- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
I really, really doubt the Republican state legislatures have the sheer balls to do it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm impressed. It's 2020 and these people are using language from the 1930s. "Repugnant plan", really?The optics don't lend themselves to anything good, though. I think @HumanHive is psyched, but observe:
View attachment 1718467
With everything that's been going on recently, you don't think faith in the elections is already obliterated?Fair enough, I just think that's semantics.
I'm pretty sure just bypassing the vote by direct elector appointment would obliterate faith in the elections forever, is my problem.
If Trump wins because of this, they have only themselves to blame. Even if Trump won under a fairer election, they would still claim he cheated, seeing as the idea that people actually like him seems unfathomable to these types.They won't need to go that far. They're going to instead say that Trump used his stacked court to steal the election.
OH NO NO NO!!!OH NO THIS IS NOT GOOD
![]()
Stop the Steal — Start the Audit | The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics
Yes, it is true. Philadelphia did in fact keep poll watchers out. The baloney propaganda that they were allowed in...spectator.org
“In Pennsylvania, three Republican leaders told me they had already discussed the direct appointment of electors among themselves, and one said he had discussed it with Trump’s national campaign.
“I’ve mentioned it to them, and I hope they’re thinking about it too,” Lawrence Tabas, the Pennsylvania Republican Party’s chairman, told me. “I just don’t think this is the right time for me to be discussing those strategies and approaches, but [direct appointment of electors] is one of the options. It is one of the available legal options set forth in the Constitution.” He added that everyone’s preference is to get a swift and accurate count. “If the process, though, is flawed, and has significant flaws, our public may lose faith and confidence” in the election’s integrity.
Jake Corman, the state’s Senate majority leader, preferred to change the subject, emphasizing that he hoped a clean vote count would produce a final tally on Election Night. “The longer it goes on, the more opinions and the more theories and the more conspiracies [are] created,” he told me. If controversy persists as the safe-harbor date nears, he allowed, the legislature will have no choice but to appoint electors. “We don’t want to go down that road, but we understand where the law takes us, and we’ll follow the law.”
Republicans control both legislative chambers in the six most closely contested battleground states. Of those, Arizona and Florida have Republican governors, too. In Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, the governors are Democrats.”
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
DIRECT APPOINTMENT IS BEING DISCUSSED
Because boomers are all past 60-70 now and becoming increasingly senile and out of touch prunes.with shit like this being pumped out nigh-on constantly you have to wonder why boomers even bother with legacy media anymore
You think the fags in corona threads might finally acknowledge how suspicious this shit is or embrace it like lapdogs?As expected.
Because it’d fucking destroy the country. R’s better hope they secure state legislatures from now until forever.They had 20 years to do it and they haven't yet.
Didn't the Democrats ignore state-level legislature for years now? Letting them be captured by Rs, sometimes in super-majority numbers.If Trump wins because of this, they have only themselves to blame. Even if Trump won under a fairer election, they would still claim he cheated, seeing as the idea that people actually like him seems unfathomable to these types.
"What do you mean? There are more people in these flyover states than us?" - The 1% coastal elitesIf Trump wins because of this, they have only themselves to blame. Even if Trump won under a fairer election, they would still claim he cheated, seeing as the idea that people actually like him seems unfathomable to these types.
It means a few things. Right now, its a force. "Biden, publicly support the inquiry or lose." What @HumanHive hasn't brought up is that it is an out, a method by which the democrats could possibly save face without having to admit wrong doing. Or, to put it in my two terms. Its putting their balls in a vice, but not pushing their back to a wall.Is this good or bad? AAAAAAAAA PLEASE SOMEONE EXPLAIN!
Is this good or bad? AAAAAAAAA PLEASE SOMEONE EXPLAIN!
This is why we cannot compromise. Don't be an optics cuck. Just be ready for calls of REEEE SLAVE OWNERS CONSTITUTION OUT OF DATE REEEEESomething to note: even if the lid gets fully blown off and the fraud laid plain for all to see, plenty of Leftists (and not just career politicians but civilians too) will be perfectly fine with it. I’m willing to bet they aren’t nearly as dumb as they seem; anyone with a brain can see something’s not right here. I think this is more of a “the ends justify the means” rhetoric than anything else.
Even IF Trump takes this back, the Left will further demonize him and contend that fraud and MSM manipulation were necessary evils to dethrone Cheeto Hitler.
That’s how far gone they are now. They’ll sacrifice Democracy itself at the altar of Progress.
It would be fucking hard to rig state-level elections because there are so fucking many of them.Didn't the Democrats ignore state-level legislature for years now? Letting them be captured by Rs, sometimes in super-majority numbers.
It really is now coming back to bite them in the ass.
That's how it used to be done. Hardly anybody voted in the 1788 election because electors were straight appointed in states except PA and MD, and maybe a couple of others without an election for example, so this is not without precedent. PA doing this would be pure pottery.It means the State Legislatures in PA are considering whether to say that the PA final result is fraudulent and that the state’s electoral votes will go to whomever the state legislature wishes. While this is good in the immediate, if this rubicon is crossed then Democrats may go full Order 66 and do the same against Trump or some future candidate. However, from a less doomer view, it means that PA democrats are getting encircled. SC from one side, legislature on the other. They stall, direct appointment.
It makes perfect sense when you look at their long-term plan. The Democrats want all power centralized on the Federal level. They have many of reasons to think that, some cynical, some earnest, but that's their plan. So, if they think they rule from the top down, they also conclude they can focus all their efforts on the top level of government and forget the lower rungs since they'll just be able to overrule them when they take power.Didn't the Democrats ignore state-level legislature for years now? Letting them be captured by Rs, sometimes in super-majority numbers.
It really is now coming back to bite them in the ass.
Imagine if they fuckin' did. Hellfire and salt for eternity.I really, really doubt the Republican state legislatures have the sheer balls to do it.
Its not that they ignored them, its that they couldn't. They are running out of cash. Obama, thank you SO much you egotistical ass, pilfered the coffers of the DNC. George Soros has been repeatedly rejected and sought to instead put all his money into AG races, which he won but... those were all 'good' mainly off the idea the Supreme Court would remain democrat. This would give the left complete control of the on the ground and highest positions.Didn't the Democrats ignore state-level legislature for years now? Letting them be captured by Rs, sometimes in super-majority numbers.
It really is now coming back to bite them in the ass.
Suicide by three taps to the back of the head.What are the actual consequences to the people* who would choose direct appointment? I'm talking about actual people, not the party reputation virginity muh constitution or anything like that.
What happens to the career of a person who is supposed to give 12Eurovisionelectoral votes to Biden but chooses Trump instead? Do they have enough incentive to commit...seppuku? Damnatio memoriae? Permaban from kiwifarms? What's the punishment? Would it be an acceptable loss for the actual person compared to handing out the country to the DNC traitors of the nation?
*And why the fuck is the electoral system so complicated, Christ you have supreme courts, state supreme courts, electors, judges that allow recounting only to fellow Republicans, governors, senators and probably a few thousand of theirescorts and trapsstagists and personal assistants
Most likely? Nothing, because the country is so polarized. They'd just get yelled at by the media.What happens to the career of a person who is supposed to give 12Eurovisionelectoral votes to Biden but chooses Trump instead? Do they have enough incentive to commit...seppuku? Damnatio memoriae? Permaban from kiwifarms? What's the punishment? Would it be an acceptable loss for the actual person compared to handing out the country to the DNC traitors of the nation?