate) it might be time to consider letting people make some money and not subject them to state-enforced poverty and familial destruction.
I'm staggered anyone believes Biden and Harris are actually following their own rules. Biden has been photographed maskless hundreds of times, he only wears them for debates and to pose for press bullshots.
 
So I was looking at the early voting number from NC and seeing if I could glean some insight into the election.

There's a website here with a breakdown of the numbers:


A lot of twitter people are poring over this stuff and doing analysis especially on the right, but I find most of it misses the mark one way or the other.

So far the party breakdown has dems leading by 298k going into election day. That sounds bad for Trump, right? Well, not really, in 2016 it was dems 310K+. Well, the Republicans must have shaved a ton off that number by the time all of the voting was done right? No. When all of the votes were counted, it was dems 330k+ and yet Trump won North Carolina by 3% or so. North Carolina is one of those states with a lot of R leaning Dem crossovers. The registration gap is about 500,000+ for the dems and it was a couple hundred thousand more in 2016 R's have gained 140,000 and D's have lost 100,000

So Trump is in good shape since the party split is well below the final 330k gap from 2016? Maybe. There are some unknowns that could turn things. First of all the Rs turned out about 74% to the Ds 68% in 2016. Right now the Rs turnout percentage (based on party ID in 2020) is maybe around 1-2% higher than the Ds at this point. That's good because the early vote and absentee is always more D leaning and that may be especially true this year since there was a huge disparity in absentee ballot requests in favor of Dems in the 2 to 1 range.

Basically the absentee ballot split would seem to indicate that the Rs have a lot more people in reserve and ready to go on election day. The election day vote is going to be smaller than last time but it will likely be more heavily R leaning(polls back this up). A 50-50 registration split on the day would probably hand a clear victory to Trump maybe a larger one than last time. The big potential wrench in that calculus is if independents break hard for Biden. Biden can win it in that instance but I think it's his only real path to victory in NC.

That was quite the effort post.
 
Well since these people are so obsessed with bringing up the Nazis, here's a recent incident that actually happened. So just around a week ago a group of Jewish people that wanted to show their support for Donald Trump had rocks thrown at their cars and even getting into fights with Antifa protestors and it's because they support Donald Trump and that was enough for these Antifa thugs to start picking fights with these Jews because of their support for Donald Trump then. So who's the Nazi now? I thought so.
"turns violent"
It didn't violent, the you lowlife media whores, they were attacked. Its not like some inevitable natural occurrence that just sometimes happens, they were targeted and attacked for donning the red hat.



View attachment 1700615

View attachment 1700616

Isn't letting probable CCP agents into your highest institutes of learning fun?
In April 2017 Lee hosted a meeting at Yale University medical school to discuss the ethics of speaking about the mental health of Donald Trump.[9] The assembled, prominent psychiatrists decided they had a "duty to warn."[10] Lee then stated in an interview with Salon in May 2017 that Trump suffers from mental health issues that amount to a "state of emergency" and that "our survival as a species may be at stake."[11][12] She also discussed her political views, linking what she sees as increasing inequality in the United States to a deterioration in collective mental health.[12] Later in 2017 she was the editor of The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump, a book of essays alleging that Trump suffers from psychological problems that make him dangerous.[13] After the book's publication, she reported receiving thousands of threatening messages by letter, phone and on social media that included death threats.[6]

In December 2017 she met 12 members of the United States Congress (11 Democrats, 1 Republican) to give them her opinion on the mental health of Trump in which she reportedly argued that he was "unraveling".[6] In a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine, Jeffrey Lieberman, past president of the APA, argued that while he accepted that Lee and her co-authors were acting in good faith and out of a sense of moral obligation, they were guilty of a "misguided and dangerous morality".[14]
And she is claiming Trump is the crazy and dangerous one. So, 3 years later, and Trump has yet to launch the nuclear missiles. 3 years later, and that woman is far crazier yet.

These are quotes from her 'instant bestseller', 'The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump':
[...] the harmful impact of Mr. Trump’s rhetoric, given his propensity to use the dog-whistle language of white terrorism that perpetuates terror and trauma in African Americans and other marginalized groups; “posttraumatic stress disorder” is thus a misnomer for marginalized groups whose trauma is ongoing in the face of police brutality, environmental racism, and the pipeline-to-prison process.
As mental health professionals, we can and must speak out, as there is an epidemic of violence, misogyny, and racism in our land and it is our profession that can most clearly recognize it.
What has changed that has permitted this vulgar display of white male power? Obviously it is the recent successes of previously degraded groups, including women, people of color, and LGBT+ people, in feeling more confident in exercising the rights they already had, but didn’t dare act on. And the insult to everything Trump stands for from a successful, respectful, intelligent, and feminist black president, whom he tried to destroy with the endless “birther” movement. He had greater success with his lies about Hillary, arguably the most qualified and well-prepared candidate for the presidency in history.
We women are in clear danger of losing all the rights we have had to struggle to assert. Meanwhile white men, under this administration, retain their rights and acquire even more.
Who wants a highly qualified, brilliant, experienced woman to be president? That would be too threatening. She was sabotaged at every turn by white men, some white women, and many young people.
She's a garden-variety social justice kook. Note: the book is not just her writing, it is numerous unhinged TDS essays by a variety of authors. Everyone involved in this project are crazier than 99% of anyone else who has ever lived, and all crazier than Trump.

