2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
So, I just had something fairly disturbing brought to my attention. For the sake of minimizing the powerlevel, let's say that I live in a county that was polling on the upside of 40% for Trump. Given that in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, Trump managed to outperform poll projections, there is a decent argument to be made that Trump could have won my county. However, checking the actual ballot count, Trump came in at about 25% of the vote, with similar results for our congressman and state legislature. I am now faced with the possibility that my own county may have been stolen in the same manner as we are seeing in the battleground states, but I cannot be certain of this, as the county only achieved roughly 50% turnout. It's the kind of thing nobody would bat an eye about normally, as my county has a record of going blue, but it is sufficiently odd under current circumstances that I am considering going to my municipal and county governments to inquire about. Suggestion: check your own counties for weird shit, they may not have limited themselves to the big ticket areas.
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Magnum Magazine, Fek and 20 others
Notgoodwithusernames said:
The most beautiful thing about this election cycle is seeing the wall the msm and big tech created for Biden crumble to the ground
Click to expand...
I'm actually shocked at how fast it's all falling apart, in less than a day it went from smugposting back to actual tears on twitter and despairing about the deathcamps if Trump wins

make_it_so said:
Should we take this as a sign that even Twitter knows which way the wind is blowing?
Click to expand...
fuck no, Twitter is just trying to maintain the very thinnest veneer of plausibility that it applies rules evenly
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parthenos, spiritofamermaid, StarkRavingMad and 4 others
ChefKiss said:
I'm actually shocked at how fast it's all falling apart, in less than a day it went from smugposting back to actual tears on twitter and despairing about the deathcamps if Trump wins


fuck no, Twitter is just trying to maintain the very thinnest veneer of plausibility that it applies rules evenly
Click to expand...
Trump better win because the alternative is way worse.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Gustav Schuchardt, Coh and 22 others
My (nightly) analysis right now:

1. PA is such a massive shitshow I doubt the Trump lawyers know what evidence to bring before the SC first. Illegal precanvasing, poll observer intimidation and removal, postal ballot fraud, VIOLATING ALITO’S ORDER TO KEEP MAIL IN BALLOTS SEPARATE AFTER 8PM. Those by themselves would get whole counties worth of ballots ghosted, at least without some serious explanation from the opposing party. The SC can always cuck, but it’s just too much.

2. Arizona might be won in the first ballot count or in the recount. May require lawsuit to remove a chunk of ballots. It’s unlikely, but possible

3. MI is another PA. There’s literally video of poll workers boarding up the building. It doesn’t inspire confidence with regards that the election process there was free and fair.

4. Georgia is big unlikely. I doubt a recount will change much, the issue will be over the ballot harvasting loophole in a lawsuit; which is not the SC’s responsibility to close, it’s the GA legislature’s. But there could be a surprise ruling. Who knows. The GOP here seem slightly chickenshit, so don’t expect direct appointment unless a bigger scandal develops. GA senators know their own election in Jan is at stake, so more pressure could be put as well.

5. Last night I would have put WI in the same category as GA, but the recent scandal here (behind premium paywall, grrrr) gives some hope.
The computer glitch story is still only being reported by Gateway Pundit and based off of cell phone screenshots of news coverage. Not confidence inspiring.
Put WI on an unlikely but possible with lawsuit. Also if the waters are kept muddy for a month, state legislature could direct appoint.

6. Nevada. It shouldn’t even be on this list, but the Signature Machine scandal will likely go to SC and I can’t say how that will go. But if those votes do get thrown out, suddenly Trump could flip NV.

7. With the Republican party line now firmly being “widespread election fraud happened”, the Senate could refuse to certify the result in Jan. Pence will lead that procedure, and will likely bring the issue up. Normally this is just a formality, but guess why there’s this one last step? If Senate refuses to certify, it goes to House where the vote is by delegation. Trump wins.

