This summarizes my view on this too. Something changed, something -snapped- in the Republicans. I don't know exactly what it even is, let alone what to predict.
When did this happen?
yeah, i see absolutely no problem herePls no bully it has been posted but Giuliani says they have evidence to prove that dead people have been voting:
He says they're aiming to invalidate 300k ballots in Philly and that they have 70 witnesses as well as video footage to prove their case.
Rudy said that according to PA law (I don't know shit about this so correct the record if you want, libtards ITT) that those ballots are illegal because they weren't observed.
Trump's people are doing the same shot with Pittsburgh trying to invalidate 150k ballots there.
They also claim have witnesses for 30 cases of backdated ballots as well as dead people voting.
Giuliani claims he has over a thousand witnesses across the country - 200 in MI, 200 in NV. At least 100 witnesses for backdating ballots.
They claim there's evidence for fraud in over 10 states and in 3 or 4 of them the evidence is substantial.
In what ways? I remember he went dark for awhile, outside of talking about the votes.
www.independent.co.uk
Thats mostly because Bush was an Idiot... there was no need for boots on the ground.
I mean there will probably be a hearing this week so it would be retarded if he was lying about having witnesses.
It didn't - he's calling it a "meltdown" that Trump is refuting the fraudulent Biden win.
What the fuck are you ranting about?
Well that argument cuts both ways the average liberal isn't a frothing at the mouth TDSer with a shrine to AOC either hence why the Progressives are also seething now.
Big claims that'll be pretty embarrassing if they had to walk them back. I'm not saying "trust the plan", but I don't think the GOP would be in this "Gondor calls for aid" mode if they didn't think something could come of it. They're far more wont to losing with dignity.Pls no bully it has been posted but Giuliani says they have evidence to prove that dead people have been voting:
He says they're aiming to invalidate 300k ballots in Philly and that they have 70 witnesses as well as video footage to prove their case.
Rudy said that according to PA law (I don't know shit about this so correct the record if you want, libtards ITT) that those ballots are illegal because they weren't observed.
Trump's people are doing the same shot with Pittsburgh trying to invalidate 150k ballots there.
They also claim have witnesses for 30 cases of backdated ballots as well as dead people voting.
Giuliani claims he has over a thousand witnesses across the country - 200 in MI, 200 in NV. At least 100 witnesses for backdating ballots.
They claim there's evidence for fraud in over 10 states and in 3 or 4 of them the evidence is substantial.
But they're not trump so it automatically makes them better according to anti-trump gangs
Yet it always fails, since pepe was a symbol of defiance, whereas Gritty is a mascot of a corporate brand.
Why does this site hate liberals so much?
I feel like before 2015/2016, there was always this unspoken rule about how both sides hated each other, but wouldn't come to death blows or something of that nature I can't quite articulate as well as I'd like.
