2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yup. But you have to prove it. Is "statistically impossible" evidence in a court case?

The left has already explained this away as "a 1 in a million chance still can happen, it's just rare. That's right now. We're the one in a million."

I got into a huge argument with a buddy in one of the affected areas and he gave me a lecture about how it totally makes sense that certain districts had a 200% turnout because people just hate Trump that much.

It's called plausible deniability.
 
Zombie Votes Matter, bigot! The voice of the living-impaired shall not be infringed!

In all seriousness, though, I did see someone doing the math in Milwaukee a few days ago. Apparently their previously high voter turnout record was during the 2004 election. In comparison that election, the 2020 election is around a 5.5 deviation from the mean.

So ... You know ... It appears to be statistically impossible.
Not necessarily statistically impossible, but so statistically improbably, that there is no good way you can rationally defend it. It's like how DNA tests technically don't rule that it is statistically impossible for someone to be the father of a child, but so statistically remote, you actually can't defend that hypothesis on any rational grounds. But yeah, when you have an event that occurs once every 26,000,000 years happen in the context of voter turnout within an election, there's no way you can explain that without going to either a mass failure/error on the part of the poll workers or more likely, outright electoral fraud. Either way, there's something clearly wrong occurring.
 
I assumed that was just me, assumed I got caught in the User Discouragement list or something. I'm glad its happening to others. Your suffering soothes my paranoia.


Easy there, champ.


I wonder if the spooks can resist the chance to instigate or false fag at these Trump supporter protests? They are bound to have a large number of gayops in their bag prepared for this moment, something they would have also war-gamed for.

Cernovich claims to have already caught one. Some guy in a Trump45 jersey no one recognized who elbowed his way to the front of the crowd, then shouted to get everyone's attention and tried to rush the Biden supporters. Cernovich of all people stopped him. They still used it as an excuse to shut down the count that night, IIRC.
 
I wonder if the spooks can resist the chance to instigate or false fag at these Trump supporter protests? They are bound to have a large number of gayops in their bag prepared for this moment, something they would have also war-gamed for.
I legitimately don't think they did... the reaction from the left has been pretty uniform now, even in their rage articles and reactions.

"Why the FUCK is he not conceding!?"

I don't know why in the absolute hell they expected him to concede. But its very clear they expected him to concede....
 
Yup. But you have to prove it. Is "statistically impossible" evidence in a court case?

The left has already explained this away as "a 1 in a million chance still can happen, it's just rare. That's right now. We're the one in a million."

I got into a huge argument with a buddy in one of the affected areas and he gave me a lecture about how it totally makes sense that certain districts had a 200% turnout because people just hate Trump that much.
Any place that has more votes than people living in the county should be seen as fraud. The only out-of-state voters would be people in the military, but even those ballots can’t create 200% turnout. Anyone that believes 200% turnout is possible for any candidate is gullible.
 
To me, their victory is just symbolic at this point, rather than reality. I expect that this week, more states will be taken from Biden to a point where the media can’t cover it up anymore. If AZ and GA are being taken out, more should follow.
As far as I can tell, Biden is still leading in AZ and GA.
 
Last edited:
He’s Zion Don, remember? Every modern presidential candidate has been pro-Israel.
Joe's talked a lot of shit about Israel, and he was very apologetic when a Palestinian terrorist stabbed an American-Israeli dual citizen in Tel Aviv during his tenure as VP. He'll also be trying to suck the balls of the Muslim Brotherhood as he seeks to court the Muslim vote.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
Any place that has more votes than people living in the county should be seen as fraud. The only out-of-state voters would be people in the military, but even those ballots can’t create 200% turnout. Anyone that believes 200% turnout is possible for any candidate is gullible.

"You only listen to that weirdass GamerGate antifeminist antisjw stuff and not real media like cnn or msnbc or god even fox would be better than some weirdo on twitter!"
 
As far as I can see, Biden is still leading in AZ and GA.

Both AZ and GA don't have their military ballots counted yet. AZ isn't done counting the main ballots and supposedly there's enough left that, when you figure in they're all from red districts, he's probably got it. GA's close enough the military ballots will flip it.

Both will likely be audited, and if there's fuckery -- I think we can all agree there has been, the question becomes "is it provable" and "how much" -- then the numbers might switch, possibly significantly.
 
Joe's talked a lot of shit about Israel, and he was very apologetic when a Palestinian terrorist stabbed an American-Israeli dual citizen in Tel Aviv during his tenure as VP. He'll also be trying to suck the balls of the Muslim Brotherhood as he seeks to court the Muslim vote.
Talk is one thing. Policy is another. Bush said some things critical of Israel.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FriedPickles
He’s Zion Don, remember? Besides, Biden-Harris are also pro-Israel.

But as a matter of policy, no president will forsake Israel.
Of course not. Regardless of your feelings on Israel or Jews in general, it'd be pretty stupid to tell your closest ally in a part of the world that mostly hates you to fuck off completely.
 
He is the perfect argument for why nobody should give a shit about the outside world. I wonder if he is happy with the new sold out Boris.

How the fuck is it possible that every single tds moron ages 20 years in 4 and Trump is full of energy like the very first day of work? Is he a vampire? Does he absorb libtard salt to regenerate his tissue?

And HOW MANY FUCKING UNFUNNY BRITISH COMEDIANS ARE OUT THERE? Is there some kind of factory mass producing them somewhere in Cuckoldshire? Why are they all obsessed with America when Britain is the biggest meme country that ever was?
 
It's actually not that difficult. If you have a Social Security card and a birth certificate and any proof whatsoever that you're actually a citizen (and the B.C. usually proves that just by itself), you get it. And then it's good for literally anything.
RealID isn't really proof of citizenship, it's proof of legal presence. (Unless you get an EDL from a border state, those are also proof of citizenship.) So you need proof of legal presence, proof of identity, something showing your SSN, and two documents proving you live at the address you say you live at. Name changes must also be documented. It can be a chore to put all that together, but we've known it's coming for 15 years, and Trump extended the deadline another year because of COVID.

It can be difficult for homeless people to get an ID, which is one of the arguments against voter ID. While researching the issue, I came across this cri de coeur:
“It makes it harder to do anything, absolutely anything," she said. "Say I want to go buy a pack of cigarettes, and they want to card me. I don’t have ID. So they card me and can’t sell me cigarettes, even though I’m well over 18. I can’t buy alcohol. I can’t go to the marijuana store if I want to buy marijuana. I can’t go into a food stamp place, I can’t go get on housing, I can’t do anything, I’m just kind of stuck."
This is why I don't spend too much time thinking, "What about the chronically homeless, how will they participate in democracy?"
 
1604948932514.png
 
I legitimately don't think they did... the reaction from the left has been pretty uniform now, even in their rage articles and reactions.

"Why the FUCK is he not conceding!?"

I don't know why in the absolute hell they expected him to concede. But its very clear they expected him to concede....
I expected him to concede if he lost but I didn't expect the apparent level of shenanigans.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back