Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

According to Nigel Farage (Brexit/Reformation Party leader, UK) - parts of Washington DC are/were(?) getting boarded up and preparing for riots...?

edit: If Trump wins and the lefties do riot, there's no way the media can go on claiming the left are peaceful...
I HATE Nigel Farage and Brexit and Boris Johnson and Donald Trump and 2010s and 2020s.

BUSH 2020! MAKE THE WORLD 2000s AGAIN!!
 
Here's what some people are saying and which may turn out to be true: after election day the democrats will come up with boxes full of ballots that lean 99% in favour Biden, flipping states such as Pennsylvania which may have initially gone red. That's the theory, I'm not saying that it will or won't happen.

But I just thought of something scarier, something which the democrats either might be too scared or too dumb to do. Instead of finding ballots 99% in favour of Biden they find ballots 99% in favour of Trump, thus giving them the casus belli to take extra-political actions to secure the presidency and much more. A lot of people are weary of the process already and I think the democrats could successfully convince more than half of the population that Trump tried to steal the election.

What happens after that scenario I don't know, but we all know that if that were to happen there would be a legitimate threat of civil war as the actual elites in power would be divided much like the first civil war.
I'm doubtful that they would pull something like that across the country. But if the election fruad theories have truth I wouldnt be surprised if someone behind closed doors has proposed doing something like that in states which are not battlegrounds. They could pull another Russiagate investigation over a few hundred votes in rural Alabama or something, it would be relatively inconsequential and could shift the narrative of voter fraud back onto the GOP. Very risky, but cant put it past some local DNC official on Wednesday.
 
Ladies and gentlemen, it's only hours away!

Screen_Shot_2017-08-17_at_3.57.59_PM.jpg
 
You severely underestimate how crazy the Left is right now. It won't just be SJW's Owned Epic Style!!! like 2016, cities will burn and people will die.
I'm just going to say it, it's surprising how many whites are engaging in riots these days all on their own in cities like Portland. It wasn't so long ago that 99% of the people in cities rioting over a police shooting or election were black. Blame it on the fentanyl.
 
I'm just going to say it, it's surprising how many whites are engaging in riots these days all on their own in cities like Portland. It wasn't so long ago that 99% of the people in cities rioting over a police shooting or election were black. Blame it on the fentanyl.
They believe in affirmative action so much they had to balance out the proportion of nogs and get involved.
 
How long until California pulls a Zimbabwe and begs everyone to come back?
The Californian economic model was based on temporary workers. Programmers and the like would come to silicon valley to earn huge wages while living a minimalist lifestyle. After spending a few years there they would go back to their hometown (or city) and work other jobs there with their experience at a big tech company being really valuable to these smaller tech companies.

California took advantage of this by raising income tax, and overtime California became almost entirely reliant on these workers and their wages. Because New York or Houston isn't going to become the tech capital of the USA, where all programmers migrate to, anytime soon California still has a way out of their hole. California is still in dire straits, but it isn't entirely doom and gloom.
 
Trump proved that identity politics is not a winning strategy.
The media will forever control the narrative. You can't win against them. There is no ground to cede.

Issue is that since his victory, media has been increasingly entwined with IDPol, as many of its newer activist-journalists truly believe in it (i.e. the 1619 project, which was started by the NYT, and is being spread into the educational system, or the propagation of BLM narratives over the summer).

As such, you can't kowtow to media, and also simultaneously expect a victory over IDPol. The two go hand in hand nowadays.

and unlike Trump, the democrats will have the political capital to get it done in a serious way that will actually destroy any right wing speech on social media. Trump's reforms if they ever come (unlikely) will basically just create a political neutrality or privately owned public space type test
Anyone expecting the Democrats to fairly reform section 230 is :optimistic:.

Twitter and Facebook will remain mostly unscathed except for a further self-regulated clampdown on 'unwanted speech'. The main salvo will be aimed towards any right-leaning media that questions their narrative. You're not going to get any viewpoints besides the ones endorsed by MSM. This little corner of the internet may not fare much better, either.
 
Last edited:
I'm just going to say it, it's surprising how many whites are engaging in riots these days all on their own in cities like Portland. It wasn't so long ago that 99% of the people in cities rioting over a police shooting or election were black. Blame it on the fentanyl.
They feel like they need to fight for something but due to the indoctrination of a failing education system they don't know what to actually fight nor how to productively fight. This leads to them fighting for all this ridiculous IDPOL shit that is just as counterintuitive as throwing gas onto a fire. All they're doing is stoking the flames for the retards that support Trump and further ensuring their long term irrelevancy.

TL:DR rich kids are dumb and lazy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back