2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm just gonna say it. If all the states worked like florida, where all the mail votes got counted as the came in and not a day after election day, none of this shit would be happening and we would already have the results yesterday morning. Prime example is PA. Reverse how the votes cam in, with mail being pre tallied, and it wouldave been blue the whole time, rather than red slowly turning blue.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: FuckedUp, spiritofamermaid, MrJokerRager and 14 others
JosephStalin said:
View attachment 1710544
Click to expand...
I have it in me that the left lost the people somewhere between the last 10 years on the very least
I mean, seriously, it's been at leat that time that they actually addressed stuff like jobs and well-being for the working class. Now it seems they shafted their supposed target demo and substituted it with things that only Twitter-addicted millenials care about, like representation for 0.001% of the population, open borders for any schmuck to enter and ending supposedly "harmful" lines of jobs at once in favour of very experimental ones, which don't fall well at all with the proper salt-of-the-earth types of any given country.

Years ago I'd consider myself a center-left type. Even as a clueless teenager I could see the dangers of going full commie. Thankfully I also didn't become a full-on Nutzi or Qtard. I just want to observe, and what I see is an total set-up.

JambledUpWords said:
If the DNC is so confident about winning, why all the censorship? Something tells me that the more this censorship goes on, the less confident they are about actually winning this. First Twitter, then Facebook, now YouTube.
Click to expand...
They're in on this, of course. It interests them deeply to see whoever Not-Trump is in the White House, if only to end the whole Repeal 230 thing.
I always knew there was something fishy on these campaigns to supress "fake news". Some are way too outlandish to be true, indeed, but there needs to be a more specific way to call out on, not just "Damn, this looks way too stupid to be plausible". There needs to be a "this is why" factor to it, and most so-called fact-checkers don't do that. And even then, who will check the fact-checkers?
I know it as an experience. All of our supposedly credible fact-checkers are linked to openly left-wing organizations. You can't simply trust this kind of thing when they have a whole ideological agenda to blatantly follow.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, MrJokerRager, Fanatical Pragmatist and 5 others
Aqua Panda said:
The sheer amount of people wanting Trump to cross the Rubicon and go full Ceaser on these streams is kinda unnerving IMO.

I'm all for recounts and having a day in court but the sheer amount of "Civil War 2.0 NOW" from both sides is getting a little crazy.

That's something that can't be taken back once started. It would be a watershed moment.
Click to expand...
Neither side can stand the other anymore. Liberals and Leftists stand for the destruction of the family, putting hormones into children, especially boys, if not turning them into drag kids and endless migration + communism. Anyone who is not a cuck will not stand for this. As for the left? They have been screaming about what the believe their opponents are about for years now.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, spiritofamermaid, MrJokerRager and 13 others
Fractal Lifeform said:
Has the so called Free Press ever been free or care about the truth? I'm starting to believe that the press have always been fucktards and they were just better at hiding it in the past. Either Trump winning
caused them to let their mask go or the liberals were replaced by leftists who fail at putting up a front that they care about the truth.
Click to expand...

couldn't find the actual quote I wanted to post that's even older, but his was said almost 100 years ago:

“The Press will not be free to tell lies. That is not freedom for the people, but a tyranny over their minds and souls. Much humbug is talked on this subject. What is press freedom? In practice it means the right of a dew millionaires to corner newspaper shares on the stock exchange and to voice their own opinions and interests, irrespective of the truth or of the national interest.”

literally nazi. I mean...

As his book 'The Greater Britain' focused on the issues of free trade, the criticisms against globalisation that he formulated can be found through the critiques of contemporary globalisation. He warns nations that buying cheaper goods from other nations may sound appealing but ultimately ravage your domestic industry and lead to large unemployment as seen in the 30s. Mosley in regards to free trade argues that they are trying to "challenge the 50-year-old system of free trade which exposes industry in the home market to the chaos of world conditions, such as price fluctuation, dumping, and the competition of sweated labour, which result in the lowering of wages and industrial decay.”

same shit, different century.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Parthenos, Pope Julius IV, spiritofamermaid and 3 others
JEEEEBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
8D0A16C1-D680-4743-B39D-659D3FE10BFF.jpeg

archive.is

Twitter

archived 5 Nov 2020 23:50:12 UTC
archive.is archive.is
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: FuckedUp, Pope Julius IV, Dynamite Ninja and 69 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back