Isn't letting probable CCP agents into your highest institutes of learning fun?
She's Korean, so probably not a Chinese spook, just a stereotypical university-bred social justice acolyte.
 
Last edited:
There's a guy called Jim Cornette who used to be in the wrestling industry doing similar (Getting mad at and blocking anyone who says they're voting for Donald Trump):

If Trump wins a second term I can't even imagine the amount of salt we'll see.
corny flips out to the point of a stroke if they forget extra bacon on his hamburger
him being spastic got boring at least a decade ago
 

6 feet from the poll counter
+ the voter being 6 feet away holding up ID
= 12 feet

Nick Rekieta had a guy on a few days back who covered the ways they were training people to fuck with the election this time. They were literally laughing about the poll observers not being able to see unless they remembered to bring binoculars. Making it impossible for the poll watchers to do anything was a strategy they were planning on employing.

From the article:

Dr. Fauci has consistently been unwilling to look outside of his own lane in terms of the pandemic. Which I can't entirely knock him for, he is a doctor after all and he is tasked with handling the medical aspect of this. But that starts to wear thin when the doctor(s) consistently disregard the socioeconomic angle of the pandemic. They both need to be weighed. And when anyone under 70 is looking at a 99% survival rate (with people over 70 facing a 95% survival rate) it might be time to consider letting people make some money and not subject them to state-enforced poverty and familial destruction.

"I don't understand why anyone would find this pandemic hard to deal with. We just have to close all public gatherings and businesses across the entire world, force everyone to take baths in pure boiling hand sanitizer every 6 hours, and prohibit all human to human contact. If we keep this up for a year or two it'll be wiped out! Or at least, we might be able to summon a vaccine-spell from the great and holy temple-labs in the meantime! JUST ACCEPT YOUR PLACE IN THE POD AND EAT THE BUGS YOU GODDAMNED FASCISTS!

What's that? Financial concerns? Political cost? Societal breakdown? None of those have anything to do with a pandemic, you stoopid dumdum! A pandemic is a virus you ignorant non-science wuvver! Now stop disagreeing with the science-priesthood, they clearly are the only word we should listen to. DON'T YOU WUV DA SCIENCE?!"
 
Pray, do tell us more of what you want to do to the silent majority out in the open, I beg of you, I would love to hear more.
ElxLbBIWoAAjFnt.png
 
I actually agree with Fauci's comments for the most part. Trump is looking at it from an economic and reopening the country perspective and that is the proper way to look at it given what we know now.

Even the WHO has come out against harsh lockdown measures. Their effectivness is limited and when the restrictions are lifted after much pain, the virus comes roaring back.
This is what both politicians and many medical experts fail to see with these draconian measures. So in this year alone, we've seen major cities around the world that went from being full of life turned into ghost towns because of the strict lockdowns and the harsh penalties for breaking these measures that are set up by a government in question.

So just to give you an idea how much damage both the pandemic and the lockdowns have both caused. In the UK, the city of London is now beginning to resemble Detroit and many businesses are going belly up and even closing down permanently because less people are shopping now. Then there's also Australia where cities such as Melbourne went from being a busy and vibrant city to now resembling a scene in a zombie apocalypse movie where the streets are empty and less people are shopping now and sure they may have lifted the lockdowns but the damage is already done. This grim sight that I'm describing here is also being seen in many parts of the developed world now.

Then there is also the aftermath when this is over. By the time that this pandemic is finally over, the economic damage will be so deep that the world will also then plunge into another 'Great Depression' because the dumbfucks that control these governments did more damage than the virus itself.

Now sure, some countries may manage to stamp out the virus (the media are praising Australia and New Zealand for this) but so long that in one part of the world remains being a petri dish that can also contaminate the rest of the world (as of now the United States, Europe, and South America are where the hot zones are at) then the virus will then continue rampaging around the world until it finally spreads out too thin and it begins to run out of people to infect. The UK 'stamped out' the virus before only for it to come back with a vengeance later on.