It all depends on three nuclear options. SC crowning Trump in two to three states, direct appointment, or final defiant coup in Senate. Or GOP cucks and likely kills enthusiasm for GA senate races. Take your pick. They were all insane to even imagine just a few weeks ago, but GOP found their balls and now all they have to do is keep them fastened for at least two months.

Most has been said before, but this is gonna be a daily summary for those with only tangental interest.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Magnum Magazine, Shield Breaker and 28 others
HumanHive said:
My (nightly) analysis right now:

1. PA is such a massive shitshow I doubt the Trump lawyers know what evidence to bring before the SC first. Illegal precanvasing, poll observer intimidation and removal, postal ballot fraud, VIOLATING ALITO’S ORDER TO KEEP MAIL IN BALLOTS SEPARATE AFTER 8PM. Those by themselves would get whole counties worth of ballots ghosted, at least without some serious explanation from the opposing party. The SC can always cuck, but it’s just too much.

2. Arizona might be won in the first ballot count or in the recount. May require lawsuit to remove a chunk of ballots. It’s unlikely, but possible

3. MI is another PA. There’s literally video of poll workers boarding up the building. It doesn’t inspire confidence with regards that the election process there was free and fair.

4. Georgia is big unlikely. I doubt a recount will change much, the issue will be over the ballot harvasting loophole in a lawsuit; which is not the SC’s responsibility to close, it’s the GA legislature’s. But there could be a surprise ruling. Who knows. The GOP here seem slightly chickenshit, so don’t expect direct appointment unless a bigger scandal develops. GA senators know their own election in Jan is at stake, so more pressure could be put as well.

5. Last night I would have put WI in the same category as GA, but the recent scandal here (behind premium paywall, grrrr) gives some hope.
The computer glitch story is still only being reported by Gateway Pundit and based off of cell phone screenshots of news coverage. Not confidence inspiring.
Put WI on an unlikely but possible with lawsuit. Also if the waters are kept muddy for a month, state legislature could direct appoint.

6. Nevada. It shouldn’t even be on this list, but the Signature Machine scandal will likely go to SC and I can’t say how that will go. But if those votes do get thrown out, suddenly Trump could flip NV.

7. With the Republican party line now firmly being “widespread election fraud happened”, the Senate could refuse to certify the result in Jan. Pence will lead that procedure, and will likely bring the issue up. Normally this is just a formality, but guess why there’s this one last step? If Senate refuses to certify, it goes to House where the vote is by delegation. Trump wins.

It all depends on three nuclear options. SC crowning Trump in two to three states, direct appointment, or final defiant coup in Senate. Or GOP cucks and likely kills enthusiasm for GA senate races. Take your pick. They were all insane to even imagine just a few weeks ago, but GOP found their balls and now all they have to do is keep them fastened for at least two months.

Most has been said before, but this is gonna be a daily summary for those with only tangental interest.
Click to expand...
You can give this argument to michigan


I don't know if math is a good evidence of election tampering and fraud in courts, but it's evidence nonetheless
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Cristobal’s Colon and HumanHive
A_Callow_Youth said:
So, I just had something fairly disturbing brought to my attention. For the sake of minimizing the powerlevel, let's say that I live in a county that was polling on the upside of 40% for Trump. Given that in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, Trump managed to outperform poll projections, there is a decent argument to be made that Trump could have won my county. However, checking the actual ballot count, Trump came in at about 25% of the vote, with similar results for our congressman and state legislature. I am now faced with the possibility that my own county may have been stolen in the same manner as we are seeing in the battleground states, but I cannot be certain of this, as the county only achieved roughly 50% turnout. It's the kind of thing nobody would bat an eye about normally, as my county has a record of going blue, but it is sufficiently odd under current circumstances that I am considering going to my municipal and county governments to inquire about. Suggestion: check your own counties for weird shit, they may not have limited themselves to the big ticket areas.
Click to expand...

Not a bad idea. I was trying to compare against a knowingly red state like Texas: https://results.texas-election.com/county Interestingly, most all their counties reported 60% to 70% turnout. Much lower than 125%..
 
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Harvey Danger and JambledUpWords
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back