- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
Not really. Remember, he calls us insane too. Essentially, use that word as the opposite of what it means and you get reality.
Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge
- Thread starter Saney
- Start date
- Status
Not really. Remember, he calls us insane too. Essentially, use that word as the opposite of what it means and you get reality.
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2015
He's never been in a real relationship. One where you share responsibilities with the other person. I think his brain is missing the essential wiring to understand what a relationship is like in reality, so he has to compensate by redefining words and then say "well, it doesn't exist".
Your narcissism has created a rich fantasy world. You're not any of these things. You misunderstand basic scientific and logical principles, so you're not intelligent. You claim to be a rapist and you asked your mom, therapist and judge for sex. You have no integrity. You lie about people and your life, so, you're not honest. And loyal ... Maybe, but only to your dogma.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
As a side note, having sex with your own mother was considered a terrible crime to the Ancient Greeks (see: Oedipus Rex). So if you had tried that back then, you probably would have been executed.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Well, Alexander himself was more of a warrior than a statesman but he would not be as successful had he not surrounded himself with people of good traits. Also, Hellenism itself was quite civilized.
And yet I can kick your idiotic claims with such ease, as evident by previous replies. Also, I explained why it is good to be a rapist today. You don't even take that into account but again scream dogmas of a bygone time and place. Same with the therapist thing - you are simply unable too see the context.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2014
Asserting a claim without any empirical evidence to present to justify said claim does not equal 'kicking' another person's claim.
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2015
All you do is make assertions, and when it's explained to you how what you say are not really arguments, you ignore it. Is that really what an intellectual powerhouse would do?
I can explain why the sky is brown, still doesn't make it true or even worthy of consideration.
Right, because it's just the nonsensical ravings of a mentally stunted manchild. Why should I take it into account?
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
Uh. Wut.
The puritans were fairly strict when it comes to sex stuff. None outside of marriage. There was no such thing as a concept of age of consent because sex wasn't supposed to happen before marriage and while it's true that Puritans in the US tended to marry late (mid-to-late twenties for men, early twenties for women), that was due to sociological pressures of farming families needed all the help that they can get (as parents get older and eldest children become more capable) and had nothing to do with the idea of protecting children from sickos. Women were considered marriageable at 14-15.
I'm not even going to go to into the insanity of comparing a 17th century religious movement to a political spectrum in the modern day.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
You have misunderstood @Ass Manager 3000's point. He was stating that not all men desire prostitutes as boys and wives as adults. How is your response relevant to this claim? Your inability to follow a simple statement disproves your intelligence
I've spoken at length about Alexander the Great, as I have an interest in ancient history (and Iskander was totally King of Bros). But let's look at the other men you claim to admire. Given the length of the piece, I've elected to spoil it, for those who don't care about my history sperging.
Socrates was a famous Greek philosopher. He is an interesting selection because he was basically a huge troll. He would go around asking people pointed questions about their beliefs, eventually leading them to question their own position. Ironically, one might argue that many of us have taken a similar method when dealing with @Holden. Contrast this with Holden's own methods, which consist of loudly and repetitively stating his beliefs and mocking the intellect of anyone who questions him. Eventually, Athens decided they were sick of him, and put him on trial; Socrates' defiance was so great that it most likely contributed to the death sentence he received. (When asked what an appropriate punishment would be for his crimes, he suggested that he should be given free meals for the rest of his life as a reward for his services but, in a move familiar to Christorians, said that if they wanted to fine him, his friends would pay. The court sentenced him to death.) I would argue that Holden claims to admire Socrates because he sees himself as a similarly persecuted figure; what Holden does not realize is that he more closely resembles the other participant in a Socratic dialogue, whose point Socrates dismantles.
Jean Calvin, or John Calvin as he is called in English, was a noted Protestant theologian. Despite his role as the founder of Calvinism, he is perhaps best remembered in modern culture for lending his name to a comic strip character. I have less to comment on here, given that I'm not as familiar with this period, but there is one thing I want to point out. The reason that Watterson chose to reference this particular figure is that he argued for predestination, that man's fate is already decided when he is born and thus he has no responsibility for his choices in life. It does not surprise me that @Holden would support a philosophy that allows him to blame his failings on an outside force (though that's not an entirely accurate interpretation of Calvinism). If anything, Holden bears a closer resemblance to the cartoon six-year-old; both have a habit of reinterpreting reality to match their own twisted viewpoint, though Spaceman Spiff is far more realistic than anything Holden spews.
Erich von Manstein is the most obscure of Holden's heroes; he was the only one on the list who I had never heard of before. He was a prominent Nazi military commander, which I think says a lot. He seems to have been more involved with the military side of things than the political side of things, so it's not quite as damning as it might seem; however he also gave a speech where he described Hitler as being sent by God to lead Germany.
Jean Calvin, or John Calvin as he is called in English, was a noted Protestant theologian. Despite his role as the founder of Calvinism, he is perhaps best remembered in modern culture for lending his name to a comic strip character. I have less to comment on here, given that I'm not as familiar with this period, but there is one thing I want to point out. The reason that Watterson chose to reference this particular figure is that he argued for predestination, that man's fate is already decided when he is born and thus he has no responsibility for his choices in life. It does not surprise me that @Holden would support a philosophy that allows him to blame his failings on an outside force (though that's not an entirely accurate interpretation of Calvinism). If anything, Holden bears a closer resemblance to the cartoon six-year-old; both have a habit of reinterpreting reality to match their own twisted viewpoint, though Spaceman Spiff is far more realistic than anything Holden spews.
