Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, I can understand that. You are in denial that anything not in accordance with liberal goals should happen. I see this with all the time with liberals. Of course, you have no idea that any of my other claims about me are true either yet you constantly whine about some.
See, I see no reason for you to claim to have begged your mother for sex if you didn't, because it makes you look pathetic. However, you do have a reason to lie about the things that prove your point, like the fact that you've blackmailed women into sex and they didn't mind, or that you knocked up a mentally ill chick. Those stories seem more like sexual fantasies that you repeat online in order to make them more real.

I remember. I thought there was no evidence because I didn't read your entire post. My goal wasn't to lie.
Holden confirmed for too stupid to read an entire post.
 
See, I see no reason for you to claim to have begged your mother for sex if you didn't, because it makes you look pathetic.
See, in a sane society getting a girl knocked up and not wanting to have anything to do with it would make me even more pathetic.

See, I see no reason for you to claim to have begged your mother for sex if you didn't, because it makes you look pathetic. However, you do have a reason to lie about the things that prove your point, like the fact that you've blackmailed women into sex and they didn't mind, or that you knocked up a mentally ill chick. Those stories seem more like sexual fantasies that you repeat online in order to make them more real.
Well, the only evidence that I can offer for my first story would be several of my 2012 posts, in which I mention entering a relationship and leaving one at the same time my biographical post from Dec 2012 describes. I'd have to be some kind of a seer if I faked it for you guys.

As for the second story, yes, I can't offer that kind of evidence, except that I mentioned it on other sites as well or that I mentioned having a fwb in 2013.

Holden confirmed for too stupid to read an entire post.
Oh, no, little girl. Not reading stupid posts until the end is a great way to avoid too much idiocy and cut down idiots. Sure, it sometimes backfires like in that case but it usually pays off.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For what is success in the West for a sane man? It is to realize that you can get sex by raping and that you can never get a partner of any kind for women here are public toilets. First thing is somewhat achievable but the other one is not.

Did you ever stop to think that maybe if you treated women like actual people you might have a better chance with finding a girlfriend?
 
Yes. I stopped to think that from like 2002-2014, with disastrous consequences that now mean my life is irreversibly over. No joke.

That's a tad dramatic don't you think? There's really nothing else to live for except sex?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Owlflaps
I am not seen as dangerous by anybody but liberals who want slaves and you don't make arguments, just ad homs.
I'm not making an ad hom. I've had plenty of practice telling the difference. I'm not making any argument. I'm stating a fact. You are a creep. Your whole philosophy is faulty and it's built upon self pity and the assumption that there is some sort of inherent problem with treating women as something other than chattel. People with a fucking working brain in their skull see you as pitiful. Those who hear you speak realize you have the potential to be a danger to others and yourself.
At this point I'm gonna give up, I've debated illogical brick walls before and I do it enough on twitter with run of the mill science denialists. I know when to stop. There are lots more lolcows on this site that are more fun to analyze and attempt to straighten out. I'll leave you to everyone else.
 
If you don't rape you go to prison. That's how it works today. Whoever rapes is a fine Christ.
Would you do it to a young girl though? That would get you in prison dear @Holden.

Also, considering the fact that you look up to Nazis like Erich von Manstein @Holden, do you also look up to Adolf Hitler as well? Because that could explain quite a lot as to why you are in fact "incel" (and highly deserving to be "incel" too @Holden).

Also, my goal isn't to eradicate feminism. I can't do that. Muslims will do it for me. I want to teach young men the proper way to deal with modern Western women an then to leave.
@Holden, if you support radical Islam and ISIS, then why don't you join them? Surely they will accept you in @Holden.
 
Also, Nara, about that thing that some men wouldn't want prostitutes as boys and wives early.

Such men would be seen as at least weirdos in a sane society. They would be seen as pretty deviant.

The fact that most men today wouldn't want this does in fact say a lot about both sane societies and current state of things because most men today are completely worthless idiots.

Would you do it to a young girl though? That would get you in prison dear @Holden.
I don't know how young you mean. If you mean a child yes. If not, raping an older woman who is less deranged by feminism would be more likely to get you prison.

Also, considering the fact that you look up to Nazis like Erich von Manstein @Holden, do you also look up to Adolf Hitler as well? Because that could explain quite a lot as to why you are in fact "incel" (and highly deserving to be "incel" too @Holden).
I don't look up to Manstein because he was a Nazi. Many Nazis were dumb thugs or degenerates. I don't like things like nationalism or socialism. I just admire his tactical brilliance.
As for Hitler, he was a great man in his time but even without his disastrous decisions during the war I don't think their economic system was healthy. For example, post war W. Germany had a brilliant economic system under Ludwig Erhard.

Also, why write incel in brackets? We never claimed it is a disease. The term had been used in scientific studies. I am fair enough to not put brackets even on any crazy tumbrism if it denotes something that exists.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, Nara, about that thing that some men wouldn't want prostitutes as boys and wives early.

Such men would be seen as at least weirdos in a sane society. They would be seen as pretty deviant.

The fact that most men today wouldn't want this does in fact say a lot about both sane societies and current state of things because most men today are completely worthless idiots.
Given that your idea of "sane" actually means "insane," I would have to agree with you.
 
Yes, but when desirable traits are stupidity, immorality, lack of desire to take care of your kids and retardation this is bad for humanity. And is the point of all of my posts.

You have yet to demonstrate your assertion that "stupidity, immorality, lack of desire to take care of your kids and retardation are desirable traits".

Until you can do that, your posts are pointless.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Owlflaps
Yes. I stopped to think that from like 2002-2014, with disastrous consequences that now mean my life is irreversibly over. No joke.
But whatabout all the good things in life like rainbows and kit kats and puppies and watching someone who just flipped you off walk into a lampost?
 
Basketball, handball, water polo.

Pools with friends, or playing spreads with a bookie?

The "argument" supdup makes, though, is erroneous (explain above).

As for your claims, that much is true, yes, but it says nothing about the quality of data in the book. It is an old book from 1930s that's been unjustly forgotten. But even so, only a fool would read any "scientific" book written after 1960, as all are to be tainted with PC.

Even if Unwin's book discusses how women destroyed societies (which it doesn't), then - as I explained previously - it was published following the effects of first wave feminism by someone with an old fashioned bias. This is the formula for incredulity, the same formula you've used to justify dismissing scientific social and history studies that came about after 1960.

Also, I guess this dismisses your precious r/K theory and its fitter, stronger offspring of life-history theory as well. After all, the r/K theory was't developed until 1967, and life-history didn't come about until r/K was discredited.
 
@Holden I'd like to see these scientific studies that state the word incel and use it as anything more than "they call themself incel". Where are these studies that use incel as if it's a real thing?

I find it difficult to believe that a legit peer reviewable scientific study would use a term that is so contradictory and unnecessary. For example, no scientific study would say "invomother" (meaning a mom who is involuntarily so). They would also not say "selfcel" (meaning you do not fuck yourself aka masturbate). Why? Because these words are redundent, unnecessary, and stupid. Incel, for example, is unnecessary and redundent... To be without relationship/sex for 6 months involuntarily does not mean you get a special title.... You are just a person without a boyfriend/girlfriend/sex fried. End of story.

So.... Link these studies. They better be legit ones.... Not these Sluthate and loveshy polls and self studies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back