2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Incidentally, if you're still paying attention to the media for reports of how 'Biden just edged into the lead in [some state]', don't. None of this matters given the election is obviously bogus. It will all be decided by one or more court cases, not 'we just found 1.5M votes for Biden in the back of a Karen's SUV'.

As old Joe Stalin once observed 'It matters not who votes but who counts the votes'. If the Democrats count them, Biden will win. If the Republicans count them, Trump will (hopefully) win. There is no objective winner of this election that can be determined, it's all about who has the power to decide.

Oddly enough that's an idea that the left should be pretty familiar with.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Blewberry Nausea, Francis York Morgan, FuckedUp and 33 others
Kane Lives said:
How does this not look shady as hell? If they wanted to assure the legitimacy of the election, they'd allow everyone to observe.
Click to expand...
Shit like this is literally why I think Trump will win his court case should it go to SCOTUS. This is so blatant that any conservative judge will automatically know what's up and rule against them. Like, all of these cases in all of these states. This amount of voter fraud is so blatant, it actually makes me think the DNC wanted to get caught
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, LatentNinja, Incognito Tuxedo and 11 others
Appalachia apparently has a magical shift in voting trends once you cross state lines into Pennsylvania:
5C6414C6-B288-42D5-8E2D-0B4793817734.jpeg

 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: FuckedUp, spiritofamermaid, Magnum Magazine and 16 others
Gustav Schuchardt said:
Incidentally, if you're still paying attention to the media for reports of how 'Biden just edged into the lead in [some state]', don't. None of this matters given the election is obviously bogus. It will all be decided by one or more court cases, not 'we just found 1.5M votes for Biden in the back of a Karen's SUV'.

As old Joe Stalin once observed 'It matters not who votes but who counts the votes'. If the Democrats count them, Biden will win. If the Republicans count them, Trump will (hopefully) win. There is no objective winner of this election that can be determined, it's all about who has the power to decide.

Oddly enough that's an idea that the left should be pretty familiar with.
Click to expand...
The Left are very fucking familiar with it.

Like I have said in another thread, the left used to be for free speech and all that and yet they are not now. Why is that? Cause they were never for it in the first place. They were only for it to protect themselves and use it to attack what they wanted to destroy and gain the allegiance of those that wanted to fight the establishment. But now that the left are the establishment, all for censorship and in ways superior to anything Rightoids could come up with. But the left will still claim that they are the resistance.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: FuckedUp, spiritofamermaid, Tismguide and 10 others
Coh said:
Shit like this is literally why I think Trump will win his court case should it go to SCOTUS. This is so blatant that any conservative judge will automatically know what's up and rule against them. Like, all of these cases in all of these states. This amount of voter fraud is so blatant, it actually makes me think the DNC wanted to get caught
Click to expand...

The point isn't to win, the point is to destroy the system. You can't have a Great Reset when all the normal machines and systems are in place. You have to obliterate them first.

That's the idea they have, at least.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Parthenos, Tismguide and 15 others
Coh said:
Shit like this is literally why I think Trump will win his court case should it go to SCOTUS. This is so blatant that any conservative judge will automatically know what's up and rule against them. Like, all of these cases in all of these states. This amount of voter fraud is so blatant, it actually makes me think the DNC wanted to get caught
Click to expand...
I'm honestly just appalled to see such a decision being handed down so publicly.

It's something I expect to see in my country (where irregularities are common-place), not in the United States of Fucking America.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Parthenos, AnitaSarsleezian and 8 others
Coh said:
Shit like this is literally why I think Trump will win his court case should it go to SCOTUS. This is so blatant that any conservative judge will automatically know what's up and rule against them. Like, all of these cases in all of these states. This amount of voter fraud is so blatant, it actually makes me think the DNC wanted to get caught
Click to expand...

They put their diversity hire autistic tranny department on the organisation and in typical hubris they thought this was such an amazing plan that no one but their level of genius would understand what happened.

Seriously though rigging an election is one thing, being this obvious about it is quite another. These people aren't just frauds, they're incompetent ones. Definitely not what you want running anything.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, LatentNinja, deeplyhigh and 7 others
Kane Lives said:
How does this not look shady as hell? If they wanted to assure the legitimacy of the election, they'd allow everyone to observe.
Click to expand...

PA’s been being sketchy for months with the rule that we could still count votes for three days after Election Day because mail in votes that were postmarked by the 3rd were still valid as long as they were received at the county election office by 5 PM on Friday the 6th. Yes, this was challenged, but our courts still allowed it.

Oh, and if the postmark was unclear, they could still be counted unless there was evidence they were mailed after Election Day. God only knows what that “evidence” would be.

Do you want to make PA look like an non-corrupt state? Because this is not how you do that.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: FuckedUp, spiritofamermaid, LatentNinja and 12 others
JohnDoe said:
The point isn't to win, the point is to destroy the system. You can't have a Great Reset when all the normal machines and systems are in place. You have to obliterate them first.

That's the idea they have, at least.
Click to expand...

They made a serious miscalculation: If you destroy it all, and loose the battle, then you hand the power and duty to rebuild to your opponent, and he's gonna have very solid reasons to do it in ways that destroy you in kind. Exemply Gratia: Weimar Germany, 1st Republic Spain, etc.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Parthenos, Tismguide and 12 others
Alright I'm gonna sleep for a few hours. Pretty worried about what will happen while I'm out, fully expecting to wake up to the media having called Pennsylvania and maybe Georgia for Biden. But honestly at this point I don't know what the fuck happened next, if I wake up and get told Saddam's back from the dead I wouldn't even question it at this point after all the shit that's gone down.

Hopefully Trump has a good game plan to get through this bullshit.

Goodnight you Magnificent Bastards
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: FuckedUp, spiritofamermaid, Parthenos and 14 others
Gustav Schuchardt said:
Here's what I think will happen

1) Biden's campaign calls Pennsylvania
2) Pennsylvania's Republican-controlled legislature says it won't certify the election until accusations of fraud are investigated and the investigators can guarantee the result is genuine, which won't happen
3) The Democrats and Republicans then go to court over whether a state legislature can do this.

All the other disputed states with Republican legislatures do the same thing. It all comes down to a court case at the Supreme Court where Republican appointees are a majority. They most definitely can by any originalist reading of Article 2 Clause 2 of the US Constitution.

The interesting thing about this is how quiet Trump is. His supporters are probably apoplectic and will support any shit he proposes to undo the obvious fraud but he seems to be uncharacteristically restrained.

Incidentally, there's an interesting case where the PA Supreme Court allowed for ballots received after polling day to be counted. The Pennsylvania Republican Legislature wanted the SCOTUS to review. ACB didn't participate because she didn't have time to read the notes and the case deadlocked with all the Democrat justices voting one way for their gibberish reason and all the Republicans voting the other for the legally correct reason that 'the state legislature decides election rules, not anyone else'.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/04/us/supreme-court-election.html
https://archive.vn/S4SAv
Click to expand...
You do know that this case is being heard now and the SCOTUS requires a response by the end of the day.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Parthenos, Nguyen Van Phuoc and 7 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back