- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
armed investigators. means usps sees enough evidence to warrant an investigation.
someone's likely going to jail.
2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.
- Thread starter Pickle Dick
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Status
armed investigators. means usps sees enough evidence to warrant an investigation.
someone's likely going to jail.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2019
So if I understand this correctly, these guys are basically FBI on steroids and are probably the closest to the eponymous Law & Order superstars on TV.
Huh. That sounds like someone's gonna get their shit kicked in.
captkrisma
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Is it bad when I say my extended family is so right-wing that I am considered the liberal? Hillbillies, man...
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2020
Half expected him to shot himself after saying that.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Basically. they have a ton of law enforcement power... but are reigned in by a tightly tailored mandate.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2020
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2018
Incidentally, if you want Trump to prevail it's actually better that the Democrats resist recounts and remedial measures long enough for it not being possible to complete them before December 14th. At that point, the SCOTUS will allow the Republican state legislature to nominate its own electors.
If they instead switch and back recounts they might just eke out a win. Though to be honest I'd be kind of OK with that. At some point you'd have to admit that the GOP has gone through the courts, got recounts and remedial measures, and still lost.
And then there are the mail-in ballots. I've pointed out before that mail-ins are an issue if there is proper scrutiny because 20-30% will be rejected. What I expected was that the election would proceed more or less normally, Biden would come out ahead and then lose it after recounts and rejected mail-in ballots and there'd be chaos. However, by illegally obstructing proper scrutiny the Democrats may well have ended up in a situation where the SCOTUS rules that they all get ruled invalid.
I've heard it claimed by Giuliani that with a mail-in ballot there is the presumption that it is not valid. If both sides observers see it opened, the chain of custody is good and it is filled in correctly it is valid. If the SCOTUS agrees and the Republicans can prove observers were not allowed they can make the case for binning all the ballots. That's a loss for Biden in PA according to Giuliani in PA.
I'm sort of light gray pilled, to be honest. I'm not convinced Trump will survive this but I'm also not convinced that if Biden is elected it will be via blatant fraud. Rather he'd eke out a win after the fraud is detected, remedial measures are ordered, recounts happen and the state legislatures end up certifying the result as real. So we're not headed for a single party dystopia but one where everyone knows that the Democrats tried to cheat and just managed to win anyway. I also think that a lack of scrutiny will cause the SCOTUS to bin much more than 20-30% of mail-in ballots, and that can't be a good thing for the Democrats who dominate those ballots while Republicans prefered to vote on the day or use Early In Person voting.
And then there's the question as to whether mail-ins received after the election day are valid. The PA supreme court says yes, the PA legislature has said no and the SCOTUS has yet to rule but is primed to agree with the legislature. Even if the SCOTUS allows mail-ins received before the deadline are OK it seems like it is unlikely to rule those received after it are.
If they instead switch and back recounts they might just eke out a win. Though to be honest I'd be kind of OK with that. At some point you'd have to admit that the GOP has gone through the courts, got recounts and remedial measures, and still lost.
And then there are the mail-in ballots. I've pointed out before that mail-ins are an issue if there is proper scrutiny because 20-30% will be rejected. What I expected was that the election would proceed more or less normally, Biden would come out ahead and then lose it after recounts and rejected mail-in ballots and there'd be chaos. However, by illegally obstructing proper scrutiny the Democrats may well have ended up in a situation where the SCOTUS rules that they all get ruled invalid.
I've heard it claimed by Giuliani that with a mail-in ballot there is the presumption that it is not valid. If both sides observers see it opened, the chain of custody is good and it is filled in correctly it is valid. If the SCOTUS agrees and the Republicans can prove observers were not allowed they can make the case for binning all the ballots. That's a loss for Biden in PA according to Giuliani in PA.
I'm sort of light gray pilled, to be honest. I'm not convinced Trump will survive this but I'm also not convinced that if Biden is elected it will be via blatant fraud. Rather he'd eke out a win after the fraud is detected, remedial measures are ordered, recounts happen and the state legislatures end up certifying the result as real. So we're not headed for a single party dystopia but one where everyone knows that the Democrats tried to cheat and just managed to win anyway. I also think that a lack of scrutiny will cause the SCOTUS to bin much more than 20-30% of mail-in ballots, and that can't be a good thing for the Democrats who dominate those ballots while Republicans prefered to vote on the day or use Early In Person voting.
And then there's the question as to whether mail-ins received after the election day are valid. The PA supreme court says yes, the PA legislature has said no and the SCOTUS has yet to rule but is primed to agree with the legislature. Even if the SCOTUS allows mail-ins received before the deadline are OK it seems like it is unlikely to rule those received after it are.
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2020
Anybody who chimes on "Muh democracy" only uses it as a convenient dogwhistle. After all, who in their right minds would go against the will of the people, right?
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
https://twitter.com/BorisJohnson/status/1326206254293913600 (https://archive.vn/7UDux)
More Great Reset talk from Boris, "build back better"
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2018
Right now the sign you're onto something is that you get nuked off Twitter and Youtube. In a perverse way, the censorship is handy because you can tell who has something and who is full of shit.
I'm sure the UK called Gore to congratulate him after the election too, even though Blair is rumored to have privately called him 'weird'. Then the election got flipped after court action and Bush and Blair ended up best buddies over Iraq. Blair burned his Premiership to ground backing Bush over that, for reasons that remain obscure.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2018
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
Yes but without the drama of Law and Order. Their job is boring a lot of the time because so much of it is "sit in car and stakeout to gather evidence that this shady bitch is stealing mail" or "hand over evidence to DEA/DHS so they can spearhead the drug bust" but they are impressive when you consider how thorough they are in the cases they handle. Because their field of work is so narrow it allows them to really focus in on the cases they do get to pursue.
I used to actually work at a PDS (postal distribution site) when someone got busted for stealing prescriptions that were going through the mail, and I can tell you that I would not want to fuck around and find out with them.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2020
And Google. I'm using Duck Duck Go now, but I couldn't find anything about the voting issues other than articles going:
"Trump in a increasingly slipping mental state contests our God-Emperor Joe Biden's well earned victory."
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Aaaaaand there goes Britian's hope's of a good trade deal if Trump wins.
That tweet is from 25 minutes ago.
Puerto Pollo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2020
Let's take a second to thank @HumanHive for teaching us europoors so many incredibly interesting things about the hidden cogs that run America and keep it somewhat more normal than we thought
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2018
BoJo literally said the same shit in
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/2020-u-s-presidential-election.53249/post-7726348
posted 17 hours ago.
Still late.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Yup, and if he had an ounce of sense he'd have stopped there. Trump might forgive someone congratulating Biden before or during the day the lawsuits dropped.
He is much less likely to forgive it later.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
Goes to show with Hammer. It's just a common noun word with no special meaning. So why did Twitter lose their shit over it?
It's just Q shit, right?
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
Obviously it will never, ever happen, to the extent I feel confident I have a better chance of Emma Stone materializing in front of me, grabbing my PP, and putting it in her butt, but imagine the sheer goddamn pandemonium if they did reject all mail-in ballots due to hijinks and Biden lost every single state because Dems primarily voted by mail this election. California would run red both figuratively and literally.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
If someone can try to decipher this, perhaps it’s best to watch what he’s been famous for in the first place:
- Status