2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Trump ends up winning enough lolsuits to get the presidency, will that put into question the house and senate races? I can't imagine there not being a yuge legitimacy crisis if that were to happen.
Who cares?

It would be the best outcome of all time. The shaking would break the Richter scales and the salt would bankrupt the industry from overstock. It would be biblical.
 
Its pretty much my view on Trump. He's mediocre to barely decent at best, but when compared to all the other options for POTUS, he looks fucking great because on the DNC you have literal lunatics who've completely lost touch with their voter base and have abandoned the low-middle class they once claimed to give a shit about for the sake of pandering to corporations, trustafarian idpoltards, political correctness, and socialist countries, while the RNC has just become a bunch of spineless cucks like Mitt Romney who never get shit done and just want to avoid any negative press, so they bend over backwards to try and appease the MSM and act as doormats for the DNC and corporations. They're all nothing but a bunch of slaves to their own greedy corruption and political correctness, so when people voted for a wild card like Trump who was hated by everyone in Washington, it was basically a middle finger to the whole fucking institution.
Not even- Trump isn't an outstanding president (largely because of his own avoidable missteps and stonewalling from Congress), but compared to the last two presidents the US has had, he's far superior.

And that's basically taking his mid-80s Democratic-esque policies and comparing them against what bipartisan garbage has been shoveled onto the US since.

I doubt it. People that voted Trump at least tend to vote the same way downballot. Plus, a lot of these mail-ins were only filled in for the presidential candidate. Can you guess for whom?
You need to bring in a comparing qualifier- the better explanation is that NONE of this happened in the surrounding states. The mail-ins were more evenly split along party lines, and there was an extremely small discrepancy between votes for Trump vs votes for the downballot candidates.

It was ONLY in these states that delayed counting that this stuff happened, the 90-100% Biden ballots with blank downballot choices.

The Dems are right. Widespread fraud didn't exist across the US. What happened instead was a targeted operation against a handful of states, enough to 'steal' an election.
 
Last edited:
Don't get me wrong. The woke shit will get a lot worse under Biden but most people don't and won't push back.
This is absolutely correct of course, I just object to the notion of everything staying the same.

Then again, it's not like the woke shit didn't keep marching on under Trump until he made the big moves, so maybe you're right.
 
How massive does it have to be? We're already past "the dead have risen from the grave in order to vote for Joe Biden and probably nobody else", where "computer glitches" led to the flipping of a commissioner election in Michigan-- now the PA BoE ignored a SCOTUS decision after the PASC ruled on a law in such a way as to invalidate all mail-in ballots.

It has to be enough to overturn the media's declaration that all fraud is impossible and deboonked.
 
Shit like this is why I consider unironic wignats voting for Biden actually retarded. Like he's going to go after you first you know? But anything to own the kikes.
What will that task force actually produce? What is supposed to be deliverable? Where does it go from here? Task forces exist all over the place and most ends up getting shelved. Or is it just a boondoggle to shut stronk whammens up so they have _something_ while serious attention is focused on making even more favorable legislation to banks?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Tismguide
People keep framing it as if the Supreme Court will rule on the election itself. They.... don't necessarily HAVE to, due to recent events. Those audits are going to find shit, and are finding shit. That takes a LOT of heat off the SC. So they can stick to the big issues, like Pennsylvania flaunting the constitution, and pretend like they aren't considering the election itself.

It's worth pointing out that in 2000 there were numerous court cases. What caused Gore to concede was the SCOTUS ruled the state legislature, which had a Republican majority, had 'plenary' power to appoint electors. So at that point either he could concede or the legislature would just nominate Republican electors and he'd lose. It took 40 days to get to that point.

The idea that the media can call the election for Biden, ignore the court cases and Big Tech can just censor anyone who posts evidence off the Internet is absurd. As is the idea that the GOP will just lay down and accept what AOC and co have planned for them.

Crowder is saying if Youtube nukes him he'll sue.
 
It has to be enough to overturn the media's declaration that all fraud is impossible and deboonked.
That doesn't make sense though, the courts can decide that there was enough fraud that can be reversed to make Trump the winner. Media opinion is irrelevant in that case. The effect the MSM calls will have is making millions of Biden supporters think that now it's stolen from them, but legally speaking Trump would be the winner.
 
The corruption thickens.
1604853549600.png
0008.gif
 
It has to be enough to overturn the media's declaration that all fraud is impossible and deboonked.
That doesn't make sense though, the courts can decide that there was enough fraud that can be reversed to make Trump the winner. Media opinion is irrelevant in that case. The effect the MSM calls will have is making millions of Biden supporters think that now it's stolen from them, but legally speaking Trump would be the winner.

