The Caroline Farrow, Adrian Harrop, and Anthony George Halliday / Stephanie Hayden Megathread

If you liked that you'll love this one...

Holy fuck, this guy is single handedly keeping satirical song alive. Not as fun as the Harrop song, but that had a catchier tune and I can see why he went for this. Also, he sounds like Lonnie Donegan.
 
Dr Haddock has locked down his Twitter to confirmed followers only.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20201023-100223_Twitter.jpg
    Screenshot_20201023-100223_Twitter.jpg
    199.6 KB · Views: 84
Hot on the heels of Tony's lolsuit against the demented Darren Duckworth, he's now got a widow in his sights (Archive). He's suing both for "misuse of private data", and it's clear he's going to win. This blog details why. Although Uncle Tony's conviction for sodomising an underage twink in the late 1990's is a matter of public record (see Hayden's main thread), the convictions are spent according to the Rehabilitation Of Offenders Act. As the blog states:
Additionally, as the Supreme Court reaffirmed in PJS v NGN [2016] UKSC 26, the fact that information is in the public domain will not, of itself, defeat a privacy claim. Where the further publication of the information will give rise to (further) intrusion into the claimant’s privacy then this further publication may be unlawful. The publication of information concerning a spent conviction may well give rise to further intrusion into private life. (my emphasis)
Newspapers, blogs and other publishers of the lurid details of Uncle Tony sodomising an underage twink at the time it happened are exempt from lolsuits as they were contemporaneous accounts of a real event. Uncle Tony cannot get these deleted, but he can ask the major search engines to exclude them from results so they will not appear in a search, say for "Uncle Tony sodomising an underage twink".
However, Tony has shot himself in the foot. If the accusation of sodomising an underage twink were false, he would sue for defamation, but as he is suing for misuse of private data it means that he was guilty of sodomising an underage twink.
If I were Duckworth and Bronwyn (the widow), I'd comply and delete the tweets to avoid the drama: the details of Uncle Tony sodomising an underage twink may be in the public domain, but they cannot rely on this as a defence. I would instead reflect in the glory of forcing Uncle Tony himself to confirm that he was indeed convicted of sodomising an underage twink.

UPDATE: the widow appears to be deleting the offending tweets.

UPDATE 2: A very good friend has pointed out that as Uncle Tony sees himself as a legal authority, and a “current affairs commentator”,’ and has appeared on TV as such, then a defence for publishing the fact that he has a conviction of sodomy on an underage twink is that it is in the public interest.
The spat continues .... / Archive
E6C85DCB-5C25-4858-A537-6E8399ED29C9.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Harrops Mob

Pharmacy damned for delivering puberty blockers to trans children


https://mol.im/a/8894267

I've often wondered who the Mr Magoos are who pop up in the comments when yet another balding, straggly-haired "woman" gets given Community Service for downloading several lifetime's supply of kiddie porn to say "That wouldn't happen if she was a man". Well look no further.

untitled1.jpg


I'd like to think that the downvoters are not being so shallow as to judge a woman merely on her looks, but rather are making a considered judgement on her entire personality.
 
Shave or no shave, it is not as though this ginormous fuck could obtain sex for fre
The envelope looked like it had been teased open and stuck down again. Lol at the Scrapheap Challenge chimnea and hamfisted document burning..
Uncle Tony’s legals and injunctions with various idiots who offend him on Twitter is not a one way street. Injunctions have high thresholds to be granted, this includes the claimant providing a full and frank disclosure of all pertinent details. If the injunctions concern certain spent convictions, then if these convictions took place - and the fact that uncle Tony is claiming misuse of personal data indicates that these convictions did take place. Then these should be included in the full and frank disclosure section.

there is also speculation about a Twitter account called @sallyvation who has been following Farrow, Moody, @bttreacle and others who are involved with Tony’s abuse of the legal system.
FC67270B-98D3-4AB9-A371-D90E47A3E302.jpeg9EE4A8D4-DBBC-484E-82A9-D18B1A7B4401.jpeg
 
Last edited:
So Tony is essentially suing Bronwyn because she said he IS a sex offender as opposed to he WAS a sex offender. :lol:

Fair play to Uncle Tony if he has the balls to stand in court and argue a technicality over his sex offences, all while having to admit that he does have convictions for sex offences, I'd be willing to take whatever fine I got just to see those words leave his fat play dough head in court.