So the way I see it, at this rate even when the pandemic is finally over things will continue to get worse before they get better and the only good thing that will come from this is when people become angry and finally wake up and realize that their leaders don't really care for them and finally stand up to the shitheads in power when they have no job anymore and the roof over their heads is also gone. When you give a population with nothing left to lose then what happens next is the guillotines start showing up at the front doors of their incompetent leaders later on.
 
Last edited:
Why do these idiots always have short-sighted thinking?
Disenfranchising people will ignite a Civil War.
They see anybody who doesn't live in their dense bugman hives as lesser.

Then there is the aftermath. By the time this pandemic is finally over, the economic damage will be so deep that the world will then plunge into another 'Great Depression' because the dumbfucks that control these governments did more damage than the virus itself.
The US may be poised to Come out ahead economically if the lockdowns are not revived.
 
Why do these idiots always have short-sighted thinking?
Disenfranchising people will ignite a Civil War.

Because they think literally everyone in the country -- other than an astonishingly small group of literally brain dead rednecks in some mythical "flyover state" that exists someplace in a tiny corner of the United States -- supports them.

They think if they started a civil war the military would immediately join them to depose the GOP and put them all in camps. And the tiny, vanishingly small number of rednecks left would be killed by... someone, Antifa I guess? in a brief "direct police action."

Of course, the rest of the country would be absolutely static while they were doing all this. That's the trick they fool themselves into -- the only people allowed to make changes to systems is them, and changes are only ever towards an ever more leftist, more authoritarian, future. Undoing their shit is a reactionary action and reactionaries aren't allowed to do anything but seethe and slowly watch their kids be indoctrinated.
 
Because they think literally everyone in the country -- other than an astonishingly small group of literally brain dead rednecks in some mythical "flyover state" that exists someplace in a tiny corner of the United States -- supports them.

They think if they started a civil war the military would immediately join them to depose the GOP and put them all in camps. And the tiny, vanishingly small number of rednecks left would be killed by... someone, Antifa I guess? in a brief "direct police action."

Of course, the rest of the country would be absolutely static while they were doing all this. That's the trick they fool themselves into -- the only people allowed to make changes to systems is them, and changes are only ever towards an ever more leftist, more authoritarian, future. Undoing their shit is a reactionary action and reactionaries aren't allowed to do anything but seethe and slowly watch their kids be indoctrinated.
These retards on Twitter are a tiny minority of the public as well.
About 22 percent of Americans use Twitter.And roughly 10 percent of those users are responsible for 80 percent of tweets — meaning just 2 percent of Americans are contributing to a majority of the site’s dialogue
source
 
Last edited:
This is what both politicians and many medical experts fail to see with these draconian measures. So in this year alone, we've seen major cities around the world that went from being full of life turned into ghost towns because of the strict lockdowns and the harsh penalties for breaking these measures that are set up by a government in question.

So just to give you an idea how much damage both the pandemic and the lockdowns have both caused. In the UK, the city of London is now beginning to resemble Detroit and many businesses are going belly up and even closing down permanently because less people are shopping now. Then there's also Australia where cities such as Melbourne went from being a busy and vibrant city to now resembling a scene in a zombie apocalypse movie where the streets are empty and less people are shopping now and sure they may have lifted the lockdowns but the damage is already done. This grim sight that I'm describing here is also being seen in many parts of the developed world now.

Then there is also the aftermath when this is over. By the time that this pandemic is finally over, the economic damage will be so deep that the world will also then plunge into another 'Great Depression' because the dumbfucks that control these governments did more damage than the virus itself.

Now sure, some countries may manage to stamp out the virus (the media are praising Australia and New Zealand for this) but so long that in one part of the world remains being a petri dish that can also contaminate the rest of the world (as of now the United States, Europe, and South America are where the hot zones are at) then the virus will then continue rampaging around the world until it finally spreads out too thin and it begins to run out of people to infect. The UK 'stamped out' the virus before only for it to come back with a vengeance later on.

So the way I see it, at this rate even when the pandemic is finally over things will continue to get worse before they get better and the only good thing that will come from that is when people become angry and finally wake up and realize that their leaders don't really care for them and finally stand up to the shitheads in power when they have no job anymore and the roof over their heads is also gone. When you give a population with nothing left to lose then what happens next is the guillotines start showing up at the front doors of their incompetent leaders later on.
They want that. The Great Reset calls for nothing less than total global collapse, so a New World Order can be built from the ashes. Just like World War II goyim!

Time Magazine printed this insanity as if it was a good thing.
 
corny flips out to the point of a stroke if they forget extra bacon on his hamburger
him being spastic got boring at least a decade ago
EXACTLY
Cornette is old school carny who is smart to the fact that he spergs out
TL/DR- old school pro wrestling personality doing old school pro wrestling things
 
Back