IMO if Trump can secure a two-seat majority Senate so that he can avoid Romney being the kingmaker, he can rule like second-term Obama via Executive Order, public opinion be darned.

Even better if the recounts can snag the Republicans a house majority.
 
If Trump ends up winning enough lolsuits to get the presidency, will that put into question the house and senate races? I can't imagine there not being a yuge legitimacy crisis if that were to happen.
Not if the fraudulent votes are the ones that voted for Biden and nothing else down ticket, which seems likely
 
The Chinese are calling them Baizuo for a reason:
Baizuo (/ˈbaɪˌdzwɔː/; Chinese: 白左; pinyin: báizuǒ, literally White Left)[1][2] is a Chinese neologism and political epithet used to refer to Western leftist ideologies primarily espoused by white people.[3] The term baizuo is related to the term shèngmǔ (圣母, 聖母, literally "Blessed Mother"), a sarcastic reference to those whose political opinions are perceived as being guided by emotions or a hypocritical show of selflessness and empathy.[4]

Wikipedia
Baizuo literally means "white left", it's far from subtle.

Let the CCP be a warning, though. As soon as commies do win the working class (and they easily can), it's over. If they keep their favour, for 71 years and counting.
 
I'd love to see all those late night show hosts absolutely explode with TDS again like 2016, but on a larger scale because "BIDEN WON NOOOO"
They won't be the only one. My liberal friend circles were all celebrating. Even the non-American ones. (This one puzzled me the most. Who the fuck is Biden to you? Why do you care Trump stays on? He's easily the best free entertainment you get.)

If Trump wins all these lolsuits, their cope and crying is going to be biblical. :story:
 
First thing, I said Vice President, not President, you autistic mong, because most of us are more or less convinced that the game plan here is that either they let Biden die in office or they 25th his ass out, but, either way it goes, Kamala Harris is going to end up becoming the next sitting President. And, thus, when she does, I have heard some belief expressed that she might either appoint AOC directly herself or have Pelosi 25th'd out to make room for AOC.

Second, I called it "tinfoil hattery" for exactly the reason that possibility seems incredibly unlikely. It's just something I've heard rumbled about among the family in the last week and I also happen to be skeptical of it.

Read more carefully next time before you decide to bang out a lecture on your keyboard.

Nah, I doubt Kamala's going to appoint AOC to any position even if she does sideline Pelosi.

Kamala may be a woman and dark-skinned, but she's not a "true and honest" SJW wokester. She's more or less a mercenary and a political opportunist who will gladly use the Woke Left and The Squad to get what she wants and then throw them under the bus as soon as she gets in.

If The Squad and BLM/Antifa are the modern Jacobins, then Kamala is their Napoleon Bonaparte.

AOC is an embarrassment and if she keeps her office, she'll be sidelined as much as possible. If Kamala does sideline Pelosi and pick a replacement VP, it's not going to be AOC. It'll be some other corporatist swamp monster, or at best, someone like Elizabeth Warren who'll pander to the wokescolds but knows socialism only works as a purr word for the Millennials and Early Zoomers and not as an actual economic policy

The only one in The Squad who'd be likely to get anywhere within the establishment of the Democratic Party is probably Ayanna Pressley because she's got the least amount of scandals and isn't a Muslim like Tlaib or Omar. She's turbo-woke but is a lot quieter. AOC is more or less the leftist equivalent of Sarah Palin or Dan Quayle while Ilhan Omar is a sociopath on par with Kamala herself and wouldn't be trusted with any more power than she already has.
 
People keep framing it as if the Supreme Court will rule on the election itself. They.... don't necessarily HAVE to, due to recent events. Those audits are going to find shit, and are finding shit. That takes a LOT of heat off the SC. So they can stick to the big issues, like Pennsylvania flaunting the constitution, and pretend like they aren't considering the election itself.
People seem to be under the impression that the SCOTUS is deciding the winner of the election directly, as if there isn't any other thing they could rule that could invalidate fraud and boost Trump's chances. My post a few hours earlier was practically begging those who think Trump has no chance to give me actual reasons to convince me that Biden has already won, and instead of getting any response since then, it was just more vague doomposting not even directed towards those who are skeptical of Biden's status as president-elect at the moment. Credit to you and @HumanHive though, he's the only other poster I've noticed who's actually updated his opinions on the matter as more information has come out, even if he started out also thinking Trump has no chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back