No way he'll let it get to court if that's the case though.
 
So Tony is essentially suing Bronwyn because she said he IS a sex offender as opposed to he WAS a sex offender. :lol:

Fair play to Uncle Tony if he has the balls to stand in court and argue a technicality over his sex offences, all while having to admit that he does have convictions for sex offences, I'd be willing to take whatever fine I got just to see those words leave his fat play dough head in court.

No way he'll let it get to court if that's the case though.
The same “bundle” has been sent to more than one person. There is “evidence” of one of the protagonists burning, but forensic study may indicate the envelope may have been opened. And who knows how many people Uncle Tony is suing. All involved can claim there’s plausible deniability that they did not leak “Noncegate”.
The “Noncegate One” - ie “Bronwyn” is not the only one in receipt of Uncle Tony’s confession.
 
Looks like someone has finally engaged the disturbed ReporterLal twitter account:
A sampler:
Reporterlal is some aging bint left by a husband trying to distance himself from her psych ward level of crazy by screwing other broads - and consequently projects her bitterness onto women instead of the men who rejected her for being a bitter old nag. Hangs around with a fat ginner Brummy thats never recovered from being dumped by one of the fair cop crew - he slides into women's DMs like the blob hoping someone will give him a pity &%^@ and doesn't react well when he's recognised for the bland creepy weirdo he is who can't cop a feel without a gaslighting sob story. A pair of desperate unattractive losers looking for validation in a movement that despises them from both sides.
 
No way he'll let it get to court if that's the case though.
If Tony's applied for or managed to secure an interim injunction against any of the people sperging about his sex offence on Twitter, then he will have to argue this in court. He''ll likely apply for a reporting restriction order if he hasn't already.

As many celebrities have discovered, applying for injunctions to cover up indiscretions is often counterproductive and a fool's errand. Tony's birth name is public domain and a source of public amusement for gender criticals. The golf club convictions are public knowledge, the 21 convictions and spell in prison is public knowledge, and the conviction for a sex offence is available on a free public legal website which doesn't require any paid-for subscription and can be easily located.
 
Reporterlal is some aging bint left by a husband trying to distance himself from her psych ward level of crazy by screwing other broads - and consequently projects her bitterness onto women instead of the men who rejected her for being a bitter old nag. Hangs around with a fat ginner Brummy thats never recovered from being dumped by one of the fair cop crew - he slides into women's DMs like the blob hoping someone will give him a pity &%^@ and doesn't react well when he's recognised for the bland creepy weirdo he is who can't cop a feel without a gaslighting sob story. A pair of desperate unattractive losers looking for validation in a movement that despises them from both sides.
Do you have any receipts on who LAL is? There are unsubstantiated rumours they are several people, but someone who is truly exceptional needs to be given true credit irl :-)
 
Do you have any receipts on who LAL is? There are unsubstantiated rumours they are several people, but someone who is truly exceptional needs to be given true credit irl :-)
She's a barrister. Real serious issues and that's before her alcohol dependency which's gotten a whole lot worse since she was abandoned. Again. Nothing exceptional about her apart from the level of disease. And now she's a liability for those who use her services, too. If she's betraying everyone then she's betraying ev.er.y.one. Being a trans dude/ette doesn't give you special leave when you're dealing with someone as sick as you are.

Expect rage and fury as she faces up to exposure and probable arrest - certain career ending shame. She may have covered all her technical bases but little Miss V didn't make allowances for those who have as much on her as she thinks she has on them. Who's got the most to lose?
 
Back