Erich von Manstein is the most obscure of Holden's heroes; he was the only one on the list who I had never heard of before. He was a prominent Nazi military commander, which I think says a lot. He seems to have been more involved with the military side of things than the political side of things, so it's not quite as damning as it might seem; however he also gave a speech where he described Hitler as being sent by God to lead Germany.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
von Manstein was an odd choice as well. He was a fairly successful general on the Eastern front during the beginning of Barbarossa (the invasion of the USSR), but didn't seem to do much special in the way of slowing down the Soviets once the tide turned. He was actually out of the war by 1944 for being under suspicion of involvement in the July 20 plot. The only truly notable thing I can find is that he's one of the big stalwarts of the "clean Wehrmacht" myth, so there's that, I suppose. So yeah, @Holden, I'm interested too in what makes this guy a personal hero of yours. Are you a Wehraboo? Do you think the Wehrmacht was free of involvement in the Holocaust?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Holy fucking shit. I didn't lie. I didn't see it.
In could be said that way, but then again, this version were all of my ancestors.
Careful what you're saying there, hon. Even my so-called guru fschmidt doesn't really know the answer. He suggested programming to make money and find a wife abroad but a.I'm not talented for that b. where would I go?
For what is success in the West for a sane man? It is to realize that you can get sex by raping and that you can never get a partner of any kind for women here are public toilets. First thing is somewhat achievable but the other one is not.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
@Holden
You claim women shouldn't be able to have sex with more men because the husband won't know if the kid is his because our nature grew before contraception.....
Are you aware women have had contraception hundreds of years BEFORE bible times?? They just kept it away from men and told it to their female line. It was pretty effective too. Not 99% like condoms and birth control today, but it was decent and they had things several ways to prevent a baby after sex too. You're a history major so I'm sure you realize that for as long as people have know that sex makes babies, there have been women who have known how to prevent a baby from taking root.
You claim women shouldn't be able to have sex with more men because the husband won't know if the kid is his because our nature grew before contraception.....
Are you aware women have had contraception hundreds of years BEFORE bible times?? They just kept it away from men and told it to their female line. It was pretty effective too. Not 99% like condoms and birth control today, but it was decent and they had things several ways to prevent a baby after sex too. You're a history major so I'm sure you realize that for as long as people have know that sex makes babies, there have been women who have known how to prevent a baby from taking root.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Well, I am sorry. I wasn't precise enough. I'd read a book on electronics, programming or anything that can't really be related to culture and politics.
Then why do most people I see irl and here lack any concept of a relationship at all?
My idea is that women are annoyed by men who aren't successful with women, not by men who don't rape just because they don't rape. So not getting sex with retarded sluts consensually and not raping eventually means you're seen as dangerous. Especially if you're, like me, against this sick system and refusing to pay in.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
I'll tell you what's not success. Bitching on the internet about how the entire world is corrupt and out to get you.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Well, I can see your point but you do know that 1. fucking crododile skins and shit were nowhere near as effective as modern contraception? 2. that a lot of sex still happened with no contraception at the time, like in great raids where women were raped? hell, women stay pregnant with their lovers all the time today. 3. most of our brains developed a lot before even basic civilizations.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
I am not saying the world is out to get me. I am saying that the West is corrupt in a way that makes it impossible for a good man to have a wife and that it wants me to pay and shut up. Would you be paying me to shit in your mouth? What would you say if I told you you should be grateful for this?
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
@Holden confirmed for scat fetishist.
DrChristianTroy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Then why aren't you in prison? You haven't raped and you're still free to smoke meth and sperg about on the internet.
He blocked me so if anyone can get answer for this it would be appreciated.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
You're a bad historian if you don't know what kinds of contraception women used pre-bible times. It wasn't any type of skins.
And women were having their lovers babies just as much back then as they are today.... It's not hard to pretend it's your husbands baby when you have sex with the man you love and then your bitter old husband climbs on often too ...fuck, women would find out they missed their period and realize they haven't fucke old man husband in forever and then decide they should fuck him so he thinks it's his. Women aren't dumb. They've been figuring out how to deal with society forever.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
@Holden, @DrChristianTroy asks this:
"Then why aren't you in prison? You haven't raped and you're still free to smoke meth and sperg about on the internet."
"Then why aren't you in prison? You haven't raped and you're still free to smoke meth and sperg about on the internet."
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
To that person who asked me about SH - I have an acc there but don't like the place. It's immensely obsessed with looks and muscles, while I am anti-lookist, because my experience is that looks are largely irrelevant. However, I might become more active now, since I like the fact that they're in a war with members of this forum, which is mostly filled with incredible shitstains. I'd even admit that more people here seem coherent, unlike them, but delusions of members here make this largely irrelevant.
Also, they seem to get some basic facts about female desirability and age, though they lack the knowledge behind this.
Also, they seem to get some basic facts about female desirability and age, though they lack the knowledge behind this.
Oh yeah. Lol. It doesn't matter what it was, macie. What matters is that it can in no way be compared to anything pre-1960.
And this is/was a good thing?
- Status